BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit ...

BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

There are 240378 comments on the Chicago Tribune story from Jan 8, 2009, titled BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen.... In it, Chicago Tribune reports that:

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chicago Tribune.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#176041 Oct 22, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
LMAO! Too bad, kid.
Too bad BirfoonBoy has no rebuttal?

Yup, too bad, loser.

If Vattel's rules were the law, there would have been MILLIONS of persons ineligible to vote, ineligible for intestate inheritance. Pray tell Vattel's rule was law and nobody ever followed it and NOBODY EVER NOTICED? Is that the ticket?

Eh, sonny?
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
That's so pathetic. BirfoonBoy thinks a birfoon web site is an authority on US law. Alexander Gofen is a birfoon who spouts Vattel as US law but doesn't even understand Vattel. Does BirfoonBoy believe a birfoon website's declarations constitute binding authority?
Clue: Nowhere does Vattel claim that natural born citizens must have two citizen parents. Indeed, Vattel claims the citizenship of the children follow that of the father, a rule that was never practiced in the United States.
If Vattel's rule had been the law in the US, children of e.g., French or German immigrants would have been ALIENS. Obviously not the rule that was followed in this country. Why cannot the birfoon cite ONE CASE where a person born in the US after ratification of the Constitution was denied intestate inheritance on the basis of alienage per Vattel?
Never happened.
Sorry Mr. Play Justice.
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#176042 Oct 22, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
The problem is that birfoon does not understand what he is saying.
If a group children, each with one of their parents parents, were in separate rooms, and then got together for dinner, one may ask, are the children and their parents assembled yet in the dining room? Using birfoons logic, the answer could never be “yes” because "both parentS [hee hee]" of each child were not present. That is simply irrational and illustrates a certain degree of cognitive dysfunction in birfoons.
BirfoonBoy needs psychiatric help.
<quoted text>
Thank you for the honest answer. So, in a normal day you understand nothing anyone says to you. I'm not surprised. LMAO!
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#176043 Oct 22, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Too bad BirfoonBoy has no rebuttal?
Yup, too bad, loser.
If Vattel's rules were the law, there would have been MILLIONS of persons ineligible to vote, ineligible for intestate inheritance. Pray tell Vattel's rule was law and nobody ever followed it and NOBODY EVER NOTICED? Is that the ticket?
Eh, sonny?
<quoted text>
A child born of citizen parentS. Thank you. Second generation at least! LMAO! moronic twit
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#176044 Oct 22, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>A child born of citizen parentS. Thank you. Second generation at least! LMAO! moronic twit
More Romper fableS. Sucks to be Romper

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#176045 Oct 22, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
Dale uses LMAO at the beginning, and LRS at the end. Look at your last posts, slug.
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
LMAO! Too bad, kid.
Oops!
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#176046 Oct 22, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Too bad BirfoonBoy has no rebuttal?
Yup, too bad, loser.
If Vattel's rules were the law, there would have been MILLIONS of persons ineligible to vote, ineligible for intestate inheritance. Pray tell Vattel's rule was law and nobody ever followed it and NOBODY EVER NOTICED? Is that the ticket?
Eh, sonny?
<quoted text>
That's really too bad fer ya, kid. Guess you should carry your commie azz to another country, huh? Or, maybe you could return to your grass hut mansion! Tip: when rebuilding, start with the ground floor! LMAO!
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#176047 Oct 22, 2013
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
More Romper fableS. Sucks to be Romper
Spine tingling!

Since: Oct 13

Louisville, KY

#176048 Oct 22, 2013
enough with this birth certificate thing
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#176049 Oct 22, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
Oops!
LMAO! Oops is right, nitwit! LMAO! Pizz poor job of altering! But then again, you are only 6. LMAO!

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#176050 Oct 22, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Too bad BirfoonBoy has no rebuttal?
Yup, too bad, loser.
If Vattel's rules were the law, there would have been MILLIONS of persons ineligible to vote, ineligible for intestate inheritance. Pray tell Vattel's rule was law and nobody ever followed it and NOBODY EVER NOTICED? Is that the ticket?
Eh, sonny?
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
A child born of citizen parentS. Thank you. Second generation at least! LMAO! moronic twit
Huh? "A child born of citizen parents"?

Sorry, loser, no such thing in de Vatell's tome.

De Vattel spoke of children born of citizen parents, NEVER a child born of citizen parents.

In the former case, children are referred to collectively, in the latter, individually. Please, loser, go to college, but learn how to read first.

Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#176051 Oct 22, 2013
coreylane wrote:
enough with this birth certificate thing
Corey with 3 posts? Is that you, Corey? LMAO!
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#176052 Oct 22, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
Huh? "A child born of citizen parents"?
Sorry, loser, no such thing in de Vatell's tome.
De Vattel spoke of children born of citizen parents, NEVER a child born of citizen parents.
In the former case, children are referred to collectively, in the latter, individually. Please, loser, go to college, but learn how to read first.
LMAO!
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#176053 Oct 22, 2013
TaDa!

Another indication to the meaning of the term may be found in the Supreme Court's definition of "natural born citizen" as "all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens" (Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162, 1875).
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#176054 Oct 22, 2013
The last part is also this nation's biggest problem.

The Constitution clearly and explicitly excludes ordinary citizenship for presidency: ordinary citizenship was reserved only for the presidential candidates - contemporaries of the Framers (referred as the grandfather clause). Definitely the "Natural born citizenship" is not the same as ordinary citizenship, but something stronger. By not explicitly quoting the Vattel's definition, the Constitution therefore leaves some room for confusions.(Many such confusions resulted of deliberate efforts of "progressives" to erode the basic constitutional concepts inconvenient for them).
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#176055 Oct 22, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>Justice LRS wrote, "<quoted text>
A child born of citizen parentS. Thank you. Second generation at least! LMAO! moronic twit"

Huh? "A child born of citizen parents"?

Sorry, loser, no such thing in de Vatell's tome.

De Vattel spoke of children born of citizen parents, NEVER a child born of citizen parents.

In the former case, children are referred to collectively, in the latter, individually. Please, loser, go to college, but learn how to read first.

Expecting Romper to know that 5 is greater than 1? You obviously have a much higher opinion of Romper than his mom does
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#176056 Oct 22, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
TaDa!

Another indication to the meaning of the term may be found in the Supreme Court's definition of "natural born citizen" as "all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens" (Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162, 1875).
And Romper clings to the same tired fableS.

Sorry Romper - "you're" misunderstanding of Minor v Happersett is consistent. But wrong
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#176057 Oct 22, 2013
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
Expecting Romper to know that 5 is greater than 1? You obviously have a much higher opinion of Romper than his mom does
Truly riveting material, fluffybritches!
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#176058 Oct 22, 2013
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
And Romper clings to the same tired fableS.
Sorry Romper - "you're" misunderstanding of Minor v Happersett is consistent. But wrong
Your interpretation is incorrect. Convenient but incorrect just the same. LMAO!

Bye now Fluffy! LMAO

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#176059 Oct 22, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
That's really too bad fer ya, kid. Guess you should carry your commie azz to another country, huh? Or, maybe you could return to your grass hut mansion! Tip: when rebuilding, start with the ground floor! LMAO!
It's too bad for Louisiana Loser.

His Play Law was never the law in this country. It's a little late to carry all those alleged commie asses from the first half of the 19th century to communist countries that did not even exist at the time.

Sorry.
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Too bad BirfoonBoy has no rebuttal?
Yup, too bad, loser.
If Vattel's rules were the law, there would have been MILLIONS of persons ineligible to vote, ineligible for intestate inheritance. Pray tell Vattel's rule was law and nobody ever followed it and NOBODY EVER NOTICED? Is that the ticket?
Eh, sonny?

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#176060 Oct 22, 2013
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
Expecting Romper to know that 5 is greater than 1? You obviously have a much higher opinion of Romper than his mom does
I'm expecting he doesn't even know what "greater than" means.

And I think his mom has the same expectation.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 2 min Earl 1,523,320
Cruel or Funny Pranks 1 hr AzzHoles 2
I think she is pissed. From a few years ago. 2 hr AllPoliticiansLIE 10
Scary Obituary 2 hr Shadow Blast 15
Look at Minn. Maine & Michigan. 2 hr The White Meat 17
A few ITEMS of interest. 2 hr Jocularity is Best 1
Julieanne Zenz 3 hr Julieanne Zenz Ri... 1

Chicago Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages