BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ... Full Story
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#173853 Oct 4, 2013
nebka wrote:
<quoted text>
Now why do you end almost every post LMAO??? Is it because that is the only thing you are capable typing?????
Hey Nebka, go back to blowing your brother, otay? lil raggy

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

RationalState

#173854 Oct 4, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
In those famous words of Conebread, "you're still an idiot"! You were born an idiot and shall die an idiot. LMAO!
And the feeble-minded Play Justice still cannot muster a rebuttal.
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
All out of ammo the Play Justice hurls insults.
The Constitution creates nether natural born citizens nor persons. Both are created by nature:“UPON thefe two foundations, the law of nature and the law of revelation, depend all human laws;”-Sir William Blackstone
<quoted text>
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#173855 Oct 4, 2013
wojar wrote:
And the ACA also upheld by USSC. Sorry if your grandkids didn't get ice cream every day.
Only after Roberts was bought off! Why do you constantly leave out the important information? LMAO! lil raggy

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

RationalState

#173856 Oct 4, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey Nebka, go back to blowing your brother, otay? lil raggy
There he goes again, so obsessed, projecting his repressed proclivities.
Dale

Wichita, KS

#173857 Oct 4, 2013
Ellen1 wrote:
<quoted text>
YOU are a nut. The courts are right, and you are wrong. Bingham is right and you are wrong. The Heritage Foundation book is right, and you are wrong, the members of the Electoral College (not one of whom changed her or his vote to vote against Obama either in the 2008 or 2012 elections) is right and you are wrong. The US Supreme Court is right, and you are wrong. The US Congress, which confirmed Obama's election unanimously both times, is right, and you are wrong. The Chief Justice of the USA, who swore Obama in several times after each election, is right, and you are wrong.
And, most importantly of all, you cannot read into the Constitution something that is not there, and there is not a single word in the Constitution (or for that matter in the writings of ANY of the members of the Constitutional Convention) that says that two citizen parents are required in order to be eligible to be president of the USA. Not a word.
LMAO!!! You're the nut! Anyone that believes that the USSC can overrule the US Constitution doesn't belong on this thread.
Dale

Wichita, KS

#173858 Oct 4, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
"The sole authority to naturalize persons as citizens of the United States is conferred upon the Attorney General."
8 USC § 1421 (a)
Authority is vested in a government which acts through its agents. The Constitution contains the law, but it does not perform any actions as it is a piece of paper, an inanimate object.
Dufus Dale suffers serious intellectual impairment.
<quoted text>
LMAO!!! The 14th amendment has plainly shown that the Constitution holds the only authority for granting citizenship, one must be subject to its jurisdiction.
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#173859 Oct 4, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>Already starting to do the crawdaddy, huh? So early? LMAO! My guess would be, there isn't a single person alive that is obsessed with you, other than you, that is!
Poor Romper. I'm still here and your still obsessing. Some things just don't change
Dale

Wichita, KS

#173860 Oct 4, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
The Constitution creates neither natural born nor naturalized citizens.
Currently it it the US Attorney General who is vested with authority to naturalize persons per statute.
Natural born citizens are "created" by Nature, and the Founders recognized this principle derived from Natural Law as embodied in English Common Law.
The Constitution recognizes both citizens and persons but creates neither.
LMAO!!! The 14th amendment has plainly stated who are citizens of the US, either born or naturalized and Obama does not conform to either category.

There are requirements to be a citizen, so with those requirements the Constitution has created a citizen.

The 14th amendment was not created from the English common law as can be found in the Civil Rights Act of 1866 and the debates of the 14th amendment.
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#173862 Oct 4, 2013
Twinkerbelle, was that your mother shooting up DC yesterday? LMAO!
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#173863 Oct 4, 2013
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
Poor Romper. I'm still here and your still obsessing. Some things just don't change
"your"? <snickers>
Ellen1

Arlington, MA

#173864 Oct 4, 2013
Dale wrote:
<quoted text>LMAO!!! The 14th amendment has plainly shown that the Constitution holds the only authority for granting citizenship, one must be subject to its jurisdiction.
And everyone born in the USA except for the children of foreign diplomats is subject to its jurisdiction. As one of the key writers of the 14th Amendment, Bingham, said:

“Who does not know that every person born within the limits of the Republic is, in the language of the Constitution, a natural-born citizen.” Rep. Bingham, The congressional globe, Volume 61, Part 2. pg. 2212 (1869)”

That is why with the exception of a few birther lawyers and other nuts, all the legal scholars and appeals courts agree with Bingham that every child born in the USA except for the children of foreign diplomats is a Natural Born US Citizen.

Some examples:

"Every child born in the United States is a natural-born United States citizen except for the children of diplomats.”---Senator Lindsay Graham (December 11, 2008 letter to constituents)

“What is a natural born citizen? Clearly, someone born within the United States or one of its territories is a natural born citizen.”(Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on OCTOBER 5, 2004)--Senator Orrin G. Hatch (R-UT).

“Under the longstanding English common-law principle of jus soli, persons born within the territory of the sovereign (other than children of enemy aliens or foreign diplomats) are citizens from birth. Thus, those persons born within the United States are "natural born citizens" and eligible to be President. Much less certain, however, is whether children born abroad of United States citizens are "natural born citizens" eligible to serve as President ..."---- Edwin Meese, et al, THE HERITAGE GUIDE TO THE CONSTITUTION (2005)[Edwin Meese was Ronald Reagan’s attorney general, and the Heritage Foundation is a well-known Conservative organization.]

"Some birthers imagine that there is a difference between being a “citizen by birth” or a “native citizen” on the one hand and a “natural born” citizen on the other.“Eccentric” is too kind a word for this notion, which is either daft or dishonest. All three terms are identical in meaning."---The Wall Street Journal ( http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142405297 ...)

More reading on the subject:

http://www.fredthompsonsamerica.com/2012/07/3 ...

http://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyiname ...

http://www.obamabirthbook.com/http:/www.obama ...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural-born-cit ...

http://tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_eviden ...

Also, as noted above, the Declaration of Independence said: "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal....."

That means that unless the Constitution specifically says that the US-born children of foreigners are NOT entitled to become president, they are created equal with the US-born children of US citizens. And the Constitution does not specifically, or in any way, say that the US-born children of foreigners are not entitled to become president.

You cannot read into the Constitution something that is not there. And there isn't a single word IN the Constitution that bars the US-born children of foreigners or dual citizens from becoming president.
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#173865 Oct 4, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>"your"? <snickers>
Jercque would be so proud of you
Dale

Wichita, KS

#173866 Oct 4, 2013
Ellen1 wrote:
<quoted text>
And everyone born in the USA except for the children of foreign diplomats is subject to its jurisdiction. As one of the key writers of the 14th Amendment, Bingham, said:
“Who does not know that every person born within the limits of the Republic is, in the language of the Constitution, a natural-born citizen.” Rep. Bingham, The congressional globe, Volume 61, Part 2. pg. 2212 (1869)”
That is why with the exception of a few birther lawyers and other nuts, all the legal scholars and appeals courts agree with Bingham that every child born in the USA except for the children of foreign diplomats is a Natural Born US Citizen.
Some examples:
"Every child born in the United States is a natural-born United States citizen except for the children of diplomats.”---Senator Lindsay Graham (December 11, 2008 letter to constituents)
“What is a natural born citizen? Clearly, someone born within the United States or one of its territories is a natural born citizen.”(Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on OCTOBER 5, 2004)--Senator Orrin G. Hatch (R-UT).
“Under the longstanding English common-law principle of jus soli, persons born within the territory of the sovereign (other than children of enemy aliens or foreign diplomats) are citizens from birth. Thus, those persons born within the United States are "natural born citizens" and eligible to be President. Much less certain, however, is whether children born abroad of United States citizens are "natural born citizens" eligible to serve as President ..."---- Edwin Meese, et al, THE HERITAGE GUIDE TO THE CONSTITUTION (2005)[Edwin Meese was Ronald Reagan’s attorney general, and the Heritage Foundation is a well-known Conservative organization.]
"Some birthers imagine that there is a difference between being a “citizen by birth” or a “native citizen” on the one hand and a “natural born” citizen on the other.“Eccentric” is too kind a word for this notion, which is either daft or dishonest. All three terms are identical in meaning."---The Wall Street Journal ( http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142405297 ...)
More reading on the subject:
http://www.fredthompsonsamerica.com/2012/07/3 ...
http://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyiname ...
http://www.obamabirthbook.com/http:/www.obama ...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural-born-cit ...
http://tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_eviden ...
Also, as noted above, the Declaration of Independence said: "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal....."
That means that unless the Constitution specifically says that the US-born children of foreigners are NOT entitled to become president, they are created equal with the US-born children of US citizens. And the Constitution does not specifically, or in any way, say that the US-born children of foreigners are not entitled to become president.
You cannot read into the Constitution something that is not there. And there isn't a single word IN the Constitution that bars the US-born children of foreigners or dual citizens from becoming president.
LMAO!!! Only citizens are subject to the jurisdiction, thereof, Obama at the moment of birth was a citizen of his father's country.
Now you say that he is a dual-citizen, if that be true then he would be on the same level as naturalized citizen, too much foreign influence, not eligible to be POTUS.
Ellen1

Arlington, MA

#173867 Oct 4, 2013
Dale wrote:
<quoted text>LMAO!!! You're the nut! Anyone that believes that the USSC can overrule the US Constitution doesn't belong on this thread.
Neither the US Supreme Court nor Congress nor the President can overrule the US Constitution.

BUT the US Supreme Court, not you, is the final decision maker on what the US Constitution means. And, not only is it the final decision maker, it is far more qualified than YOU, FAR more. The US Supreme Court's decision is not only the final legal decision barring a constitutional amendment (which isn't likely), it is the right decision. It is correct on the meaning. YOU are wrong.

The US Supreme Court ruled in the Wong Kim Ark case, as Bingham one of the KEY writers of the 14th Amendment had said:

“Who does not know that every person born within the limits of the Republic is, in the language of the Constitution, a natural-born citizen.” Rep. Bingham, The congressional globe, Volume 61, Part 2. pg. 2212 (1869)”

That is why all the real constitutional scholars (not counting a few birther lawyers and lots of birther nuts) agree that the meaning of Natural Born Citizen includes every child born in the USA except for the children of foreign diplomats. Some examples:

"Every child born in the United States is a natural-born United States citizen except for the children of diplomats.”---Senator Lindsay Graham (December 11, 2008 letter to constituents)

“What is a natural born citizen? Clearly, someone born within the United States or one of its territories is a natural born citizen.”(Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on OCTOBER 5, 2004)--Senator Orrin G. Hatch (R-UT).

“Under the longstanding English common-law principle of jus soli, persons born within the territory of the sovereign (other than children of enemy aliens or foreign diplomats) are citizens from birth. Thus, those persons born within the United States are "natural born citizens" and eligible to be President. Much less certain, however, is whether children born abroad of United States citizens are "natural born citizens" eligible to serve as President ..."---- Edwin Meese, et al, THE HERITAGE GUIDE TO THE CONSTITUTION (2005)[Edwin Meese was Ronald Reagan’s attorney general, and the Heritage Foundation is a well-known Conservative organization.]

More reading on the subject:

http://www.fredthompsonsamerica.com/2012/07/3 ...

http://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyiname ...

http://www.obamabirthbook.com/http:/www.obama ...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural-born-cit ...

http://tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_eviden ...

You cannot read into the Constitution something that is not there. And there isn't a single word IN the Constitution that bars the US-born children of foreigners or dual citizens from becoming president.

Also, the Declaration of Independence said: "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal....."

That means that unless the Constitution specifically says that the US-born children of foreigners are NOT equal, NOT entitled to become president, they are created equal with the US-born children of US citizens. And hence they are just as able as the US-born children of US citizens to become president. And the Constitution does not specifically, or in any way, say that the US-born children of foreigners are not entitled to become president.

You cannot read into the Constitution something that is not there. And there isn't a single word IN the Constitution that bars the either the US-born children of foreigners or dual citizens from becoming president. Not a word.
Dale

Wichita, KS

#173868 Oct 4, 2013
Ellen1 wrote:
<quoted text>
And everyone born in the USA except for the children of foreign diplomats is subject to its jurisdiction. As one of the key writers of the 14th Amendment, Bingham, said:
“Who does not know that every person born within the limits of the Republic is, in the language of the Constitution, a natural-born citizen.” Rep. Bingham, The congressional globe, Volume 61, Part 2. pg. 2212 (1869)”
That is why with the exception of a few birther lawyers and other nuts, all the legal scholars and appeals courts agree with Bingham that every child born in the USA except for the children of foreign diplomats is a Natural Born US Citizen.
Some examples:
"Every child born in the United States is a natural-born United States citizen except for the children of diplomats.”---Senator Lindsay Graham (December 11, 2008 letter to constituents)
“What is a natural born citizen? Clearly, someone born within the United States or one of its territories is a natural born citizen.”(Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on OCTOBER 5, 2004)--Senator Orrin G. Hatch (R-UT).
“Under the longstanding English common-law principle of jus soli, persons born within the territory of the sovereign (other than children of enemy aliens or foreign diplomats) are citizens from birth. Thus, those persons born within the United States are "natural born citizens" and eligible to be President. Much less certain, however, is whether children born abroad of United States citizens are "natural born citizens" eligible to serve as President ..."---- Edwin Meese, et al, THE HERITAGE GUIDE TO THE CONSTITUTION (2005)[Edwin Meese was Ronald Reagan’s attorney general, and the Heritage Foundation is a well-known Conservative organization.]
"Some birthers imagine that there is a difference between being a “citizen by birth” or a “native citizen” on the one hand and a “natural born” citizen on the other.“Eccentric” is too kind a word for this notion, which is either daft or dishonest. All three terms are identical in meaning."---The Wall Street Journal ( http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142405297 ...)
More reading on the subject:
http://www.fredthompsonsamerica.com/2012/07/3 ...
http://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyiname ...
http://www.obamabirthbook.com/http:/www.obama ...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural-born-cit ...
http://tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_eviden ...
Also, as noted above, the Declaration of Independence said: "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal....."
.
LMAO!!!
The first amendment is to section one, declaring that all "persons born in the United States and Subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the States wherein they reside. I do not propose to say anything on that subject except that the question of citizenship has been fully discussed in this body as not to need any further elucidation, in my opinion. This amendment which I have offered is simply declaratory of what I regard as the law of the land already, that every person born within the limits of the United States, and subject to their jurisdiction, is by virtue of natural law and national law a citizen of the United States. This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the Government of the United States, but will include every other class of persons. It settles the great question of citizenship and removes all doubt as to what persons are or are not citizens of the United States. This has long been a great desideratum in the jurisprudence and legislation of this country.
Now would you please tell me how foreigners and aliens are born in this country, we all know that ambassador's family members are not granted citizenship to the US, but just how are aliens born here.
Dale

Wichita, KS

#173869 Oct 4, 2013
Ellen1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Neither the US Supreme Court nor Congress nor the President can overrule the US Constitution.
BUT the US Supreme Court, not you, is the final decision maker on what the US Constitution means. And, not only is it the final decision maker, it is far more qualified than YOU, FAR more. The US Supreme Court's decision is not only the final legal decision barring a constitutional amendment (which isn't likely), it is the right decision. It is correct on the meaning. YOU are wrong.
The US Supreme Court ruled in the Wong Kim Ark case, as Bingham one of the KEY writers of the 14th Amendment had said:
“Who does not know that every person born within the limits of the Republic is, in the language of the Constitution, a natural-born citizen.” Rep. Bingham, The congressional globe, Volume 61, Part 2. pg. 2212 (1869)”
That is why all the real constitutional scholars (not counting a few birther lawyers and lots of birther nuts) agree that the meaning of Natural Born Citizen includes every child born in the USA except for the children of foreign diplomats. Some examples:
"Every child born in the United States is a natural-born United States citizen except for the children of diplomats.”---Senator Lindsay Graham (December 11, 2008 letter to constituents)
“What is a natural born citizen? Clearly, someone born within the United States or one of its territories is a natural born citizen.”(Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on OCTOBER 5, 2004)--Senator Orrin G. Hatch (R-UT).
“Under the longstanding English common-law principle of jus soli, persons born within the territory of the sovereign (other than children of enemy aliens or foreign diplomats) are citizens from birth. Thus, those persons born within the United States are "natural born citizens" and eligible to be President. Much less certain, however, is whether children born abroad of United States citizens are "natural born citizens" eligible to serve as President ..."---- Edwin Meese, et al, THE HERITAGE GUIDE TO THE CONSTITUTION (2005)[Edwin Meese was Ronald Reagan’s attorney general, and the Heritage Foundation is a well-known Conservative organization.]
More reading on the subject:
http://www.fredthompsonsamerica.com/2012/07/3 ...
http://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyiname ...
http://www.obamabirthbook.com/http:/www.obama ...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural-born-cit ...
http://tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_eviden ...
You cannot read into the Constitution something that is not there. And there isn't a single word IN the Constitution that bars the US-born children of foreigners or dual citizens from becoming president.
Also, the Declaration of Independence said: "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal....."
That means that unless the Constitution specifically says that the US-born children of foreigners are NOT equal, NOT entitled to become president, they are created equal with the US-born children of US citizens. And hence they are just as able as the US-born children of US citizens to become president. And the Constitution does not specifically, or in any way, say that the US-born children of foreigners are not entitled to become president.
You cannot read into the Constitution something that is not there. And there isn't a single word IN the Constitution that bars the either the US-born children of foreigners or dual citizens from becoming president. Not a word.
LMAO!!! No, wrong again, the Constitution has the final say as to any USSC ruling and this must be brought by the other two branches of the government, no branch of the government has anymore control than the others. This seem to be our problem as a nation, we have placed too much false authority into the USSC.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

RationalState

#173870 Oct 4, 2013
Dale wrote:
<quoted text>LMAO!!! The 14th amendment has plainly shown that the Constitution holds the only authority for granting citizenship, one must be subject to its jurisdiction.
Not according to Article 1 Section 8 Clause 4. The authority to establish legislation governing naturalization is vested in Congress which in turn delegated the authority to the Attorney General per 8 USC § 1421 (a).

The 14th Amendment requires aliens to be under the jurisdiction of the United States in order to be naturalized in the United States. While under the jurisdiction of the United States aliens are subject to US law, including naturalization law per Art 1 Sec 8 Cl 4. The amendment and the clause are in perfect harmony.
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
"The sole authority to naturalize persons as citizens of the United States is conferred upon the Attorney General."
8 USC § 1421 (a)
Authority is vested in a government which acts through its agents. The Constitution contains the law, but it does not perform any actions as it is a piece of paper, an inanimate object.
Dufus Dale suffers serious intellectual impairment.
<quoted text>
Dale

Wichita, KS

#173871 Oct 4, 2013
Ellen1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Neither the US Supreme Court nor Congress nor the President can overrule the US Constitution.
BUT the US Supreme Court, not you, is the final decision maker on what the US Constitution means. And, not only is it the final decision maker, it is far more qualified than YOU, FAR more. The US Supreme Court's decision is not only the final legal decision barring a constitutional amendment (which isn't likely), it is the right decision. It is correct on the meaning. YOU are wrong.
The US Supreme Court ruled in the Wong Kim Ark case, as Bingham one of the KEY writers of the 14th Amendment had said:
“Who does not know that every person born within the limits of the Republic is, in the language of the Constitution, a natural-born citizen.” Rep. Bingham, The congressional globe, Volume 61, Part 2. pg. 2212 (1869)”
That is why all the real constitutional scholars (not counting a few birther lawyers and lots of birther nuts) agree that the meaning of Natural Born Citizen includes every child born in the USA except for the children of foreign diplomats. Some examples:
"Every child born in the United States is a natural-born United States citizen except for the children of diplomats.”---Senator Lindsay Graham (December 11, 2008 letter to constituents)
“What is a natural born citizen? Clearly, someone born within the United States or one of its territories is a natural born citizen.”(Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on OCTOBER 5, 2004)--Senator Orrin G. Hatch (R-UT).
“Under the longstanding English common-law principle of jus soli, persons born within the territory of the sovereign (other than children of enemy aliens or foreign diplomats) are citizens from birth. Thus, those persons born within the United States are "natural born citizens" and eligible to be President. Much less certain, however, is whether children born abroad of United States citizens are "natural born citizens" eligible to serve as President ..."---- Edwin Meese, et al, THE HERITAGE GUIDE TO THE CONSTITUTION (2005)[Edwin Meese was Ronald Reagan’s attorney general, and the Heritage Foundation is a well-known Conservative organization.]
More reading on the subject:
http://www.fredthompsonsamerica.com/2012/07/3 ...
http://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyiname ...
http://www.obamabirthbook.com/http:/www.obama ...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural-born-cit ...
http://tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_eviden ...
You cannot read into the Constitution something that is not there. And there isn't a single word IN the Constitution that bars the US-born children of foreigners or dual citizens from becoming president.
Also, the Declaration of Independence said: "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal....."
That means that unless the Constitution specifically says that the US-born children of foreigners are NOT equal, NOT entitled to become president, they are created equal with the US-born children of US citizens. And hence they are just as able as the US-born children of US citizens to become president. And the Constitution does not specifically, or in any way, say that the US-born children of foreigners are not entitled to become president.
You cannot read into the Constitution something that is not there. And there isn't a single word IN the Constitution that bars the either the US-born children of foreigners or dual citizens from becoming president. Not a word.
LMAO!!! What is a Natural Born Citizen, as Jay indicated, one who is without foreign attachments.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

RationalState

#173872 Oct 4, 2013
Dale wrote:
<quoted text>LMAO!!!
The first amendment is to section one, declaring that all "persons born in the United States and Subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the States wherein they reside. I do not propose to say anything on that subject except that the question of citizenship has been fully discussed in this body as not to need any further elucidation, in my opinion. This amendment which I have offered is simply declaratory of what I regard as the law of the land already, that every person born within the limits of the United States, and subject to their jurisdiction, is by virtue of natural law and national law a citizen of the United States. This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the Government of the United States, but will include every other class of persons. It settles the great question of citizenship and removes all doubt as to what persons are or are not citizens of the United States. This has long been a great desideratum in the jurisprudence and legislation of this country.
Now would you please tell me how foreigners and aliens are born in this country, we all know that ambassador's family members are not granted citizenship to the US, but just how are aliens born here.
One way for a foreigner or alien to be born in this country is to be born the child of a foreign ambassador (as plainly stated in the quote Dufus Dale does not comprehend).
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#173873 Oct 4, 2013
Dale wrote:
<quoted text>LMAO!!! What is a Natural Born Citizen, as Jay indicated, one who is without foreign attachments.
Jay? That's a funny name to give to your copy of the Constitution. Seems like a more authoritative sounding name would be appropriate

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 2 min sonicfilter 1,109,124
Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 3 min Boy G 49,794
rahm emanuel is a no show at ASNE-APME Conference 11 min rahm jizzbucket e... 1
IL Who do you support for Governor in Illinois in ... (Oct '10) 11 min Common Sense 4,019
Abby 9-16 24 min edogxxx 4
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 24 min Socialism is for ... 46,581
Amy 9-16 27 min edogxxx 5
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 34 min responsible party 98,200
•••
•••

Chicago Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••
•••

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••