BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ... Full Story

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#173793 Oct 3, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Have you ever been to Laredo, TX in recent years? They have the biggest Walmart I have ever seen. It is like a regular Walmart and a Sam's stuck together and they have about a hundred check outs.
I have seen two Hispanic people checking out with three or four shopping carts and then go out into the parking lot and stuff every nook and cranny of their Mexican plated and head south.
NAFTA has opened up much of Mexico to American goods!!!
Democracynow org wrote:
<quoted text>
Those are goods made in China, Pakistan, and India.
There are no American products in any Walmart? Can they get those things in Mexico? Whose sales tax do they pay?(Texas!)
Now, have you ever been to Laredo, TX? I took an Army nurse to Nevo Laredo in 1971 and walked across the bridge. I did not get laid as she found out I was 20 years old. Yep, a 20 year old Army CW2!

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#173794 Oct 3, 2013
wojar wrote:
Declaration of Independence.
Life, liberty, and the **pursuit of happiness**. Right from Natural Law.
Of course most birfoons have no clue where "pursuit of happiness" came from.
“[Per]plexed the law of nature with a multitude of abftracted rules and precepts,
referring merely to the fitnefs or unfitnefs of things, is fome have vainly furmifed;
but has gracioufly reduced the rule of obedience to this one paternal precept,“that man
fhould 'purfue his own happinefs.'”
-Sir William Blackstone
From his "Commentaries on the Laws of England."
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
But I do know that "Life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness" is not in our Constitution!
wojar wrote:
That's news?

Who said it was?

You have a point?
And the empty-headed parrot replies:
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
That's news?
Who said it was?
You have a point?!?
Need a point Rouge?

It was right in your face.

The fantasy that the Founders distanced this country from English Common Law is pure fiction. They valued English Common Law as it protected the common man from abuses by the government. and they valued Natural Law, much embodied in English Common Law.

Duh!

Got a clue yet?

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#173795 Oct 3, 2013
Hummm, the lady that was shot was driving what looks to be a very nice car. But because she was black, she was poor?
Whey a cop points a gun at you, stop what you are doing and put your hands in the air and it is very likely you will NOT get shot! Try and run over a cop and there is a good chance you will get shot!!!

Shelia Jackson Lee Suggests Govt Shutdown Drove "Poor" Capital Hill Shooter To Kill
Greg Hengler | Oct 03, 2013

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#173796 Oct 3, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Need a point Rouge?
It was right in your face.
The fantasy that the Founders distanced this country from English Common Law is pure fiction. They valued English Common Law as it protected the common man from abuses by the government. and they valued Natural Law, much embodied in English Common Law.
Duh!
Got a clue yet?
No I don't need a point. It is NOT in our Constitution. Ergo, they are not rights!!! Our rights are listed in the Bill of Rights amending our Constitution. You have no right to purse happiness!

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#173797 Oct 3, 2013
"Ted Cruz faced a barrage of hostile questions Wednesday from angry GOP senators, who lashed the Texas tea party freshman for helping prompt a government shutdown crisis without a strategy to end it."

A Republican with no exit strategy. Does that sound familiar?

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/right-tur...
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#173799 Oct 3, 2013
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
That explains your repetitive dance moves
This coming from the "crawdaddy" king? LMAO!

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#173800 Oct 3, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
No I don't need a point. It is NOT in our Constitution. Ergo, they are not rights!!! Our rights are listed in the Bill of Rights amending our Constitution. You have no right to purse happiness!
Huh? The moron asked for a point, and then when the obvious point is bluntly shoved in his face he doesn't "need a point."

Sad.

The right to life is not a right? Pray tell where did Rougie ever get that idea from?

The right to liberty is not a right? Ever hear of the fecking Bill of Rights?

And the inalienable right to pursue happiness was DECLARED BY THE FOUNDERS. Does Rougie think they were on LSD?

Yup, it came from ENGLISH COMMON LAW.

I do have a right to pursue happiness. George, Thomas, and many other founders staked their lives on that right.

Got a clue yet?
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Need a point Rouge?
It was right in your face.
The fantasy that the Founders distanced this country from English Common Law is pure fiction. They valued English Common Law as it protected the common man from abuses by the government. and they valued Natural Law, much embodied in English Common Law.
Duh!
Got a clue yet?
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#173801 Oct 3, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
"The Congress shall have Power To ... establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization ...."
What part of "Congress shall have the power to" does Dufus Dale not understand?
<quoted text>
People from CT should remain quiet today!
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#173802 Oct 3, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
"The sole authority to naturalize persons as citizens of the United States is conferred upon the Attorney General."
8 USC § 1421 (a)
Authority is vested in a government which acts through its agents. The Constitution contains the law, but it does not perform any actions as it is a piece of paper, an inanimate object.
Dufus Dale suffers serious intellectual impairment.
<quoted text>
What a dumbazz you are, Twinkerbelle! "As it is a piece of paper"? Really? Really? ID 10T Error

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#173803 Oct 3, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
People from CT should remain quiet today!
Play Law justices should remain quiet every day but they are too demented to know better.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#173804 Oct 3, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
What a dumbazz you are, Twinkerbelle! "As it is a piece of paper"? Really? Really? ID 10T Error
In Play Justice LRS's world, the Constitution is not an inanimate object. He talks to it. Remarkably, it talks back to him.

His therapist is not amused.

----------

Insofar as naturalization is concerned, it is "We the People" who make citizens from immigrants, not the Constitution, which is literally a piece of paper, like it or not.

On the other hand, it is Nature that make citizens (and persons) as recognized by "We the People" and declared in our Constitution.

The Constitution (as it is currently written) cannot create a natural born citizen any more than it can create a person. Both are recognized by the Constitution, however.
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
"The sole authority to naturalize persons as citizens of the United States is conferred upon the Attorney General."
8 USC § 1421 (a)
Authority is vested in a government which acts through its agents. The Constitution contains the law, but it does not perform any actions as it is a piece of paper, an inanimate object.
Dufus Dale suffers serious intellectual impairment.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#173805 Oct 3, 2013
On the other hand, it is Nature that makes natural born citizens (and persons) as recognized by "We the People" and declared in our Constitution.
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#173806 Oct 3, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Play Law justices should remain quiet every day but they are too demented to know better.
The lil pollock speaketh! Pfft.
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#173807 Oct 3, 2013
wojar wrote:
On the other hand, it is Nature that makes natural born citizens (and persons) as recognized by "We the People" and declared in our Constitution.
You're an idiot, Twinkerbelle. You and Ellen are neck and neck, who's gonna win that crown! LMAO!
wojar

Wallingford, CT

#173808 Oct 3, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
You're an idiot, Twinkerbelle. You and Ellen are neck and neck, who's gonna win that crown! LMAO!
Pray tell, how does the Constitution create a person? And a natural born citizen is similarly not created by the Constitution but rather RECOGNIZED. Duh!
Play law sucks.
wojar wrote:
On the other hand, it is Nature that makes natural born citizens (and persons) as recognized by "We the People" and declared in our Constitution.
wojar

Wallingford, CT

#173809 Oct 3, 2013
Here's the kicker. The Constitution can create one kind of 'person': a corporation.
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#173810 Oct 3, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>Did you say the same thing when Tip O'Neal shut down the government a dozen times when Reagan was president? It is O'Bummer Boy who will not negotiate even one iota whereas Bill Clinton negotiated with Newt Gingrich.
O'Bummer is a spoiled brat who demands he get his way.

Did Speaker Bonehead? Waz da matta, cat got yo tongue.
Several Tepublican reps did. They kept their promise. Why are they ashamed?
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#173811 Oct 3, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>This coming from the "crawdaddy" king? LMAO!
Poor Romper. Still arguing with yourself?
Frank

Spokane, WA

#173812 Oct 3, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry Frank, Obama didn't illegally pass the bill. He signed it. he's the PRESIDENT.
BTW, Frank, the ACA has been upheld by the Supreme Court, so claiming it is invalid will not fly.
Ignoring the Republicans? There's nothing to negotiate. The ACA is not a bill that is being debated before passage. It is the law. It has been the law for three years. It was affirmed by the Supreme Court and the American voters rejected the man who vowed to repeal it. Over forty repeal attempts have failed in Congress. It's time for the Tea Baggers to grow up and get over their infantile tantrum.
<quoted text>
When Obama ran for office in 2008 he promised he would never sign a bill that did not have bipartisan support. Not one Republican voted for ObamaKare, and eighty of the Democrats that voted for ObamaKare were voted out of office either before ObamKare was pushed trough illegally during holiday break or during the next election. Polls show between 55% and 78% of United States citizens do not want ObamaKare and many of those that claim thy like ObamKare,including members of Congress are just saying they like it because they love Obama and don't want to let him accept the failure that he believes to be his only achievement.
Frank

Spokane, WA

#173813 Oct 3, 2013
wojar wrote:
Ever since 1790 it has been required that prior to naturalization in the US that aliens must be "under the jurisdiction" of the United States for a period of years. That means they had to be "subject to the jurisdiction" of the United States before they could be citizens.
Play Law cannot change that fact.
Barack Hussein Obama's father never immigrated to the United States and was never a citizen of the United States,not even for one day.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 1 min fetch almighty 1,193,111
Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 8 min scirocco 69,139
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 30 min IB DaMann 51,584
Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 3 hr orange 71,562
Arlington Heights woman charged with psychic-se... (Dec '08) 3 hr Kyle 27
Mrs. Bush: History will vindicate her husband (Jun '08) 7 hr Just Saying 54,548
Word (Dec '08) 9 hr Moon Rhythm 5,088
Chicago Dating
Find my Match
More from around the web

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]

NFL Latest News

Updated 12:51 pm PST

Bleacher Report12:51PM
Report: 7-Time Pro Bowl LB Briggs Won't Return to Bears
Bleacher Report 2:30 PM
Dan Herron Tendered by Colts, Jerrell Freeman Receives Qualifying Offer
NBC Sports 3:57 PM
Colts tender Jerrell Freeman, Boom Herron, Daniel Adongo
NFL 5:29 PM
Chicago Bears must make Jay Cutler decision soon
NFL 6:30 PM
Report: Lance Briggs will not return to Chicago Bears