BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ... Full Story
Democracynow org

West Sayville, NY

#174315 Oct 9, 2013
Obskeptic wrote:
<quoted text>
Your nothing but a partisan hack my friend. Not an objective brain cell between your ears. My dog is smarter then you, but you are just as loyal to your master. I'll give you that!
The Katharine Gun Case
February 25, 2004 / http://tinyurl.com/p9w8kwa
Katharine Gun, a British former government employee, faced two years imprisonment in England for the "crime" of telling the truth. She was charged with leaking an embarrassing U.S. intelligence memo indicating that the U.S. had mounted a spying "surge" against U.N. delegations in early 2003 in an effort to win approval of the Iraq war resolution. The leaked memo was big news in parts of the world.
England has no First Amendment that might have protected Ms. Gun. It does have a repressive Official Secrets Act, under which she was being prosecuted by the Blair government. http://www.accuracy.org/1104-the-katharine-gu...

=====

When Truth Tried to Stop War
by Ray McGovern CIA Ret./ http://tinyurl.com/axzmlu6 / January 31, 2013
Ten years ago, Katharine Gun, then a 28-year-old British intelligence officer, saw an e-mailed memo from the U.S. National Security Agency George Bush and Tony Blair.(Photo: Mario Tama/EPA)(NSA) that confirmed for her in black and white the already widespread suspicion that the U.S. and U.K. were about to launch war against Iraq on false pretenses.
Doing what she could to head off what she considered, correctly, an illegal war of aggression, she printed a copy of the memo and arranged for a friend to give it to the London Observer.“I have always ever followed my conscience,” she said, explaining what drove her to take such a large risk.
Those early months of 2003 were among the worst of times – and not just because the U.S. and U.K. leaders were perverting the post-World War II structure that those same nations designed to stop aggressive wars, but because the vast majority of U.S. and U.K. institutions including the major news organizations and the nations’ legislatures were failing miserably to provide any meaningful check or balance.
The common excuse from politicians, bureaucrats, editors and other opinion leaders was that there was no way the momentum toward war could be stopped, so why take on the career damage that would result from getting in the way. And if Ms. Gun were made of lesser stuff, she might have hidden behind a similar self-serving excuse or found solace in other comforting rationalizations, like the government must know what it’s doing, or what do I, a Mandarin-to-English translator, know about Iraq.
But Katharine Gun could smell a rat, as well as the sulfur of war, and she would not put her career and comfort ahead of the slaughter and devastation that war inevitably brings to innocent people. In that, she distinguished herself, just as many others in positions of authority disgraced themselves.
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2013/01/31-1...
Democracynow org

West Sayville, NY

#174316 Oct 9, 2013
Obskeptic wrote:
<quoted text>
Your nothing but a partisan hack my friend. Not an objective brain cell between your ears. My dog is smarter then you, but you are just as loyal to your master. I'll give you that!
EXCLUSIVE: International War Whistleblowers Tell Why They Exposed Their Governments / http://tinyurl.com/5hkw6z / September 9, 2004
In a Democracy Now! U.S. exclusive, two former intelligence officials from Britain and Denmark discuss why they blew the whistle on their governments in relation to the war in Iraq. Katharine Gun is a former British employee who leaked details of a secret U.S. spy operation on UN Security Council members in the run-up to the Iraq invasion. Major Frank Grevil is a former military intelligence officer from Denmark who was fired for leaking classified reports that showed no weapons of mass destruction would be found in Iraq. He currently faces charges for breaching the country’s official information law
http://www.democracynow.org/2004/9/9/exclusiv...

====

Translator turns 'whistle-blower'
The daughter of a university lecturer, Katharine Gun was thrust into the limelight after being accused of leaking top secret information.
http://tinyurl.com/4d9sno / 26 February, 2004
The 29-year-old from the Regency Cotswold town of Cheltenham was a little-known translator working at the government's communications headquarters GCHQ.
But in March last year she was arrested, accused of breaching the Official Secrets Act by leaking an e-mail to the Observer newspaper from US spies asking British counterparts to tap the telephones of UN Security Council members.
In June 2003 she was sacked from her post.
She always admitted leaking the e-mail but argued she had "only ever followed her conscience" to prevent an "illegal war against Iraq".
The revelations contained in the leaked memo made her a cause celebre in the US.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/3507533.stm

======

The spy who wouldn't keep a secret
In the year since she leaked an explosive email about spying on UN diplomats, GCHQ translator Katharine Gun has been arrested, charged with breaking the Official Secrets Act and transformed into an international cause celebre. As the case against her was dropped yesterday, Oliver Burkeman and Richard Norton-Taylor met an unlikely rebel / 25 February 2004 / http://tinyurl.com/lxktnbx
Working for the intelligence agencies is rarely as glamorous as it sounds, and until last year - when everything changed for ever - Katharine Gun often found it quite mundane. On Friday January 31 2003, at the high-security GCHQ compound on the outskirts of Cheltenham, she was doing her job as usual, translating Mandarin Chinese into English, when an email from America came to her attention.
"I thought,'Good God, that's pretty outrageous'," she recalls. She printed out a copy, put it in her bag, took it home, and spent the weekend stewing about it. She didn't discuss it with anyone. On the Monday she was still just as angry - "indignation was fuelling me on," she remembers - and so she passed the email to a friend on the outside, whom she knew was in touch with journalists. But she heard nothing more, and almost forgot about it./ http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2004/feb/2...
Democracynow org

West Sayville, NY

#174317 Oct 9, 2013
Diplomat's Suppressed Document Lays Bare the Lies behind Iraq War
December 15, 2006 http://tinyurl.com/ye8w94
The Government's case for going to war in Iraq has been torn apart by the publication of previously suppressed evidence that Tony Blair lied over Saddam Hussein's weapons of mass destruction.
A devastating attack on Mr. Blair's justification for military action by Carne Ross, Britain's key negotiator at the UN, has been kept under wraps until now because he was threatened with being charged with breaching the Official Secrets Act.

In the testimony revealed today Mr. Ross, 40, who helped negotiate several UN security resolutions on Iraq, makes it clear that Mr. Blair must have known Saddam Hussein possessed no weapons of mass destruction. He said that during his posting to the UN, "at no time did HMG [Her Majesty's Government] assess that Iraq's WMD (or any other capability) posed a threat to the UK or its interests."

Mr. Ross revealed it was a commonly held view among British officials dealing with Iraq that any threat by Saddam Hussein had been "effectively contained".
He also reveals that British officials warned US diplomats that bringing down the Iraqi dictator would lead to the chaos the world has since witnessed. "I remember on several occasions the UK team stating this view in terms during our discussions with the US (who agreed)," he said.

It shows Mr. Ross told the inquiry, chaired by Lord Butler, "there was no intelligence evidence of significant holdings of CW [chemical warfare], BW [biological warfare] or nuclear material" held by the Iraqi dictator before the invasion. "There was, moreover, no intelligence or assessment during my time in the job that Iraq had any intention to launch an attack against its neighbors or the UK or the US," he added.

Mr. Ross's evidence directly challenges the assertions by the Prime Minster that the war was legally justified because Saddam possessed WMDs which could be "activated" within 45 minutes and posed a threat to British interests. These claims were also made in two dossiers, subsequently discredited, in spite of the advice by Mr. Ross.

Mr. Ross said in late 2002 that he "discussed this at some length with David Kelly", the weapons expert who a year later committed suicide when he was named as the source of a BBC report saying Downing Street had "sexed up" the WMD claims in a dossier. The Butler inquiry cleared Mr. Blair and Downing Street of "sexing up" the dossier, but the publication of the Carne Ross evidence will cast fresh doubts on its findings.

Mr Ross, 40, was a highly rated diplomat but he resigned because of his misgivings about the legality of the war. He still fears the threat of action under the Official Secrets Act.
http://www.commondreams.org/headlines06/1215-...
Democracynow org

West Sayville, NY

#174318 Oct 9, 2013
Frank wrote:
<quoted text>The Heritage Foundation never proposed a bill with over 50 taxes and over 2700 pages full of restrictions and requirements. The Heritage Foundation didn't propose a bill that would require 200 million people that already had insurance to lose the insurance they already had. The Heritage Foundation didn't propose a bill that would take massive amounts of dollars and send it around the world. ObamaKare is simply a bill that allows the government to have more control of our lives,the Heritage Foundation did not propose any thing like that.
Romney PROVES Newt Gingrich is a closet RINO!

---------

How the Heritage Foundation, a Conservative Think Tank, Promoted the Individual Mandate / 10/20/2011 / http://tinyurl.com/7yztznx
ROMNEY: Actually, Newt, we got the idea of an individual mandate from you.

GINGRICH: That’s not true. You got it from the Heritage Foundation.

ROMNEY: Yes, we got it from you, and you got it from the Heritage Foundation and from you.

GINGRICH: Wait a second. What you just said is not true. You did not get that from me. You got it from the Heritage Foundation.

ROMNEY: And you never supported them?

GINGRICH: I agree with them, but I’m just saying, what you said to this audience just now plain wasn’t true.

ROMNEY: OK. Let me ask, have you supported in the past an individual mandate?

GINGRICH: I absolutely did with the Heritage Foundation against Hillarycare.

ROMNEY: You did support an individual mandate?

ROMNEY: Oh, OK. That’s what I’m saying. We got the idea from you and the Heritage Foundation.

GINGRICH: OK. A little broader.

ROMNEY: OK.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/aroy/2011/10/20/h...

=====

Assuring Affordable Health Care for All Americans
October 1, 1989 / http://tinyurl.com/8xb6rd9
http://www.heritage.org/research/lecture/assu...

Obama says Heritage Foundation is source of health exchange idea
March 30th, 2010 / http://tinyurl.com/26xm72p
EDITOR'S NOTE: An analysis of this comment by President Barack Obama was published on April 1, 2010. After it appeared, the Heritage Foundation's communications office contacted us to argue that our rating of Mostly True was too generous to the president. We did some additional reporting to review our ruling. Our second round of reporting -- primarily talking to conservative policy experts outside of Heritage -- solidified our initial conclusions. Below is the updated version of our story, which retains the rating of Mostly True, published April 26, 2010.
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/state...

=======

Summary Of A 1993 Republican Health Reform Plan
Feb 23, 2010 / http://tinyurl.com/amcg2tz
In November, 1993, Sen. John Chafee, R-R.I., introduced what was considered to be one of the main Republican health overhaul proposals: "A bill to provide comprehensive reform of the health care system of the United States."
Titled the "Health Equity and Access Reform Today Act of 1993," it had 21 co-sponsors, including two Democrats (Sens. Boren and Kerrey). The bill, which was not debated or voted upon, was an alternative to President Bill Clinton's plan. It bears similarity to the Democratic bill passed by the Senate Dec. 24, 2009, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.
http://www.kaiserhealthnews.org/stories/2010/...
Democracynow org

West Sayville, NY

#174319 Oct 9, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
You do know ALL generals are political appointees, don't you? They were appointed by a president and approved by the Senate. Who appointed Gen. Zini? Would it have been ..... Bill Clinton by chance?
Very few generals are either loony-lefties or loony-righties but some are ... left of center!!!
Your rightwing idols like Limbaugh and Cheney got five deferments to avoid service for the Vietnam war.

Who Picked Powell?

Two Liberal who ran up the deficits 12 years of Reagan and Daddy Bush who never used the VETO.

ROTFL

-------

Colin Powell endorses Obama for second term
Oct 25, 2012 / http://tinyurl.com/9melusp
(Reuters)- Former U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell on Thursday endorsed Barack Obama in his bid for re-election, citing the Democratic president's efforts to wind down the war in Afghanistan and tackling terrorism.
"And so I think we ought to keep on the track that we are on," the Republican, who also backed Obama in 2008, told "CBS This Morning."
The move comes just days after Obama and Republican challenger Mitt Romney clashed over foreign policy in the third and last presidential debate ahead of the November 6 election.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/10/25/us-...
Democracynow org

West Sayville, NY

#174320 Oct 9, 2013
Joe OBiden wrote:
Democracynow org wrote:
<quoted text>
INTERVIEW: GENERAL JOSEPH P. HOAR
http://tinyurl.com/yqyep May 21, 2004
`The Neo-Cons Have Had Their Day;
Now It's Time for a Clean Sweep'
Gen. Joseph P. Hoar (USMC-ret.), a four-star general, was Commander in Chief, U.S. Central Command (1991-94), commanding the U.S. forces in the Persian Gulf after the 1991 war. He also served in the Vietnam War, as a battalion and brigade advisor with the Vietnamese Marines. He was interviewed by Jeffrey Steinberg on May 6, 2004.
http://www.larouchepub.com/other/interviews/2... text>
If you Google "Generals who support Mitt Romney" you will probably get this;
500 ADMIRALS, GENERALS TO ENDORSE ROMNEY
Group posting full-page ad in Washington Times
Published: 11/04/2012
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2012/11/500-admirals-gener...
Now Google, "Generals who support Obama" and see what you get!
Military Donations Favoring Obama
August 15, 2008 / http://tinyurl.com/n5gpura
WASHINGTON - U.S. Soldiers have donated more presidential campaign money to Democrat Barack Obama than to Republican John McCain, a reversal of previous White House campaigns in which military donations tended to favor Republicans, a nonpartisan group reported Aug. 14.
Troops serving abroad have given nearly six times as much money to Obama's presidential campaign as they have to McCain's, the Center for Responsive Politics said.
The results also are striking because they favored Obama, who has never served in the military. McCain meanwhile, is a decorated war veteran who spent nearly five years as a prisoner of war in Vietnam. The Arizona senator graduated from the U.S. Naval Academy and had a 22-year career as a naval aviator.
Obama has opposed the war in Iraq and says he would withdraw combat troops within 16 months. McCain has been a steadfast supporter of the war, saying he would withdraw the troops only when conditions on the ground warrant it.
http://www.armytimes.com/article/20080814/NEW...
Voluntarist

United States

#174321 Oct 9, 2013
Democracynow org wrote:
<quoted text>
Military Donations Favoring Obama
August 15, 2008 / http://tinyurl.com/n5gpura
WASHINGTON - U.S. Soldiers have donated more presidential campaign money to Democrat Barack Obama than to Republican John McCain, a reversal of previous White House campaigns in which military donations tended to favor Republicans, a nonpartisan group reported Aug. 14.
Troops serving abroad have given nearly six times as much money to Obama's presidential campaign as they have to McCain's, the Center for Responsive Politics said.
The results also are striking because they favored Obama, who has never served in the military. McCain meanwhile, is a decorated war veteran who spent nearly five years as a prisoner of war in Vietnam. The Arizona senator graduated from the U.S. Naval Academy and had a 22-year career as a naval aviator.
Obama has opposed the war in Iraq and says he would withdraw combat troops within 16 months. McCain has been a steadfast supporter of the war, saying he would withdraw the troops only when conditions on the ground warrant it.
http://www.armytimes.com/article/20080814/NEW...
But Ron Paul surpassed John McCain in military donations.
Democracynow org

West Sayville, NY

#174322 Oct 9, 2013
Voluntarist wrote:
<quoted text>
But Ron Paul surpassed John McCain in military donations.
Exactly right!

Paul proved our military rank and file wanted out of these wars.

“On Deck”

Since: Aug 08

French Polynesia

#174323 Oct 9, 2013
Yeah, that was before Barack Obama showered Libya with cruise missiles at over a million dollars a pop.
John McCain is a criminal too.
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#174325 Oct 9, 2013
wojar wrote:
All the states at the time of adoption of the constitution recognized birthright citizenship. According to the states, a person was a natural born citizen of the state if born in the state. But birfoons fantasize that the founders decided to change the meaning of natural born citizen but forgot to tell anyone about it. And then after the constitution was ratified, everybody just forgot about it: people born in the US were regarded as natural born citizens by common people, legal scholars, and courts. And nobody, not even members of Congress, knew the real definition of "jurisdiction" because it was not revealed to humankind until a voice told Dufus Dale that only citizens in the US are under the jurisdiction of the United States.
And the birfoons wonder why no one takes them seriously.
States? LMAO! Time to move the goal post, huh? LMAO! No one was talking about the states, lil dip. Just more of your BS. bonehead
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#174326 Oct 9, 2013
Too much SPAM! Ahem.....idiot from NY!! Posts just like Smellen, hmmm.
Ellen1

Arlington, MA

#174328 Oct 9, 2013
Dale wrote:
<quoted text>LMAO!!!! By the operation of the 14th amendment it only creates NBCs and naturalized citizens. People that are subject to a foreign power doesn't receive ipso facto citizenship, they must be naturalized. Why! Because they are subjects of and subject to the jurisdiction of another country and as wojar stated, the US only recognizes one allegiance, unless naturalized.
Only people born outside of the USA have to be nationalized. Children born in the USA (except for the children of foreign diplomats) are Natural Born US Citizens at birth.

The USA recognizes only one allegiance, that is true. When a child is born in the USA and not a child of foreign diplomats, the USA recognizes ONLY that child's allegiance to the USA.
Frank

Spokane, WA

#174329 Oct 9, 2013
Joe OBiden wrote:
<quoted text>
Yea, and Clinton will be remembered as the president between two Bushs.
Clinton will forever be tied to Monica and his numerous adulterous affairs. Obama will be associated to his incompetence in the Henry Louis Gates Jr encounter and for being the most dishonest resident of The White House.
Dale

Wichita, KS

#174330 Oct 9, 2013
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
Well you are certainly a.Whack-job. And being in KanSass, if you voted for Romney then you really deserve everything you've got
LMAO!!! Yep, the reason I deserve everything I got, I worked for it. If that makes me a whack-job, I can live with that.
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#174331 Oct 9, 2013
Dale wrote:
<quoted text>LMAO!!! Yep, the reason I deserve everything I got, I worked for it. If that makes me a whack-job, I can live with that.
Voting for Romney was work?

Your desperate adherence to play law makes you a whack-job

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#174332 Oct 9, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry, I have no idea what you are talking about because your links do not work. And I thought I was computer challenged.
wnd.com works very well, and really, you didn't "get" the foxnewsrightwingpropaganda.com , now did you?

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#174333 Oct 9, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Ya know if you punish the, so called, rich, you punish the working class? How many jobs did Steve Jobs and Bill Gates make?!? And if a family farm has to be sold because of inheritance taxes and gets bought out by a large corporation, who benefits?
Yep, you are a commie!
And could Bill Gates, Steve Jobs, Warren Buffett, etc, get rich without employees?

Public Integrity is a communist because he wants fairness and equality, not charity? Stalin was a communist. How would you rate him as to fairness and equality?

Public Integrity org wrote:

<quoted text>
I am still a registered Republican.
LOL
I am an authentic liberal/progressive who puts the needs of average Americans first and the wealthiest 0.1% last.
They already own most of Congress and do not need any help from me.
Dale

Wichita, KS

#174334 Oct 9, 2013
wojar wrote:
Even in the case of Look Tin Sing, Justice Field lamented the inadequacy of the jus soli rule but was resigned to the reality that it was the law.
The key word is reality, something of which birfoons have, at best, only the most tenuous grasp.
LMAO!!! "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside."
Crap! I keep forgetting that pesky stipulation!!!

“ad maiora nati sumus ”

Since: Sep 09

Justice Scalia is an Oxymoron

#174335 Oct 9, 2013
Ellen1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Dual citizenship at birth, or for that matter dual citizenship when president (for example, James Madison, who had been made a full voting citizen of France by the French National Assembly during the French Revolution), has absolutely no effect on Natural Born Citizen status. EVERY child born on US soil except for the children of foreign diplomats, is a Natural Born US Citizen.
The status of Obama's dual citizenship at the time of his birth is completely irrelevant as to his natural born citizenship status.

What is relevant is the fact that he was born in the United States. Obama was born in the allegiance of the United States. "All persons born in the allegiance of the king are natural born subjects, and all persons born in the allegiance of the United States are natural born citizens. Birth and allegiance go together. Such is the rule of the common law, and it is the common law of this country, as well as of England. United States v. Rhodes, 27 F Cas 785,818 (1866)

Courts on numerous times have held that a native born citizen is a citizen who is not naturalized. United States v. Schwimmer, 279 US 644, 649 (1929)(“Except for eligibility to the Presidency, naturalized citizens stand on the same footing as do native born citizens.”)

In fact, the courts on numerous occasions observed that native born citizens are natural born citizens and thus are eligible to the Presidency. Luria v. United States, 231 US 9, 22 (1913)("Under our Constitution, a naturalized citizen stands on an equal footing with the native citizen in all respects, save that of eligibility to the Presidency.")

Furthermore, if Obama was not a natural born citizen then he is either a naturalized citizen or an alien. But this is a false dilemma fallacy since Naturalization Acts do not confer citizenship on native born citizens in the United States nor is he an alien since courts have held that children born in the United States to alien parents are natural born citizen.

In Podea v. Marshall, 83 F. Supp. 216, 219-220(ED NY 1949 )
the court noted:

"It is a long recognized and well established principle that plaintiff acquired American citizenship upon his birth on September 21, 1912, at Youngstown, Ohio, even though his parents were immigrant aliens.(internal citations omitted) And it is equally well established in our law that the plaintiff, while an infant could not divest himself of such citizenship, whether by his own acts, or the acts of his parents.(internal citations omitted)

Similarly the court in United States v. Richmond, 274 F. Supp. 43 , 56 (CD Ca. 1967) observed:

"Obedient primarily to that unequivocal constitutional language, but also to the lately quoted Title 8 U.S.C., section 1401(a)(1), it has consistently been held judicially that one born in the United States and subject to its jurisdiction is, from birth, a citizen of the United States; that such citizenship does not depend upon like citizenship of his or her parents, or of either of them (except in the case of the children of ambassadors etc.); and that upon the subject, his or her color or racial origin is immaterial."(internal citation omitted)

As such, Obama's dual citizenship status at birth is legally irrelevant and immaterial since courts have held that mere birth in the United States is legally sufficient to be a natural born citizen.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#174336 Oct 9, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
With no facts the moron decides to shoot the messenger.
<quoted text>
So true, but that is the essence of Justice LMAO LRS. And as we know, the EPA people rake in billions from their findings on the environment, why, more, even , than the oil and coal barons.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 3 min flack 1,153,391
Deat Abby 12-16 23 min cheluzal 71
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 25 min cheluzal 98,834
Abby 12-18 1 hr RACE 6
Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 1 hr Uzi 68,879
Why do some cover for obumbler? 1 hr HolderjakdMyCock 1
Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 1 hr auntiesemite 70,992
Chicago Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 12:26 pm PST

NFL12:26PM
Trestman on Cutler benching: I think we need a spark
Yahoo! Sports12:48 PM
Jay Cutler wants to stay in Chicago, but will the Bears keep him?
NBC Sports 1:35 PM
Jimmy Clausen: 'Gained knowledge' since last start in 2010
NBC Sports 1:50 PM
Marc Trestman: 'I think we need a lift at quarterback'
ESPN 2:17 PM
Cutler: 'Crossed my mind' Bears tenure over