BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

Full story: Chicago Tribune

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...
Comments
156,161 - 156,180 of 176,889 Comments Last updated 21 min ago
Fox News Propaganda

Sayville, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#176916
Oct 29, 2013
 
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Fox News Propaganda wrote:
http://tinyurl.com/ptf7ck / November 09, 2006
Today, more than ever, our national climate and economy is determined by our access to one thing: information. Companies who control the distribution of information have developed into some of the most lucrative businesses in the United States and the world.
More than any other individual, Rupert Murdoch may be responsible for fueling this intense interest in sensationalism and the tabloid sensibility that now pervades the media in the United States. Murdoch is responsible for launching A Current Affair, a gaudy newsmagazine TV show that became the prototype for all tabloid television programs to follow. http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/7677 ...
<quoted text>
You do know A Current Affair was cancelled in 2006, don't you?!? Probably not as you are looking for trash and found an old posting and ran with it without checking!
Oh, Rupert Murdoch does NOT run Fox News. Yes, he corporation owns it but it is run by the CEO which is Roger Ailes!!!
Yep, all you have to do is mention "Rupert" and the Libtards go into conniption fits.
MPs say Rupert Murdoch unfit to run company
May 2, 2012 / http://tinyurl.com/7lqquss
Rupert Murdoch is not fit to run a major international company, MPs said on Tuesday, finding him ultimately responsible for the illegal phone hacking that has corroded his global media empire and damaged the political establishment.
The MPs said the 81-year-old News Corp chief lacked credibility, his son James appeared incompetent and the company was guilty of "wilful blindness" towards its staff at the News of the World tabloid.
http://uk.reuters.com/article/2012/05/02/uk-b...

--------

UK lawmakers: Rupert Murdoch unfit to lead company
May 1, 2012 / http://tinyurl.com/6q7gfjd
A committee of British lawmakers called Rupert Murdoch unfit to run his global media empire -- a finding that reflects just how deeply the phone hacking scandal born of his defunct News of the World has shaken the relationship between the press and politics.
The divisive ruling Tuesday against Murdoch, his son James and three of their executives also exposed the waning influence of the media tycoon, and could jeopardize his control of a major broadcaster.
http://www.businessweek.com/ap/2012-05/D9UG4R...
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#176917
Oct 29, 2013
 
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>loose cannon wrote:
More white folks were lynched it Texas than black people.
Most of them were cattle rustlers.
Put that in your pipe and smoke it.

Well, can YOU prove you statement? Or are you just flapping your gums? It took me only a few minutes to find this;

.....Texas stands third among the states, after Mississippi and Georgia, in the total number of lynching victims. Of the 468 victims in Texas between 1885 and 1942, 339 were black, 77 white, 53 Hispanic, and 1 Indian.....
http://www.tshaonline.org/handbook/online/art...
Very factual of you. Who are you and what have you done with Rogue?

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#176918
Oct 29, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Obskeptic wrote:
<quoted text>
http://www.wnd.com/2007/10/44171/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ku_Klux_Klan
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ku_Klux_Klan
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/fe...
Democrats in those days were equal opportunity terrorists Jacque. They weren't democratic, just democrats.
Sometimes I wish I was a right-wing salesman, selling my easily-influenced wares to unsuspecting people like you.

Your first source is wnd.com . Why not Mein Kampf or Das Kapital? What's the difference. And your other sources do tell the truth, as does wnd.com , but its kind of truth.

Certainly, the KKK democrats (though dems did not exist or hradly did in 1860) killed whites from the 1860s to 1964. What your press clippings don't tell you is that those white victims were all pro-blacks rights. THAT's why they were hanged. 1964? Give me a break. By that time, the tide had turned. Started in the 30s with FDR. Dems were now, and Eisenhower the Repub helped, the pro-equality , pro civil rights, the majority of them, save the Wallaces and Maddoxes who were excluded from the real Dem party. As to lynchings of whites in 1964 , yes, remember the road to Selma and all the manifestations? Your southern friends indeed lynched white folks who were part and parcel of the civil rights movement, who wee allied and demonstrated with the blacks. I doubt that even one white was hanged by KKK because he was pro-white.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#176919
Oct 29, 2013
 
Now these murders where notorious and two of the victims where white Jews but whether they were murdered because they were Jews or just because the were Civil, Rights advocates?

Mississippi civil rights workers' murders
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Three American civil rights' workers, James Earl Chaney, Andrew Goodman, and Michael "Mickey" Schwerner, were shot at close range on the night of June 21–22, 1964 by members of the Mississippi White Knights of the Ku Klux Klan, the Neshoba County's Sheriff Office and the Philadelphia Police Department located in Philadelphia, Mississippi. The three had been working on the "Freedom Summer" campaign, attempting to register African Americans to vote.

Their murders sparked national outrage and a massive federal investigation. The Federal Bureau of Investigation referred to this investigation as Mississippi Burning (MIBURN), and eventually found the bodies 44 days later in an earthen dam near the murder site. After the state government refused to prosecute, the federal government initially charged 18 individuals but was only able to secure convictions for seven of them, who received relatively minor sentences for their actions. However, outrage over their deaths assisted in the passing of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#176920
Oct 29, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1


Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Tell me the truth. For once, be honest. Barack Obama, before he was known to the public , walks into your store . You are asked to identify him. Do you say he's
a ) white
b ) white-black
c ) black-white
d ) mulatto
e ) black
2nd question :
A KKK lynching party is looking for a black guy to hang. Any black guy, for the hell of it. The spot Zimmerman and Obama. Which one do they choose?
I would call him a "Pookie" which is a light colored black man who lives in a big house he does not own and is lazy.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#176921
Oct 29, 2013
 
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:

<quoted text>
Er, Z's soon-to-be ex-wife stated she regretted not pressing charges. The police therefore dropped them. Grateful you indicate where and when police said there was not enough evidence.
FYI, Martin was never ever formally charged for his so-called crimes. You conveniently omit that.
Wojar is a gentleman, a knowing one. If he criticizes republicans, it's regrettable that you would feel targeted. Best you live with that.
Are you sure you wanted to write this ?: "Liars hate hearing the truth. Just because people like yourself and wojar and many others who post here present and repeat lies doesn't make them truths. If I am supposed to be intimidated or stifled because more then one of you repeat those lies ad nauseam, I'm not, and never will be" Liars, calling us liars, yet no proof? This is the civilized talk you invoked? Did wojar or I call you a hypocrite, liar? We did? Where? When? And if we did, which I doubt, was it not "in kind"?
You talk big on civility. When will you start acting it?
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
AzzClown!
Muzzled, puzzled, dumbfounded by FACTS, and "clownstomped" LMAO (LRS-Dale tm reg'd), LRS issues another literary gem : "AzzClown!"

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#176922
Oct 29, 2013
 
Soupy Sales - Pookie does Motown

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#176923
Oct 29, 2013
 
Fox News Propaganda wrote:
<quoted text>
MPs say Rupert Murdoch unfit to run company
May 2, 2012 / http://tinyurl.com/7lqquss
Rupert Murdoch is not fit to run a major international company, MPs said on Tuesday, finding him ultimately responsible for the illegal phone hacking that has corroded his global media empire and damaged the political establishment.
The MPs said the 81-year-old News Corp chief lacked credibility, his son James appeared incompetent and the company was guilty of "wilful blindness" towards its staff at the News of the World tabloid.
http://uk.reuters.com/article/2012/05/02/uk-b...
--------
UK lawmakers: Rupert Murdoch unfit to lead company
May 1, 2012 / http://tinyurl.com/6q7gfjd
A committee of British lawmakers called Rupert Murdoch unfit to run his global media empire -- a finding that reflects just how deeply the phone hacking scandal born of his defunct News of the World has shaken the relationship between the press and politics.
The divisive ruling Tuesday against Murdoch, his son James and three of their executives also exposed the waning influence of the media tycoon, and could jeopardize his control of a major broadcaster.
http://www.businessweek.com/ap/2012-05/D9UG4R...
Hummmm, Rupert does not run A company. He runs a corporation ..... and he is very $ucce$$ful at it.
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#176924
Oct 29, 2013
 
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
[QUOTE]
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Tell me the truth. For once, be honest. Barack Obama, before he was known to the public , walks into your store . You are asked to identify him. Do you say he's
a ) white
b ) white-black
c ) black-white
d ) mulatto
e ) black
2nd question :
A KKK lynching party is looking for a black guy to hang. Any black guy, for the hell of it. The spot Zimmerman and Obama. Which one do they choose?"

I would call him a "Pookie" which is a light colored black man who lives in a big house he does not own and is lazy.
And Rouge is back ...

Since: Feb 11

Nearer than you would like

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#176925
Oct 29, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
loose cannon wrote:
More white folks were lynched it Texas than black people.
Most of them were cattle rustlers.
Put that in your pipe and smoke it.
<quoted text>
Well, can YOU prove you statement? Or are you just flapping your gums? It took me only a few minutes to find this;
.....Texas stands third among the states, after Mississippi and Georgia, in the total number of lynching victims. Of the 468 victims in Texas between 1885 and 1942, 339 were black, 77 white, 53 Hispanic, and 1 Indian.....
http://www.tshaonline.org/handbook/online/art...
ROTFLMAO! The quote you provided states that more blacks were lynched than whites! Are you that fucking stupid?

Yes, apparently, you are. LOL!!!!!

Let's looks elsewhere, just to rub some salt in the wound.

http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials...

Texas Whites lynched: 141 Blacks lynched: 352 Total: 493

----------

http://www.chesnuttarchive.org/classroom/lync...

"From 1882-1968, 4,743 lynchings occurred in the United States. Of these people that were lynched 3,446 were black. The blacks lynched accounted for 72.7% of the people lynched. These numbers seem large, but it is known that not all of the lynchings were ever recorded. Out of the 4,743 people lynched only 1,297 white people were lynched. That is only 27.3%."

----------

This is great fun. The post I questioned stated that more whites than blacks were lynched. History states otherwise.

You remain my bitch.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#176926
Oct 29, 2013
 
Rupert Murdoch Net Worth
Random Celebrity Profile
How much is Rupert Murdoch worth?
$12.5 Billion

Rupert Murdoch net worth: Rupert Murdoch is a media mogul from Australia, most widely known as the head of the Fox Broadcasting Company who has a net worth of $12.5 billion dollars. Rupert Murdoch began his career with one newspaper in Adelaide and expanded into other forms of media, in other countries, in the late 1980&#8242;s.
http://www.celebritynetworth.com/richest-busi...

Since: Feb 11

Nearer than you would like

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#176927
Oct 29, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
Very factual of you. Who are you and what have you done with Rogue?
The irony is that he provided a quote that AGREED with me - more blacks than whites were lynched in Texas.

It just gets easier to humiliate him.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#176928
Oct 29, 2013
 
It is funny that all you have to do is mention one name like "Rupert","Sarah ", "Ted" or "Ronald" and Libtards start spitting blood!

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#176929
Oct 29, 2013
 
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Tell me the truth. For once, be honest. Barack Obama, before he was known to the public , walks into your store . You are asked to identify him. Do you say he's
a ) white
b ) white-black
c ) black-white
d ) mulatto
e ) black
2nd question :
A KKK lynching party is looking for a black guy to hang. Any black guy, for the hell of it. The spot Zimmerman and Obama. Which one do they choose?"
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
I would call him a "Pookie" which is a light colored black man who lives in a big house he does not own and is lazy.
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
And Rouge is back ...
I always speak the truth. If the truth hurts, it is not my problem.
Ellen1

Arlington, MA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#176930
Oct 29, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

The headline on the top of this page: "BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen..."

is from an article originally published in December 2008. The US Supreme Court did consider whether or not to take the case, and it decided not to take the case. It has never taken a birther case. And birthers have not won a single case, in some 200 or so cases, some of which, like the one in Georgia, were decided on the merits. And ten appeals courts ruled on the definition of Natural Born Citizen, and all ten of them said that it had been defined by the US Supreme Court in the Wong Kim Ark case and that the Wong Kim Ark case ruled that every child born on US soil (except for the children of foreign diplomats) is a Natural Born Citizen.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#176931
Oct 29, 2013
 
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>loose cannon wrote:
More white folks were lynched it Texas than black people.
Most of them were cattle rustlers.
Put that in your pipe and smoke it.

Well, can YOU prove you statement? Or are you just flapping your gums? It took me only a few minutes to find this;

.....Texas stands third among the states, after Mississippi and Georgia, in the total number of lynching victims. Of the 468 victims in Texas between 1885 and 1942, 339 were black, 77 white, 53 Hispanic, and 1 Indian.....
http://www.tshaonline.org/handbook/online/art ...
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
Very factual of you. Who are you and what have you done with Rogue?
Well, initially I thought that more whites had been lynched than blacks but I want the truth and I think I found a reliable source and my OPINION was incorrect.
They did say they did not have reliable information before about 1885 so we may never know what the total result will be but between 1885 and 1942 it looks like black people were singled out.
Fox News Propaganda

Sayville, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#176932
Oct 29, 2013
 
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Hummmm, Rupert does not run A company. He runs a corporation ..... and he is very $ucce$$ful at it.
Might does not make right!

==========

OUTFOXED : Rupert Murdoch's War on Journalism
http://tinyurl.com/bvfdak5

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#176933
Oct 29, 2013
 
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
Very factual of you. Who are you and what have you done with Rogue?
ChaunceyGardiner wrote:
<quoted text>
The irony is that he provided a quote that AGREED with me - more blacks than whites were lynched in Texas.
It just gets easier to humiliate him.
No, all you had was was an opinion and I wanted the truth. So the truth backs your opinion. Why could you not look it up like I did?
I am not computer wizard and often times I can not find what I am looking for.
Now, do you agree with me that we have been in Global Cooling since about 2007? The facts back me!!!

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#176934
Oct 29, 2013
 
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Hummmm, Rupert does not run A company. He runs a corporation ..... and he is very $ucce$$ful at it.
Fox News Propaganda wrote:
<quoted text>
Might does not make right!
==========
OUTFOXED : Rupert Murdoch's War on Journalism
http://tinyurl.com/bvfdak5
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =lFDwdRXCg3IXX
Opinions are like azz-holes, everyone has one.
Hey, did you watch the ABC morning news this morning? They really bash ObamaCare!!!
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#176935
Oct 29, 2013
 
ChaunceyGardiner wrote:
<quoted text>
ROTFLMAO! The quote you provided states that more blacks were lynched than whites! Are you that fucking stupid?
Yes, apparently, you are. LOL!!!!!
Let's looks elsewhere, just to rub some salt in the wound.
http://law2.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials...
Texas Whites lynched: 141 Blacks lynched: 352 Total: 493
----------
http://www.chesnuttarchive.org/classroom/lync...
"From 1882-1968, 4,743 lynchings occurred in the United States. Of these people that were lynched 3,446 were black. The blacks lynched accounted for 72.7% of the people lynched. These numbers seem large, but it is known that not all of the lynchings were ever recorded. Out of the 4,743 people lynched only 1,297 white people were lynched. That is only 27.3%."
----------
This is great fun. The post I questioned stated that more whites than blacks were lynched. History states otherwise.
You remain my bitch.
LMAO! I suppose you also "own" him, right? LMAO! trollchild

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Other Recent Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
James Foley’s beheading is shown over and over 14 min Liars 1
Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 14 min voice of peace 68,307
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 18 min Nostrilis Waxman 1,096,635
Amy 8-23-14 20 min PEllen 1
Abby 8-23-14 22 min PEllen 1
'The war on cancer may NEVER be won' 46 min Lizzie Parry 1
Alabama community alleges race bias over toxic ... 1 hr Spooks-R-A-Jumpen 1
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 8 hr Mimi Seattle 97,847

Search the Chicago Forum:
•••

Flood Warning for Cook County was issued at August 22 at 8:29PM CDT

•••
•••

Chicago Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••