BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ... Full Story

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#176875 Oct 29, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Well now that most of us realize that Obama lied to us, I wonder how many votes the Democrats get next year?
er, as we write, the Repub party gets about 20% approval rating. How do you figure the number of votes the dems will get? Is this another of your great predictions? I've often made lists of your horrendous predictions. Shall I prepare another one?

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#176876 Oct 29, 2013
Obskeptic wrote:
<quoted text>
What's funny is that you present them as evidence to condemn GZ in the court of your public opinion when the ex-wife and mother-in-law withdrew those accusations and the investigation into them by police found there to be insufficient evidence to pursue charges. As for wojar, let me state it in terms a bit more clear for you, he is nothing, a nobody, and even the president he defends as admitted through surrogates that he was lying to the American people regarding their insurance coverage. Liars hate hearing the truth. Just because people like yourself and wojar and many others who post here present and repeat lies doesn't make them truths. If I am supposed to be intimidated or stifled because more then one of you repeat those lies ad nauseam, I'm not, and never will be. I treat others as they treat me Jacque, and I have stated it before, just because I am not directly a target of an attack, insult, or degrading comment, I'm one those types that rushes in anyway. To a leftist, that would be a character flaw, because they are followers of their leadership and do what they are told. I point to congress as the best example of that.
Er, Z's soon-to-be ex-wife stated she regretted not pressing charges. The police therefore dropped them. Grateful you indicate where and when police said there was not enough evidence.

FYI, Martin was never ever formally charged for his so-called crimes. You conveniently omit that.

Wojar is a gentleman, a knowing one. If he criticizes republicans, it's regrettable that you would feel targeted. Best you live with that.

Are you sure you wanted to write this ?: "Liars hate hearing the truth. Just because people like yourself and wojar and many others who post here present and repeat lies doesn't make them truths. If I am supposed to be intimidated or stifled because more then one of you repeat those lies ad nauseam, I'm not, and never will be" Liars, calling us liars, yet no proof? This is the civilized talk you invoked? Did wojar or I call you a hypocrite, liar? We did? Where? When? And if we did, which I doubt, was it not "in kind"?

You talk big on civility. When will you start acting it?

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#176877 Oct 29, 2013
Obskeptic wrote:
<quoted text>
The ACA was sold to the people based on lies and bribes Jacque, and although it is true that both houses did manage to force it on us, they did so without a single republican fingerprint on the unread bill. The truest statement came from Nancy Pelosi herself, when she said they would have to pass the bill to find out what is in it. Your defending of such a process as fair speaks volumes about your character and sense of fairness. As this train wreck (stated by Senator Max Baucus(D) Montana) unfolds, it will be even more clear to the American people that the democrat party is not our ally or friend, but enemies of the country and our freedom. Its a power grab, not about healthcare.
As you said, not one single Republican voted in favour of obamacare. And that alone does not tell you something? Not one single one of hundreds of republicans in both houses could vote for a bill that gives universal health care to everyone, privileged and NOT privileged? Not one. I call that obstinacy, obstruction and just plain hate for the president.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#176878 Oct 29, 2013
Obskeptic wrote:
<quoted text>
GZ is a white guy? Who'd a thunk it. First time I ever heard the term "white hispanic" is from the left wing press. No racial agenda there now, is there.
He sure as hell didn't look black to me. Or to Rogue. Or to LRS. Or to any of your birther budcdies.

He sure looked whiter to me. He sure didn't look like the one who would have his own segregated water fountain or toilet to me.
Obskeptic

Southfield, MI

#176879 Oct 29, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
He sure as hell didn't look black to me. Or to Rogue. Or to LRS. Or to any of your birther budcdies.
He sure looked whiter to me. He sure didn't look like the one who would have his own segregated water fountain or toilet to me.
So that would make the president a white black man then. I get it. The white part is what makes the person guilty and evil and necessary to point out and emphasize. Unless he/she is a liberal white, then they get the benefit of the doubt. wojar is not a gentlemen, he's typical. BTW, the birther thing is totally irrelevant at this point even if he was not born in Hawaii. Just sayin'.
Obskeptic

Southfield, MI

#176880 Oct 29, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
As you said, not one single Republican voted in favour of obamacare. And that alone does not tell you something? Not one single one of hundreds of republicans in both houses could vote for a bill that gives universal health care to everyone, privileged and NOT privileged? Not one. I call that obstinacy, obstruction and just plain hate for the president.
Some republicans actually do stand on principle over party Jacque, and would never in a million years vote to force taxpayers or Christians to pay for the killing of an innocent, unborn human life, or to advance socialism that gives the state so much power to interfere with the lives and liberty of a free people. There are exceptions to that in the republican party I admit, but they are more like democrats from the fifties then the radicals today who never fail to put party over the will of the people. Even democrat Bart Stupak had to be lied to and bought off to get this terd of a piece of legislation that very few read and understood before passing. Interesting that as the roll out continues to unravel, that just weeks after the republicans tried to get the individual mandate extended, like the corporate side was granted, we see red state democrat senators up for re-election calling for what the republicans were accused of being unreasonable for trying to negotiate. One of them even said the president needed to man up. Pretty outrageous by your standards. Also, I remember the president being the one who stated that he refuses to negotiate. No hypocrisy there now, is there.
Obskeptic

Southfield, MI

#176881 Oct 29, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
He sure as hell didn't look black to me. Or to Rogue. Or to LRS. Or to any of your birther budcdies.
He sure looked whiter to me. He sure didn't look like the one who would have his own segregated water fountain or toilet to me.
http://globalgrind.com/2012/05/11/george-zimm...

To quote the next president of the United States, "what difference at this point does it make?"

And the KKK didn't just lynch the black folk either Jacque, so what's your point?

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#176882 Oct 29, 2013
Obskeptic wrote:
<quoted text>
So that would make the president a white black man then. I get it. The white part is what makes the person guilty and evil and necessary to point out and emphasize. Unless he/she is a liberal white, then they get the benefit of the doubt. wojar is not a gentlemen, he's typical. BTW, the birther thing is totally irrelevant at this point even if he was not born in Hawaii. Just sayin'.
Tell me the truth. For once, be honest. Barack Obama, before he was known to the public , walks into your store . You are asked to identify him. Do you say he's

a ) white
b ) white-black
c ) black-white
d ) mulatto
e ) black

2nd question :

A KKK lynching party is looking for a black guy to hang. Any black guy, for the hell of it. The spot Zimmerman and Obama. Which one do they choose?
wojar

Bristol, CT

#176883 Oct 29, 2013
Obskeptic wrote:
<quoted text>
GZ is a white guy? Who'd a thunk it. First time I ever heard the term "white hispanic" is from the left wing press. No racial agenda there now, is there.
I have a friend from PR who is pure Castillian. The locals there call him a "whitey". But because a disgruntled birfoon never heard the term "white Hispanic" before the Zimmerman case it's a designation invented for a liberal racial agenda.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#176884 Oct 29, 2013
Obskeptic wrote:
<quoted text>
Some republicans actually do stand on principle over party Jacque, and would never in a million years vote to force taxpayers or Christians to pay for the killing of an innocent, unborn human life, or to advance socialism that gives the state so much power to interfere with the lives and liberty of a free people. There are exceptions to that in the republican party I admit, but they are more like democrats from the fifties then the radicals today who never fail to put party over the will of the people. Even democrat Bart Stupak had to be lied to and bought off to get this terd of a piece of legislation that very few read and understood before passing. Interesting that as the roll out continues to unravel, that just weeks after the republicans tried to get the individual mandate extended, like the corporate side was granted, we see red state democrat senators up for re-election calling for what the republicans were accused of being unreasonable for trying to negotiate. One of them even said the president needed to man up. Pretty outrageous by your standards. Also, I remember the president being the one who stated that he refuses to negotiate. No hypocrisy there now, is there.
ALL 300 or so, unanimously, all 300 Republican congressmen and senators voted ON PRINCIPLE? Not one single dissenting vote? All men and women of principle? Are you finished with your unfunny jokes? To vote so that, at minimum, 55 million + non health insured get some kind of coverage is a principle? Well, I'll be.

Innocent, unborn fetus, you say. That is your opinion, to be respected I guess. My opinion is I don't know at which point the fetus is a human being. Do you? What do you rely on to establish it as such? 1st century medical journals? As I said, I don't know, so even though I am basically opposed to abortion for reasons other than yours, I declare myself free choice.

You talk of democrats changing their minds as elections approach. Of course, they are vile politicians just like the rest of them. But tell me, what about those "principled" republicans voting UNANYMOUSLY against obamacare, a near-exact copy of Romney's Mass. health care law? Waiting.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#176885 Oct 29, 2013
Obskeptic wrote:
<quoted text>
http://globalgrind.com/2012/05/11/george-zimm...
To quote the next president of the United States, "what difference at this point does it make?"
And the KKK didn't just lynch the black folk either Jacque, so what's your point?
The KKK lynched white folks? Is that what you're trying to say? Mind giving us a few samples of that? And, if you do, the proportion of whites and blacks lynched.

I can just see the nice white-robed and hooded sympathetic fellas : " Aw, geez, guys, hmm, this one I'm not sure. Is he white or black or both? Hmm, not black-black but not white-white either. Hey, how about being democratic about this? Let's put it to a vote. Okay, so it's 14 to 1 BLACK. Whoopee, let's hang the ni***r and hey, who voted he wasn't black, you? Let's hang him too, guys, this way, some poor birther will be able to say in October 2013 that we hanged a white dude.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#176886 Oct 29, 2013
Naw, Liberals aren't racists, are they?

Black Conservative Candidate E.W. Jackson Finds Campaign Sign Vandalized With White Paint
by Steven Ertelt | Washington, DC | LifeNews.com | 10/28/13

While much of the political world is focusing on the battle between pro-life gubernatorial candidates Ken Cuccinelli and Terry McAuliffe in Virginia, pro-life Lt. Gov. candidate, Bishop E.W. Jackson, is seeking to become the state’s next Lt. Governor.
http://www.lifenews.com/2013/10/28/black-cons...

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#176887 Oct 29, 2013
Maybe this is why the Libtards HATE Jackson? Yep, the truth hurts!

Earleir this year, Democratic went nuts over statements by Jackson. The quote all the news pieces were highlighting:“Planned Parenthood has been far more lethal to black lives than the KKK ever was.”
Fox News Propaganda

Sayville, NY

#176888 Oct 29, 2013
Rebekah Brooks at Old Bailey as British phone-hacking accused in dock
October 29, 2013 / http://tinyurl.com/kj5ue66
REBEKAH Brooks, the former chief executive of News International, and Andy Coulson, the British Prime Minister's former spin doctor, last night arrived at the Old Bailey to face a jury trial on charges arising from the phone-hacking scandal. Mrs Brooks and Mr Coulson, both 45 and former editors of the News of the World, deny involvement in a conspiracy to intercept voicemails. The case involves eight defendants who face allegations evolving from Operation Weeting, Scotland Yard's investigation into alleged phone-hacking, and Operation Elveden, its investigation into alleged corrupt payments to public officials. The trial could have significant political consequences, given Prime Minister David Cameron's friendship with Mrs Brooks, and his hiring of Mr Coulson as his director of communications. The News of the World was closed in 2011 amid public outcry over allegations that the phone of the murdered schoolgirl Milly Dowler had been hacked. The hacking of voicemail is believed to have been carried out on more than 600 victims, including celebrities such as Paul McCartney.
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/world/re... #

----------

Information Control: Rupert Murdoch and the Media Moguls
http://tinyurl.com/ptf7ck / November 09, 2006
Today, more than ever, our national climate and economy is determined by our access to one thing: information. Companies who control the distribution of information have developed into some of the most lucrative businesses in the United States and the world.
More than any other individual, Rupert Murdoch may be responsible for fueling this intense interest in sensationalism and the tabloid sensibility that now pervades the media in the United States. Murdoch is responsible for launching A Current Affair, a gaudy newsmagazine TV show that became the prototype for all tabloid television programs to follow. http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/7677...

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#176889 Oct 29, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Naw, Liberals aren't racists, are they?
Black Conservative Candidate E.W. Jackson Finds Campaign Sign Vandalized With White Paint
by Steven Ertelt | Washington, DC | LifeNews.com | 10/28/13
While much of the political world is focusing on the battle between pro-life gubernatorial candidates Ken Cuccinelli and Terry McAuliffe in Virginia, pro-life Lt. Gov. candidate, Bishop E.W. Jackson, is seeking to become the state’s next Lt. Governor.
http://www.lifenews.com/2013/10/28/black-cons...
Another isolated incident, but Rogue thinks this is how ALL 200 million, give or take a few, think and act.

First off, how do you know Liberals defaced the election sign? How do you know it was not a tactic employed by one of Jackson's "agent provocateur" to sully his opponents? So many candidates of every persuasion, race, creed, do that to their own signs. I've SEEN it, witnessed it when I was mixed up in politics. Common trait, that.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#176890 Oct 29, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Maybe this is why the Libtards HATE Jackson? Yep, the truth hurts!
Earleir this year, Democratic went nuts over statements by Jackson. The quote all the news pieces were highlighting:“Planned Parenthood has been far more lethal to black lives than the KKK ever was.”
Democrats went nuts over Jackson? Can you illustrate? Never mind, I don't have months to wait for you to finally write "I already proved it"

As for this "Jackson" thing, does anyone, outside his electoral precinct, even know who the dude is?
Fox News Propaganda

Sayville, NY

#176891 Oct 29, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
ALL 300 or so, unanimously, all 300 Republican congressmen and senators voted ON PRINCIPLE? Not one single dissenting vote? All men and women of principle? Are you finished with your unfunny jokes? To vote so that, at minimum, 55 million + non health insured get some kind of coverage is a principle? Well, I'll be.
Innocent, unborn fetus, you say. That is your opinion, to be respected I guess. My opinion is I don't know at which point the fetus is a human being. Do you? What do you rely on to establish it as such? 1st century medical journals? As I said, I don't know, so even though I am basically opposed to abortion for reasons other than yours, I declare myself free choice.
You talk of democrats changing their minds as elections approach. Of course, they are vile politicians just like the rest of them. But tell me, what about those "principled" republicans voting UNANYMOUSLY against obamacare, a near-exact copy of Romney's Mass. health care law? Waiting.
Your post is extremely astute and factual.

You should also remind our friend obs, that Bush/Cheney had the power to overturn Roe vs Wade and did nothing about it.

For 6 out of 8 years Bush/Cheney had a Republican House, Republican Senate, and with Roberts and Alito a Rightwing Republican Supreme Court.

Obskeptic beliefs are misguided.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#176892 Oct 29, 2013
Fox News Propaganda wrote:
Rebekah Brooks at Old Bailey as British phone-hacking accused in dock
October 29, 2013 / http://tinyurl.com/kj5ue66
REBEKAH Brooks, the former chief executive of News International, and Andy Coulson, the British Prime Minister's former spin doctor, last night arrived at the Old Bailey to face a jury trial on charges arising from the phone-hacking scandal. Mrs Brooks and Mr Coulson, both 45 and former editors of the News of the World, deny involvement in a conspiracy to intercept voicemails. The case involves eight defendants who face allegations evolving from Operation Weeting, Scotland Yard's investigation into alleged phone-hacking, and Operation Elveden, its investigation into alleged corrupt payments to public officials. The trial could have significant political consequences, given Prime Minister David Cameron's friendship with Mrs Brooks, and his hiring of Mr Coulson as his director of communications. The News of the World was closed in 2011 amid public outcry over allegations that the phone of the murdered schoolgirl Milly Dowler had been hacked. The hacking of voicemail is believed to have been carried out on more than 600 victims, including celebrities such as Paul McCartney.
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/world/re... #
----------
Information Control: Rupert Murdoch and the Media Moguls
http://tinyurl.com/ptf7ck / November 09, 2006
Today, more than ever, our national climate and economy is determined by our access to one thing: information. Companies who control the distribution of information have developed into some of the most lucrative businesses in the United States and the world.
More than any other individual, Rupert Murdoch may be responsible for fueling this intense interest in sensationalism and the tabloid sensibility that now pervades the media in the United States. Murdoch is responsible for launching A Current Affair, a gaudy newsmagazine TV show that became the prototype for all tabloid television programs to follow. http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/7677...
Er, just a reminder. Rupert Murdoch runs Foxnews.com . And thanks for the above. Most informative and be sure the birthers won't read it.
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#176893 Oct 29, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Check out your post number 176848.
Whopper lie : Check out the extract from your very own post number 176848 : "And you just love posting all this personal information "
Please indicate in that sentence where I wrote " I enjoyed it" .
Whopper number 2 : It's page 7838, not one page back. Same page. Why do you keep churning out the lies?
You really are stupid. Last night when I made the post, it was one page back. Guess you're just late. "I" said, you enjoyed it. I didn't say "you" said that! Once again, the facts do not match your claims. Got English?

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#176894 Oct 29, 2013
Obskeptic wrote:
<quoted text>
Some republicans actually do stand on principle over party Jacque, and would never in a million years vote to force taxpayers or Christians to pay for the killing of an innocent, unborn human life, or to advance socialism that gives the state so much power to interfere with the lives and liberty of a free people. There are exceptions to that in the republican party I admit, but they are more like democrats from the fifties then the radicals today who never fail to put party over the will of the people. Even democrat Bart Stupak had to be lied to and bought off to get this terd of a piece of legislation that very few read and understood before passing. Interesting that as the roll out continues to unravel, that just weeks after the republicans tried to get the individual mandate extended, like the corporate side was granted, we see red state democrat senators up for re-election calling for what the republicans were accused of being unreasonable for trying to negotiate. One of them even said the president needed to man up. Pretty outrageous by your standards. Also, I remember the president being the one who stated that he refuses to negotiate. No hypocrisy there now, is there.
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
ALL 300 or so, unanimously, all 300 Republican congressmen and senators voted ON PRINCIPLE? Not one single dissenting vote? All men and women of principle? Are you finished with your unfunny jokes? To vote so that, at minimum, 55 million + non health insured get some kind of coverage is a principle? Well, I'll be.
Innocent, unborn fetus, you say. That is your opinion, to be respected I guess. My opinion is I don't know at which point the fetus is a human being. Do you? What do you rely on to establish it as such? 1st century medical journals? As I said, I don't know, so even though I am basically opposed to abortion for reasons other than yours, I declare myself free choice.
You talk of democrats changing their minds as elections approach. Of course, they are vile politicians just like the rest of them. But tell me, what about those "principled" republicans voting UNANYMOUSLY against obamacare, a near-exact copy of Romney's Mass. health care law? Waiting.
I will tell you what voting on your principal is really. It is the the 34 House Democrats who voted "Nay" on ObamaCare in 2009!!!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 6 min shinningelectr0n 1,153,467
Marcus Bachmann acts like a sissy 41 min LOL 1
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 1 hr _Zoey_ 4,913
Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 2 hr Eric 70,994
Obama pardons 2 Illinoisans, including former M... 2 hr Le Duped 7
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 2 hr market indicators 98,836
How long to do this? 2 hr Jako Hondasaki 1
Chicago Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 3:25 pm PST

NBC Sports 3:25PM
Bears clearly looking to move in another direction
NBC Sports 3:44 PM
Lions preparing for the cold - NBC Sports
Bleacher Report 3:47 PM
Cutler's Benching Too Little, Too Late for Bears
NBC Sports 6:32 PM
Week 16 skill-position injury report — Thursday
NBC Sports 7:47 PM
Golden Tate excited for Jimmy Clausen to get another starting opportunity