BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

Full story: Chicago Tribune

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...
Comments
152,701 - 152,720 of 176,660 Comments Last updated 6 min ago

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#173209
Sep 28, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Lap babies flew for free, you know?. One seat but two people. HaHaHa
So, Immigration does not count lap babies. Like you said, "wrong about what"?

Stop squirming, loser/liar, best to drop it, you are wrong, dead wrong.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

RationalState

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#173210
Sep 28, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Frank wrote:
<quoted text>ObamaKare was passed illegally by Obama because he doesn't care about the law or about what is best for our country. ObamaKare is nothing but a tax and spend appropriations bill and that kind of bill can not originate in the Senate or be passed by conciliation. What Reid is doing today is just as dishonest as what he did three years ago. ObamaKare was never meant to lower the total cost of health care. ObamKare was a plan to maker the working people pay for health care for the people that won't work. The rich people don't care about the extra seven or eight thousand dollars but the average worker already spends more than they can afford and this will break their backs. How come all the working people in this country won't stand up and complain will be a mystery to future generations.
Whoa! Hold the presses! Frank has discovered a new test for the validity of laws passed by Congress! A new binding precedent is now in effect. If Frank discerns that the President's intentions might not be a pure as the driven snow and he concludes that the President's motivation is not centered on "what's best for the country" (according to Frank), then the law is invalid.

Get a life, Frank.
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>Obamacare is the law Frank, passed by Congress and signed by the President. Repeal has failed over 40 times. There's nothing for the President to compromise over. "Kill your son or I'll kill your daughter" is not an offer for compromise.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#173211
Sep 28, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Only a fool would think O's ComaCare is a good thing. Only a fool.
BTW, anyone who travels half-way around the world in hopes of some manbutt, is the epitome of a "Loser"! Dat bs U! LMAO!
1. Apparently, millions think it's a good thing. But of course, you know better ;

2. Hmmm, now it's "manbutt". Surprise , more "gay" and "butt" obsessions.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

RationalState

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#173212
Sep 28, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Frank wrote:
<quoted text>ObamaKare is nothing like an insurance mandate or like a state run program such as Massachusetts. Every state has and has had there own state run programs, but none are the same as ObamaKare. ObamaKare is not a health care program,it is tax scheme with 2700 pages and over fifty new taxes. ObamKare was never meant to reduce total health care costs and not a single cent of the tens of billions that have been spent has been for health care for anyone. None of the trillions that will be spent over the next ten years will be spent on health care either.
An insurance mandate is nothing like an insurance mandate if Frank says it isn't.

"Every state has and has had there own state run programs, but none are the same as ObamaKare."

Who says the pre-existing policies (or lack thereof) of the various states are "the same as" Obamacare? And that means an insurance mandate is not an insurance mandate?

2700 pages means an insurance mandate is not an insurance mandate? Eh?

Frank, you're ranting aimlessly. Now go take your Aricept!

wojar wrote:
The Heritage Foundation was behind the insurance mandate when they first proposed it.
From Heritage Lecture 218:
"This mandate is based on two important principles. First, that health care protection is a responsibility of individuals, not businesses. Thus to the extent that anybody should be required to provide coverage to a family, the household mandate assumes that it is the family that carries the first responsibility. Second, it assumes that there is an implicit contract between households and society, based on the notion that health insurance is not like other forms of insurance protection."
Faux conservatives were not screaming SOCIALISM then.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#173213
Sep 28, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
What was I wrong about?
For starters, how about the November 2012 chant : "can you hear us coming?" And the constant rant that Obama is not eligible. And that being a lap baby does not count as a person when entering the United States? How about John Roberts being bought out? Shall I go on?

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#173214
Sep 28, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

P.S.: Hard to choose between "wrong" or "lies" with reference to the above. How about 50-50? Deal.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

RationalState

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#173215
Sep 28, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Frank wrote:
<quoted text>ObamaKare is the opposite of an individual mandate. ObamaKare is a tax a revenue bill designed to pull trillions of dollars away from our economy.
Wowee Zowee! An insurance mandate enforced through the tax code is not an insurance mandate.

It's not a mandate because Frank thinks it is "designed to pull" money away from the economy.

And if paranoid Frank perceives ill intent by golly it's not a mandate.

Frank, you're a crashing bore.
wojar wrote:
The Heritage Foundation was behind the insurance mandate when they first proposed it.
From Heritage Lecture 218:
"This mandate is based on two important principles. First, that health care protection is a responsibility of individuals, not businesses. Thus to the extent that anybody should be required to provide coverage to a family, the household mandate assumes that it is the family that carries the first responsibility. Second, it assumes that there is an implicit contract between households and society, based on the notion that health insurance is not like other forms of insurance protection."
Faux conservatives were not screaming SOCIALISM then.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

RationalState

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#173216
Sep 28, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Frank wrote:
<quoted text>The numbers you were looking at from the 1962 report do not state that only fourteen Kenyan's traveled to the United States. Read along the entire line, first are the people that traveled by boat, then across the line are the people that traveled by air and the smaller number that is much higher than fourteen is the number that actually immigrated to the United States,that number is minute compared to the number that traveled. Barack Obama's father never immigrated to the United states and he was never a citizen of the United States,not even for one day.
Frank, nobody said only fourteen people traveled to the US from Kenya.

Frank, what part of Total by Sea and air (21) do you not comprehend?(14 aliens, 7 citizens)

By air: total 1, aliens 1, citizens -.

By sea: total 20, aliens 13, citizens 7.

That's ever number in the entire friggin' line Frank.

One person arrived by air, an alien. Obviously not a newborn infant flying by himself.

Capsice?
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry, only one person arrived by air - an alien. You really think a four-day-old child was flying by himself?
<quoted text>

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

RationalState

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#173217
Sep 28, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Frank: "the smaller number that is much higher than fourteen is the number that actually immigrated to the United States"

Frank, RU on crack?

Since: Sep 13

Kendallville, IN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#173218
Sep 28, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

When are you racist morons going to get it through your head? IDIOTS. He is now, and will be, for the next 3 years, POTUS. Give it up. You only make yourselves look delusional and ignorant.
Majority Will wrote:
Barack Obama was born at the Kapi'olani Medical Center for Women & Children in Honolulu, Hawaii, to Ann Dunham, a White American from Wichita, Kansas of English and Irish descent.
Congress officially declares Obama next president
By JIM ABRAMS 30 minutes ago
WASHINGTON (AP) Congress has officially declared Barack Obama the next President of the United States after tallying electoral college votes in a centuries old tradition.
The House and Senate met in joint session to hear their colleagues read off the electoral votes from the 50 states and the District of Columbia. The outcome, never in doubt, was 365 votes for Obama and Vice President-elect Joe Biden, and 173 votes for John McCain and his running mate, Sarah Palin.
Both Democrats and Republicans gave a standing ovation as Vice President Dick Cheney, in his role as president of the Senate, announced the vote count for Obama.
THIS IS A BREAKING NEWS UPDATE. Check back soon for further information. AP's earlier story is below.
WASHINGTON (AP) The House and Senate are coming together in a centuries-old tradition to count the electoral votes from the November election and formally declare that Barack Obama will be the 44th president of the United States.
Vice President Dick Cheney will take a seat next to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi to preside over the joint session of Congress on Thursday. In what could be his last act as president of the Senate, Cheney was to hand the certificates from each state's electors to the tellers two members each from the House and the Senate to be read off and tallied.
At the conclusion of the state-by-state rundown, Cheney was to read the tally sheet and announce the results that Obama has been elected president and Joe Biden will succeed Cheney as vice president.
The 12th Amendment, ratified in 1804, directs the electors chosen by the states to meet and vote for president and vice president, conveying the results to the president of the Senate.
That was accomplished Dec. 15, when the electors, in a largely ceremonial rite preordained by Obama's Nov. 4 victory over John McCain, gathered in state capitals to cast their votes. The tally was 365 for Obama, 173 for McCain.
The electoral college is made up of 538 electors, with each state getting its equivalent in the 435-member House and the 100-member Senate. The District of Columbia gets the other three electors.
The session this year should be drama-free, unlike in 2001, when then-Vice President Al Gore presided over the session that declared George W. Bush the winner over Gore in a disputed election. Gore disallowed objections from fellow Democrats who asserted that Bush had unfairly won Florida and tried to block Florida's electoral votes from being counted.
wojar

Bristol, CT

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#173219
Sep 28, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Only a fool would think O's ComaCare is a good thing. Only a fool.
BTW, anyone who travels half-way around the world in hopes of some manbutt, is the epitome of a "Loser"! Dat bs U! LMAO!
Anyone who believes sock puppets are real is not just a loser but also a birther.
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#173220
Sep 28, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
For starters, how about the November 2012 chant : "can you hear us coming?" And the constant rant that Obama is not eligible. And that being a lap baby does not count as a person when entering the United States? How about John Roberts being bought out? Shall I go on?
A song lyric can be "wrong"? I think not. I do not think Obobblehead is eligible. I didn't say a lap baby would not count as a person entering the U.S. I do think Roberts was bought off. You can go on as long as you like. Just remember you have no voice here. LMAO! You said you were about 5' 10", right? Hmmm?
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#173221
Sep 28, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

unsui wrote:
When are you racist morons going to get it through your head? IDIOTS. He is now, and will be, for the next 3 years, POTUS. Give it up. You only make yourselves look delusional and ignorant.
<quoted text>
He is merely the CiCino! Get that through your thick skull. HaHa!
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#173222
Sep 28, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

wojar wrote:
<quoted text>Anyone who believes sock puppets are real is not just a loser but also a birther.
Is that supposed to make sense? Any sense at all? BTW, the epitome of a loser is one who travels half-way around the world in hopes of nailing some manbutt! LMAO!!! lil raggy

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#173223
Sep 28, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Frank, nobody said only fourteen people traveled to the US from Kenya.
Frank, what part of Total by Sea and air (21) do you not comprehend?(14 aliens, 7 citizens)
By air: total 1, aliens 1, citizens -.
By sea: total 20, aliens 13, citizens 7.
That's ever number in the entire friggin' line Frank.
One person arrived by air, an alien. Obviously not a newborn infant flying by himself.
Capsice?
<quoted text>
You wrote : "One person arrived by air, an alien. Obviously not a newborn infant flying by himself."

Wojar, wojar, you don't understand. Immigration lawyer and specialist LRS did point out that this "newborn infant" travelled on his mother's lap and therefore had no need to be "vetted" by Immigration. Also, his mother, a 100% red-blooded American, had somehow become an alien.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

RationalState

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#173224
Sep 28, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Frank wrote:
<quoted text>I was corrected on that number of 334 by boat since I was looking at the 1961 numbers. Those numbers can't be correct, it would have been asterisked if the number went from 334 one year (the number on page 68) to 67 the next. Since air travel was common in 1961,it is not likely that you number of zero is even close.
Zero arrivals by air from Kenya in 1960 and 1962 reports. Frank can't comprehend that 1961 was an outlier.

Geez, could it be because that was the year of the "airlift"?

Sorry Frank, air travel to the US from Kenya was anything but common in those days.
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
ONE came by air, not your phoney numbers, what was it, 334 for which I'm still waiing for proof. ONE, not your made-up numbers. And your trying to be funny to wiggle out of your absurdities (placed in a box and shipped!) is pathetic. An even slightly smarter person would've kept quiet, but it seems you don't mind self-clownstomping. You're a fool, you know that?
"Can you hear us coming?". LMAO (LRS tm reg'd). Like those funny and noisy goose-stepping Nazi drill-robot soldiers in the stage presentation of Evita.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#173225
Sep 28, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
A song lyric can be "wrong"? I think not. I do not think Obobblehead is eligible. I didn't say a lap baby would not count as a person entering the U.S. I do think Roberts was bought off. You can go on as long as you like. Just remember you have no voice here. LMAO! You said you were about 5' 10", right? Hmmm?
The lies, they just keep a'comin', don't they^ Never spoke about my height. "A song lyric can be "wrong"? " Another lie, my my, you grow them like in a garden, don't you? For the 50th time, minimum, please tell us what you referred to prior to November 6 when you kept chanting "can you hear us coming?" and why you stopped chanting it beginning November 7, 2012? Do I detect another lie coming up? Yes, you said a lap baby did not count, or clearly inferred it did not. Even tried to slough it off, as usual, saying baby travelled free.

I have no voice here? You mean because I'm Canadian, I'm wrong when I declare you're a liar? I have to be American to declare the obvious?
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#173226
Sep 28, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
You wrote : "One person arrived by air, an alien. Obviously not a newborn infant flying by himself."
Wojar, wojar, you don't understand. Immigration lawyer and specialist LRS did point out that this "newborn infant" travelled on his mother's lap and therefore had no need to be "vetted" by Immigration. Also, his mother, a 100% red-blooded American, had somehow become an alien.
I see Path has entered his "creative" playtime and will now just start making up stuff. Think I'll go take a dump! LMAO!!!

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#173227
Sep 28, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Is that supposed to make sense? Any sense at all? BTW, the epitome of a loser is one who travels half-way around the world in hopes of nailing some manbutt! LMAO!!! lil raggy
Again the anal repressed homosexual reveals himself. Manbutt? Who but a repressed gay invents that kind of word?

Get this straight, "can you hear us coming" loser, homosexuality is not bad, not wrong, and nothing to be ashamed of. Come out. Now. You'll be at peace at long last.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#173228
Sep 28, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
I see Path has entered his "creative" playtime and will now just start making up stuff. Think I'll go take a dump! LMAO!!!
LRS : "Kerplunk"

Step mom : "What? Again on the floor? I'm not cleaning that up."

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

79 Users are viewing the Chicago Forum right now

Search the Chicago Forum:
Title Updated Last By Comments
Abby 8-20 6 min Sublime1 2
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 7 min TSM 1,095,102
Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 10 min KankaFred 49,235
Chicago voters split on luring Obama presidenti... 11 min reality is a crutch 1
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 20 min Sublime1 97,732
police arrest 47 people overnight after bottles... 22 min David Mccormack 1
IL Who do you support for Governor in Illinois in ... (Oct '10) 31 min CitiZen9 3,895
•••
•••
•••

Chicago Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••