BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

Full story: Chicago Tribune

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...
Comments
153,941 - 153,960 of 174,513 Comments Last updated 1 hr ago

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#174560
Oct 10, 2013
 
Learn to Read wrote:
BTW Jercque - I ignored "Loves LA" - guess I should have besieged the thread with several posts about how I ignored it
Hey, CONservative dude. I said I'd ignore you before I left on vacation. During my absence, you took a cheap behind-my-back shot in a comment you made to a fellow birther. How brave of you to do that when I can't respond. I replied. I proposed an "I'll ignore you and you ignore me deal before I left ." Agreed?

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#174561
Oct 10, 2013
 
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Two very big points here Tootsie. You said that the "UN" was destroying the WMDs and I said it was the Russians and all your article says is that the UN will supervise.
Next, how the UN ever know if the Syrians are fully compliant? Did the UN ever get all the Iraqi WMD? NO!!! In fact years after our invasion of Iraq we were still finding WMDs in Iraq.
UK experts to help destroy Iraq’s WMDs that don’t exist 07/31/2012
Bush told the truth, here’s the proof:
BAGHDAD (AP)— Britain will help the Iraqi government dispose of what’s left of deposed Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein’s chemical weapons, still stored in two bunkers in north of Baghdad, the British embassy in Baghdad announced Monday.
The British Defense Ministry will start training Iraqi technical and medical workers this year, an embassy statement said. The teams will work to safely destroy remnants of munitions and chemical warfare agents left over from Saddam’s regime. He was overthrown in 2003 following an American-led invasion.
Saddam stored the chemical weapons near population centers so that he could access them quickly, despite the danger to his civilian population.
Remember “Bush lied, people died”? Yeah, never mind. Remember Sean Penn and Naomi Watts making a movie about a fake scandal on top of a fake scandal? Pay no attention.(The viewing public sure didn’t.) That’s right, a decade’s worth of leftist lies just got capped off with:“Oh yeah, um… they’re getting rid of that stuff now. You know, the stuff that doesn’t exist.”
By the way, the AP’s headline refers to Iraq’s “chemical residues.” As if they’re cleaning up an accident in the household aisle at the supermarket. Make sure to minimize it as much as possible, guys, and hope nobody notices. That’s why you’re the gatekeepers.
Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2012/07/31/uk-experts-...
Poor loser. My saying the UN was doing it may not be accurate, though they are supervising it, but it's a hell of a lot more accurate than STATING that the Russians are doing it. I did not invent or concoct the UN, and it's of little importance. Fact is, though, they are supervising it and the Russians ain't doing it.

Oh for God's sake, GWB HIMSELF SAID THERE WERE NO WMDs. Go see the video. It's all over. There were no WMDs, except for some odd gas canisters scattered here and there that they forgot to get rid of before they were invaded. Iraq HAD chemical weapons and used them on their Kurds and Iranians. Under threat of invasion and UN inspections, Saddam got rid of all of it except residues here and there and no way to gas anyone, he had no air force and no missiles. Quit being in denial.

Are Iraqis better off today, Rogue? Is there less killing than pre-invasion? Except for the 1% rich from oil, how much more economically better-off are the Iranians today, seeing as there is no embargo and there was one before the invasion? How many killed in August? I saw somewhere over 850. Now, that would've been a big month for Saddam, something, except when he waged war, he would've been proud of.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#174562
Oct 10, 2013
 
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
1.
3. Why not talking with Iran. The worst thing that can happen is talks will break down. What's the downside of risking opening doors to dialogue, maybe curtail their nuclear bomb program and even, even perhaps tone down their intervention in Syria? Things are already quieting down a tad over there right now, no? Is that a bad thing? ;
4. Troops in Australia? Why? What for? If Obama wanted them, he was mistaken, is all. Why troops there? And, if socialist gov't wanted those troops deployed as you maintain, why'd the socialist gov't cancel them? Or did the new conservative gov't refuse basing of US troops after only a month and 4 days in power? Is it the new gov't that refused to have them? Answer if you please.
I have no problems talking to Iran. But all they do is deny and stall. Just like North Korea did under Bill Clinton.
The reason for troops is Australia is that we are pulling out of Okinawa and we need to put them some place in the Pacific. When did we agree to pull out of Okinawa? Under Obama!!!

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#174563
Oct 10, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
It is Russia and they make the laws. Why don't you go to some Muslim country and do some gay sex and see how long it take for you to get stoned .... to death.
When in Rome, do as the Romans!!!
Oh, Syria is an ally of Russia. In fact Russia Mediterranean base is in ...... Syria. What do you expect allies to do, stab each other in the back?
Are you nuts? Grateful you supply a relevance between my post (below) and your above reply. That will take some doing. In the meantime, you ramble on about Muslims and your obsession, gay sex and the Romans and do as the Romans do and Syria being an ally of Russia. Relevance, relevance, please.

Jacques from Ottawa wrote:

<quoted text>
1. The Russians are doing it^ Under a UN mandate? I don't disbelieve you, but would you very much mind giving me a reliable source that says the Russians are doing it?. Note : you believe the Russian side of the story on the Greenpeace thing, not your compatriots' side. Yet, on destruction of the chemical weapons, you don't trust the Russians. Would you care to explain this little contradiction or will I not : a) receive proof that the Russians are destroying the weapons and b) that you cannot explain your contradictory statements. Anxiously awaiting responde;
2. Yes, as per above. Russians are LEGALLY holding the greenies, you state. You know this for a fact? You believe the Russian version over your compatriots' and allies' word? Yet, the Russians are not to be trusted on chemical weapons destruction? Hmmm ;
3......

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#174564
Oct 10, 2013
 
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
You wrote, and will history, YOUR history of predictions, repeat itself? "Then, with the new Republican Congress, we can defeat all of ObamaCare." Will this prediction be as accurate as the teabagger future ex-mayor of Jacksonville , or the election of future never-president Romney, or again, your prediction, on the first day the obamacare docket hit the Supreme court, your "insider " prediction of its rejection, or the Russians destroying Syrian chemical weapons, or or, hmmm, so many.
Obamacare is law, constitutional and legal, as voted by TWO chambers, presidentially signed into law and confirmed by the supreme court. Accept it as firearms opponents accepted the Supreme court confirmation of the 2nd amendment when it was challenged.
Yep, ObamaCare is the CURRENT law and like any law it can be UNlawed! Why you can even change our Constitution. Ever hear of our 18th Amendment that prohibited alcohol? Well the 21st Amendment repealed it!!!
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#174565
Oct 10, 2013
 

Judged:

1

Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>Hey, CONservative dude. I said I'd ignore you before I left on vacation. During my absence, you took a cheap behind-my-back shot in a comment you made to a fellow birther. How brave of you to do that when I can't respond. I replied. I proposed an "I'll ignore you and you ignore me deal before I left ." Agreed?
I recall no such deal. I will ignore or reply as I see fit. If your foolishness is appropriate to use in mocking Romper I will do so. You don't like it? Then employ your favorite phrase
Obskeptic

Walled Lake, MI

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#174566
Oct 10, 2013
 
Joe OBiden wrote:
<quoted text>
Now, now, you are stretching the truth. Obama only increased the National Debt a mere $860 Billion this past fiscal year and that no where near one trillion.
But he knows that if he can get the National Debt extended another Trillion $ what will carry us past next years general elections.
And you would be stretching the truth to suggest it was a result of the presidents intent to do so. He of course was the author of the "sequester", and deserves the credit for it's result in reducing that debt, but that was by no means the outcome he was looking for. His intent was to corner the republicans with a trigger mechanism that he believed they would NEVER accept, because of the hit the Pentagon would take if it were enacted. They called his bluff in spite of the fear and scare campaign he and the democrats waged through the propaganda wing of the democrat party commonly referred to as the main stream media, but I like to call the alphabet soup channels. At least attempt to present a cogent, objective analysis if you want credibility and respect. Otherwise the partisan narrative you and the rest of the extreme left try to sell falls on deaf ears. An $860 billion dollar deficit stands as witness to the failure of leadership and lack of concern for our countries fiscal future. Do you care about our kids and their future?

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#174567
Oct 10, 2013
 
Well tomorrow is IT. And it will probably turn out the same way it did in 1994. A lot of nothing. Do expect some violence but it will not be from the right. It will be from UNION thugs.

Truckers’ protest: Convoy or con?

By KEVIN ROBILLARD | 10/9/13 5:05 AM EDT
Right-wing activists who have made a media splash by claiming they’ll use big trucks to jam Beltway traffic this weekend are off to a rocky start.

Barely a day after U.S.News & World Report wrote about the “Ride for the Constitution,” organizers are condemning a former compatriot who suggested that the group will “arrest” congressmen. Meanwhile, mainstream trucking industry organizations are disavowing any connection with the activists, including some protest supporters who alleged they plan to snarl traffic for three days by circling Interstate 495 at 55 mph.

Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2013/10/trucker...
American Lady

Danville, KY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#174568
Oct 10, 2013
 

Judged:

2

1

1

SC Man Takes It Upon Himself to Maintain DC Memorials

As Jenna Lee said, it's about time we brought you a heartwarming story out of Washington, D.C.[YES!!!]

On Happening Now this afternoon, Chris Cox said when he got to D.C. with a lawnmower, chainsaw and other tools he noticed it was a "ghost town" at some of the monuments, with garbage strewn about because maintenance crews presumably had not been there in days.

"[JFK] once said 'ask not what your country can do for you, but what can you do for your country.' As a civilian, you don't get a lot of opportunities to serve your country and I saw this as an opportunity," he said, adding that he's surprised that others haven't shown up with the same intentions.

"I had to lead by example, and so I got in the trenches and just started making it happen," said Cox.

He said his goal is to inspire Americans around the country to go to their local memorials or national parks and do what he's been doing.

http://foxnewsinsider.com/2013/10/10/mower-ma...

WE all NEED to "pitch in" ...!!!
Do NOT litter!

It IS "supposed" to be a $500 FINE!
IF they would follow laws already written, we COULD BE self sustaining AGAIN ...

without NEW laws AND taxes!

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#174569
Oct 10, 2013
 
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
I have no problems talking to Iran. But all they do is deny and stall. Just like North Korea did under Bill Clinton.
The reason for troops is Australia is that we are pulling out of Okinawa and we need to put them some place in the Pacific. When did we agree to pull out of Okinawa? Under Obama!!!
No need to be in Okinawa OR Australia. Not in 2013. Did the socialist say no or what is the conservatives in Australia? You don't know too much about foreign politics, do you? Almost as much as domestic, LMAO (LRS tm reg'd)

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#174570
Oct 10, 2013
 
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
I recall no such deal. I will ignore or reply as I see fit. If your foolishness is appropriate to use in mocking Romper I will do so. You don't like it? Then employ your favorite phrase
I don't mind it at all as I always, always, consider the source. You as a source are no competition, CONservative extinct dinosaur. But I'm ignoring you. As I said , you are boring. Rogue is not. Neither are Frank or other birthers who share your low I.Q. Yet, they have a redeeming value : They are funny. Not intentionally, true, but funny nonetheless. Bye bye CONservative, LMAO (LRS-LTR tm reg'd). If you need that definition of CON as in CONservative once more (hey, Rogue, a few moments ago, said he was a conservative and predicted big tea bag victories. Awww, you are bedmates. Congrats), hmmmm, I digress, so easy with you. Now where was I? Oh yes, if you need a reminder of the true definition of CON as in CONservartive, call on me, I'll let myself be bored for a sec and give it to you. Bye bye, there you go, son, take a hike, a long long hike and don't wear a hoodie or be holding skittles, Rogue may just decide to "vigilante" you.
Learn to Read

Columbus, IN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#174571
Oct 10, 2013
 
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>I don't mind it at all as I always, always, consider the source. You as a source are no competition, CONservative extinct dinosaur. But I'm ignoring you. As I said , you are boring. Rogue is not. Neither are Frank or other birthers who share your low I.Q. Yet, they have a redeeming value : They are funny. Not intentionally, true, but funny nonetheless. Bye bye CONservative, LMAO (LRS-LTR tm reg'd). If you need that definition of CON as in CONservative once more (hey, Rogue, a few moments ago, said he was a conservative and predicted big tea bag victories. Awww, you are bedmates. Congrats), hmmmm, I digress, so easy with you. Now where was I? Oh yes, if you need a reminder of the true definition of CON as in CONservartive, call on me, I'll let myself be bored for a sec and give it to you. Bye bye, there you go, son, take a hike, a long long hike and don't wear a hoodie or be holding skittles, Rogue may just decide to "vigilante" you.
As I said moron. I will respond as I see fit. My responses will be in plain English so we know you won't be able to comprehend them.

You just continue to be a pathetic boring fool. It is what you do best

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#174572
Oct 10, 2013
 
Many states with state income taxes check their voter rolls with tax payer rolls but what about state without state income taxes like Florida. If you voted in both, lets say, New York and Florida, New York will check to see if you paid your taxes but Florida does not. In other words, it is not likely a resident of Florida would also vote in New York as they do not pay taxes.
But what about the New York resident, who winters in Florida, cotes in both states? Florida does not check because there is no state income tax here. In other words, if is far more likely for people from outside Florida to also vote IN FLORIDA! And that is voter fraud.

States joining forces to scrub voter rolls

SEATTLE (AP)— More than half of states are now working in broad alliances to scrub voter rolls of millions of questionable registrations, identifying people registered in multiple states and tens of thousands of dead voters who linger on election lists.

Poll managers are looking for more states to get involved and say the efforts are necessary because outdated voter registration systems are unable to keep up with a society where people frequently move from one state to another. While many of the registration problems are innocent, some election leaders fear the current disorder within the system is inviting trouble.

"It creates an environment where there could be more problems," said Scott Gessler, the Republican secretary of state in Colorado. "It's a precursor to potential fraud, there's no doubt about it."

Half of all states have now joined a consortium anchored by the state of Kansas, compiling their voter registration lists at the end of every year to assess for duplicates. That program has grown rapidly since beginning in 2005 in an agreement between four Midwestern states.

Meanwhile, seven states are coordinating on another project that makes those assessments more frequently with advanced algorithms — while also checking for deceased voters.

The efforts are already finding massive numbers of outdated or problematic registrations. This year, the Kansas project identified some 5 million records that were questionable in 22 states and also identified some people who voted in multiple states, according to officials. The newer project — known as the Electronic Registration Information Center — identified hundreds of thousands of other registrations that need updating, including 23,000 people who were dead.

http://news.yahoo.com/states-joining-forces-s...
Frank

Spokane, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#174573
Oct 10, 2013
 
Why should the NFL football team in Washington,DC change their name. No player that has ever been drafted by the team has ever complained about the name. Even Obama has no standing on this subject,since he was never drafted by the NFL,neither has any member of the Onieta tribe.
Frank

Spokane, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#174574
Oct 10, 2013
 

Judged:

2

1

1

If Kwame Kilpatrick was sentenced Thursday to 28 years in prison for corruption,then Obama should spend 280 years in prison since he is 10 times more corrupt.
Frank

Spokane, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#174575
Oct 10, 2013
 

Judged:

1

Frank wrote:
Why should the NFL football team in Washington,DC change their name. No player that has ever been drafted by the team has ever complained about the name. Even Obama has no standing on this subject,since he was never drafted by the NFL,neither has any member of the Onieta tribe.
Should they change the name to The Washington Thinskins?
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#174576
Oct 10, 2013
 
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't mind it at all as I always, always, consider the source. You as a source are no competition, CONservative extinct dinosaur. But I'm ignoring you. As I said , you are boring. Rogue is not. Neither are Frank or other birthers who share your low I.Q. Yet, they have a redeeming value : They are funny. Not intentionally, true, but funny nonetheless. Bye bye CONservative, LMAO (LRS-LTR tm reg'd). If you need that definition of CON as in CONservative once more (hey, Rogue, a few moments ago, said he was a conservative and predicted big tea bag victories. Awww, you are bedmates. Congrats), hmmmm, I digress, so easy with you. Now where was I? Oh yes, if you need a reminder of the true definition of CON as in CONservartive, call on me, I'll let myself be bored for a sec and give it to you. Bye bye, there you go, son, take a hike, a long long hike and don't wear a hoodie or be holding skittles, Rogue may just decide to "vigilante" you.
You're such a lil pryck, Path. Miserable, empty, old soul. Burn brightly lil ember! LMAO!

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#174577
Oct 10, 2013
 
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
You're such a lil pryck, Path. Miserable, empty, old soul. Burn brightly lil ember! LMAO!
If you cannot respond intelligently, at least, don't butt in. Enough that you make a fool of yourself every time it's your turn, don't start freelancing now. Funny, you and LTR are both CONservatives, both anal obsessives and profanity-laden. What with all your so-called disagreements, is that for real, a put-on? Really? Because it's strange, as every time he is backed into a corner, and that is often, god knows, he reacts like you, hurls anal-related slurs. Today, he said I talked through my ass, like a person who is used to confront real asses all the time, not persons.
Ellen1

Arlington, MA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#174578
Oct 11, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

AngryOld WhiteGuy wrote:
Good stuff.<quoted text>How could someone as evil, dishonest and corrupt as Barack H. Obama become leader of the so-called free-world if he is not The Antichrist?
Kenyan-born Obama is an illegal-alien and should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law, i.e. Firing Squad.
“It’s not who votes that counts, it’s who counts the votes.” Joseph Stalin
CNN, BBC, NPR & even FOX are all controlled by the Freemasons/Illuminati.
“Obama was born in Kenya.” Grandma Sarah Obama
Sarah Obama never said any such thing. That was all made up by birther web sites. In fact, she said repeatedly that Obama was born IN HAWAII, but birther sites refused to quote her on that statement and cut off the tape recordings on their web sites just before she was asked "Where was he born" (to which she replied, "In Hawaii, where his father was studying at the time.")

The “born in Kenya” story is the height of the loony side of the birther movement. It is based on forged "Kenyan birth certificates," like that of Lucas D. Smith, and falsifications–such as the claim that Obama’s Kenyan grandmother said that he was born in Kenya, when she never said any such thing. And, BTW, the government of Kenya said it investigated and that Obama was not born there. And, BTW, only 21 people came to the USA from Kenya in 1961, and all but one of them came by ship, and there were no scheduled direct ships from Kenya to Hawaii in 1961.

Only birther “experts”—who have not proven that they are really experts, and who certainly have not shown that they are fair and impartial—have claimed that there is something wrong with Obama’s birth certificate. That is two reasons why Ann Coulter, Glenn Beck, the National Review and the Conservative secretary of state of Arizona do not believe them, and it is why Rush Limbaugh and Fox news will not even discuss it. Why not? Because they would simply be discussing allegations made by a group of people who hate Obama.

Officials of both parties in Hawaii have stated repeatedly that they sent the short form and long form birth certificates to Obama, and they also confirmed that the facts on what they sent match those on the BC that the White House put online.

Before the election last year the Conservative secretary of state of Arizona asked Hawaii to confirm that Obama was born there and to confirm other facts on his published birth certificate. Hawaii did, and the Conservative secretary of state of Arizona accepted it as evidence that Obama was born in Hawaii.

Obama’s mother lived in Hawaii. Obama’s father was studying in Hawaii. There is not a shred of evidence that either of them went from Hawaii to any other country in 1961—----and certainly not to Kenya, where the Kenyan government said that it checked on the “born in Kenya” claim and found that it was false. And, guess what, there isn't even evidence that Obama's mother had a passport in 1961---and very few 18-year-olds did in those days.

Hawaii is thousands of miles from any foreign country, and pregnant women rarely traveled late in pregnancy in those days, and yet birthers think that they can fool gullible people into thinking that Obama was born outside of the USA and that the officials of both parties in Hawaii, and the Index Data, and the birth notices sent to the newspapers by the DOH of Hawaii in 1961—-are all lying about that fact.
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#174579
Oct 11, 2013
 
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>If you cannot respond intelligently, at least, don't butt in. Enough that you make a fool of yourself every time it's your turn, don't start freelancing now. Funny, you and LTR are both CONservatives, both anal obsessives and profanity-laden. What with all your so-called disagreements, is that for real, a put-on? Really? Because it's strange, as every time he is backed into a corner, and that is often, god knows, he reacts like you, hurls anal-related slurs. Today, he said I talked through my ass, like a person who is used to confront real asses all the time, not persons.
As I've often noted. You love to talk out of your ass. Your whining about profanity is especially "Con" worthy

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

25 Users are viewing the Chicago Forum right now

Search the Chicago Forum:
Title Updated Last By Comments
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 1 min WAKE UP DEM VOTERS 1,079,024
Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 3 min Frijoles 68,367
IL Illinois Governor Recall Amendment (Oct '10) 4 min Corrupt Democrats 1,855
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 41 min edogxxx 97,516
Abby 7-24 43 min edogxxx 1
Amy 7-24 46 min edogxxx 1
Obama Gives Trillions for Wall Street, Not a Di... 50 min lolol 12
•••

Beach Hazards Statement for Cook County was issued at July 24 at 3:20AM CDT

•••
•••
•••
Chicago Dating

more search filters

less search filters

•••

Chicago Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••