BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

Jan 8, 2009 Read more: Chicago Tribune 186,847
The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ... Read more

“A proud Kentuckian ”

Since: Aug 13

At Your Mama's House

#174156 Oct 7, 2013
Dale wrote:
<quoted text>I couldn't give a shit where Obama was born, at his birth where ever it was, he was a citizen of his father's country.
We don't go by the rules of other nations, we don't go by accepted practices, we don't go by the Federalist papers, we go by the Constitution period.
Under the Constitution of the United States he is a US citizen.
Having been born a citizen of this country, the 14th Amendment makes him a "Natural citizen" and entitled to run for President.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#174157 Oct 7, 2013
Dale wrote:
<quoted text>LMAO!!! Are you really that stupid? Without the Constitution there isn't a nation/country called the United States of America.
And there isn't a Dale without a Dufus. Every sovereign nation has its jurisdiction, regardless of the name of the country or the form of government.

Grow up.
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Crash and burn. Pathetic.
A country has a certain jurisdiction whether it is a constitutional republic, monarchy, or other form of government. A definition of jurisdiction of a government is not dependent on any particular form of government. See for example the definition in Black's Law Dictionary.
jurisdiction, n.(14c) 1. A government's general power to exercise authority over all persons and things within its territory;
The Constitution makes reference to the jurisdiction of the United States.(Does Dufus believe this is a self-reference to the constitution?) Dale seems incapable of defining the jurisdiction of the United States; rather he conflates the terms constitution and jurisdiction. While authority to exercise power flows from the constitution, jurisdiction i.e., the actual power to exercise within the dominion is not a document. The limits of a jurisdiction are not the four corners of a document but a territory over which dominion is exercised.
He seems to believe that the jurisdiction of the United States, the power to exercise authority within its borders is limited to its own citizens. This turns the notion of sovereignty on its head. A country needs no permission from a foreign power to govern within its own borders.
Dale needs to get educated and to grow up.
<quoted text>

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#174158 Oct 7, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Again, rad the 10th Amendment. States can and should do all of those things.
And typical Libtardian logic. Fascism is all about control at the Federal level. As a Conservative I want minimum Federal control If anyone is a Nazi, it is you Libtards as you are sooo stupid you have no idea what Fascism is.
There is nothing in the Constitution that proscribes a government agency from promoting educational goals by providing assistance. That's the carrot. The only stick is not to give the money if the states refuse.

Your 10th Amendment argument goes down in flames.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#174159 Oct 7, 2013
Dale wrote:
<quoted text>LMAO!!! Still makes no difference an alien has never "subject to the Jurisdiction, thereof".(see 14th amend)
See 14th Amendment. UR FOS.

"Subject to the jurisdiction, thereof" is precedent to born citizenship or naturalization in the country, not equivalent. Almost any fool can see that, except for the schizophrenic.
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
So Dufus doesn't care how many stateless people there are? Pretty odd since he was so hot and bothered about getting an answer about which country was an alien's country though seemingly unaware that there need be no country.
Duh!
Simply saying so doesn't make it so. Neither the founders nor the framers of the 14th Amendment believed in the Play Law definition of jurisdiction. It is the intent of Congress according to their words as construed by the US courts that determines the meaning of the 14th Amendment and not some silly disjointed meaningless rambling babble from an uneducated grandiose psycho.
And Dufus has it arse backwards. Natural born citizenship derives from the tie of natural allegiance according to the law as understood in this country since its founding. Dufus cannot change that by simply saying otherwise.
<quoted text>

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#174160 Oct 7, 2013
Dale wrote:
<quoted text>LMAO!! Aliens have never been "subject to the jurisdiction, thereof".(see 14th amendment)
Aliens must be subject to the jurisdiction thereof otherwise they cannot be naturalized in the United States per statute (statute that they MUST BE SUBJECT TO), a condition precedent to citizenship.(See 14th amendment.)

Duh!

RU really that stupid and demented?

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#174161 Oct 7, 2013
Dale wrote:
<quoted text>The Constitution is the Law of the Land, therefore it has jurisdiction over the federal government, all branches.
The Constitution makes reference to the jurisdiction of the United States, not the "jurisdiction of this constitution," whatever the F Dale thinks that means.

The jurisdiction of the United States is the power of the government of the United States to exercise its authority over its territories. That is how the term was understood by the founders and is understood by the courts and legal scholars today, Dufus Dale's fantasies notwithstanding.
Dufus Dale cannot rewrite history and redefine established legal definitions to suit his delusions.

Dufus Dale is not working with a full deck.
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry Dale, it is the federal government that has jurisdiction, the power to exercise federal authority over all persons and things within it's territories.

The United States of America has territory, not the Constitution. Duh!
And if the United States were to change its form of government to a pure internet-based democracy, it would still be the US government that exercises authority.

It is the branches of government which form the government that possesses jurisdiction.

In a case of Law of the Sea the question may arise "which country has jurisdiction"? For example the US or Canada. Only an idiot would say "da constitooshun!"

Dufus is not working with a full deck.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#174162 Oct 7, 2013
Ellen1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Obama, having been born in the USA, in Hawaii (as his birth certificate and the confirmation of the officials of BOTH parties in Hawaii and the Index Data and the birth notices sent to the Hawaii newspapers in 1961 by the DOH of Hawaii all show) is a Natural Born US Citizen.
Dale wrote:
<quoted text>Constitutional Law doesn't change without an amendment and as it stand now, Jr. is just an alien.
I will get back to the libs tomorrow, been working on my mud machine this weekend. I see that would be page 7697.
Too bad constitutional law has never changed in order to conform to Dufus Dale's unique delusions. As it stands now, Dufus Dale is just a blithering idiot.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#174163 Oct 7, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
We are energy independent? We import about 40% of our crude oil!
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/...
And how much of our gasoline do we export?

"U.S. exported more gasoline than imported last year"

http://content.usatoday.com/communities/ondea...

http://tinyurl.com/kced5rt

"Energy updates: Crude oil production and petroleum exports are surging, net imports are declining, and oil prices are stable"

http://www.aei-ideas.org/2013/07/energy-updat...

http://tinyurl.com/med8j4x

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#174164 Oct 7, 2013
Dale wrote:
<quoted text>LMAO!!! Your dual-citizen would be below the level of a naturalized citizen, since they would carry two allegiances. This is why the constitution does not recognized a dual-citizenship status.
According to US law, a child born here owes one allegiance, to the United States. That's the law. It's not Dufus Dale's fantasy, but it is the law, which does not depend at all on Dufus Dales delusions.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#174165 Oct 7, 2013
Dale wrote:
<quoted text>LMAO!!! The 14th amendment makes only two types of citizens those that are without foreign attachments (NBC) and naturalized.
Now if you want a citizenship status called a dual-citizen, then you must get yourself an amendment.
A child born here of ordinary aliens has, according to US law, no foreign attachments.

Foreign law is null and void.

BTW, Dufus, from 1802 - 1855 children born of US parents abroad were aliens. Fact. But of course, all the courts and all legal scholars were unaware of Play Law so they were wrong.

Moron.
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#174166 Oct 7, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
See 14th Amendment. UR FOS.
"Subject to the jurisdiction, thereof" is precedent to born citizenship or naturalization in the country, not equivalent. Almost any fool can see that, except for the schizophrenic.
<quoted text>
Speaking of FOS, you're carrying around a load there, Twinkerbelle. Get mommie to puy a fresh diaper on ya. You're spooking the vultures.

Twinkerbelle wants us to think the founding fathers gave no thought of protecting the presidency from usurpers. Twinkerbelle thinks the founding fathers were too stupid to realize that by allowing anyone born on U.S. soil, to be considered an NBC, would be asinine. Twinkerbelle doesn't think the founding fathers had the foresight to protect its own government from our enemies! Twinkerbelle is flat out wrong. Isn't that correct, Twinkerbelle? LMAO! such a small child LMAO!

Tip for the mentally challenged; in order to be "natural born", one must come from two "natural borns". Tip 2; alone, one cannot produce a child. I threw tip 2 in just for ya, Twinkerbelle.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#174167 Oct 7, 2013
But Dufus Dale will insist that the 14th amendment changed the meaning of jurisdiction, even though a change in definition would require that the new definition be stated. And even though only a demented fool could ever believe in dufus Dales' fanciful concept of jurisdiction, which is a conflation of constitution, jurisdiction, and citizenship. It's the "I am the Walrus" theory of citizenship. So pathetic.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#174168 Oct 7, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Speaking of FOS, you're carrying around a load there, Twinkerbelle. Get mommie to puy a fresh diaper on ya. You're spooking the vultures.
Twinkerbelle wants us to think the founding fathers gave no thought of protecting the presidency from usurpers. Twinkerbelle thinks the founding fathers were too stupid to realize that by allowing anyone born on U.S. soil, to be considered an NBC, would be asinine. Twinkerbelle doesn't think the founding fathers had the foresight to protect its own government from our enemies! Twinkerbelle is flat out wrong. Isn't that correct, Twinkerbelle? LMAO! such a small child LMAO!
Tip for the mentally challenged; in order to be "natural born", one must come from two "natural borns". Tip 2; alone, one cannot produce a child. I threw tip 2 in just for ya, Twinkerbelle.
Tip from James Madison: Play Justice LRS is FOS.

“It is an established maxim that birth is a criterion of allegiance. Birth however derives its force sometimes from place and sometimes from parentage, but in general place is the most certain criterion; it is what applies in the United States; it will therefore be unnecessary to investigate any other.”–James Madison
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
See 14th Amendment. UR FOS.
"Subject to the jurisdiction, thereof" is precedent to born citizenship or naturalization in the country, not equivalent. Almost any fool can see that, except for the schizophrenic.
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#174169 Oct 7, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Tip from James Madison: Play Justice LRS is FOS.
“It is an established maxim that birth is a criterion of allegiance. Birth however derives its force sometimes from place and sometimes from parentage, but in general place is the most certain criterion; it is what applies in the United States; it will therefore be unnecessary to investigate any other.”–James Madison
<quoted text>
And what year did Madison say that? Who was he talking to? Who was he talking about? Let's start with the year, shall we?

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#174170 Oct 7, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Tip for the mentally challenged; in order to be "natural born", one must come from two "natural borns".
If that were true there would be almost no natural born citizens in the US.

Do the math, MORON. Anyone with a genealogy wherein one immigrant is an ancestor **somewhere** in the direct lineage, would not be natural born according to your fantasy delusion.

Gawd you're stupid. No country on earth ever had such a law.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#174171 Oct 7, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Tip for the mentally challenged; in order to be "natural born", one must come from two "natural borns".
Thanks for explaining why none of the Founding Fathers' descendants could possibly be natural born citizens. Every last one of them was born a British or foreign subject.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#174172 Oct 7, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
And what year did Madison say that? Who was he talking to? Who was he talking about? Let's start with the year, shall we?
If you think Madison was wrong, be my guest and make an ass out of yourself. You have the floor. I'll wipe it with your ass.
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Tip from James Madison: Play Justice LRS is FOS.
“It is an established maxim that birth is a criterion of allegiance. Birth however derives its force sometimes from place and sometimes from parentage, but in general place is the most certain criterion; it is what applies in the United States; it will therefore be unnecessary to investigate any other.”–James Madison
<quoted text>

“On Deck”

Since: Aug 08

French Polynesia

#174173 Oct 7, 2013
Wojar,
The law is a trifle.
The longer this political logjam in Washington continues, the less respect people will have for the law.
Like it or lump it, that's the way it is.
I suggest they get their house in order, lickity split.

Hey, did you know that the FAA is in non-compliance with the Ciean Air Act?
Put that in your pipe and smoke it.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#174174 Oct 7, 2013
loose cannon wrote:
Wojar,
The law is a trifle.
The longer this political logjam in Washington continues, the less respect people will have for the law.
Like it or lump it, that's the way it is.
I suggest they get their house in order, lickity split.
Hey, did you know that the FAA is in non-compliance with the Ciean Air Act?
Put that in your pipe and smoke it.
The problem is not that the law is a trifle but that some in power trifle with the law.
Frank

Spokane, WA

#174175 Oct 7, 2013
Linktv org wrote:
<quoted text>
The Health Care Law Guru vs. the Conservative who Inspired It
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/businessdesk/2013...
--------
People Want Full Medicare for All
by Ralph Nader / September 26, 2013 / http://tinyurl.com/kazjgbq
Freshman Senator Ted Cruz (R-Texas), who somehow got through Princeton and Harvard Law School, is the best news the defaulting Democratic Party has had in years.
As the Texas bull in the Senate china shop, he has been making a majority of his Republican colleagues cringe with his bare-knuckle antics and language. His 21-hour talkathon on the Senate floor demanding the defunding of Obamacare made his Republican colleagues cringe. His Nazi appeasement analogies and threats to shut down were especially embarrassing
After listening to his lengthy rant on the Senate Floor on Tuesday and Wednesday, one comes away with two distinct impressions. Ted Cruz cannot resist inserting himself here, there and everywhere. And nothing is too trivial for Senator Talkathon. He likes White Castle hamburgers, he loves pancakes; he talked about what he liked to read as a little boy, where he’s traveled, what clothes he wears and other trivia.
You’d think he would have used his time to talk specifically about the suffering that uninsured people and their children are going through, especially in the Lone Star State. Or about what could replace Obamacare other than his repeated “free market” solution, which is to say the “pay or die” profiteering, tax-subsidized corporate system.
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2013/09/26-1...
After ObamaKare is completely installed and Obama is no longer in office and we are trillions of dollars into it, we will still need health care reform.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 3 min OzRitz 52,694
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 14 min Patrick 1,216,565
News From the scene of downtown shooting: 'It looked... 3 hr reality is a crutch 1
News Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 3 hr timmy 71,939
News Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 3 hr Cheftell 69,599
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 8 hr curiousity 99,353
News 3 accused of murder in 2012 shooting 8 hr reality is a crutch 1
More from around the web

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]