"Country of Embarkation" means the country where you STARTED the trip. It does not mean any of the countries you stopped in on the way or for that matter the last country you stopped in.Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Ah, but it does not say where they came from. It said where they "embarked from" and there were very few ships and planes that made a direct trip between Kenya and America. Now if they flew to a European city and then switched planes, they "embarked" from a European country!!!
Next, you sat there is no evidence that Obama's mother had a passport. Well, has anyone been allowed to check? Have her files been purged?!?
You do know that Dr. Orly Taitz still has an active lawsuit about Obama's fraudulent Selective Service registration, don't you?
Update: No decisio0ns yet in 7 Obama cases. No new date for October in the 4th District. Waiting for DOJ to file a response in the case of Obama’s use of a stolen SSN of Harry Bounel and in the case of Obama using a fabricated stamp on his Selective Service certificate
Posted on | September 9, 2013
So Obama did not publish one. But the SS supplied one based on an FOI request. This means someone in the SS forged the document. WHY? Maybe because Obama never complied with the law in the first place.
In 1961, there were only 21 people who started their trips to the USA in Kenya. So, where did you get the figures that say 334 came to the USA by sea and 1,012 by air?
Re: "Next, you sat there is no evidence that Obama's mother had a passport. Well, has anyone been allowed to check? Have her files been purged?!?"
Answer: Obama's mother's passport file was made available to the birther Strunk years ago under the Freedom of Information Act, and there is nothing in it that indicates that she had a passport in 1961. Moreover, Strunk and other birthers who had access to the FOI Act files have never shown on what date the passport file was created.(I wonder why not??????) If in fact the file was created after 1961 (as is highly likely), then Obama's mother could not have had a passport in 1961.
Birthers' unwillingness to show the date on which Obama's mother's passport file was created tends to confirm the high probability that she did not have one. In any case, very few 18-year-olds did have a passport in 1961, and yet birthers would like us to assume that Obama's mother was one of the very few who did. And extremely few women traveled abroad late in pregnancy in 1961, and yet birthers would like us to assume that Obama's mother was one of the extremely few who did. And, they would like us to assume that she made that trip to Kenya and gave birth there (which, BTW, the Kenyan government said did not happen) despite the fact that her husband stayed in Hawaii throughout 1961 (as WND has proven with a FOI Act request).
AND, they would like us to assume that she had a passport and traveled late in pregnancy ALONE despite the fact that there is a birth certificate from Hawaii saying that she gave birth in Kapiolani Hospital. And the fact that there is such a birth certificate and says that he was born in that hospital was confirmed repeatedly by the officials of BOTH political parties in Hawaii, and further confirmed by the public Index Data file and still further confirmed by the birth notices sent to the Hawaii newspapers by the DOH of Hawaii in 1961 (and only the DOH could send birth notices to that section of the newspapers, and it only did so for births IN Hawaii).
Re: "But the SS supplied one based on an FOI request. This means someone in the SS forged the document. "
Answer: So now the SS Administration back during the Bush Administration is forging Obama's SS card? What is far more likely is that the birther got the card with a FOI request and then fooled around a little with it a bit before publishing it---so, duh, the SS card was indeed forged;it was forged by that birther.