BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit ...

BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

There are 216929 comments on the Chicago Tribune story from Jan 8, 2009, titled BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen.... In it, Chicago Tribune reports that:

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chicago Tribune.

Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#176668 Oct 27, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>It's basically Rouge going off on another tangent.
Reminds me of why we used to call him "Stream of unconscience Rouge". Any image that flutters past that warped little bean may be fodder for a flurry of Rouge-pastes. Especially if the image includes hints of race and aircraft

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#176669 Oct 27, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
When a Voltarian dies, do you bury them or do you just chuck their remains out into a field to feed the poor starving animals?
And Rouge assumes respect for the dead requires belief in a deity.

Cemeteries are not for the dead but for the living.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#176670 Oct 27, 2013
ChaunceyGardiner wrote:
<quoted text>

Yes, like the smoker who blames the doctor for his cancer, you refuse to acknowledge the true culprit. Well done, fucktard.
Oh goody, I pissed you off and jerked your chain. Thank you for the "f*cktard" comment!

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#176671 Oct 27, 2013
Scrutiny wrote:
<quoted text>
I am sure you could work the formula to represent sects of the cult. That would be heavily on your parents religious camps.
I don't have the foggiest idea. If voltan is like mother nature... I would imagine. Being an Earth god and all... how many options could he have?
That just proves my point that most Libtards are either atheists or pagans. So whether you pray to Mother Nature or Voltan does not make any difference.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#176672 Oct 27, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Again, what religion did Hitler, Stalin, Mao and Pol Pot practice? They killed a hundred million people in the 29th Century!!!
Atticus Tiberius Finch wrote:
<quoted text>
Rogue's logic:
Killing a hundred million people is not a religious tenet or creed.
Hitler, et. seq. killed a hundred million people.
Therefore, Hitler et. seq. are not religious people.
Analogy:
All Scotsman are brave.
Ian McDonald is a coward.
Therefore Ian is not a Scotsman.
What war did Ian start?

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#176673 Oct 27, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
And if you are born in Boston, are you a Catholic?
Voltan, the Earth gawd? What is the difference between Voltan and Mother Nature?
People politely smile and move on when Rouge rambles on like this at the grocery store. He just cannot save it for his big monologue at the Waffle House.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#176674 Oct 27, 2013
Atticus Tiberius Finch wrote:
<quoted text>
Rogue's logic:
Killing a hundred million people is not a religious tenet or creed.
Hitler, et. seq. killed a hundred million people.
Therefore, Hitler et. seq. are not religious people.
Analogy:
All Scotsman are brave.
Ian McDonald is a coward.
Therefore Ian is not a Scotsman.
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:

What war did Ian start?
Another one flies right over Rouge's pin head.

This is Rougie's cue to re-post the redneck joke about logic.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#176675 Oct 27, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
And Rouge assumes respect for the dead requires belief in a deity.
Cemeteries are not for the dead but for the living.
The comment above earned four "racy" Judge-its.

Is this comment "Racy"?
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
When a Voltarian dies, do you bury them or do you just chuck their remains out into a field to feed the poor starving animals?

“Arm the homeless!”

Since: Jul 12

The internet

#176676 Oct 27, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
That just proves my point that most Libtards are either atheists or pagans. So whether you pray to Mother Nature or Voltan does not make any difference.
You are finally getting it!

It doesn't matter. No one is listening.

“Arm the homeless!”

Since: Jul 12

The internet

#176677 Oct 27, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
The comment above earned four "racy" Judge-its.
Is this comment "Racy"?
<quoted text>
Atticus picked up a "touching" for his brief lesson in logic.

“Arm the homeless!”

Since: Jul 12

The internet

#176678 Oct 27, 2013
Atticus Tiberius Finch wrote:
<quoted text>
What the difference if these people were religious or non religious? Would you feel better if they were Druids or Episcopalian? What would happen if these people have the same trait or characteristic such as same blood type or same shoe size?
Do you actually believe that if these people went to church or temple on Sundays that they would have acted differently?
Would you agree that a psychotic is a psychotic regardless as to their religious affiliation or eye color?
Amazing as it sounds, you hit it right on the head. They would feel better.

Rouge is the only one I have ever seen use Hitler as an atheist let alone a liberal...lol. It is denial in it's purist form. It kills him that a right wing christian nationalist movement is the greatest depiction of modern evil that we have.

The other three are commonly used as a rebuttal to anyone suggesting that religion is largely responsible for war throughout history. Which is a half-truth. War is rarely fought over religion it's self. That doesn't stop them from dragging god into it.

Stalin is the only one that flies as an atheist. And he never started a war.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#176679 Oct 27, 2013
I always do the opposite of what Libtards say I should dew.

Don’t Listen to Al Gore, Buy an Energy Stock Instead
By Matthew DiLallo | October 27, 2013 |

Former Vice President Al Gore is warning long-term investors to steer clear of energy stocks. According to his estimates, investors stand to lose $7 trillion as the carbon assets on the books of global oil companies will turn out to be worthless.

This is because investors are under the assumption that these oil and natural gas assets will eventually be produced, sold, and burned. However, according to Gore, "they are not going to be burned. They cannot be burned and will not be burned. No more than one-third can ever possibly be burned without destroying the future."

The problem with that statement is that it doesn't line up with current trends. Global energy demand is growing and is expected to grow by 35% by 2040. Fossil fuels will supply much of that demand. In fact, by most estimates fossil fuels will still be fueling most of our energy needs for the foreseeable future. Even the sunniest estimates show that renewables will only account for about a fifth of total U.S. power generating capacity by 2040. Clearly, we will be burning a lot of oil and natural gas in the years ahead.

For example, by 2040 natural gas consumption in the U.S. is expected to grow to 29.5 trillion cubic feet annually. That's about 21% more than we use now. That suggests to me that Chesapeake Energy's

http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2013/10...

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#176680 Oct 27, 2013
Scrutiny wrote:
<quoted text>
Amazing as it sounds, you hit it right on the head. They would feel better.
Rouge is the only one I have ever seen use Hitler as an atheist let alone a liberal...lol. It is denial in it's purist form. It kills him that a right wing christian nationalist movement is the greatest depiction of modern evil that we have.
The other three are commonly used as a rebuttal to anyone suggesting that religion is largely responsible for war throughout history. Which is a half-truth. War is rarely fought over religion it's self. That doesn't stop them from dragging god into it.
Stalin is the only one that flies as an atheist. And he never started a war.
Then what religion did Hitler follow? Mao? Pol Pot? Come on now, put out or shut up!
Oh, Hitler was a Socialist. Fascism believes in private property but only if you do what you are told. Communism believes that all property belongs to the state. Likewise Progressives believe in a big, over controlling government which takes care of everything, cradle to grave.
Whereas Conservatives believe in minimal government and individual liberties.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#176681 Oct 27, 2013
Stupid Libtards (is that a double negative?), they believe that communism and Fascism are not the same just because Hitler hated communists. Do you know that Communist hated Fascists too?
They both have the same goal and that is the common people serve the state (slavery).

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#176682 Oct 27, 2013
Scrutiny wrote:
<quoted text>
Amazing as it sounds, you hit it right on the head. They would feel better.
Rouge is the only one I have ever seen use Hitler as an atheist let alone a liberal...lol. It is denial in it's purist form. It kills him that a right wing christian nationalist movement is the greatest depiction of modern evil that we have.
The other three are commonly used as a rebuttal to anyone suggesting that religion is largely responsible for war throughout history. Which is a half-truth. War is rarely fought over religion it's self. That doesn't stop them from dragging god into it.
Stalin is the only one that flies as an atheist. And he never started a war.
Hey, I forgot, yes, Rogue incredibly labelled Hitler a Liberal. That's even more outlandish than calling him a Jew.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#176683 Oct 27, 2013
Scrutiny wrote:
<quoted text>
Amazing as it sounds, you hit it right on the head. They would feel better.
Rouge is the only one I have ever seen use Hitler as an atheist let alone a liberal...lol. It is denial in it's purist form. It kills him that a right wing christian nationalist movement is the greatest depiction of modern evil that we have.
The other three are commonly used as a rebuttal to anyone suggesting that religion is largely responsible for war throughout history. Which is a half-truth. War is rarely fought over religion it's self. That doesn't stop them from dragging god into it.
Stalin is the only one that flies as an atheist. And he never started a war.
all of the above's good, except that Stalin, a former seminarian,(got out as soon as he read the bible, but did gather torture and killing secrets from old testament and Inquisition) invaded Finland.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#176684 Oct 27, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
and how many were killed by the Conquistadores in Central and South America? Were you aware that the Catholic gospels "bringers" killed, either by war or disease, over 60% of the population? That is a lot of people. How many killed during the 100-year war? How many killed by the Crusaders? How many horribly tortured and killed during the "Holy", yes, HOLY Inquisition? How many Christian Orthodox killed by the Crusaders in Constantinople - by their own brothers? Add to that the hundreds of thousands killed by Joshuah, 81 holocausts by him alone and by murderer Mohamad and his hoards of killers? Pretty much sums up religion up to now. And to think I've skipped over so many...
Incidentally, Hitler and Stalin were both Christian0-born, did you even know that and you ignored it when I said earlier on that Stalin had attended a seminary. Mao was a God onto himself, you know that, right down to the Mao bible, that little red book. As to Pol Pot, who knows?
How many Europeans where killed by syphilis? Do you think it odd that the first recorded case of syphilis was recorded in northern Italy in 1494, two years after Columbus discovered the new world and a year after he returned?
Again, I asked you what religion where Hitler, Stalin, Mao and Pol Pot PRACTICING? Why several of you claimed to have been raised Catholic but are any of you practicing Catholics today?
And wasn't Chastity Bono born a female but is she still a female today?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Bono_Chaz_2...

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#176685 Oct 27, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey, I forgot, yes, Rogue incredibly labelled Hitler a Liberal. That's even more outlandish than calling him a Jew.
Where did I say Hitler was a "Liberal" or an "Atheist". He was a Fascist which is a form of Socialist and he was not a practicing Christian, Jew, Muslim, etc. The NAZIs practice some sort of Aryan mysticism so I guess they where Pagans.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#176686 Oct 27, 2013
Religious views of Adolf Hitler
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hitler in 1933

Adolf Hitler was raised by an anticlerical, sceptic father and a devout Catholic mother. Baptized and confirmed as a child in Austria, he ceased to participate in the sacraments after childhood. In adulthood, Hitler became disdainful of Christianity, but in seeking out and in trying to retain power in Germany, he was prepared to restrain his radical instincts out of political considerations. He said repeatedly that Nazism was a secular ideology founded on science.[1] It is generally believed by historians that Hitler's post war and long term goal was the eradication of Christianity in Germany.[2][3] Hitler appears not to have believed in the Judeo-Christian notion of God, though various scholars consider his final religious position may have been a form of deism. Others consider him "atheist". The question is debated. During his early career, and for a variety of reasons, he made various comments against non-Nazi atheistic (i.e. "Bolshevik") movements, and in favour of so-called positive Christianity (a movement which purged Christianity of its Jewish elements and instilled it with Nazi philosophy). In private, confidantes such as Martin Bormann, Joseph Goebbels and Albert Speer noted that he was hostile to Christianity (though Speer also wrote that he never formally left the Church).

I

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#176687 Oct 27, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Where did I say Hitler was a "Liberal" or an "Atheist". He was a Fascist which is a form of Socialist and he was not a practicing Christian, Jew, Muslim, etc. The NAZIs practice some sort of Aryan mysticism so I guess they where Pagans.
You wrote last week that he was a liberal. Are you denying it? You were mocked over the remark.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Mohammed a White Guy with Black Slaves 5 min Hotel California 1
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 31 min OzRitz 60,141
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 53 min USAsince1680 1,395,958
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 2 hr They cannot kill ... 8,910
Word (Dec '08) 2 hr They cannot kill ... 6,423
last post wins! (Dec '10) 2 hr They cannot kill ... 2,152
News Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 4 hr TRD 70,730
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 6 hr Sublime1 102,527

Chicago Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages