BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ... Full Story
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#174548 Oct 10, 2013
BTW Jercque - I ignored "Loves LA" - guess I should have besieged the thread with several posts about how I ignored it
AngryOld WhiteGuy

Delavan, WI

#174549 Oct 10, 2013
Good stuff.
John Kenney wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/channel /UCFndRpNWpadGuqGtinN-Dbw/vide os
Click The Video Now To see for Yourself.
How could someone as evil, dishonest and corrupt as Barack H. Obama become leader of the so-called free-world if he is not The Antichrist?
Kenyan-born Obama is an illegal-alien and should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law, i.e. Firing Squad.
“It’s not who votes that counts, it’s who counts the votes.” Joseph Stalin
CNN, BBC, NPR & even FOX are all controlled by the Freemasons/Illuminati.
“Obama was born in Kenya.” Grandma Sarah Obama

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#174551 Oct 10, 2013
I don't want the Individual Mandate delayed. I want it to be THE issue for the next general election! We Conservatives have warned everyone and twelve months from now it will be fully exposed for the failure that it is. Then, with the new Republican Congress, we can defeat all of ObamaCare.

Wolf Blitzer: Obama Should 'Accept GOP Advice, Delay Obamacare
Obamanation

Falls Church, VA

#174552 Oct 10, 2013
Obama scores another low for the U.S.A.--

WASHINGTON – The White House signaled Thursday that President Obama might not sign a bill to pay death benefits to the families of fallen soldiers, leading a top Republican senator to allege the president has hit a "new low."

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#174553 Oct 10, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
Okay, Rogue, so much for your BS and |Russian destruction of Syrian chemical stocks. Why oh why do you allow your delusions and hateful concoctions to state and distribute outright lies and misinformation?
Bet you hope my link will not work. It does. sob sob.
www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-24419468
Response please. Merci.
Two very big points here Tootsie. You said that the "UN" was destroying the WMDs and I said it was the Russians and all your article says is that the UN will supervise.
Next, how the UN ever know if the Syrians are fully compliant? Did the UN ever get all the Iraqi WMD? NO!!! In fact years after our invasion of Iraq we were still finding WMDs in Iraq.

UK experts to help destroy Iraq’s WMDs that don’t exist 07/31/2012

Bush told the truth, here’s the proof:

BAGHDAD (AP)— Britain will help the Iraqi government dispose of what’s left of deposed Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein’s chemical weapons, still stored in two bunkers in north of Baghdad, the British embassy in Baghdad announced Monday.
The British Defense Ministry will start training Iraqi technical and medical workers this year, an embassy statement said. The teams will work to safely destroy remnants of munitions and chemical warfare agents left over from Saddam’s regime. He was overthrown in 2003 following an American-led invasion.
Saddam stored the chemical weapons near population centers so that he could access them quickly, despite the danger to his civilian population.
Remember “Bush lied, people died”? Yeah, never mind. Remember Sean Penn and Naomi Watts making a movie about a fake scandal on top of a fake scandal? Pay no attention.(The viewing public sure didn’t.) That’s right, a decade’s worth of leftist lies just got capped off with:“Oh yeah, um… they’re getting rid of that stuff now. You know, the stuff that doesn’t exist.”

By the way, the AP’s headline refers to Iraq’s “chemical residues.” As if they’re cleaning up an accident in the household aisle at the supermarket. Make sure to minimize it as much as possible, guys, and hope nobody notices. That’s why you’re the gatekeepers.

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2012/07/31/uk-experts-...

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#174554 Oct 10, 2013
Obamanation wrote:
Obama scores another low for the U.S.A.--
WASHINGTON – The White House signaled Thursday that President Obama might not sign a bill to pay death benefits to the families of fallen soldiers, leading a top Republican senator to allege the president has hit a "new low."
Well, he can't sign it until Dirty Hairy Reid allows it to be voted on in the Senate.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#174555 Oct 10, 2013
Learn to Read wrote:
BTW Jercque - I ignored "Loves LA" - guess I should have besieged the thread with several posts about how I ignored it
Oh, that's okay. I erred. S instead of D. I admit it. No big deal, we all make mistakes. There. How about you?

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#174556 Oct 10, 2013
Excuse me, it did pass the Senate and is waiting on Obama's signature.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#174557 Oct 10, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
1. The Russians are doing it^ Under a UN mandate? I don't disbelieve you, but would you very much mind giving me a reliable source that says the Russians are doing it?. Note : you believe the Russian side of the story on the Greenpeace thing, not your compatriots' side. Yet, on destruction of the chemical weapons, you don't trust the Russians. Would you care to explain this little contradiction or will I not : a) receive proof that the Russians are destroying the weapons and b) that you cannot explain your contradictory statements. Anxiously awaiting responde;
2. Yes, as per above. Russians are LEGALLY holding the greenies, you state. You know this for a fact? You believe the Russian version over your compatriots' and allies' word? Yet, the Russians are not to be trusted on chemical weapons destruction? Hmmm ;
3......
It is Russia and they make the laws. Why don't you go to some Muslim country and do some gay sex and see how long it take for you to get stoned .... to death.
When in Rome, do as the Romans!!!
Oh, Syria is an ally of Russia. In fact Russia Mediterranean base is in ...... Syria. What do you expect allies to do, stab each other in the back?
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#174558 Oct 10, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>Oh, that's okay. I erred. S instead of D. I admit it. No big deal, we all make mistakes. There. How about you?
I often make mistakes and readily admit them. I also usually post from a portable device with a tiny keyboard and don't really care about typos or auto complete errors that don't impact the meaning of my post.

The "your" in this morning's post was deliberately placed knowing you would blather on and in - hence I told you that it was intentional knowing you couldn't contain yourself - and you immediately proved me right. "Your" so predictable

So you finally grasped what Ellen told you in her first post (after ranting about how that couldn't possibly be the law). Are you still confused about the difference between play law and real law ("Mr don't start up with me")?

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#174559 Oct 10, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
I don't want the Individual Mandate delayed. I want it to be THE issue for the next general election! We Conservatives have warned everyone and twelve months from now it will be fully exposed for the failure that it is. Then, with the new Republican Congress, we can defeat all of ObamaCare.
Wolf Blitzer: Obama Should 'Accept GOP Advice, Delay Obamacare
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =qYju593o9eEXX
You wrote, and will history, YOUR history of predictions, repeat itself? "Then, with the new Republican Congress, we can defeat all of ObamaCare." Will this prediction be as accurate as the teabagger future ex-mayor of Jacksonville , or the election of future never-president Romney, or again, your prediction, on the first day the obamacare docket hit the Supreme court, your "insider " prediction of its rejection, or the Russians destroying Syrian chemical weapons, or or, hmmm, so many.

Obamacare is law, constitutional and legal, as voted by TWO chambers, presidentially signed into law and confirmed by the supreme court. Accept it as firearms opponents accepted the Supreme court confirmation of the 2nd amendment when it was challenged.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#174560 Oct 10, 2013
Learn to Read wrote:
BTW Jercque - I ignored "Loves LA" - guess I should have besieged the thread with several posts about how I ignored it
Hey, CONservative dude. I said I'd ignore you before I left on vacation. During my absence, you took a cheap behind-my-back shot in a comment you made to a fellow birther. How brave of you to do that when I can't respond. I replied. I proposed an "I'll ignore you and you ignore me deal before I left ." Agreed?

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#174561 Oct 10, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Two very big points here Tootsie. You said that the "UN" was destroying the WMDs and I said it was the Russians and all your article says is that the UN will supervise.
Next, how the UN ever know if the Syrians are fully compliant? Did the UN ever get all the Iraqi WMD? NO!!! In fact years after our invasion of Iraq we were still finding WMDs in Iraq.
UK experts to help destroy Iraq’s WMDs that don’t exist 07/31/2012
Bush told the truth, here’s the proof:
BAGHDAD (AP)— Britain will help the Iraqi government dispose of what’s left of deposed Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein’s chemical weapons, still stored in two bunkers in north of Baghdad, the British embassy in Baghdad announced Monday.
The British Defense Ministry will start training Iraqi technical and medical workers this year, an embassy statement said. The teams will work to safely destroy remnants of munitions and chemical warfare agents left over from Saddam’s regime. He was overthrown in 2003 following an American-led invasion.
Saddam stored the chemical weapons near population centers so that he could access them quickly, despite the danger to his civilian population.
Remember “Bush lied, people died”? Yeah, never mind. Remember Sean Penn and Naomi Watts making a movie about a fake scandal on top of a fake scandal? Pay no attention.(The viewing public sure didn’t.) That’s right, a decade’s worth of leftist lies just got capped off with:“Oh yeah, um… they’re getting rid of that stuff now. You know, the stuff that doesn’t exist.”
By the way, the AP’s headline refers to Iraq’s “chemical residues.” As if they’re cleaning up an accident in the household aisle at the supermarket. Make sure to minimize it as much as possible, guys, and hope nobody notices. That’s why you’re the gatekeepers.
Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2012/07/31/uk-experts-...
Poor loser. My saying the UN was doing it may not be accurate, though they are supervising it, but it's a hell of a lot more accurate than STATING that the Russians are doing it. I did not invent or concoct the UN, and it's of little importance. Fact is, though, they are supervising it and the Russians ain't doing it.

Oh for God's sake, GWB HIMSELF SAID THERE WERE NO WMDs. Go see the video. It's all over. There were no WMDs, except for some odd gas canisters scattered here and there that they forgot to get rid of before they were invaded. Iraq HAD chemical weapons and used them on their Kurds and Iranians. Under threat of invasion and UN inspections, Saddam got rid of all of it except residues here and there and no way to gas anyone, he had no air force and no missiles. Quit being in denial.

Are Iraqis better off today, Rogue? Is there less killing than pre-invasion? Except for the 1% rich from oil, how much more economically better-off are the Iranians today, seeing as there is no embargo and there was one before the invasion? How many killed in August? I saw somewhere over 850. Now, that would've been a big month for Saddam, something, except when he waged war, he would've been proud of.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#174562 Oct 10, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
1.
3. Why not talking with Iran. The worst thing that can happen is talks will break down. What's the downside of risking opening doors to dialogue, maybe curtail their nuclear bomb program and even, even perhaps tone down their intervention in Syria? Things are already quieting down a tad over there right now, no? Is that a bad thing? ;
4. Troops in Australia? Why? What for? If Obama wanted them, he was mistaken, is all. Why troops there? And, if socialist gov't wanted those troops deployed as you maintain, why'd the socialist gov't cancel them? Or did the new conservative gov't refuse basing of US troops after only a month and 4 days in power? Is it the new gov't that refused to have them? Answer if you please.
I have no problems talking to Iran. But all they do is deny and stall. Just like North Korea did under Bill Clinton.
The reason for troops is Australia is that we are pulling out of Okinawa and we need to put them some place in the Pacific. When did we agree to pull out of Okinawa? Under Obama!!!

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#174563 Oct 10, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
It is Russia and they make the laws. Why don't you go to some Muslim country and do some gay sex and see how long it take for you to get stoned .... to death.
When in Rome, do as the Romans!!!
Oh, Syria is an ally of Russia. In fact Russia Mediterranean base is in ...... Syria. What do you expect allies to do, stab each other in the back?
Are you nuts? Grateful you supply a relevance between my post (below) and your above reply. That will take some doing. In the meantime, you ramble on about Muslims and your obsession, gay sex and the Romans and do as the Romans do and Syria being an ally of Russia. Relevance, relevance, please.

Jacques from Ottawa wrote:

<quoted text>
1. The Russians are doing it^ Under a UN mandate? I don't disbelieve you, but would you very much mind giving me a reliable source that says the Russians are doing it?. Note : you believe the Russian side of the story on the Greenpeace thing, not your compatriots' side. Yet, on destruction of the chemical weapons, you don't trust the Russians. Would you care to explain this little contradiction or will I not : a) receive proof that the Russians are destroying the weapons and b) that you cannot explain your contradictory statements. Anxiously awaiting responde;
2. Yes, as per above. Russians are LEGALLY holding the greenies, you state. You know this for a fact? You believe the Russian version over your compatriots' and allies' word? Yet, the Russians are not to be trusted on chemical weapons destruction? Hmmm ;
3......

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#174564 Oct 10, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
You wrote, and will history, YOUR history of predictions, repeat itself? "Then, with the new Republican Congress, we can defeat all of ObamaCare." Will this prediction be as accurate as the teabagger future ex-mayor of Jacksonville , or the election of future never-president Romney, or again, your prediction, on the first day the obamacare docket hit the Supreme court, your "insider " prediction of its rejection, or the Russians destroying Syrian chemical weapons, or or, hmmm, so many.
Obamacare is law, constitutional and legal, as voted by TWO chambers, presidentially signed into law and confirmed by the supreme court. Accept it as firearms opponents accepted the Supreme court confirmation of the 2nd amendment when it was challenged.
Yep, ObamaCare is the CURRENT law and like any law it can be UNlawed! Why you can even change our Constitution. Ever hear of our 18th Amendment that prohibited alcohol? Well the 21st Amendment repealed it!!!
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#174565 Oct 10, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>Hey, CONservative dude. I said I'd ignore you before I left on vacation. During my absence, you took a cheap behind-my-back shot in a comment you made to a fellow birther. How brave of you to do that when I can't respond. I replied. I proposed an "I'll ignore you and you ignore me deal before I left ." Agreed?
I recall no such deal. I will ignore or reply as I see fit. If your foolishness is appropriate to use in mocking Romper I will do so. You don't like it? Then employ your favorite phrase
Obskeptic

Southfield, MI

#174566 Oct 10, 2013
Joe OBiden wrote:
<quoted text>
Now, now, you are stretching the truth. Obama only increased the National Debt a mere $860 Billion this past fiscal year and that no where near one trillion.
But he knows that if he can get the National Debt extended another Trillion $ what will carry us past next years general elections.
And you would be stretching the truth to suggest it was a result of the presidents intent to do so. He of course was the author of the "sequester", and deserves the credit for it's result in reducing that debt, but that was by no means the outcome he was looking for. His intent was to corner the republicans with a trigger mechanism that he believed they would NEVER accept, because of the hit the Pentagon would take if it were enacted. They called his bluff in spite of the fear and scare campaign he and the democrats waged through the propaganda wing of the democrat party commonly referred to as the main stream media, but I like to call the alphabet soup channels. At least attempt to present a cogent, objective analysis if you want credibility and respect. Otherwise the partisan narrative you and the rest of the extreme left try to sell falls on deaf ears. An $860 billion dollar deficit stands as witness to the failure of leadership and lack of concern for our countries fiscal future. Do you care about our kids and their future?

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#174567 Oct 10, 2013
Well tomorrow is IT. And it will probably turn out the same way it did in 1994. A lot of nothing. Do expect some violence but it will not be from the right. It will be from UNION thugs.

Truckers’ protest: Convoy or con?

By KEVIN ROBILLARD | 10/9/13 5:05 AM EDT
Right-wing activists who have made a media splash by claiming they’ll use big trucks to jam Beltway traffic this weekend are off to a rocky start.

Barely a day after U.S.News & World Report wrote about the “Ride for the Constitution,” organizers are condemning a former compatriot who suggested that the group will “arrest” congressmen. Meanwhile, mainstream trucking industry organizations are disavowing any connection with the activists, including some protest supporters who alleged they plan to snarl traffic for three days by circling Interstate 495 at 55 mph.

Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2013/10/trucker...
American Lady

Danville, KY

#174568 Oct 10, 2013
SC Man Takes It Upon Himself to Maintain DC Memorials

As Jenna Lee said, it's about time we brought you a heartwarming story out of Washington, D.C.[YES!!!]

On Happening Now this afternoon, Chris Cox said when he got to D.C. with a lawnmower, chainsaw and other tools he noticed it was a "ghost town" at some of the monuments, with garbage strewn about because maintenance crews presumably had not been there in days.

"[JFK] once said 'ask not what your country can do for you, but what can you do for your country.' As a civilian, you don't get a lot of opportunities to serve your country and I saw this as an opportunity," he said, adding that he's surprised that others haven't shown up with the same intentions.

"I had to lead by example, and so I got in the trenches and just started making it happen," said Cox.

He said his goal is to inspire Americans around the country to go to their local memorials or national parks and do what he's been doing.

http://foxnewsinsider.com/2013/10/10/mower-ma...

WE all NEED to "pitch in" ...!!!
Do NOT litter!

It IS "supposed" to be a $500 FINE!
IF they would follow laws already written, we COULD BE self sustaining AGAIN ...

without NEW laws AND taxes!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 10 min gcaveman1 46,668
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 14 min n-dis-grace 1,110,358
Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 29 min Scott 49,839
Amy 9-18 38 min pde 25
Word (Dec '08) 41 min andet1987 4,713
A short math question. I will reply with answer... 3 hr MalignantNarcissi... 5
Antarctic Ice Sheet Largest by Far in 25 Years 3 hr ThisWhatAlGorpMeant 4
Amy 9-16 4 hr ralph 58
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 5 hr billyh 98,228
•••
•••

Chicago Jobs

•••
•••
•••

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••