BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit ...

BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

There are 207521 comments on the Chicago Tribune story from Jan 8, 2009, titled BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen.... In it, Chicago Tribune reports that:

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chicago Tribune.

American Lady

Danville, KY

#174568 Oct 10, 2013
SC Man Takes It Upon Himself to Maintain DC Memorials

As Jenna Lee said, it's about time we brought you a heartwarming story out of Washington, D.C.[YES!!!]

On Happening Now this afternoon, Chris Cox said when he got to D.C. with a lawnmower, chainsaw and other tools he noticed it was a "ghost town" at some of the monuments, with garbage strewn about because maintenance crews presumably had not been there in days.

"[JFK] once said 'ask not what your country can do for you, but what can you do for your country.' As a civilian, you don't get a lot of opportunities to serve your country and I saw this as an opportunity," he said, adding that he's surprised that others haven't shown up with the same intentions.

"I had to lead by example, and so I got in the trenches and just started making it happen," said Cox.

He said his goal is to inspire Americans around the country to go to their local memorials or national parks and do what he's been doing.

http://foxnewsinsider.com/2013/10/10/mower-ma...

WE all NEED to "pitch in" ...!!!
Do NOT litter!

It IS "supposed" to be a $500 FINE!
IF they would follow laws already written, we COULD BE self sustaining AGAIN ...

without NEW laws AND taxes!

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#174569 Oct 10, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
I have no problems talking to Iran. But all they do is deny and stall. Just like North Korea did under Bill Clinton.
The reason for troops is Australia is that we are pulling out of Okinawa and we need to put them some place in the Pacific. When did we agree to pull out of Okinawa? Under Obama!!!
No need to be in Okinawa OR Australia. Not in 2013. Did the socialist say no or what is the conservatives in Australia? You don't know too much about foreign politics, do you? Almost as much as domestic, LMAO (LRS tm reg'd)

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#174570 Oct 10, 2013
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
I recall no such deal. I will ignore or reply as I see fit. If your foolishness is appropriate to use in mocking Romper I will do so. You don't like it? Then employ your favorite phrase
I don't mind it at all as I always, always, consider the source. You as a source are no competition, CONservative extinct dinosaur. But I'm ignoring you. As I said , you are boring. Rogue is not. Neither are Frank or other birthers who share your low I.Q. Yet, they have a redeeming value : They are funny. Not intentionally, true, but funny nonetheless. Bye bye CONservative, LMAO (LRS-LTR tm reg'd). If you need that definition of CON as in CONservative once more (hey, Rogue, a few moments ago, said he was a conservative and predicted big tea bag victories. Awww, you are bedmates. Congrats), hmmmm, I digress, so easy with you. Now where was I? Oh yes, if you need a reminder of the true definition of CON as in CONservartive, call on me, I'll let myself be bored for a sec and give it to you. Bye bye, there you go, son, take a hike, a long long hike and don't wear a hoodie or be holding skittles, Rogue may just decide to "vigilante" you.
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#174571 Oct 10, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>I don't mind it at all as I always, always, consider the source. You as a source are no competition, CONservative extinct dinosaur. But I'm ignoring you. As I said , you are boring. Rogue is not. Neither are Frank or other birthers who share your low I.Q. Yet, they have a redeeming value : They are funny. Not intentionally, true, but funny nonetheless. Bye bye CONservative, LMAO (LRS-LTR tm reg'd). If you need that definition of CON as in CONservative once more (hey, Rogue, a few moments ago, said he was a conservative and predicted big tea bag victories. Awww, you are bedmates. Congrats), hmmmm, I digress, so easy with you. Now where was I? Oh yes, if you need a reminder of the true definition of CON as in CONservartive, call on me, I'll let myself be bored for a sec and give it to you. Bye bye, there you go, son, take a hike, a long long hike and don't wear a hoodie or be holding skittles, Rogue may just decide to "vigilante" you.
As I said moron. I will respond as I see fit. My responses will be in plain English so we know you won't be able to comprehend them.

You just continue to be a pathetic boring fool. It is what you do best

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#174572 Oct 10, 2013
Many states with state income taxes check their voter rolls with tax payer rolls but what about state without state income taxes like Florida. If you voted in both, lets say, New York and Florida, New York will check to see if you paid your taxes but Florida does not. In other words, it is not likely a resident of Florida would also vote in New York as they do not pay taxes.
But what about the New York resident, who winters in Florida, cotes in both states? Florida does not check because there is no state income tax here. In other words, if is far more likely for people from outside Florida to also vote IN FLORIDA! And that is voter fraud.

States joining forces to scrub voter rolls

SEATTLE (AP)— More than half of states are now working in broad alliances to scrub voter rolls of millions of questionable registrations, identifying people registered in multiple states and tens of thousands of dead voters who linger on election lists.

Poll managers are looking for more states to get involved and say the efforts are necessary because outdated voter registration systems are unable to keep up with a society where people frequently move from one state to another. While many of the registration problems are innocent, some election leaders fear the current disorder within the system is inviting trouble.

"It creates an environment where there could be more problems," said Scott Gessler, the Republican secretary of state in Colorado. "It's a precursor to potential fraud, there's no doubt about it."

Half of all states have now joined a consortium anchored by the state of Kansas, compiling their voter registration lists at the end of every year to assess for duplicates. That program has grown rapidly since beginning in 2005 in an agreement between four Midwestern states.

Meanwhile, seven states are coordinating on another project that makes those assessments more frequently with advanced algorithms — while also checking for deceased voters.

The efforts are already finding massive numbers of outdated or problematic registrations. This year, the Kansas project identified some 5 million records that were questionable in 22 states and also identified some people who voted in multiple states, according to officials. The newer project — known as the Electronic Registration Information Center — identified hundreds of thousands of other registrations that need updating, including 23,000 people who were dead.

http://news.yahoo.com/states-joining-forces-s...
Frank

Spokane, WA

#174573 Oct 10, 2013
Why should the NFL football team in Washington,DC change their name. No player that has ever been drafted by the team has ever complained about the name. Even Obama has no standing on this subject,since he was never drafted by the NFL,neither has any member of the Onieta tribe.
Frank

Spokane, WA

#174574 Oct 10, 2013
If Kwame Kilpatrick was sentenced Thursday to 28 years in prison for corruption,then Obama should spend 280 years in prison since he is 10 times more corrupt.
Frank

Spokane, WA

#174575 Oct 10, 2013
Frank wrote:
Why should the NFL football team in Washington,DC change their name. No player that has ever been drafted by the team has ever complained about the name. Even Obama has no standing on this subject,since he was never drafted by the NFL,neither has any member of the Onieta tribe.
Should they change the name to The Washington Thinskins?
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#174576 Oct 10, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't mind it at all as I always, always, consider the source. You as a source are no competition, CONservative extinct dinosaur. But I'm ignoring you. As I said , you are boring. Rogue is not. Neither are Frank or other birthers who share your low I.Q. Yet, they have a redeeming value : They are funny. Not intentionally, true, but funny nonetheless. Bye bye CONservative, LMAO (LRS-LTR tm reg'd). If you need that definition of CON as in CONservative once more (hey, Rogue, a few moments ago, said he was a conservative and predicted big tea bag victories. Awww, you are bedmates. Congrats), hmmmm, I digress, so easy with you. Now where was I? Oh yes, if you need a reminder of the true definition of CON as in CONservartive, call on me, I'll let myself be bored for a sec and give it to you. Bye bye, there you go, son, take a hike, a long long hike and don't wear a hoodie or be holding skittles, Rogue may just decide to "vigilante" you.
You're such a lil pryck, Path. Miserable, empty, old soul. Burn brightly lil ember! LMAO!

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#174577 Oct 10, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
You're such a lil pryck, Path. Miserable, empty, old soul. Burn brightly lil ember! LMAO!
If you cannot respond intelligently, at least, don't butt in. Enough that you make a fool of yourself every time it's your turn, don't start freelancing now. Funny, you and LTR are both CONservatives, both anal obsessives and profanity-laden. What with all your so-called disagreements, is that for real, a put-on? Really? Because it's strange, as every time he is backed into a corner, and that is often, god knows, he reacts like you, hurls anal-related slurs. Today, he said I talked through my ass, like a person who is used to confront real asses all the time, not persons.
Ellen1

Arlington, MA

#174578 Oct 11, 2013
AngryOld WhiteGuy wrote:
Good stuff.<quoted text>How could someone as evil, dishonest and corrupt as Barack H. Obama become leader of the so-called free-world if he is not The Antichrist?
Kenyan-born Obama is an illegal-alien and should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law, i.e. Firing Squad.
“It’s not who votes that counts, it’s who counts the votes.” Joseph Stalin
CNN, BBC, NPR & even FOX are all controlled by the Freemasons/Illuminati.
“Obama was born in Kenya.” Grandma Sarah Obama
Sarah Obama never said any such thing. That was all made up by birther web sites. In fact, she said repeatedly that Obama was born IN HAWAII, but birther sites refused to quote her on that statement and cut off the tape recordings on their web sites just before she was asked "Where was he born" (to which she replied, "In Hawaii, where his father was studying at the time.")

The “born in Kenya” story is the height of the loony side of the birther movement. It is based on forged "Kenyan birth certificates," like that of Lucas D. Smith, and falsifications–such as the claim that Obama’s Kenyan grandmother said that he was born in Kenya, when she never said any such thing. And, BTW, the government of Kenya said it investigated and that Obama was not born there. And, BTW, only 21 people came to the USA from Kenya in 1961, and all but one of them came by ship, and there were no scheduled direct ships from Kenya to Hawaii in 1961.

Only birther “experts”—who have not proven that they are really experts, and who certainly have not shown that they are fair and impartial—have claimed that there is something wrong with Obama’s birth certificate. That is two reasons why Ann Coulter, Glenn Beck, the National Review and the Conservative secretary of state of Arizona do not believe them, and it is why Rush Limbaugh and Fox news will not even discuss it. Why not? Because they would simply be discussing allegations made by a group of people who hate Obama.

Officials of both parties in Hawaii have stated repeatedly that they sent the short form and long form birth certificates to Obama, and they also confirmed that the facts on what they sent match those on the BC that the White House put online.

Before the election last year the Conservative secretary of state of Arizona asked Hawaii to confirm that Obama was born there and to confirm other facts on his published birth certificate. Hawaii did, and the Conservative secretary of state of Arizona accepted it as evidence that Obama was born in Hawaii.

Obama’s mother lived in Hawaii. Obama’s father was studying in Hawaii. There is not a shred of evidence that either of them went from Hawaii to any other country in 1961—----and certainly not to Kenya, where the Kenyan government said that it checked on the “born in Kenya” claim and found that it was false. And, guess what, there isn't even evidence that Obama's mother had a passport in 1961---and very few 18-year-olds did in those days.

Hawaii is thousands of miles from any foreign country, and pregnant women rarely traveled late in pregnancy in those days, and yet birthers think that they can fool gullible people into thinking that Obama was born outside of the USA and that the officials of both parties in Hawaii, and the Index Data, and the birth notices sent to the newspapers by the DOH of Hawaii in 1961—-are all lying about that fact.
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#174579 Oct 11, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>If you cannot respond intelligently, at least, don't butt in. Enough that you make a fool of yourself every time it's your turn, don't start freelancing now. Funny, you and LTR are both CONservatives, both anal obsessives and profanity-laden. What with all your so-called disagreements, is that for real, a put-on? Really? Because it's strange, as every time he is backed into a corner, and that is often, god knows, he reacts like you, hurls anal-related slurs. Today, he said I talked through my ass, like a person who is used to confront real asses all the time, not persons.
As I've often noted. You love to talk out of your ass. Your whining about profanity is especially "Con" worthy

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#174580 Oct 11, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Poor loser. My saying the UN was doing it may not be accurate, though they are supervising it, but it's a hell of a lot more accurate than STATING that the Russians are doing it. I did not invent or concoct the UN, and it's of little importance. Fact is, though, they are supervising it and the Russians ain't doing it.
Oh for God's sake, GWB HIMSELF SAID THERE WERE NO WMDs. Go see the video. It's all over. There were no WMDs, except for some odd gas canisters scattered here and there that they forgot to get rid of before they were invaded. Iraq HAD chemical weapons and used them on their Kurds and Iranians. Under threat of invasion and UN inspections, Saddam got rid of all of it except residues here and there and no way to gas anyone, he had no air force and no missiles. Quit being in denial.
Are Iraqis better off today, Rogue? Is there less killing than pre-invasion? Except for the 1% rich from oil, how much more economically better-off are the Iranians today, seeing as there is no embargo and there was one before the invasion? How many killed in August? I saw somewhere over 850. Now, that would've been a big month for Saddam, something, except when he waged war, he would've been proud of.
The UN is not even supervising it!!! They are trying to verify it and nothing more. Meanwhile the Syrians and Russians will do a token amount of something. It is like a pea and nut game.
Yes, the Iraqis are far better off than they were under Saddamn. Oh wow, 850 killed in August ...... in Mexico!
And I really do not care how many Muslims are killed by other Muslims so long as they do not disturb the free flow of oil out of the Persian Gulf!
Oh, if we were allowed to drill our own oil right here in America, Persian Gulf oil would not be a consideration of ours!

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#174581 Oct 11, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Poor loser. My saying the UN was doing it may not be accurate, though they are supervising it, but it's a hell of a lot more accurate than STATING that the Russians are doing it. I did not invent or concoct the UN, and it's of little importance. Fact is, though, they are supervising it and the Russians ain't doing it.
Oh for God's sake, GWB HIMSELF SAID THERE WERE NO WMDs. Go see the video. It's all over. There were no WMDs, except for some odd gas canisters scattered here and there that they forgot to get rid of before they were invaded. Iraq HAD chemical weapons and used them on their Kurds and Iranians. Under threat of invasion and UN inspections, Saddam got rid of all of it except residues here and there and no way to gas anyone, he had no air force and no missiles. Quit being in denial.
Are Iraqis better off today, Rogue? Is there less killing than pre-invasion? Except for the 1% rich from oil, how much more economically better-off are the Iranians today, seeing as there is no embargo and there was one before the invasion? How many killed in August? I saw somewhere over 850. Now, that would've been a big month for Saddam, something, except when he waged war, he would've been proud of.
Hey Jaqueau, why did Valerie Flame resign from the CIA? Why was the Wilson/Flame lawsuit against Scooter Libby get squashed? Because the truth would come out that Iraq DID HAVE an active WMD program and that Amb. Joe Wilson LIED to Bush as did Colon Powell. Now shut the f-up!

Sunday, June 9, 2013
WikiLeaks Dump Vindicated Bush and WMD's in Iraq

WikiLeaks Vindicated Bush and WMD in Iraq

Apparently, the press missed this important story. No, they didn't miss it. As they always do, anything that makes Obama look bad or George Bush look good, they simply don't print.

Over a year ago, Larry Elder reported on Townhall.com concerning what was revealed in the WikiLeaks dump.

In 2003 , President Bush said in the State of the Union address that, "The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa."

And WikiLeaks defacto declassification of privileged material makes it case closed – and true. Hussein possessed weapons of mass destruction and intended to restart his program once the heat was off.

Former Ambassador Joe Wilson had gone to Africa to investigate, returned saying he found the statement without merit. Wilson implied Cheney had sent him when in fact, his CIA-employed wife had sent him. And he lied.

The Brits stood by the claim, as did the anti-Bush Washington Post as they had discovered Wilson had told the CIA the exact opposite.
http://kdminer.com/main.asp...
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#174582 Oct 11, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>You're such a lil pryck, Path. Miserable, empty, old soul. Burn brightly lil ember! LMAO!
Warning for you Romper. "Don't start up with" the whiny Canadian. He can't comprehend English and will likely respond with a flood of off-topic nonsense and typing-cop obsessions ending with yet another declaration that you are not who you think you are (and Jercque should know - he obsesses over you way more than you do)
Obskeptic

Southfield, MI

#174583 Oct 11, 2013
Frank wrote:
<quoted text>Should they change the name to The Washington Thinskins?
I think the Washington Charlatan's is appropriate.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#174584 Oct 11, 2013
For Rogue :

Where the hell did you get the info that the Russians were destroying Syria's chemical weapons? You'd do Goebbels proud, do you know that?

abcnews.go.com › International

Whether link works or not is irrelevant. Like you, I "made up" the following despatches.

The Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons, an international panel formed in 1997 to enforce a treaty banning the use of chemical weapons.

FOR WHAT?

Behind-the-scenes work in identifying whether all 190 nations that have signed the treaty adhere fully to terms of the 1997 Chemical Weapons Convention. That treaty outlaws the production or use of chemical weapons; authorizes OPCW staff to decommission chemical-weapons production plants; and gives them power to inspect a country's industrial sites suspected of involvement in such production.

WHY NOW?

Because the OPCW is at the center of global efforts to keep Syria's 2 1/2 -year-old civil war from worsening into a deeper international conflict. Syria's government last month signed the chemical weapons treaty under pressure from Russian diplomats and the threat of U.S. air strikes. An OPCW inspection team is currently deployed in Syria documenting its chemical weapons supplies and planning their destruction, a mission expected to take nine months.

IMPACT

The Nobel honor puts a spotlight on an organization that typically attracts no public attention from its headquarters in The Hague, Netherlands. It could strengthen the OPCW's hand in seeking additional financing and powers, and could encourage the few nations still boycotting the treaty to join the club.

MORE :

UN News Centre-Oct 8, 2013

“The role of (UN) Member States will be critical,” he said in a letter to the UN ... In phase two, through 1 November, the OPCW must complete its ...

UN chief suggests joint Syria chem mission with Cyprus support base
RT (blog)-Oct 7, 2013

UN Chief Calls Syria Weapons Mission 'Dangerous'
Voice of America-Oct 8, 2013

UN and Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) inspectors checking their equipment in August 2013 in The Hague. Photo: OPCW

8 October 2013 – Nearly 100 United Nations and chemical weapons experts will be deployed over the coming months in a joint mission overseeing the destruction of Syria’s chemical weapons stockpiles, with many members of the team to be based in Cyprus due to the dangers on the ground in the war-torn country, under a proposal submitted by Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon.

“The role of (UN) Member States will be critical,” he said in a letter to the UN Security Council outlining his plans for the Joint Mission with the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) to carry out last month’s Council resolution on the elimination of Syria’s chemical weapons material and equipment, scheduled for completion by 30 June, 2014.

==========
We know you well now, Rogue. Like phoney American lady, you have set out to discredit your own country and chosen, of all the countries available as a competing model, Russia and IMAGINED that the Russians were on a mission to disarm Syria of its gas stockpiles. How about the ONE HUNDRED U.N. inspectors who will supervise the work of the OCPW? Even though OCPW is not a UN member, it is closely associated with the work of said OCPW and I was a hell of a lot closer than you were with the Russians. At least I didn't make it up. If I were Putin, it is naïve and ignorant people like you and American communist Lady that I would be recruiting.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#174585 Oct 11, 2013
P.S.:

Oh no, Rogue, the link works. Darn it.

Oh, I can just see it now. Despatch is from lame press ABC news. Not reliable. The OCPW canNOT exist , does not monitor the removal and destruction of gas stockpiles and is not supervised by the U.N.. "ABC probably made it up," says Rogue, "the same way I made up the Russians dismantling the gas stockpiles and so many other lies."

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#174586 Oct 11, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey Jaqueau, why did Valerie Flame resign from the CIA? Why was the Wilson/Flame lawsuit against Scooter Libby get squashed? Because the truth would come out that Iraq DID HAVE an active WMD program and that Amb. Joe Wilson LIED to Bush as did Colon Powell. Now shut the f-up!
Sunday, June 9, 2013
WikiLeaks Dump Vindicated Bush and WMD's in Iraq
WikiLeaks Vindicated Bush and WMD in Iraq
Apparently, the press missed this important story. No, they didn't miss it. As they always do, anything that makes Obama look bad or George Bush look good, they simply don't print.
Over a year ago, Larry Elder reported on Townhall.com concerning what was revealed in the WikiLeaks dump.
In 2003 , President Bush said in the State of the Union address that, "The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa."
And WikiLeaks defacto declassification of privileged material makes it case closed – and true. Hussein possessed weapons of mass destruction and intended to restart his program once the heat was off.
Former Ambassador Joe Wilson had gone to Africa to investigate, returned saying he found the statement without merit. Wilson implied Cheney had sent him when in fact, his CIA-employed wife had sent him. And he lied.
The Brits stood by the claim, as did the anti-Bush Washington Post as they had discovered Wilson had told the CIA the exact opposite.
http://kdminer.com/main.asp...
Then how do you explain this, Rogue? Words from the mouth of your idol. Was he lying - again? And why?

www.democracynow.org/.../president_bush_admit... ;

Link doesn't work? I made it up, LMAO (Rogue tm reg'd).

Nov 30, 2007
On Monday, President Bush admitted that the Iraq war is "straining the ... In his answer, Bush admitted that ...

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#174587 Oct 11, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
The UN is not even supervising it!!! They are trying to verify it and nothing more. Meanwhile the Syrians and Russians will do a token amount of something. It is like a pea and nut game.
Yes, the Iraqis are far better off than they were under Saddamn. Oh wow, 850 killed in August ...... in Mexico!
And I really do not care how many Muslims are killed by other Muslims so long as they do not disturb the free flow of oil out of the Persian Gulf!
Oh, if we were allowed to drill our own oil right here in America, Persian Gulf oil would not be a consideration of ours!
Once more, ranting irrelevancy. This is a record, Rogue, even for you. Mexicans? The Iraqis are now better off because 850 were killed in Mexico in August...what? Your irrelevancy is so blatant and atrocious, even Orly Taitz, were she a judge, would rule you out of order.

As to the UN not supervising as you've written above, there are 100 U.N. supervisors on the job. See my post 174584 along with, unlike you, supporting documentation. There are no Russians, as U.S. is not dumb enough to have Russians do it as Russians are also not dumb enough to let the U.S. do it. In your adoration for Putin's Russia, you persist in heaping praise on that country and constantly bashing your own U.S.A. You do Republican CONservatives proud.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 15 min TheIndependentMaj... 1,346,753
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 24 min Doug77 7,298
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 31 min Into The Night 57,266
last post wins! (Apr '13) 2 hr Red_Forman 608
last post wins! (Dec '10) 2 hr Red_Forman 1,581
Word (Dec '08) 4 hr Red_Forman 5,642
NO corkscrew, open win bottle. 5 hr POS Gone 9
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages