Poor loser. My saying the UN was doing it may not be accurate, though they are supervising it, but it's a hell of a lot more accurate than STATING that the Russians are doing it. I did not invent or concoct the UN, and it's of little importance. Fact is, though, they are supervising it and the Russians ain't doing it.<quoted text>
Two very big points here Tootsie. You said that the "UN" was destroying the WMDs and I said it was the Russians and all your article says is that the UN will supervise.
Next, how the UN ever know if the Syrians are fully compliant? Did the UN ever get all the Iraqi WMD? NO!!! In fact years after our invasion of Iraq we were still finding WMDs in Iraq.
UK experts to help destroy Iraqs WMDs that dont exist 07/31/2012
Bush told the truth, heres the proof:
BAGHDAD (AP) Britain will help the Iraqi government dispose of whats left of deposed Iraqi dictator Saddam Husseins chemical weapons, still stored in two bunkers in north of Baghdad, the British embassy in Baghdad announced Monday.
The British Defense Ministry will start training Iraqi technical and medical workers this year, an embassy statement said. The teams will work to safely destroy remnants of munitions and chemical warfare agents left over from Saddams regime. He was overthrown in 2003 following an American-led invasion.
Saddam stored the chemical weapons near population centers so that he could access them quickly, despite the danger to his civilian population.
Remember Bush lied, people died? Yeah, never mind. Remember Sean Penn and Naomi Watts making a movie about a fake scandal on top of a fake scandal? Pay no attention.(The viewing public sure didnt.) Thats right, a decades worth of leftist lies just got capped off with:Oh yeah, um theyre getting rid of that stuff now. You know, the stuff that doesnt exist.
By the way, the APs headline refers to Iraqs chemical residues. As if theyre cleaning up an accident in the household aisle at the supermarket. Make sure to minimize it as much as possible, guys, and hope nobody notices. Thats why youre the gatekeepers.
Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2012/07/31/uk-experts-...
Oh for God's sake, GWB HIMSELF SAID THERE WERE NO WMDs. Go see the video. It's all over. There were no WMDs, except for some odd gas canisters scattered here and there that they forgot to get rid of before they were invaded. Iraq HAD chemical weapons and used them on their Kurds and Iranians. Under threat of invasion and UN inspections, Saddam got rid of all of it except residues here and there and no way to gas anyone, he had no air force and no missiles. Quit being in denial.
Are Iraqis better off today, Rogue? Is there less killing than pre-invasion? Except for the 1% rich from oil, how much more economically better-off are the Iranians today, seeing as there is no embargo and there was one before the invasion? How many killed in August? I saw somewhere over 850. Now, that would've been a big month for Saddam, something, except when he waged war, he would've been proud of.