BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ... Full Story

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#176522 Oct 26, 2013
Scrutiny wrote:
<quoted text>
We know exactly what we are talking about.
I will make this real simple for you.
Christians like Jesus.
Actual christians emulate Jesus.
The difference is outright evident.
I don't think Jesus talked about the limit of how much you can do to help the poor and unfortunate either.
Is simplistic outdated technology where you draw the line? Should tech be the hallmark of the haves? Or, did it pass you by at food and shelter?
The lion's share of EVERYTHING Jesus preached was on this very subject. Over 300 verses of pretty straight forward word of Christ.
So, yeah... we know what we are talking about.
There is something especially sinister and blasphemous about your attitudes when you are trying to make sure the poor stay right where they are by holding up Jesus. There is something immensely twisted about defending your prejudices with a moral high ground found in a book that tells you that these people...
Those ones you so crave to kill each other, die, or just go away...
Are your greatest and perhaps ONLY charge in this world.
That... in a nutshell, is what pisses us off about your average vocal christian. The use of something sacred to validate ill will.
So, when we say "un-christian". What we mean is... it is a pity that there isn't a hell for you to go to. At least for a day or so.
I don't think I have ever used that exact term myself. But, I am pretty sure I know the feeling of evoking it.
But, by all means... continue to think of it as "funny". It kind of supports our argument if you give it some thought.
If Rogue had been around when Jesus was here, the following famous words would've been aimed straight at him : "Again I tell you, it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for someone who is rich to enter the kingdom of God." " (Matthew 19:24)

Well, the ironic part is that Rogue is a merely a non-remunerated serf, a vassal, a peon for the rich 1%. Go figure. They'd have HIM go through the eye of the needle for them. LMAO (LRS-Dale tm reg'd).

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#176523 Oct 26, 2013
Another Idiotard thinks he can trespass on the Eiffel Tower and that will get the 30 trespasser in Russia released. The Eiffel guy needs to sit in prison in France and think about that real hard.
Lefties always think laws do not apply to them.

Greenpeace activist dangles from Eiffel Tower in Russia protest

PARIS (Reuters)- A Greenpeace activist suspended himself from the Eiffel Tower on Saturday to call for the release of 30 people who have spent more than a month in a Russian jail over a protest against oil drilling in the Arctic

After lowering himself from the second tier of the Paris landmark, the man unfurled a large yellow sign saying: "Free the Arctic 30." He was brought down about two hours later by firemen without incident.

Twenty-eight Greenpeace activists and two journalists were arrested last month after trying to scale a Gazprom oil platform off Russia's northern coast, the country's first offshore oil platform in the Arctic.
http://news.yahoo.com/greenpeace-activist-dan...

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#176524 Oct 26, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
If Rogue had been around when Jesus was here, the following famous words would've been aimed straight at him : "Again I tell you, it is easier for a camel to go through the eye of a needle than for someone who is rich to enter the kingdom of God." " (Matthew 19:24)
Well, the ironic part is that Rogue is a merely a non-remunerated serf, a vassal, a peon for the rich 1%. Go figure. They'd have HIM go through the eye of the needle for them. LMAO (LRS-Dale tm reg'd).
Why are you worried about heaven if it does not exist?

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#176525 Oct 26, 2013
ChaunceyGardiner wrote:
<quoted text>
Are you still mad that I reminded the board of your most un-Christian behavior despite your protestations to the contrary?
My goodness, WWJD? LOL! Your fake god is making you look even more ridiculous today.
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
I think it is funny when an atheist calls someone "un-Christian" as if he knows what he is talking about. I don't think Jesus ever mentioned giving people Obama Phones!
Scrutiny wrote:
<quoted text>
We know exactly what we are talking about.
I will make this real simple for you.
Christians like Jesus.
Actual christians emulate Jesus.
The difference is outright evident.
I don't think Jesus talked about the limit of how much you can do to help the poor and unfortunate either.
Is simplistic outdated technology where you draw the line? Should tech be the hallmark of the haves? Or, did it pass you by at food and shelter?
The lion's share of EVERYTHING Jesus preached was on this very subject. Over 300 verses of pretty straight forward word of Christ.
So, yeah... we know what we are talking about.
There is something especially sinister and blasphemous about your attitudes when you are trying to make sure the poor stay right where they are by holding up Jesus. There is something immensely twisted about defending your prejudices with a moral high ground found in a book that tells you that these people...
Those ones you so crave to kill each other, die, or just go away...
Are your greatest and perhaps ONLY charge in this world.
That... in a nutshell, is what pisses us off about your average vocal christian. The use of something sacred to validate ill will.
So, when we say "un-christian". What we mean is... it is a pity that there isn't a hell for you to go to. At least for a day or so.
I don't think I have ever used that exact term myself. But, I am pretty sure I know the feeling of evoking it.
But, by all means... continue to think of it as "funny". It kind of supports our argument if you give it some thought.
Do you know anything about my charitable work and donations? YOU think raising the taxes on the rich to give to the so called poor is a good thing and I disagree.

Since: Feb 11

Nearer than you would like

#176526 Oct 26, 2013
Truth Detector wrote:
<quoted text>
That would be the UnConstitutional ObamaCare that is unaffordable and will provide care to no one.
Obama: USA needs more people without jobs???
Are you getting what you voted for?
1) The PPACA was signed into law because it passed the Republicant controlled House and the Democratic controlled Senate. It survived committees chaired by the opposition and numerous challenges. Even the independent - indicating bipartisan support, agreed with it. Still, you have not provided the quote where President Barack Obama stated he would only sign legislation that was backed by both parties. Why is that?

2) Yes, my career and future are very enjoyable.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#176527 Oct 26, 2013
ChaunceyGardiner wrote:
<quoted text>
Yawn. Jesus never talked about vaginal probes either.
This atheist knows far more about Christianity than you do. That is why I am able to mock you so easily.
America has a freedom from religion - we are not a Christian nation though some of you believe that to be the case. Just like the GOPs ignorance regarding those of Latin heritage, you fail to heed the signs. Islam is the worlds largest religion. Jesus lived and died a Jew. Did your deity create man in his image and promise eternal salvation to all who followed him? If so, he must be very spiteful since he created the majority on places where he is not known. That's brilliant duplicity...I can see where your party gets it.
Where in our Constitution does it say YOU have a "freedom from religion"? Better read the First Amendment again and this time .... slowly!
Oh, by the way, 33% of the people on this Earth are Christians while only 21% are .... Muslims! And you claim to know more about religion than I do?
http://www.adherents.com/Religions_By_Adheren...

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#176528 Oct 26, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Why are you worried about heaven if it does not exist?
Please indicate where and when I said heaven did not exist. Please do so, and at same time, proof I've been asking you the last three days. Also kindly indicate how you came to the conclusion that I am worried. Did I do that by quoting Jesus and the eye of the needle? Did that hit home? Are YOU worried now?

Here's what you ought to know before even touching on religion :

1. Most atheists know more about the bible, old and new testament, the gospels, acts of the apostles, and theologians than practicing Christians;

2. This is why they have become non-religious. If you bothered to read these things, you'd be so shocked and scandalized, and knowing how you harbour violence against those that don't agree with you, you'd most likely end up burning churches.

I've noticed, based on experience and relationships, that so-called atheists" as you like to call them, or me, are so much more tolerant of others. Atheists, for example, are mostly tolerant towards those who practice religions. Very few atheists have ever started a war. Some, yes, but very few indeed. Yet, religions and their leaders are most always at the root of massacres, wars, pogroms, famine and pestilence. If you knew your history, which you don't except for reproduction of right-wing links that you don't comprehend, you'd agree with me.

3. To be non-Christian or one that does not practice religion is not synonymous with atheism. Oh, you didn't know that, now did you?
Obskeptic

Southfield, MI

#176529 Oct 26, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm saying that the Inflatable Plastic Politician was all for the individual mandate until it became a disadvantage to gaining the Republican nomination. He was pro choice when governor of Massachusetts, and flip-flopped when it suited his political ambitions. He has the depth of conviction of a Ted Bundy. The People of the United States decided he could not be trusted to act on behalf of anyone but Mitt himself.
BTW, Barack Obama had ten years of experience in government, including almost four years as a United States Senator. He had more experience in government than did John F. Kennedy when he was elected to the Presidency. And his work as a community organizer put him in touch with people at the grass roots level. So the notion that he was unqualified is simply baseless. President Obama entered the White House when the US economy was in free-fall and the threat of collapse of the US and world economies were perilously close. His track record proved to the people of the United States that he was the most suitable candidate to hold the office of President and they re-elected him accordingly.
Get over it.
<quoted text>
The fact a community is a community means it was already organized wojar, so to suggest that there is some inherent skill in organizing something that already is organized is ludicrous, and means nothing. Barry spent most of his short hops from one office to the next running for the next office, so that one means very little as well, except to those who place unwarranted emphasis on getting elected, like you. As for flip flopping, another hypocrisy of left wing extremists like yourself, who accuse a republican of a position change as a flip flopper, like Romney on abortion, but when Barry goes from against gay marriage to supporting it he has "evolved". I know you would like to think you can have it both ways, condemn one for the same actions you support another, but what it makes you is a hypocrite and a fool. So get over it!
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#176530 Oct 26, 2013
wojar wrote:
Such a contract will not be enforced against the weaker party when it is (1) not within that party's reasonable expectations; or (2) is unduly oppressive, unconscionable or against public policy." AEB & Associates Design Group, Inc. v. Tonka Corp., 853 F. Supp. 724, 732 (S.D.N.Y. 1994)(citations omitted).
Courts have ruled that terms accessible through highlighted hyperlinks on the terms and conditions page are enforceable.
"The Court held that plaintiffs were not bound by this policy, which was not linked or otherwise referenced in the Usage Agreement to which plaintiffs were in fact bound."[1]
See, A.V., et al. v. IParadigms, Limited Liability Company, Civ. Act. No. 07-0293 (E.D. Va., March 11, 2008)
Needless to say, non-displayed source code does not qualify as linked or otherwise referenced in the Usage Agreement.
__________
[1] http://www.internetlibrary.com/topics/click_w...
All you have to do is watch and listen. Think you can handle that, lil one?

http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/BartononA
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#176531 Oct 26, 2013

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#176532 Oct 26, 2013
Naw, does Dems ain't worried,,,,,, much. The AP leans left and they are trying to spin this but the race has closed and either one can win. But if he does win it will because of ObamaCare and that will be very bad news for the Dems.
That is why Hillary campaigned against him last weekend in Virginia. She would not have made the trip if the Dem was not in trouble.

Cuccinelli tests conservatism Va. governor race
Associated Press By PHILIP ELLIOTT 1 hour ago

RICHMOND, Va.(AP)— Ken Cuccinelli's campaign for governor of Virginia has always been a test of whether a deeply conservative Republican could win in a swing-voting state.

For months, the attorney general — known outside his state for mounting the first-in-the-nation legal challenge to President Barack Obama's health care law — was locked in a competitive race with Democrat Terry McAuliffe as both candidates sought to court an ideologically diverse crop of voters, moderates and women among them.
http://news.yahoo.com/cuccinelli-tests-conser...

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#176533 Oct 26, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Please indicate where and when I said heaven did not exist. Please do so, and at same time, proof I've been asking you the last three days. Also kindly indicate how you came to the conclusion that I am worried. Did I do that by quoting Jesus and the eye of the needle? Did that hit home? Are YOU worried now?
Here's what you ought to know before even touching on religion :
1. Most atheists know more about the bible, old and new testament, the gospels, acts of the apostles, and theologians than practicing Christians;
2. This is why they have become non-religious. If you bothered to read these things, you'd be so shocked and scandalized, and knowing how you harbour violence against those that don't agree with you, you'd most likely end up burning churches.
I've noticed, based on experience and relationships, that so-called atheists" as you like to call them, or me, are so much more tolerant of others. Atheists, for example, are mostly tolerant towards those who practice religions. Very few atheists have ever started a war. Some, yes, but very few indeed. Yet, religions and their leaders are most always at the root of massacres, wars, pogroms, famine and pestilence. If you knew your history, which you don't except for reproduction of right-wing links that you don't comprehend, you'd agree with me.
3. To be non-Christian or one that does not practice religion is not synonymous with atheism. Oh, you didn't know that, now did you?
Well, since about 11% of the people on this Earth are non-religious, it is likely that they did not start many wars.
Who started WWI! It was a Muslim who murdered Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria! Who started the Crusades? The Muslims who had captured the Christian Holy Lands!

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#176534 Oct 26, 2013
Obskeptic wrote:
<quoted text>
The fact a community is a community means it was already organized wojar, so to suggest that there is some inherent skill in organizing something that already is organized is ludicrous, and means nothing. Barry spent most of his short hops from one office to the next running for the next office, so that one means very little as well, except to those who place unwarranted emphasis on getting elected, like you. As for flip flopping, another hypocrisy of left wing extremists like yourself, who accuse a republican of a position change as a flip flopper, like Romney on abortion, but when Barry goes from against gay marriage to supporting it he has "evolved". I know you would like to think you can have it both ways, condemn one for the same actions you support another, but what it makes you is a hypocrite and a fool. So get over it!
Working among Chicago's poor to organize and get things done in relation to issues such as drugs, unemployment, public safety, water contamination, involves "no inherent skill" because the community is already "organized"? RU on drugs? BTW, that was a job he held after college and before law school. Obama has said of those three years,“the best education I ever had, better than anything I got at Harvard Law School,” an education that he said was “seared into my brain.” Have you ever done community service work? What you have said is an insult to people serving their communities.

Three terms as state senator and election to US Senator is "hops from one office to the next"?

Again, he had 14 years in government,(four as President), Mitt, one term as a state governor, and experience at stripping corporations and off-shoring jobs, and skill at moistening his finger to see which way the political wind was blowing before his next flip-flop.

The notion that Romney was qualified and Obama unqualified is pure sour grapes drivel. Obama was a sitting President who had led this country through one of its darkest times following the financial meltdown that occurred during his predecessor's watch.

Get over it. It has been almost one year since Mitt lost. Get on with your life.
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm saying that the Inflatable Plastic Politician was all for the individual mandate until it became a disadvantage to gaining the Republican nomination. He was pro choice when governor of Massachusetts, and flip-flopped when it suited his political ambitions. He has the depth of conviction of a Ted Bundy. The People of the United States decided he could not be trusted to act on behalf of anyone but Mitt himself.
BTW, Barack Obama had ten years of experience in government, including almost four years as a United States Senator. He had more experience in government than did John F. Kennedy when he was elected to the Presidency. And his work as a community organizer put him in touch with people at the grass roots level. So the notion that he was unqualified is simply baseless. President Obama entered the White House when the US economy was in free-fall and the threat of collapse of the US and world economies were perilously close. His track record proved to the people of the United States that he was the most suitable candidate to hold the office of President and they re-elected him accordingly.
Get over it.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#176535 Oct 26, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Another Idiotard thinks he can trespass on the Eiffel Tower and that will get the 30 trespasser in Russia released. The Eiffel guy needs to sit in prison in France and think about that real hard.
Lefties always think laws do not apply to them.
Greenpeace activist dangles from Eiffel Tower in Russia protest
PARIS (Reuters)- A Greenpeace activist suspended himself from the Eiffel Tower on Saturday to call for the release of 30 people who have spent more than a month in a Russian jail over a protest against oil drilling in the Arctic
After lowering himself from the second tier of the Paris landmark, the man unfurled a large yellow sign saying: "Free the Arctic 30." He was brought down about two hours later by firemen without incident.
Twenty-eight Greenpeace activists and two journalists were arrested last month after trying to scale a Gazprom oil platform off Russia's northern coast, the country's first offshore oil platform in the Arctic.
http://news.yahoo.com/greenpeace-activist-dan...
Why are you pro-Russian and anti-American? Do you know for sure whether the Greenpeacers were or were NOT in Int'l waters? Were you there when their ship was seized as you were there when Z killed M and Chief Justice Roberts decided, on the first day of deliberations, that Obamacare was dead? These men who were fighting the good fight and arrested by the Russians are AMERICANS, Rogue. You take the Russians' word against them because they are "lefties"? What are the Russians, pray tell? Righties? And, don't worry about the Eiffel Tower protesters. They will be much better treated by the French than the Americans and Canadians apprehended by the Russians.

You've chosen your friends, your allies. The Russians. That's what you fought for in Vietnam? Russian law, justice and freedom?

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#176536 Oct 26, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
All you have to do is watch and listen. Think you can handle that, lil one?
http://www.c-spanvideo.org/program/BartononA
Can Play Justice write a sentence or paragraph in rebuttal?
wojar wrote:
Such a contract will not be enforced against the weaker party when it is (1) not within that party's reasonable expectations; or (2) is unduly oppressive, unconscionable or against public policy." AEB & Associates Design Group, Inc. v. Tonka Corp., 853 F. Supp. 724, 732 (S.D.N.Y. 1994)(citations omitted).
Courts have ruled that terms accessible through highlighted hyperlinks on the terms and conditions page are enforceable.
"The Court held that plaintiffs were not bound by this policy, which was not linked or otherwise referenced in the Usage Agreement to which plaintiffs were in fact bound."[1]
See, A.V., et al. v. IParadigms, Limited Liability Company, Civ. Act. No. 07-0293 (E.D. Va., March 11, 2008)
Needless to say, non-displayed source code does not qualify as linked or otherwise referenced in the Usage Agreement.
__________
[1] http://www.internetlibrary.com/topics/click_w ...
Obskeptic

Southfield, MI

#176537 Oct 26, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Working among Chicago's poor to organize and get things done in relation to issues such as drugs, unemployment, public safety, water contamination, involves "no inherent skill" because the community is already "organized"? RU on drugs? BTW, that was a job he held after college and before law school. Obama has said of those three years,“the best education I ever had, better than anything I got at Harvard Law School,” an education that he said was “seared into my brain.” Have you ever done community service work? What you have said is an insult to people serving their communities.
Three terms as state senator and election to US Senator is "hops from one office to the next"?
Again, he had 14 years in government,(four as President), Mitt, one term as a state governor, and experience at stripping corporations and off-shoring jobs, and skill at moistening his finger to see which way the political wind was blowing before his next flip-flop.
The notion that Romney was qualified and Obama unqualified is pure sour grapes drivel. Obama was a sitting President who had led this country through one of its darkest times following the financial meltdown that occurred during his predecessor's watch.
Get over it. It has been almost one year since Mitt lost. Get on with your life.
<quoted text>
I would say that the current condition of those poor neighborhoods in Chicago is proof that his impact was negligible at best. Most would grade his effect as a complete failure, so again, not very impressive by any objective standard,except for those trying to prop him up. His resume is one of the thinnest a serving president has managed to get elected with, and the poor performance he has provided the country reflects that. The gap between the wealthiest and the poor has widened. Food assistance has more then doubled under his "leadership". Unemployment has remained above 7% throughout his presidency in spite of the U3 number being manipulated by not taking into account those who have dropped out of the workforce completely. Unemployment for college grad's and women is at a multiple decades high. American household income has dropped off by over $3000. Taxpayers have been fleeced for 100's of millions over the failed "green energy" picks he was responsible for like Solyndra and others. The labor force participation rate is almost as bad as is it was during the "great recession" during FDR's reign as president. His foreign policy debacles have put Iran closer to having the bomb and caused even more instability in the middle east and Egypt then we have seen in decades. Thats before we get around to Fast and Furious, the IRS scandal, the NSA spying scandal, Bengahzi, and the $7 trillion he has added in debt to the backs of our grandchildren, and he has yet to pass a budget, continuing to pretend that CR's are an effective way to run the countries finances. He has spent close to six months of his presidency on the golf course for crying out loud. I understand your desire to put forth a subjective and false narrative that he is some kind of messiah that is beyond criticism, but he is average at best wojar, just like you. Get over yourself.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#176538 Oct 26, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, since about 11% of the people on this Earth are non-religious, it is likely that they did not start many wars.
Who started WWI! It was a Muslim who murdered Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria! Who started the Crusades? The Muslims who had captured the Christian Holy Lands!
1. Your 11% and wars not initiated by atheists is so ridiculous, I'll stop right here;

2. Franz Ferdinand's assassin started WW I? Do you know how even more ridiculous than the atheists starting fewer wars this statement of yours is? Do you know how many Serb officers were behind this plot and for what purpose and that the assassin just "happened" to be Moslem?;

3. Who started the Crusades? The Crusaders and the Catholic Church. You have anyone else in mind? What right had they to hold on to those Palestinian colonies? Were they at home? To whom did those territories belong, the original inhabitants, the Arabs, or the European powers?
Obskeptic

Southfield, MI

#176540 Oct 26, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
1. Your 11% and wars not initiated by atheists is so ridiculous, I'll stop right here;
2. Franz Ferdinand's assassin started WW I? Do you know how even more ridiculous than the atheists starting fewer wars this statement of yours is? Do you know how many Serb officers were behind this plot and for what purpose and that the assassin just "happened" to be Moslem?;
3. Who started the Crusades? The Crusaders and the Catholic Church. You have anyone else in mind? What right had they to hold on to those Palestinian colonies? Were they at home? To whom did those territories belong, the original inhabitants, the Arabs, or the European powers?
Is it all right to ask you Jacque how many centuries mans existence on the planet was ruled by the concept of conquer or be conquered? Prior to the existence of America, weren't most countries populations divided between the aristocracy, and the desperate poor who served them? Note that I did not say every country in mans history, just most.
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#176541 Oct 26, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Working among Chicago's poor to organize and get things done in relation to issues such as drugs, unemployment, public safety, water contamination, involves "no inherent skill" because the community is already "organized"? RU on drugs? BTW, that was a job he held after college and before law school. Obama has said of those three years,“the best education I ever had, better than anything I got at Harvard Law School,” an education that he said was “seared into my brain.” Have you ever done community service work? What you have said is an insult to people serving their communities.
Three terms as state senator and election to US Senator is "hops from one office to the next"?
Again, he had 14 years in government,(four as President), Mitt, one term as a state governor, and experience at stripping corporations and off-shoring jobs, and skill at moistening his finger to see which way the political wind was blowing before his next flip-flop.
The notion that Romney was qualified and Obama unqualified is pure sour grapes drivel. Obama was a sitting President who had led this country through one of its darkest times following the financial meltdown that occurred during his predecessor's watch.
Get over it. It has been almost one year since Mitt lost. Get on with your life.
<quoted text>
Right! That's what he was doing. LMAO! In Chicago, the most corrupt system in the land! LMAO! He's your common, garden variety con-man that doesn't know what he's doing. His actions are more than proof of that. There's not a trustworthy bone in his body. Lap up the lies, kid! The only community service he's ever done was court ordered and consisted of picking up garbage. LMAO! Hey Mr. 6 Year Old, want to invest in a wildcat well? What a dope!

Since: Feb 11

Nearer than you would like

#176542 Oct 26, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Where in our Constitution does it say YOU have a "freedom from religion"? Better read the First Amendment again and this time .... slowly!
Nah, read the NUMEROUS SCOTUS rulings that concur with what I stated.
Oh, by the way, 33% of the people on this Earth are Christians while only 21% are .... Muslims! And you claim to know more about religion than I do?
http://www.adherents.com/Religions_By_Adheren...
That's funny...you want to lump all Christian faiths, even cults, in that mix. Way to dream.

I said that I know more about Christianity than you. Your attempt to lie is as sad as your need to ridicule the nation and our administration. That is not a very Christian thing to do.

Apparently, you are one of those who claims to be Christian but has no idea what it actually means.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 4 min shinningelectr0n 1,174,530
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 1 hr OzRitz 50,484
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 4 hr FoLLoW aLoNg 5,398
Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 6 hr TRD 69,018
lace hairline fusion ! ! ! 7 hr Soliloquy 2
Dear Abby 1-31-15 7 hr PEllen 1
Amy 1-31-15 7 hr PEllen 1

Winter Storm Warning for Cook County was issued at January 31 at 2:32PM CST

Chicago Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 10:04 am PST

NFL10:04AM
Richardson was suspended for two Colts playoff games
ESPN10:58 AM
Colts won't commit to RB Richardson for 2015
Yahoo! Sports11:49 AM
League conducts nearly 40 interviews into 'deflate-gate'
Yahoo! Sports11:50 AM
NFL: No decision yet on deflated balls
NBC Sports12:54 PM
Grigson goes silent on NFL investigation into Patriots