BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ... Full Story
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#172692 Sep 23, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
It obviously does. That is unless you think credit ratings have no effect.
Sinking credit rankings are not a good thing, Twinkerbelle.
Frank

Spokane, WA

#172693 Sep 23, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>If you refuse to pay your credit card company because the debt is too high do you think that will lower your debt?
If you don't use your credit card to buy any thing you can't afford or you don't use your card wastefully you will not go over your limit. The wise among us will pay their credit card balance every month. The rest will vote for Democrats.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#172695 Sep 23, 2013
loose cannon wrote:
Scrutiny,
It's the ame wih music. Science knows all the notes and harmonics and physics of sound, but it can't write a Mozart Symphony or a Rachmoninov Concerto or even a simple Chopin Prelude.
loose
Renée Fleming's in Ottawa. I miraculously got one of the last tickets. Wednesday night, Fleming in concert. Eat your heart out.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#172696 Sep 23, 2013
I see, hear Fleming, then I think there MUST be a God.
Frank

Spokane, WA

#172697 Sep 23, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Again, is refusal to pay your debts a means to lower debt?
<quoted text>
You can lower your debt by not buying anything you can't afford to pay for. Credit cards were not designed to accommodate deadbeats or liberal loafers who believe themselves to be morally above paying their own way. Liberals in fact have no morals,values or principles that allow them to function or they believe that society owes them a living.
Frank

Spokane, WA

#172698 Sep 23, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Thank you for admitting it won't lower the debt. And since expenditures are authorized separately refusal to increase the limit will not stop spending but only make it more expensive.
<quoted text>
Congress should have held Obama's feet to the fire.

“On Deck”

Since: Aug 08

French Polynesia

#172699 Sep 23, 2013
American Lady

Danville, KY

#172700 Sep 23, 2013
There he was again a couple nights ago.

Our illustrious leader, Barack Hussein Obama, lecturing the American people to work harder for tougher gun laws if they want to end a plague of violence in schools, military installations and in certain cities – all of which share one attribute: They don’t allow guns.

Makes sense, huh?

What we need are tougher laws – meaning more restrictions on firearms. But everywhere it’s tried we see the slaughter of the innocents.

“I have an idea,” says Obama.“Let’s keep doing the same thing over against and expect different results!”

Think about it, people: Where is the gun violence?

It’s in Washington, a city that does everything in its power to discourage law-abiding citizens from getting firearms. It’s in Chicago, a city that does everything in its power to discourage law-abiding citizens from getting firearms. It’s in Detroit, a city that does everything in its power to discourage law-abiding citizens from getting firearms.

It’s in schools across America that have been declared “gun-free zones,” meaning law-abiding citizens are not permitted to have them on the premises. It’s in movie theaters that have been declared “gun-free zones,” meaning law-abiding citizens are not permitted to have them on the premises. It’s in “secure” military installations that have inexplicably and illogically become “gun-free zones,” meaning law-abiding citizens are not permitted to have them on the premises.

These cities and institutions have followed to the letter Obama’s prescription – and they are the very places witnessing increases in gun violence.

...

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/09/the-absurdity-and-...

LAWMAKER TO OBAMA:'YOU'RE NOT A DICTATOR'
'You don't get to impose your will. We negotiate everything in Washington'

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/09/lawmaker-to-obama-...

EXPERT WARNS OF COMING CHAOS IN CITIES
Exclusive: Jerry Robinson interviews author David Morris

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/09/expert-warns-of-co...

BLACK-ON-WHITE BEATINGS LEAVE MORE DEAD
Violent 'Knockout Game' becoming murderous trend

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/09/black-on-white-bea...

Wonder WHY this is happening?
WE HAVE NO LEADER to calm/pull the Nation together!

ALL he does is DIVIDE!
He IS a f-a-i-l-u-r-e ...

Very PLAIN to see!
Local News

Sparks, NV

#172701 Sep 23, 2013
ObamaCare = Insurance Companies
Forum

Carlsbad, NM

#172702 Sep 23, 2013
Frank wrote:
<quoted text>If you don't use your credit card to buy any thing you can't afford or you don't use your card wastefully you will not go over your limit. The wise among us will pay their credit card balance every month. The rest will vote for Democrats.
Why even use it?
Pay cash.
Buy your home cash.
Buy your car cash.
They have already made their money.
They love to burn you.
American Lady

Danville, KY

#172703 Sep 23, 2013
BILL CLINTON:‘[Republicans] have a much more **reliable media base’
Read more at http://girlsjustwannahaveguns.com/2013/09/bil...

**reliable

1 re·li·able adjective
: able to be trusted to do or provide what is needed : able to be relied on
: able to be believed : likely to be true or correct

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/rel...
Dale

Wichita, KS

#172704 Sep 23, 2013
Therealnews com wrote:
<quoted text>
Bill Clinton wanted to wiretap al Qaeda terrorist and the Republicans were against it. For 8 years of Clinton the Republicans were only concerned with Monica and nothing else.
ENCLOSED IS PROOF:
---------
Clinton PDD 63
http://tinyurl.com/cvuom
For Immediate Release May 22, 1998 FACT SHEET PROTECTING AMERICA'S
CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURES: PDD 63
http://www.fas.org/irp/offdocs/pdd-63.htm
Clinton PDD 62
http://tinyurl.com/bze57
COMBATING TERRORISM: PRESIDENTIAL DECISION DIRECTIVE 62
http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/ciao/62fa...
LMAO!!! Clinton was more interested in killing people at Waco, diddling with Monica and covering up Flt 800.
Dale

Wichita, KS

#172705 Sep 23, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
What a child, how juvenile. You make it look like I'm questioning realnews post on 9/11 warnings by deleting the following :
Dale wrote:
<quoted text>Another fact of history is Bill was offered Bin Laden and refused the offer.
==========
Not to mention dishonest. And stupid to boot, as if no one would notice. Birther tea party tactics.
LMAO!!! What's wrong, can't you answer my post? Hahahaha!!!
Oh, I did answer your question, you just can't understand or refuse to read!
Dale

Wichita, KS

#172706 Sep 23, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Wayne Lapierre should be locked up for starters. People like him are the single biggest threat to the nation.
LMAO!!! Maybe your nation!!!
Dale

Wichita, KS

#172707 Sep 23, 2013
Therealnews com wrote:
<quoted text>
TERRORISM PREVENTION ACT--CONFERENCE REPORT
http://tinyurl.com/2lj3t8 / April 17, 1996
Congressional Record: April 17, 1996 (Senate)- Pages S3454-S3478 DOCID:cr17ap96-153
Terrorism prevention Act--Conference Report
Orrin Hatch: Mr. President, again, in the real world, in the case of the Unabomber or a terrorist where there is a real threat or an immediate concern, you do not need this provision to get an emergency wiretap. All the Senator's motion does is expand the number of crimes that would trigger the wiretap statute. This amendment was offered during the Senate debate. It was defeated. It was not a part of the Senate bill. It was not a part of the House bill. It is not a part of our conference report, and rightly so. I oppose this provision that could expand emergency wiretap authority to permit the Government to begin a wiretap prior to obtaining court approval in a greater range of cases than the law presently allows. I personally find this proposal troubling. I am concerned that this provision, if enacted, would unnecessarily broaden emergency wiretap authority. Under current law, such authority exists when life is in danger, when the national security is threatened, or when an organized crime conspiracy is involved. In the real world, we do not need this amendment to get emergency wiretap authority, and that is a fact.
Let me also say that this authority is constrained by a requirement that surveillance be approved by the Court within 48 hours, but that authority already exists in those areas I have addressed.
http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdo...
LMAO!!! Yep, Slick Willy sure screwedup, had he taken bin Laden when offered 9/11 wouldn't have happened.
Dale

Wichita, KS

#172708 Sep 23, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
It was LBJ and Jimmy Carter who let all the loonies out of the mental hospitals but the Libtards blame Reagan as he closed the EMPTY mental hospitals! It does not matter, in the minds of Libtards, anything that goes bad, was caused by evil Republicans!
LMAO!!! Hell, we all know "liberalism" is a mental disorder and we don't have the facilities to deal with them, so they run them for POTUS and Congress.
Dale

Wichita, KS

#172709 Sep 23, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>If you refuse to pay your credit card company because the debt is too high do you think that will lower your debt?
LMAO!!! Don't know about you, but I insure I can pay my card debt, this way I don't need to extend my line of credit and if you can't pay your debt why ask for an extended line of credit.
I get it, I might win the lotto.
Forum

Carlsbad, NM

#172710 Sep 23, 2013
Dale wrote:
<quoted text>LMAO!!! Don't know about you, but I insure I can pay my card debt, this way I don't need to extend my line of credit and if you can't pay your debt why ask for an extended line of credit.
I get it, I might win the lotto.
Whether you pay it or not they
made money off of your goods.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#172711 Sep 24, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>To be Forgiven one must Repent, Repair and Reform! Most Liberals will never Repent (acknowledge their sins) much less try to repair the damage or reform their activities.
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
And Rouge jumps in to emphasize my point.
Sure we'll forgive you. Say - you ain't a Liberal are you?
If you are talking about being a "classic liberal", I am. Classic Liberals should never be confused with Progressives who want to control everyone else but themselves!

Classical liberalism
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Classical liberalism is a political philosophy and ideology belonging to liberalism in which primary emphasis is placed on securing the freedom of the individual by limiting the power of the government. The philosophy emerged as a response to the Industrial Revolution and urbanization in the 19th century in Europe and the United States. It advocates civil liberties with a limited government under the rule of law, private property, and belief in laissez-faire economic policy. Classical liberalism is built on ideas that had already arisen by the end of the 18th century, such as selected ideas of Adam Smith, John Locke, Jean-Baptiste Say, Thomas Malthus, and David Ricardo. It drew on a psychological understanding of individual liberty, the contradictory theories of natural law and utilitarianism, and a belief in progress. Classical liberals were more suspicious than conservatives of all but the most minimal government[6] and, adopting Thomas Hobbes's theory of government, they believed government had been created by individuals to protect themselves from one another.
truman

Boise, ID

#172712 Sep 24, 2013
Frank wrote:
<quoted text>You can lower your debt by not buying anything you can't afford to pay for. Credit cards were not designed to accommodate deadbeats or liberal loafers who believe themselves to be morally above paying their own way. Liberals in fact have no morals,values or principles that allow them to function or they believe that society owes them a living.
Is there a meatheaded generalization or stereotypical Caricature from the adle-pated Right that you HAVENT swallowed whole so it can regurgitated on demand?
I sometimes wonder if you arent some idiot Liberal trying to PARODY a Teabagger.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 7 min Patrick 1,115,663
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 7 min Socialism is for ... 47,079
Amy 10-2 53 min edogxxx 3
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 1 hr PEllen 98,375
Rauner, Quinn clash on Obamacare expansion ahea... 1 hr Le Duped 2
Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 1 hr in the end 50,065
Abby 10-2 1 hr edogxxx 1
Chicago Dating
Find my Match

Chicago Jobs

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]