BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit ...

BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

There are 241670 comments on the Chicago Tribune story from Jan 8, 2009, titled BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen.... In it, Chicago Tribune reports that:

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chicago Tribune.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#176045 Oct 22, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
Dale uses LMAO at the beginning, and LRS at the end. Look at your last posts, slug.
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
LMAO! Too bad, kid.
Oops!
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#176046 Oct 22, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Too bad BirfoonBoy has no rebuttal?
Yup, too bad, loser.
If Vattel's rules were the law, there would have been MILLIONS of persons ineligible to vote, ineligible for intestate inheritance. Pray tell Vattel's rule was law and nobody ever followed it and NOBODY EVER NOTICED? Is that the ticket?
Eh, sonny?
<quoted text>
That's really too bad fer ya, kid. Guess you should carry your commie azz to another country, huh? Or, maybe you could return to your grass hut mansion! Tip: when rebuilding, start with the ground floor! LMAO!
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#176047 Oct 22, 2013
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
More Romper fableS. Sucks to be Romper
Spine tingling!

Since: Oct 13

Louisville, KY

#176048 Oct 22, 2013
enough with this birth certificate thing
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#176049 Oct 22, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
Oops!
LMAO! Oops is right, nitwit! LMAO! Pizz poor job of altering! But then again, you are only 6. LMAO!

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#176050 Oct 22, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Too bad BirfoonBoy has no rebuttal?
Yup, too bad, loser.
If Vattel's rules were the law, there would have been MILLIONS of persons ineligible to vote, ineligible for intestate inheritance. Pray tell Vattel's rule was law and nobody ever followed it and NOBODY EVER NOTICED? Is that the ticket?
Eh, sonny?
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
A child born of citizen parentS. Thank you. Second generation at least! LMAO! moronic twit
Huh? "A child born of citizen parents"?

Sorry, loser, no such thing in de Vatell's tome.

De Vattel spoke of children born of citizen parents, NEVER a child born of citizen parents.

In the former case, children are referred to collectively, in the latter, individually. Please, loser, go to college, but learn how to read first.

Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#176051 Oct 22, 2013
coreylane wrote:
enough with this birth certificate thing
Corey with 3 posts? Is that you, Corey? LMAO!
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#176052 Oct 22, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
Huh? "A child born of citizen parents"?
Sorry, loser, no such thing in de Vatell's tome.
De Vattel spoke of children born of citizen parents, NEVER a child born of citizen parents.
In the former case, children are referred to collectively, in the latter, individually. Please, loser, go to college, but learn how to read first.
LMAO!
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#176053 Oct 22, 2013
TaDa!

Another indication to the meaning of the term may be found in the Supreme Court's definition of "natural born citizen" as "all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens" (Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162, 1875).
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#176054 Oct 22, 2013
The last part is also this nation's biggest problem.

The Constitution clearly and explicitly excludes ordinary citizenship for presidency: ordinary citizenship was reserved only for the presidential candidates - contemporaries of the Framers (referred as the grandfather clause). Definitely the "Natural born citizenship" is not the same as ordinary citizenship, but something stronger. By not explicitly quoting the Vattel's definition, the Constitution therefore leaves some room for confusions.(Many such confusions resulted of deliberate efforts of "progressives" to erode the basic constitutional concepts inconvenient for them).
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#176055 Oct 22, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>Justice LRS wrote, "<quoted text>
A child born of citizen parentS. Thank you. Second generation at least! LMAO! moronic twit"

Huh? "A child born of citizen parents"?

Sorry, loser, no such thing in de Vatell's tome.

De Vattel spoke of children born of citizen parents, NEVER a child born of citizen parents.

In the former case, children are referred to collectively, in the latter, individually. Please, loser, go to college, but learn how to read first.

Expecting Romper to know that 5 is greater than 1? You obviously have a much higher opinion of Romper than his mom does
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#176056 Oct 22, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
TaDa!

Another indication to the meaning of the term may be found in the Supreme Court's definition of "natural born citizen" as "all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens" (Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162, 1875).
And Romper clings to the same tired fableS.

Sorry Romper - "you're" misunderstanding of Minor v Happersett is consistent. But wrong
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#176057 Oct 22, 2013
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
Expecting Romper to know that 5 is greater than 1? You obviously have a much higher opinion of Romper than his mom does
Truly riveting material, fluffybritches!
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#176058 Oct 22, 2013
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
And Romper clings to the same tired fableS.
Sorry Romper - "you're" misunderstanding of Minor v Happersett is consistent. But wrong
Your interpretation is incorrect. Convenient but incorrect just the same. LMAO!

Bye now Fluffy! LMAO

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#176059 Oct 22, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
That's really too bad fer ya, kid. Guess you should carry your commie azz to another country, huh? Or, maybe you could return to your grass hut mansion! Tip: when rebuilding, start with the ground floor! LMAO!
It's too bad for Louisiana Loser.

His Play Law was never the law in this country. It's a little late to carry all those alleged commie asses from the first half of the 19th century to communist countries that did not even exist at the time.

Sorry.
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Too bad BirfoonBoy has no rebuttal?
Yup, too bad, loser.
If Vattel's rules were the law, there would have been MILLIONS of persons ineligible to vote, ineligible for intestate inheritance. Pray tell Vattel's rule was law and nobody ever followed it and NOBODY EVER NOTICED? Is that the ticket?
Eh, sonny?

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#176060 Oct 22, 2013
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
Expecting Romper to know that 5 is greater than 1? You obviously have a much higher opinion of Romper than his mom does
I'm expecting he doesn't even know what "greater than" means.

And I think his mom has the same expectation.
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#176061 Oct 22, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>Your interpretation is incorrect. Convenient but incorrect just the same. LMAO!

Bye now Fluffy! LMAO
Sure - every court and legal scholar agrees with me, but Romper's magic 8 ball says otherwise ....

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#176062 Oct 22, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Thank you for the honest answer. So, in a normal day you understand nothing anyone says to you. I'm not surprised. LMAO!
I understand your failure to comprehend English, PERFECTLY.

Hey loser, did you score in the top 5% of college graduates in the GRE verbal test?

The birfoon's problem is that no sane person "understands" birfoon reasoning to be sane.
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
The problem is that birfoon does not understand what he is saying.
If a group children, each with one of their parents parents, were in separate rooms, and then got together for dinner, one may ask, are the children and their parents assembled yet in the dining room? Using birfoons logic, the answer could never be “yes” because "both parentS [hee hee]" of each child were not present. That is simply irrational and illustrates a certain degree of cognitive dysfunction in birfoons.
BirfoonBoy needs psychiatric help.
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#176063 Oct 22, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>I understand your failure to comprehend English, PERFECTLY.

Hey loser, did you score in the top 5% of college graduates in the GRE verbal test?

The birfoon's problem is that no sane person "understands" birfoon reasoning to be sane.

wojar wrote, "
<quoted text>
The problem is that birfoon does not understand what he is saying.
If a group children, each with one of their parents parents, were in separate rooms, and then got together for dinner, one may ask, are the children and their parents assembled yet in the dining room? Using birfoons logic, the answer could never be “yes” because "both parentS [hee hee]" of each child were not present. That is simply irrational and illustrates a certain degree of cognitive dysfunction in birfoons.
BirfoonBoy needs psychiatric help."
Romper did get a "check minus" on staying within the lines while using crayons ....

Please try to control your envy

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#176064 Oct 22, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Why do you make excuse after excuse for ObobbleHead? 45 minutes, my azz! LMAO! Good one.
Maybe less than 45 minutes. But a poor reader and writer the likes of you would never believe that. It's okay, you don't count.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 1 hr VetnorsGate 1,549,439
Spanx-they're for me. 2 hr Spanx ME 2
Black Humor. NO not that black. 2 hr GenePoolDead 5
America should let all immigrants in, why not? 2 hr Rooster panties 2
last post wins! (Apr '13) 7 hr honeymylove 2,549
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 9 hr They cannot kill ... 10,854
Why are White men obsessed with Latina women? (Feb '10) 9 hr LuvHardCock 209

Chicago Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages