BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

Full story: Chicago Tribune

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...
Comments
152,981 - 153,000 of 175,089 Comments Last updated 22 min ago
Frank

Spokane, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#173498
Oct 1, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Fox News Propaganda wrote:
<quoted text>
Bush and Cheney Republicans destroyed Middle Class and Working Poor Americans and were warned about a financial meltdown and did nothing about it.
Instead of bailing out average Americans Bush and Cheney only bailed out Wall Street.
PROOF:
GAO's Walker Sounds An Alarm
http://tinyurl.com/2aptf5 11.05.06 Nov. 5, 2006
Accountants don't often speak in revolutionary tones, but these days David Walker, head of the U.S. Government Accountability Office sounds a lot more like Thomas Paine than your average calculator-carrying CPA.
"History has shown that when America faces difficult challenges and when it rises to the occasion, anything is possible," he said in an interview. Yet “a fiscal cancer,” he said,“is growing within us, that if we don't treat, can have catastrophic consequences."
http://www.forbes.com/2006/11/05/walker-gao-c...
You have this all backwards. Bush actually went to Congress multiple times to try to stop the problems. Of course, after the November 2006 election Bush no longer had a chance and basically gave up on attempted to get the Democrats to change.

“zero nuclear weapons”

Since: Sep 08

Perryville

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#173500
Oct 1, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

WelbyMD wrote:
Nothing we can say or do will stop this Kenyan-born Antichrist. All we can really do is get right with God by inviting Jesus into our hearts and surrendering our lives to Him. John 3:16
Lisin the Antichrist is called MABUS
Ellen1

Arlington, MA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#173501
Oct 1, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

WelbyMD wrote:
Nothing we can say or do will stop this Kenyan-born Antichrist. All we can really do is get right with God by inviting Jesus into our hearts and surrendering our lives to Him. John 3:16
The “born in Kenya” story is the height of the loony side of the birther movement. It is based on alleged birth certificates, like that of Lucas D. Smith, and falsifications–such as the claim that Obama’s Kenyan grandmother said that he was born in Kenya—when she actually said right on the same tape that he was born IN HAWAII, and she said in another interview that the first that her family in Kenya had heard of Obama’s birth was in a letter FROM HAWAII.

Lucas D. Smith claimed that he went to Kenya and got Obama’s birth certificate at a hospital in Mombasa. But Lucas D. Smith has constantly refused to show proof that he, Smith, had ever gone to Kenya. All that he would have to do would be to show a Kenya stamp on a page of a passport, but Lucas D. Smith has refused to do that, constantly, and he has also constantly refused to say why he will not show that proof.

Laying aside for a moment the overwhelming proof that Obama was born in Hawaii, the evidence that Obama was NOT born in Kenya is also very strong. There were a grand total of 21 people who came to the USA from Kenya in 1961. Of these only seven were US citizens. And the birther myth has always been that Obama’s parents went there and returned by plane, but only one person came to the USA from Kenya in 1961 by plane and that person was, wait for it, NOT a US citizen. And Obama’s father did not go to Kenya in 1961 either (making it unlikely that his mother did, since travel late in pregnancy was rare, and even more rare without the husband going along). WND has proved with a FOI Act request that Obama senior stayed in Hawaii throughout 1961.

And the Kenyan government investigated the “born in Kenya” story, and found that it was not true.

“Jon Chessoni, a first secretary at the Kenyan Embassy in Washington, can’t understand why his office gets so many baseless questions about whether Barack Obama was born in Kenya.

“It’s madness,” said Chessoni on Monday.“His father, in 1961, would not even have been in Kenya. When this matter first came up, the Kenyan government did its research and confirmed that these are all baseless claims.””

http://washingtonindependent.com/53654/forged

Obama has a Hawaii birth certificate that says that he was born in Hawaii, in Kapiolani Hospital, and the officials of both parties in Hawaii have confirmed that fact. It is also confirmed by the birth announcement in the Hawaii newspapers in 1961, which were sent to the papers only by the DOH of Hawaii.

Obama’s birth announcement appeared in a section of the newspapers called Health Bureau Statistics. As the name indicates, and as the papers and the DOH also say, ONLY the DOH of Hawaii could send birth notices to the Health Bureau Statistics section of the paper. And the DOH only sent out those notices for children that it had issued birth certificates for, and in 1961 the DOH was not allowed to register the births of children who were not born in Hawaii.

Oh, and there is this:

http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2011/04/kapiol
Ellen1

Arlington, MA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#173502
Oct 1, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Continuing...

Is that all? NO there is more.

Birthers allege that the Kenyan government has hidden all documents that prove that Obama’s mother went to Kenya. Well, that is possible, but not likely—such things tend to leak. But what about the US government? Did it hide its records too?

That is because, obviously, if a child were born in Kenya she or he would need a US travel document to get to the USA. We simply do not allow a child to be carried into the USA without some form of official document.(Except some are smuggled across the Mexican and Canadian borders, but Kenya does not have a land border with the USA.) And a US travel document, such as having Obama added to his mother’s US passport would have required an application for that document in the US consulate in Nairobi Kenya.

That application would have been filed in multiple files, and there would have been communication about it with Washington, so it would be difficult to be lost or scrapped. And the Bush Administration was in charge of the US State Department for eight years until early 2009, so they could have found it, and if they did they would surely have shown it, and they didn’t.

So, for the “born in Kenya” story to be true, both Kenya and the Bush Administration must be part of a plot. Hawaii too, of course, and that would include the former Republican governor of Hawaii. And the birth notices in the Hawaii newspapers that were placed by the DOH in the Hawaii newspapers (and only the DOH could put notices into the Health Bureau Statistics section of the papers) in 1961 would have to be fraudulent too.

And, Kenya is about ten thousand miles from Hawaii, and the idea that Obama’s parents had that kind of money (Obama’s American grandfather was a furniture salesman and his grandmother was just a low-level employee in a bank at the time) or would spend it on a trip while Obama’s mother was late in pregnancy (which was very rare in those days) and take the risk of stillbirth and Yellow Fever (which was endemic in Kenya, and a Yellow Fever shot is bad during pregnancy) is nutty in the extreme.

The bottom line: There is no proof that Obama’s mother went to Kenya and it is highly unlikely that she did. The Kenyan government and Obama’s relatives both say that he was not born there. If he were born in Kenya there would have to be US government documents saying that his family applied for a passport or a visa, and there isn’t any. There is no INS check in for Obama or his mother (which would normally have taken place in New York, since there were no direct flights, and those files are not missing), and the birth certificate and the confirmation of the officials of both parties and the Index Data and the birth notices in the Hawaii newspapers all show that he was born in Hawaii.
Ellen1

Arlington, MA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#173503
Oct 1, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Truth Detector wrote:
And herein lies Barack HUSSEIN Obama's problems for whether he was born in Kenya as some claim or whether he was born in Hawaii as others claim...his American citizen mother did NOT reside in the U.S. for 5 years after age 14 as she was 18 years of age when Obama was born...only 4 years after reaching the mandatory 14 years of age...and Obama was born in 1964 so he comes under the same rules of law as Ted Cruz does.
This simple fact makes Barack HUSSEIN Obama ineligible to be President NO matter which side of the 'birther' vs 'non-birther' battle one is on.[...]
Answer: Obama was born in HAWAII, and the evidence for that is OVERWHELMING.

And, guess what, every child born on US soil is a Natural Born US Citizen regardless of the age of the mother of the time and regardless of the citizenship of the parents at the time of birth. Birth on US soil is sufficient. Yes, even anchor babies, children born to illegal immigrants on US soil, are Natural Born US Citizens because that is what the term Natural Born MEANS. The expression comes from the common law (not from Vattel, who is not even mentioned once in the Federalist Papers) and includes every child born on the soil of a country except for the children of foreign diplomats.

“What is a natural born citizen? Clearly, someone born within the United States or one of its territories is a natural born citizen.”(Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on OCTOBER 5, 2004)–Senator Orrin G. Hatch (R-UT).

“Every child born in the United States is a natural-born United States citizen except for the children of diplomats.”—Senator Lindsay Graham (December 11, 2008 letter to constituents)

“Under the longstanding English common-law principle of jus soli, persons born within the territory of the sovereign (other than children of enemy aliens or foreign diplomats) are citizens from birth. Thus, those persons born within the United States are “natural born citizens” and eligible to be President. Much less certain, however, is whether children born abroad of United States citizens are “natural born citizens” eligible to serve as President …”—- Edwin Meese, et al, THE HERITAGE GUIDE TO THE CONSTITUTION (2005)[Edwin Meese was Ronald Reagan’s attorney general, and the Heritage Foundation is a well-known Conservative organization.]

Still don't believe? Well there are TEN appeals court rulings on Obama's and McCain's NBC status and every single one of them said that the US Supreme Court had defined the meaning of Natural Born Citizen in the Wong Kim Ark case (which, BTW, was AFTER Minor v. Happersett, which did not say what birthers think in any case). And every single one of them said that the US Supreme Court had ruled in the Wong Kim Ark case that EVERY child born on US soil except for the children of foreign diplomats is a Natural Born Citizen. That is regardless of the citizenship of the parents at the time and regardless of the age of the mother at the time.
Ellen1

Arlington, MA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#173505
Oct 1, 2013
 
Ellen1

Arlington, MA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#173506
Oct 1, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

“Natural born citizen. Persons who are born within the jurisdiction of a national government, i.e. in its territorial limits, or those born of citizens temporarily residing abroad.”— Black’s Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition

(These links will work better than those shown above.)

http://www.fredthompsonsamerica.com/2012/07/3...

http://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyiname...

http://tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_eviden...

http://tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_eviden...

http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/bookmarks/fact...

http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2009/01/natura...

http://www.obamabirthbook.com/http:/www.obama...

http://ohforgoodnesssake.com/...

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#173507
Oct 1, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Again Obama is a half hour late for a speech. It seems the more Liberal a person is,the more they are late. And then he attacks the Republicans for being late!!!
Oh, you remember Bill Clinton's event where he was late and Bono did an impersonation of Bill?!? Just in case you did not see it, here it is;
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
Dale

Hutchinson, KS

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#173508
Oct 1, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Ellen1 wrote:
http://www.obamaconspiracy.org /2009/01/the-great-mother-of-a ll-natural-born-citizen-quotat ion-pages/
LMAO!!!
"All persons born in the allegiance of the king are natural-born subjects, and all persons born in the allegiance of the United States are natural-born citizens. Birth and allegiance go together..Such is the rule of the common law, and it is the common law of this country, as well as of England. There are two exceptions, and only two, to the universality of its application. The children of ambassadors are in theory born in the allegiance of the powers the ambassadors represent, and slaves, in legal contemplation, are property, and not persons. 2 Kent Com. 1 ; Calven's Case, 7 Coke, 1 ; 4 Black. Com. 366 ; Lynch v. Clark, 1 Sandf. Ch. 139.
Looks like everyone has forgotten that we haven't used English common law since Apr 9, 1866, citizenship at this time comes under Constitutional Law.
At the moment of birth, Jr. was a citizen of his father's nation, just a fact that precludes him from being a citizen of the US, since the Constitution has never recognized a dual-citizenship.(See 14th Amendment)

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#173509
Oct 1, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Fox News Propaganda wrote:
<quoted text>
The wealthy has never been punished in America except when Republican President General Eisenhower had them paying 91% in taxes and had a balanced budget for average Americans.
What was the tax rate under Truman? Under FDR? Under HOOVER? But that evil Republican Eisenhower is bad to the bone.
http://taxfoundation.org/sites/taxfoundation....
Dale

Hutchinson, KS

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#173510
Oct 1, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Ellen1 wrote:
“Natural born citizen. Persons who are born within the jurisdiction of a national government, i.e. in its territorial limits, or those born of citizens temporarily residing abroad.”— Black’s Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition
(These links will work better than those shown above.)
http://www.fredthompsonsamerica.com/2012/07/3...
http://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyiname...
http://tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_eviden...
http://tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_eviden...
http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/bookmarks/fact...
http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2009/01/natura...
http://www.obamabirthbook.com/http:/www.obama...
http://ohforgoodnesssake.com/...
LMAO!!!

Wong Kim Ark v. US, para. 34, "Nor can it be doubted that it is the inherent right of every independent nation to determine for itself, and according to its own constitution and laws, what classes of persons shall be entitled to its citizenship."

We did just that in the 14th Amendment, aliens and foreigners do not receive citizenship ipso facto, they must be naturalized.(See 14th Amendment)

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#173511
Oct 1, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

In Ike's first year in office the marginal tax rate was 92% above $200k.
The following year it dropped to 91% above $200k.
In 1955 it was 91%......... above $400k where it remained until 1964 (voted in 1963) which reduced it to 77% above $400k
And who did that and why? JOHN F. KENNEDY!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch...

Yep, JFK cut taxes in a recession.
And what has Obama done? INCREASED tax in a recession!!!
Ellen1

Arlington, MA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#173512
Oct 1, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Dale wrote:
<quoted text>LMAO!!!
"All persons born in the allegiance of the king are natural-born subjects, and all persons born in the allegiance of the United States are natural-born citizens. Birth and allegiance go together..Such is the rule of the common law, and it is the common law of this country, as well as of England. There are two exceptions, and only two, to the universality of its application. The children of ambassadors are in theory born in the allegiance of the powers the ambassadors represent, and slaves, in legal contemplation, are property, and not persons. 2 Kent Com. 1 ; Calven's Case, 7 Coke, 1 ; 4 Black. Com. 366 ; Lynch v. Clark, 1 Sandf. Ch. 139.
Looks like everyone has forgotten that we haven't used English common law since Apr 9, 1866, citizenship at this time comes under Constitutional Law.
At the moment of birth, Jr. was a citizen of his father's nation, just a fact that precludes him from being a citizen of the US, since the Constitution has never recognized a dual-citizenship.(See 14th Amendment)
Neither the citizenship of the father NOR dual citizenship of the child at the time of birth has any effect whatever on Natural Born Citizen status. And, in fact, we have already had two presidents before Obama who were dual citizens at the time of birth, Woodrow Wilson because his mother never gave up her British subject status, and Dwight D. Eisenhower because old German laws made the grandchildren of its citizens German citizens at birth. And James Madison actually was a dual citizen at the time that he was president, having been made a full voting citizen of France by the French National Assembly during the French Revolution.

If dual citizen status could have any effect on our definition of Natural Born Citizen, then any foreign country could just pass a law making someone or some group of people citizens of that country and they would not be eligible. Mexico, for example, could just pass a law that said that any child born in Texas was also a Mexican citizen, and if dual citizen status had any effect on their Natural Born Citizen status, they would not be eligible to become president, not one of them.

Fogbow summarizes it this way: http://www.thefogbow.com/birther-claims-debun...

More important is that IF the writers of the US Constitution had wanted people with two or one foreign citizen parent not to be eligible or people who had been born with dual citizenship at the time of birth not to be eligible THEY WOULD HAVE SAID SO, and they didn't. Under strict construction rules and under libertarian thinking, something is not forbidden unless there is a specific law or constitutional statement that says that it is forbidden, and guess what, there is NO specific statement in the Constitution or in any of the writings of the members of the Constitutional Convention or any of the American leaders at the time that bars the children of foreigners or people who had been born dual citizens from becoming president.

In short there is nothing in the US Constitution that says either that the US-born children of foreigners or people who were dual citizens at birth (or dual citizens when president, like James Madison) are not eligible to be president. And, if they did not specifically forbid it, it is not forbidden.
Ellen1

Arlington, MA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#173513
Oct 1, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Dale wrote:
<quoted text>LMAO!!!
Wong Kim Ark v. US, para. 34, "Nor can it be doubted that it is the inherent right of every independent nation to determine for itself, and according to its own constitution and laws, what classes of persons shall be entitled to its citizenship."
We did just that in the 14th Amendment, aliens and foreigners do not receive citizenship ipso facto, they must be naturalized.(See 14th Amendment)
A child born on US soil is neither an alien nor a foreigner, nor is she or he a naturalized citizen.

And, if the writers of the US Constitution had intended that the US-born children of foreigners were to not be US citizens at birth or that the US-born children of foreigners were a lower category of citizens who were not eligible to become president, they would have told us---and they didn't.
Learn to Read

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#173514
Oct 1, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Dale wrote:
<quoted text>LMAO!!!

Wong Kim Ark v. US, para. 34, "Nor can it be doubted that it is the inherent right of every independent nation to determine for itself, and according to its own constitution and laws, what classes of persons shall be entitled to its citizenship."

We did just that in the 14th Amendment, aliens and foreigners do not receive citizenship ipso facto, they must be naturalized.(See 14th Amendment)
And Dufus fantasizes that this amendment also changed the meaning of the phrase "subject to the jurisdiction thereof". Dufus makes a habit of being very wrong
Dale

Hutchinson, KS

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#173515
Oct 1, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Ellen1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Neither the citizenship of the father NOR dual citizenship of the child at the time of birth has any effect whatever on Natural Born Citizen status. And, in fact, we have already had two presidents before Obama who were dual citizens at the time of birth, Woodrow Wilson because his mother never gave up her British subject status, and Dwight D. Eisenhower because old German laws made the grandchildren of its citizens German citizens at birth. And James Madison actually was a dual citizen at the time that he was president, having been made a full voting citizen of France by the French National Assembly during the French Revolution.
If dual citizen status could have any effect on our definition of Natural Born Citizen, then any foreign country could just pass a law making someone or some group of people citizens of that country and they would not be eligible. Mexico, for example, could just pass a law that said that any child born in Texas was also a Mexican citizen, and if dual citizen status had any effect on their Natural Born Citizen status, they would not be eligible to become president, not one of them.
Fogbow summarizes it this way: http://www.thefogbow.com/birther-claims-debun...
More important is that IF the writers of the US Constitution had wanted people with two or one foreign citizen parent not to be eligible or people who had been born with dual citizenship at the time of birth not to be eligible THEY WOULD HAVE SAID SO, and they didn't. Under strict construction rules and under libertarian thinking, something is not forbidden unless there is a specific law or constitutional statement that says that it is forbidden, and guess what, there is NO specific statement in the Constitution or in any of the writings of the members of the Constitutional Convention or any of the American leaders at the time that bars the children of foreigners or people who had been born dual citizens from becoming president.
In short there is nothing in the US Constitution that says either that the US-born children of foreigners or people who were dual citizens at birth (or dual citizens when president, like James Madison) are not eligible to be president. And, if they did not specifically forbid it, it is not forbidden.
LMAO!!! You just can't get around the fact that Jr. was born a citizen of his father's country.
Citizenship is by Constitutional Law, now if you can find dual-citizenship in the 14th amendment, then you win.

"This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the Government of the United States, but will include every other class of persons. It settles the great question of citizenship and removes all doubt as to what persons are or are not citizens of the United States. This has long been a great desideratum in the jurisprudence and legislation of this country."
Ellen1

Arlington, MA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#173516
Oct 1, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Dale wrote:
<quoted text>LMAO!!! You just can't get around the fact that Jr. was born a citizen of his father's country.
Citizenship is by Constitutional Law, now if you can find dual-citizenship in the 14th amendment, then you win.
"This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the Government of the United States, but will include every other class of persons. It settles the great question of citizenship and removes all doubt as to what persons are or are not citizens of the United States. This has long been a great desideratum in the jurisprudence and legislation of this country."


Answer: A child born on US soil is neither an alien nor a foreigner, nor is she or he a naturalized citizen. A child born on US soil is a Natural Born US citizen, the only exception being the children of foreign diplomats.

And, if the writers of the US Constitution had intended that the US-born children of foreigners were to not be US citizens at birth or that the US-born children of foreigners were a lower category of citizens who were not eligible to become president, they would have told us---and they didn't.

Moreover, under strict construction judicial interpretation and libertarian principles unless something is specifically forbidden in a law or in the US Constitution, it is not forbidden. And there is nothing in the US Constitution or any law that forbids the US-born children of foreigners or US citizens who happen to be dual nationals from becoming president. Not a word.
Dale

Hutchinson, KS

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#173517
Oct 1, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
And Dufus fantasizes that this amendment also changed the meaning of the phrase "subject to the jurisdiction thereof". Dufus makes a habit of being very wrong
LMAO!!! I see you are just as dumb as ever.
The phrase, "and subject to the jurisdiction, thereof", simply means the US Constitution, since the Constitution has jurisdiction over the US.
Oh, foreigners and aliens have never been "and subject to the jurisdiction, thereof", if they were they would be called citizens.
Ellen1

Arlington, MA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#173519
Oct 1, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Dale wrote:
<quoted text>LMAO!!! I see you are just as dumb as ever.
The phrase, "and subject to the jurisdiction, thereof", simply means the US Constitution, since the Constitution has jurisdiction over the US.
Oh, foreigners and aliens have never been "and subject to the jurisdiction, thereof", if they were they would be called citizens.
If the US constitution or any law specifically said that the US-born children of foreigners were not eligible to be president, they would not be eligible, but none does. If the US constitution or any law specifically said that US citizens who were dual nationals at birth are not eligible to be president, they would not be eligible to be president, but none does.

When something is not forbidden by law, it is permitted.
Dale

Hutchinson, KS

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#173520
Oct 1, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Ellen1 wrote:
“Natural born citizen. Persons who are born within the jurisdiction of a national government, i.e. in its territorial limits, or those born of citizens temporarily residing abroad.”— Black’s Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition
(These links will work better than those shown above.)
http://www.fredthompsonsamerica.com/2012/07/3...
http://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyiname...
http://tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_eviden...
http://tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_eviden...
http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/bookmarks/fact...
http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2009/01/natura...
http://www.obamabirthbook.com/http:/www.obama...
http://ohforgoodnesssake.com/...
LMAO!!! Foreigners and aliens have never been "and subject to the jurisdiction, thereof", they never lose their subject status of their country of origin, unless naturalized into the US.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

84 Users are viewing the Chicago Forum right now

Search the Chicago Forum:
Title Updated Last By Comments
Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 2 min truth 49,007
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 2 min harmonious 1,083,311
Amy 7-30 10 min Stina2 9
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 28 min Stina2 97,575
Christianity 38 min larry 1
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 1 hr litesong 45,875
Abby 7-30 2 hr Mister Tonka 7
•••
•••
•••

Chicago Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••