So there is no fallacy of affirming the consequent?<quoted text>
Dumb just got dumber.
There is no simple-minded conflation?
However the grand "Justice" seems unable to formulate any semblance of a rebuttal.
That's because there is nothing but empty space between his ears.
"All persons born or naturalized in the US and "subject to the jurisdiction, thereof" are citizens." Who are subject to the jurisdiction, thereof?[See 122489]
Play Justice Dale assumes that if all A are B then all B are A. That's like assuming all men who wear hats are bald because all bald men wear hats. Irrational.
Post 173968: "The constitution is the government."
Post 173952 "[T]he jurisdiction ... is the Constitution."
Conflation of constitution, jurisdiction, and government. They are all apparently the same in Play Law. "I am he as you are he as you are me and we are all together."
Play Law is Helter Skelter law.
So which Play Justice is the Walrus and which is the Eggman?