BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

There are 189577 comments on the Chicago Tribune story from Jan 8, 2009, titled BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen.... In it, Chicago Tribune reports that:

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chicago Tribune.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#173193 Sep 27, 2013
Hey Frank. Nobody cares how many arrived by boat. Got a clue?

Of course not!
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#173194 Sep 27, 2013
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
As often as you're wrong you'd think admitting once in a while would be bound to happen
What was I wrong about?

“Arm the homeless!”

Since: Jul 12

The internet

#173195 Sep 27, 2013
Dale wrote:
<quoted text>LMAO!!!
(There is general consensus*) that the Left includes progressives, communists, social-liberals, greens, social-democrats, socialists, democratic-socialists, civil-libertarians (as in "social-libertarians "; not to be confused with the right's "economic-libertarians "), secularists, and anarchists,[5][6][7][8] and that the Right includes conservatives, reactionaries, neoconservatives, capitalists, neoliberals, economic-libertarians (not to be confused with the left's "civil-libertarians" ), social-authoritarians, monarchists, theocrats, nationalists, Nazis (including neo-Nazis) and fascists.[9]
*Just a general consensus, so the above must not be a fact.
You are correct, consensus is not fact. Not by a long shot.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#173196 Sep 27, 2013
Frank wrote:
<quoted text>The numbers you were looking at from the 1962 report do not state that only fourteen Kenyan's traveled to the United States. Read along the entire line, first are the people that traveled by boat, then across the line are the people that traveled by air and the smaller number that is much higher than fourteen is the number that actually immigrated to the United States,that number is minute compared to the number that traveled. Barack Obama's father never immigrated to the United states and he was never a citizen of the United States,not even for one day.
Sorry, LOSER. Please learn how to read the English language.

14 aliens arrived. Only one person by air.

Obviously not a four day old child alone.

Grow up Frank.

GROW UP!
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry, only one person arrived by air - an alien. You really think a four-day-old child was flying by himself?
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#173197 Sep 27, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry, loser, but ur not the Supreme Court. Grow up!
Man, did they ever get that one WRONG! Wonder how much Roberts took a dive for? BTW, the "Supreme" court was and still is wrong. Fact.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#173198 Sep 27, 2013
Hey Frank, total by Sea and Air: 21.

Aliens 14 Citizens 7

By sea 20

By air 1

Grow up, Frank.
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#173199 Sep 27, 2013
wojar wrote:
Hey Frank, total by Sea and Air: 21.
Aliens 14 Citizens 7
By sea 20
By air 1
Grow up, Frank.
Lap babies flew for free, you know?. One seat but two people. HaHaHa
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#173200 Sep 27, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
You're not man and mature enough to admit when you've erred. And you've proven it hundreds of times here, even when shown your own prose in black and white, you hedge, haw, wiggle, twist, and when you're backed up against the wall, out come the expletives, anal and homosexual rants. I find it much easier to say , "hey, I erred here" and when appropriate, like just now with LRT for instance, I apologize, it's the thing to do.
If it's that easy to do, then you should be apologizing to everyone you ever posted to!

“Arm the homeless!”

Since: Jul 12

The internet

#173201 Sep 27, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Lap babies flew for free, you know?. One seat but two people. HaHaHa
Or maybe conjoined twins!

Two seats but one people.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#173202 Sep 27, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Man, did they ever get that one WRONG! Wonder how much Roberts took a dive for? BTW, the "Supreme" court was and still is wrong. Fact.
Last time I checked 5-4 is not a single-handed decision.

It's the law. Loser. Check out Art. 3 Sec. 1.
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry, loser, but ur not the Supreme Court. Grow up!

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#173203 Sep 27, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Lap babies flew for free, you know?. One seat but two people. HaHaHa
Has nothing to do with how much they paid. Loser.
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#173204 Sep 27, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Last time I checked 5-4 is not a single-handed decision.
It's the law. Loser. Check out Art. 3 Sec. 1.
<quoted text>
Only a fool would think O's ComaCare is a good thing. Only a fool.

BTW, anyone who travels half-way around the world in hopes of some manbutt, is the epitome of a "Loser"! Dat bs U! LMAO!
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#173205 Sep 28, 2013
Truth Detector wrote:
On Nov. 19, 2013, a day that will hopefully live on in the history of our once great republic, I call upon millions of Americans who have been appalled and disgusted by Obama’s criminality – his Muslim, socialist, anti-Semitic, anti-Christian, anti-white, pro-illegal immigrant, pro-radical gay and lesbian agenda – among other outrages, to descend on Washington, D.C., en masse, and demand that he leave town and resign from office
http://giveusliberty1776.blogspot.com/2013/09...
Another gathering of 6?
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#173206 Sep 28, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>What was I wrong about?
Where to begin ...
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#173207 Sep 28, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>Has nothing to do with how much they paid. Loser.
Sure Woj. Don't you know that immigration only counted people that paid full fare? I'll bet Obama's mom used frequent flier miles AND held him on her lap ... 2 people, no fare, no tick on the tally sheet

Simple ....

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#173208 Sep 28, 2013
Truth Detector wrote:
On Nov. 19, 2013, a day that will hopefully live on in the history of our once great republic, I call upon millions of Americans who have been appalled and disgusted by Obamas criminality his Muslim, socialist, anti-Semitic, anti-Christian, anti-white, pro-illegal immigrant, pro-radical gay and lesbian agenda among other outrages, to descend on Washington, D.C., en masse, and demand that he leave town and resign from office
http://giveusliberty1776.blogspot.com/2013/09...
Give the U.S. liberty from crackpot orgs like giveusliberty1776.blogspot.com/2013/09

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#173209 Sep 28, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Lap babies flew for free, you know?. One seat but two people. HaHaHa
So, Immigration does not count lap babies. Like you said, "wrong about what"?

Stop squirming, loser/liar, best to drop it, you are wrong, dead wrong.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#173210 Sep 28, 2013
Frank wrote:
<quoted text>ObamaKare was passed illegally by Obama because he doesn't care about the law or about what is best for our country. ObamaKare is nothing but a tax and spend appropriations bill and that kind of bill can not originate in the Senate or be passed by conciliation. What Reid is doing today is just as dishonest as what he did three years ago. ObamaKare was never meant to lower the total cost of health care. ObamKare was a plan to maker the working people pay for health care for the people that won't work. The rich people don't care about the extra seven or eight thousand dollars but the average worker already spends more than they can afford and this will break their backs. How come all the working people in this country won't stand up and complain will be a mystery to future generations.
Whoa! Hold the presses! Frank has discovered a new test for the validity of laws passed by Congress! A new binding precedent is now in effect. If Frank discerns that the President's intentions might not be a pure as the driven snow and he concludes that the President's motivation is not centered on "what's best for the country" (according to Frank), then the law is invalid.

Get a life, Frank.
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>Obamacare is the law Frank, passed by Congress and signed by the President. Repeal has failed over 40 times. There's nothing for the President to compromise over. "Kill your son or I'll kill your daughter" is not an offer for compromise.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#173211 Sep 28, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Only a fool would think O's ComaCare is a good thing. Only a fool.
BTW, anyone who travels half-way around the world in hopes of some manbutt, is the epitome of a "Loser"! Dat bs U! LMAO!
1. Apparently, millions think it's a good thing. But of course, you know better ;

2. Hmmm, now it's "manbutt". Surprise , more "gay" and "butt" obsessions.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#173212 Sep 28, 2013
Frank wrote:
<quoted text>ObamaKare is nothing like an insurance mandate or like a state run program such as Massachusetts. Every state has and has had there own state run programs, but none are the same as ObamaKare. ObamaKare is not a health care program,it is tax scheme with 2700 pages and over fifty new taxes. ObamKare was never meant to reduce total health care costs and not a single cent of the tens of billions that have been spent has been for health care for anyone. None of the trillions that will be spent over the next ten years will be spent on health care either.
An insurance mandate is nothing like an insurance mandate if Frank says it isn't.

"Every state has and has had there own state run programs, but none are the same as ObamaKare."

Who says the pre-existing policies (or lack thereof) of the various states are "the same as" Obamacare? And that means an insurance mandate is not an insurance mandate?

2700 pages means an insurance mandate is not an insurance mandate? Eh?

Frank, you're ranting aimlessly. Now go take your Aricept!

wojar wrote:
The Heritage Foundation was behind the insurance mandate when they first proposed it.
From Heritage Lecture 218:
"This mandate is based on two important principles. First, that health care protection is a responsibility of individuals, not businesses. Thus to the extent that anybody should be required to provide coverage to a family, the household mandate assumes that it is the family that carries the first responsibility. Second, it assumes that there is an implicit contract between households and society, based on the notion that health insurance is not like other forms of insurance protection."
Faux conservatives were not screaming SOCIALISM then.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 4 min Grey Ghost 1,231,696
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 13 min Environmentalist PhD 53,443
Amy 5-22-15 25 min Pippa 6
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 39 min not a ghost 5,986
Song Title Game (Dec '11) 42 min not a ghost 1,178
Last word + 2 (Mar '12) 43 min not a ghost 893
last post wins! (Apr '13) 51 min not a ghost 519
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 52 min editor 99,531
More from around the web

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]