BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ... Read more

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#175823 Oct 20, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Oh, did you hear that Laura Bush had a heart attack last night?
G.W. made a pass at her!
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
That unfunny useless and stupid joke you posted 2 days ago. Yanking chains, red herrings? So childish.
My point being that that joke only 'works' when the Clintons are in it. Most Liberals (not Libtards) laugh at the joke.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#175824 Oct 20, 2013
Frank wrote:
<quoted text>If Obama would have accepted input from Republicans five years ago, he could have gotten a good bill passed and he still would have had his name tied to it.
I asked a question, and as usual,in true birhther fashion, you failed to answer it.

Jacques from Ottawa wrote:

<quoted text>
Shut down a dozen times, eh? Total days of those 7 shutdowns, please. And what was it over each time? Do you even know? But begin by telling us how many times?
And tell us why it's NOT ok to critique the 2nd amendment confirmation by the USSC and OK to shut down the government for 3 weeks over a bill that was approved by both Houaes, the president and the USSC? You still haven't replied, Mr expert and I frankly don't expect to a reply. Maybe a few "flaming hypocrites" or "WTF"s? Very apt

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#175825 Oct 20, 2013
Frank wrote:
<quoted text>ObamaKare was passed illegally. A tax and revenue bill could not be passed through reconciliation. If you remember they pushed it through during recess the final evenings before New Years in the Senate before Scott could vote. The Senate should have gave their recommendations and returned the bill to The House where it would have failed to get enough votes. The ObamKare bill was never good for our country and should have been redone properly. If Obama would have accepted recommendations from Republicans the past five years would have ran mush smoother, bit Obama decided to ignore half the country. Obama doesn't care about The Constitution or our country.
Interesting that you would write : "ObamaKare was passed illegally", seeing as both houses approved it, Obama signed it, and the Supreme Court confirmed its legality. Should those three bodies be slammed in jail forthwith? Not satisfied with accepting legal House votes as law, birthers then stopped the gov't in its tracks , blackmailing and terrorizing the gov't and, even worse, the people. And the rest of the world, but "hey, who cares, we hate this BLACK man in the WHITE House. We'll do anything, even get our country to default if it spites him".

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#175826 Oct 20, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Oh, did you hear that Laura Bush had a heart attack last night?
G.W. made a pass at her!<quoted text>
My point being that that joke only 'works' when the Clintons are in it. Most Liberals (not Libtards) laugh at the joke.
There is no point. You've a childish mentality. Grow up.

Do comment on people based on their talent, behaviour, ethics, honesty, ability or not to do stuff. Not on big azz or big hips or presidential sex you know nothing about. Yes, grow up.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#175827 Oct 20, 2013
Karma is a_______ wrote:
<quoted text>
Bush disdained the military and refused to follow their counsel concerning the invasion of Iraq. Instead he chose to let two idiot civilians with no military command experience run the war. Generals who openly disagreed and spoke their minds (with the welfare of their troops their foremost concern) were quickly cashiered out. We should have gone in with 500K troops insteand of Rumsnuts war on the cheap 140K. After the ouster of Saddam, the military was overruled by Bremmer and Woldowitz about using Iraqi troops to maintain the peace.
Oh, G.W. Bush disdained the military and Obama loves the military? And just what do you know about the military? Probably as much as Jacqueau does!!!
Now, we should have sent in 500K troops? From where? When Bush-41 was president we had 14 divisions but when Clinton left office we were down to just TEN divisions. You go to war with what you have!!!
Oh, and FDR cut the military to the bone and it was only in 1938 did some Blue Dog Democrats twist FDR's arm to rebuild the military. Do you know who the USS Carl Vinson was named for (who is buried in Grant's tomb)?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carl_Vinson
Carl Vinson was a BLUE DOG DEMOCRAT Congressman and he was instrumental in rebuilding the Navy in the late 1930s. They do not name aircraft carriers after no body civilians, do they?!?
Frank

Spokane, WA

#175828 Oct 20, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Interesting that you would write : "ObamaKare was passed illegally", seeing as both houses approved it, Obama signed it, and the Supreme Court confirmed its legality. Should those three bodies be slammed in jail forthwith? Not satisfied with accepting legal House votes as law, birthers then stopped the gov't in its tracks , blackmailing and terrorizing the gov't and, even worse, the people. And the rest of the world, but "hey, who cares, we hate this BLACK man in the WHITE House. We'll do anything, even get our country to default if it spites him".
No Republican voted for ObamaKare,at least eighty members of Congress that voted for ObamaKare are no longer in Congress. That in is self shows that the Citizens of the United States didn't approve of it. Yes if there was corruption,any guilty civil service employee should be fired or jailed if guilty of that corruption. No, ObamaKare did not pass both Houses in Congress, the bill that passed the House was not the bill that we are currently forced to endure. Any tax and revenue bill must start in The House.
Frank

Spokane, WA

#175829 Oct 20, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
I asked a question, and as usual,in true birhther fashion, you failed to answer it.
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Shut down a dozen times, eh? Total days of those 7 shutdowns, please. And what was it over each time? Do you even know? But begin by telling us how many times?
And tell us why it's NOT ok to critique the 2nd amendment confirmation by the USSC and OK to shut down the government for 3 weeks over a bill that was approved by both Houaes, the president and the USSC? You still haven't replied, Mr expert and I frankly don't expect to a reply. Maybe a few "flaming hypocrites" or "WTF"s? Very apt
Since the seventies there have been 17 shutdowns,mostly over budget and disagreements. The last was over a raise for Congress.
Democracynow org

West Sayville, NY

#175830 Oct 20, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Now, now, how can you publish such garbage? Everyone, well, every creationist, believes the earth and human beings are 6,000 years old, 6,500 tops. And this is all calculated in, and this is new scientific term , "Birther Rogue years". Yup, dinosaurs roamed the plains alongside human beings. Scientists are wasting so much time trying to resolve their ultimate demise, when everyone, well, every creationist, knows Noah couldn't fit the huge creatures into the Ark,they just drowned.(told before, lest I be accused of Rogue-like senility).
Not so fast, the article clearly states that human-like skulls were found dating back to 1.8 million years ago.

See, science does change from time to time and nobody can really prove one way or the other.

Who came first? The Chicken? Or The Egg?

lol

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#175831 Oct 20, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
I believe that Ted Cruz is eligible because of the simple argument outlined by Ilya Shapiro of the libertarian Cato Institute.
“It boils down to whether Cruz is a “natural born citizen” of the United States, the only class of people constitutionally eligible for the presidency… What’s a “natural born citizen”? The Constitution doesn’t say, but the Framers’ understanding, combined with statutes enacted by the First Congress, indicate that the phrase means both birth abroad to American parents — in a manner regulated by federal law — and birth within the nation’s territory regardless of parental citizenship… Harvard law professor Laurence Tribe and former solicitor general Ted Olson… co-authored a memorandum in March 2008 detailing the above legal explanation in the context of John McCain’s eligibility… In other words, anyone who is a citizen at birth — as opposed to someone who becomes a citizen later (“naturalizes”) or who isn’t a citizen at all — can be president…
So the one remaining question is whether Ted Cruz was a citizen at birth. That’s an easy one. The Nationality Act of 1940 outlines which children become ‘nationals and citizens of the United States at birth.’…That single-parent requirement has been amended several times, but under the law in effect between 1952 and 1986 — Cruz was born in 1970 — someone must have a citizen parent who resided in the United States for at least 10 years, including five after the age of 14, in order to be considered a natural-born citizen. Cruz’s mother, Eleanor Darragh, was born in Delaware, lived most of her life in the United States, and gave birth to little Rafael Edward Cruz in her 30s. QED”
Read more at http://eaglerising.com/2298/can-ted-cruz-pres...
Actually the natural born language in the Naturalization Act of the First Congress was erroneously included. The language was removed in 1795. In fact from 1802 to about 1855 children born outside of the US were aliens that had to be naturalized when brought to the US by their parents.
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#175832 Oct 20, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Interesting that you would write : "ObamaKare was passed illegally", seeing as both houses approved it, Obama signed it, and the Supreme Court confirmed its legality. Should those three bodies be slammed in jail forthwith? Not satisfied with accepting legal House votes as law, birthers then stopped the gov't in its tracks , blackmailing and terrorizing the gov't and, even worse, the people. And the rest of the world, but "hey, who cares, we hate this BLACK man in the WHITE House. We'll do anything, even get our country to default if it spites him".
LMAO! Good one.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#175833 Oct 20, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
I believe that Ted Cruz is eligible because of the simple argument outlined by Ilya Shapiro of the libertarian Cato Institute.
“It boils down to whether Cruz is a “natural born citizen” of the United States, the only class of people constitutionally eligible for the presidency… What’s a “natural born citizen”? The Constitution doesn’t say, but the Framers’ understanding, combined with statutes enacted by the First Congress, indicate that the phrase means both birth abroad to American parents — in a manner regulated by federal law — and birth within the nation’s territory regardless of parental citizenship… Harvard law professor Laurence Tribe and former solicitor general Ted Olson… co-authored a memorandum in March 2008 detailing the above legal explanation in the context of John McCain’s eligibility… In other words, anyone who is a citizen at birth — as opposed to someone who becomes a citizen later (“naturalizes”) or who isn’t a citizen at all — can be president…
So the one remaining question is whether Ted Cruz was a citizen at birth. That’s an easy one. The Nationality Act of 1940 outlines which children become ‘nationals and citizens of the United States at birth.’…That single-parent requirement has been amended several times, but under the law in effect between 1952 and 1986 — Cruz was born in 1970 — someone must have a citizen parent who resided in the United States for at least 10 years, including five after the age of 14, in order to be considered a natural-born citizen. Cruz’s mother, Eleanor Darragh, was born in Delaware, lived most of her life in the United States, and gave birth to little Rafael Edward Cruz in her 30s. QED”
Read more at http://eaglerising.com/2298/can-ted-cruz-pres...
The Framers' understanding?

Sorry.

“Mr. James Madison, who had been a member of the Constitutional Convention and had participated in the drafting of the terms of eligibility for the President, was a member of the Committee of the House, together with Samuel Dexter of Massachusetts and Thomas A. Carnes of Georgia when the matter of the uniform naturalization act was considered in 1795. Here the false inference which such language might suggest with regard to the President was noted, and the Committee sponsored a new naturalization bill which deleted the term,“natural-born” from the Act of 1795.(1 Stat 414) The same error was never repeated in any subsequent naturalization act.”

Honorable Pinckney G. McElwee, unpublished article reprinted in, 113 Cong. Rec. 15,877 (1967).

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#175834 Oct 20, 2013
Frank wrote:
<quoted text>ObamaKare was passed illegally. A tax and revenue bill could not be passed through reconciliation. If you remember they pushed it through during recess the final evenings before New Years in the Senate before Scott could vote. The Senate should have gave their recommendations and returned the bill to The House where it would have failed to get enough votes. The ObamKare bill was never good for our country and should have been redone properly. If Obama would have accepted recommendations from Republicans the past five years would have ran mush smoother, bit Obama decided to ignore half the country. Obama doesn't care about The Constitution or our country.
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Interesting that you would write : "ObamaKare was passed illegally", seeing as both houses approved it, Obama signed it, and the Supreme Court confirmed its legality. Should those three bodies be slammed in jail forthwith? Not satisfied with accepting legal House votes as law, birthers then stopped the gov't in its tracks , blackmailing and terrorizing the gov't and, even worse, the people. And the rest of the world, but "hey, who cares, we hate this BLACK man in the WHITE House. We'll do anything, even get our country to default if it spites him".
ObamaCare was not passed in violation of the letter of our Constitution did did violate the Sprit of the Constitution. They took an existing bill that had already passed the House that had nothing to do with Healthcare and totally rewrote the bill. In other words, DIRTY POLITICS! But then again, the Democarts are the Dirty Party.

Senate
The Senate began work on its own proposals while the House was still working on the Affordable Health Care for America Act. Instead, the Senate took up H.R. 3590, a bill regarding housing tax breaks for service members.[88] As the United States Constitution requires all revenue-related bills to originate in the House,[89] the Senate took up this bill since it was first passed by the House as a revenue-related modification to the Internal Revenue Code.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patient_Protecti...

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#175835 Oct 20, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually the natural born language in the Naturalization Act of the First Congress was erroneously included. The language was removed in 1795. In fact from 1802 to about 1855 children born outside of the US were aliens that had to be naturalized when brought to the US by their parents.
That's funny as my younger sister was born in a U.S. Army hospital, in Munich Germany and was issued a DS-1350 and was never naturalized!
http://www.travel.state.gov/passport/faq/faq_...

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#175836 Oct 20, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Now, now, how can you publish such garbage? Everyone, well, every creationist, believes the earth and human beings are 6,000 years old, 6,500 tops. And this is all calculated in, and this is new scientific term , "Birther Rogue years". Yup, dinosaurs roamed the plains alongside human beings. Scientists are wasting so much time trying to resolve their ultimate demise, when everyone, well, every creationist, knows Noah couldn't fit the huge creatures into the Ark,they just drowned.(told before, lest I be accused of Rogue-like senility).
Sorry, I have NEVER said that I believed that man walked on Earth at the same time dinosaurs did nor does the Bible (or Koran) say that.
I believe in divine design and that God directed evolution. I also believe that God did not get bored 6,500 years ago and create everything.
I believe that God was been inventing the Universe over and over again and that there have been many Earth-like planets and many had intelligent life that may or may not have looked like us but looked like Him the way He wanted to be seen..

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#175837 Oct 20, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
There is no point. You've a childish mentality. Grow up.
Do comment on people based on their talent, behaviour, ethics, honesty, ability or not to do stuff. Not on big azz or big hips or presidential sex you know nothing about. Yes, grow up.
And how many times have you Libtards made childish remarks like "eye of Newt" Gingrich?!?

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#175838 Oct 20, 2013
The Evil Eye of Newt Now, Newton Leroy Gingrich is Accusing Obama

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#175839 Oct 20, 2013
Hey Jacqueau, you still have not explained how Sen. Cruz shut down the government by a 21 hour filibuster that ended at noon of Sep. 25 and the government did not shut down until Oct. 1? Come on now, admit you are afraid of Sen. Cruz. That is the only reason why you bring up his name! The ONLY reason!!!
Frank

Spokane, WA

#175840 Oct 20, 2013
Karma is a_______ wrote:
<quoted text>what input, as I recall they refused to even come to the table
You only believe what Obama tells you. Obama and reid refused to accept any input from Republicans. The Republicans put up several plans, most of the Republican plans had Doctors help write them.
Learn to Read

Fairmount, IN

#175841 Oct 20, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>That's funny as my younger sister was born in a U.S. Army hospital, in Munich Germany and was issued a DS-1350 and was never naturalized!
http://www.travel.state.gov/passport/faq/faq_...
Was your sister born between 1802 and 1855? No? So your story is irrelevant?- thanks for sharing
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#175842 Oct 20, 2013
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
Was your sister born between 1802 and 1855? No? So your story is irrelevant?- thanks for sharing
Fluffybritches, do you attend Azz U on a daily basis for refresher courses, or what?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 2 min Nostrilis Waxman 1,206,802
News Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 3 hr Brian_G 51,876
Ask Amy 3-29-15 5 hr Kuuipo 5
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 6 hr litesong 52,331
News Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 6 hr Cold Front 69,312
Word (Dec '08) 9 hr _Zoey_ 5,150
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 9 hr _Zoey_ 5,815
Chicago Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]