BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit ...

BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

There are 237647 comments on the Chicago Tribune story from Jan 8, 2009, titled BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen.... In it, Chicago Tribune reports that:

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chicago Tribune.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#176257 Oct 24, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
We? R U hard of hearing, HUH? Please say you think someone on here actually cares what you have to say. LMAO! That is what you call a delusion, Mr. 6 Year Old in a wet diaper. LMAO! loser scumbag you reek badly
I'm not the pathetic delusional paranoid loser issuing laughable "watch your back" fatwas.

"We"? You and the voices in your head cannot get permission to go outside and play.
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
"We"?
Sorry, Mr. Nobody, no one cares about your delusions.
Now which precedential opinions have issued from the High Play Court? And which courts are bound by Play Court precedent?
<quoted text>

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#176258 Oct 24, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
"We"?
Sorry, Mr. Nobody, no one cares about your delusions.
Now which precedential opinions have issued from the High Play Court? And which courts are bound by Play Court precedent?
<quoted text>
LMAO (LRS-Dale tm reg'd). We? Who is we? How about Siamese twins LRS and Dale, with two imaginary beautiful nurse girl friends along with the girl friends' equally imaginary Nobel medicine prize winning brother, real but suffering step mother in constant fear of hearing "kerplunk", with, for added fun, Rogue, Frank, American er hmm Lady, Rush whom I suspect makes up the Dale/LRS/Rush trinity, GB KFC and some other assorted unfunny boorish characters.
Grand Bither

United States

#176259 Oct 24, 2013

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#176260 Oct 24, 2013
Er, Justice ha ha LMAO (LRS-Dale tm reg'd) LRS , still working on that confession draft I prepared for you? I'm willing to go over it with you.
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#176261 Oct 24, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>You should stop trying to think.
Poor Romper. Why does it feel like everyone is laughing at you?

Oh - that's right - we are
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#176262 Oct 24, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>"We"?

Sorry, Mr. Nobody, no one cares about your delusions.

Now which precedential opinions have issued from the High Play Court? And which courts are bound by Play Court precedent?

wojar wrote, "
<quoted text>
"We"?
Now which cases have the Justices of the Play Court remanded lately? And who is listening?"
You forget. Romper and his 27 cousins live in a gas station. They do EVERYTHING together

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#176264 Oct 24, 2013
Naw, the Fed ain't worried. Why would they want the banks to have more cash on hand? For the very same reason why FDR caused a double-dip depression, Obama will cause a double-dip recession. And who will he blame? Bush? It's been five years now and Obama owns this economy which ever way it goes and right now it looks baaaddddddd!

Fed Proposes Big Banks Hold More Cash, Assets
WASHINGTON October 24, 2013 (AP)
By MARCY GORDON AP Business Writer
Associated Press

The Federal Reserve on Thursday proposed that big banks keep enough cash, government bonds and other high-quality assets on hand to survive during a severe downturn on par with the 2008 financial crisis.

The proposal subjects U.S. banks for the first time to so-called "liquidity" requirements. Liquidity is the ability to access cash quickly.

The largest banks — those with more than $250 billion in assets — would be required to hold enough cash and securities to fund their operations for 30 days during a time of market stress. Smaller banks — those with more than $50 billion and less than $250 billion — would have to keep enough to cover 21 days.

Fed officials said the rules are stronger than new international standards for banks. Combined, the largest banks would have to hold an estimated $2 trillion in high-quality assets to meet the requirement. The banks already hold roughly 90 percent of that amount, according to the Fed.

The public has 90 days to comment on the proposal, which was approved unanimously by the Fed's 6-member board of governors. After that the rules would be phased in beginning January 2015.
http://abcnews.go.com/Business/wireStory/fed-...

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#176265 Oct 24, 2013
Grand Bither wrote:
https://twitter.com/arimelber/ status/393514920081244160
Do you know why "only 6% of Americans knows it"? Because it ain't true! Keep gulping that Red Koolaide and you will never see the bus run over you!

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#176266 Oct 24, 2013
Grand Bither wrote:
https://twitter.com/arimelber/ status/393514920081244160
How do they know what will happen in 2014?
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#176267 Oct 24, 2013
Calderon wrote:
[email protected] com is the best, i ordered a Brazilian Passport from Him Last week Friday and got It today Thursday, I'm so Happy.
Oh look - the brightest bulb in the bin

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#176268 Oct 24, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Naw, the Fed ain't worried. Why would they want the banks to have more cash on hand? For the very same reason why FDR caused a double-dip depression, Obama will cause a double-dip recession. And who will he blame? Bush? It's been five years now and Obama owns this economy which ever way it goes and right now it looks baaaddddddd!
Fed Proposes Big Banks Hold More Cash, Assets
WASHINGTON October 24, 2013 (AP)
By MARCY GORDON AP Business Writer
Associated Press
The Federal Reserve on Thursday proposed that big banks keep enough cash, government bonds and other high-quality assets on hand to survive during a severe downturn on par with the 2008 financial crisis.
The proposal subjects U.S. banks for the first time to so-called "liquidity" requirements. Liquidity is the ability to access cash quickly.
The largest banks — those with more than $250 billion in assets — would be required to hold enough cash and securities to fund their operations for 30 days during a time of market stress. Smaller banks — those with more than $50 billion and less than $250 billion — would have to keep enough to cover 21 days.
Fed officials said the rules are stronger than new international standards for banks. Combined, the largest banks would have to hold an estimated $2 trillion in high-quality assets to meet the requirement. The banks already hold roughly 90 percent of that amount, according to the Fed.
The public has 90 days to comment on the proposal, which was approved unanimously by the Fed's 6-member board of governors. After that the rules would be phased in beginning January 2015.
http://abcnews.go.com/Business/wireStory/fed-...
Perhaps if GWB had done that (increase cash holdings), perhaps he wouldn't have had to bail out the big banks. It's called liquidity or cash on the barrelhead, Rogue.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#176269 Oct 24, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you know why "only 6% of Americans knows it"? Because it ain't true! Keep gulping that Red Koolaide and you will never see the bus run over you!
As opposed to you, GB produced a chart, or proof that you may or may not agree with. Fair and square. But, your answer, the usual , is a STATEMENT that says "Because it ain't true!". He proved his assertion, now please show us , prove to us, that it ain't true. Will you at least answer that one?

P.S. The U.S. deficit is fast going down. That is a fact. But of course, there still is a deficit, it has to be financed and you therefore require to raise the debt ceiling until the deficit is down to zero. This is why you think the deficit is a big as ever. It ain't.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#176270 Oct 24, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
How do they know what will happen in 2014?
I believe they started by stating what happened prior to 2014, which is correct, I think and made a prediction, based on past performance for 2014. FYI, Rogue, and if they are wrong, plus or minus, it will not be a lie. Just an incorrect prediction.
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#176271 Oct 24, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm not the pathetic delusional paranoid loser issuing laughable "watch your back" fatwas.
"We"? You and the voices in your head cannot get permission to go outside and play.
<quoted text>
Wow, the 6 year old really has those cap guns ablazin' now! Give us an update on your hut and island mama. Talk about delusional! LMAO! Kid, you're a dud.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#176272 Oct 24, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
HUH? Oh, just another mouse fart! LMAO!
So many time I've asked now. For your birther brethrens' benefit, and Topix posters in general, please tell us again (you said you did, which is a barefaced lie) why you kept chanting "Can you hear us coming" all of October up to the early hours of November 7, 2012, and stopped chanting it from then on?

Again, please :

1. Tell us what you meant by "Can you hear us coming?";
2, Tell us why you chanted it incessantly until early November 7, 2012;
3. Tell us why you stopped chanting it.

I have a bonus question, but this time , it's for Rogue Scholar :

A) Did you say you had acquired dancing shoes so you could dance in the street on the morning of November 7 to fête Romney's sure victory?;

B) Did you dance and, whether you did or not (funeral dance, perhaps?) what have you done with the dancing shoes?
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#176273 Oct 24, 2013
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
You forget. Romper and his 27 cousins live in a gas station. They do EVERYTHING together
Drop on by the station anytime, Fluffybritches! LMAO!
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#176274 Oct 24, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
So many time I've asked now. For your birther brethrens' benefit, and Topix posters in general, please tell us again (you said you did, which is a barefaced lie) why you kept chanting "Can you hear us coming" all of October up to the early hours of November 7, 2012, and stopped chanting it from then on?
Again, please :
1. Tell us what you meant by "Can you hear us coming?";
2, Tell us why you chanted it incessantly until early November 7, 2012;
3. Tell us why you stopped chanting it.
I have a bonus question, but this time , it's for Rogue Scholar :
A) Did you say you had acquired dancing shoes so you could dance in the street on the morning of November 7 to fête Romney's sure victory?;
B) Did you dance and, whether you did or not (funeral dance, perhaps?) what have you done with the dancing shoes?
Not once did I chant "Can You Hear Us Coming". Not once. Now, why do you support a liar? HUH? LMAO!

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#176275 Oct 24, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you know why "only 6% of Americans knows it"? Because it ain't true! Keep gulping that Red Koolaide and you will never see the bus run over you!
"[K]nows it"? That wasn't a "red herron".

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#176276 Oct 24, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
http://www.thedailybeast.com/a rticles/2012/06/20/canadian-he althcare.html
My, my, that paints a different picture, doesn't it Pathological Liar? LMAO Fool
No, it does not. A note about David Frum, the author (from Wikepedida)

"David J. Frum (/&#712;fr&#652;m/; born June 30, 1960) is a Canadian-American journalist who was active in the Canadian political arena, and later became active in American politics after immigrating to the United States. A member of the Canada-Israel Committee, and later AIPAC, he became a speechwriter for President George W. Bush"

Yeah, speechwriter for GWB. Okay.

Now, and not being a denier nor hiding from facts, a lot of what is written is true. There are queues. There will always be queues when medicine is free for everyone. Study also says that mostly patients awaiting minor procedures are affected. Says nothing about the urgent cases. Also, I guess it's better to wait a couple weeks for elective or minor surgery than to be one of 50 million who CANNOT have that as they have no insurance and don't have the thousands of dollars to get it, not to mention the ones whose medical care of drugs or tests or surgeries are turned down by insurance companies or individuals paying hundreds of dollars monthly premiums for basis coverage..

Yes,$5,000 per person universal health care costs us. But, we are all eligible. I've personally never had to wait , nor my family, for an unreasonable period of time. But that's me, that's us, yet I have no personal strings to pull when I need treatment. I got my flu shot the other day, FREE, tomorrow, 2 days after ordering the serums, getting my pneumonia and zona (shingles) shots for FREE. How do you and your compatriots fare in that category?

Now, the per capita cost of universal health care in Canada is $4,445. Not the exaggerated amount Frum posted and you gleefully informed. In the U.S., where before Obamacare, 50 million were not insured and, as is rumoured, over 100 million are poorly insured, the per capita cost is $8,223. In SOCIALIST European countries such as France, Germany, Belgium, etc, where coverage is much more complete than Canada even (100%, medical, doctor, hospital, dental etc)(Source : Wikepedia , but I already knew that.)

So, don't be so happy and cheerful when you read what you think is bad news about Canada. I never lorded our system over yours, but I did just now give you some facts. I do not, as you stupidly just did, publish a story with no comment of my own, rejoice that your health coverage is the worst in the industrialized world. Makes me sad, as I like the U.S., wish they'd fix it. I do not take pleasure if something is amiss in ANY country, including yours.

Our health care system is far from perfect. Hope we can improve it.

Any news about riots in Canada? Wish we had some more, just so you can be cheerful about something.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#176277 Oct 24, 2013
omitted in above post 176276: In SOCIALIST European countries such as France, Germany, Belgium, etc, where coverage is much more complete than Canada even (100%, medical, doctor, hospital, dental etc)(Source : Wikepedia , but I already knew that.) the cost per capita universal health care is slightly over $4,000 per capita, half the U.S. triple the coverage,(Socialist, remember).How do you explain that?

Am I expecting expletives and ad hominem? You bet.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 2 min Nostrillis Waxman 1,497,791
Finally help for Citizens 28 min Let Freedom Ring 1
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 54 min Mothra 63,374
Are democrats destroyed? 59 min Susanm 326
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 1 hr Susanm 10,362
Four letter word game (Dec '11) 1 hr GEORGIA 2,481
News Scientists say they have proved climate change ... (Dec '08) 1 hr Patriot AKA Bozo 8,008

Chicago Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages