BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit ...

BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

There are 194818 comments on the Chicago Tribune story from Jan 8, 2009, titled BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen.... In it, Chicago Tribune reports that:

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chicago Tribune.

Frank

Spokane, WA

#171766 Sep 15, 2013
Nation of Change org wrote:
<quoted text>
You are 100% incorrect if you think Obama is pushing a left wing agenda.
Obama continued over 90% of all Bush/Cheney failed rightwing policies.
Obama destroyed Liberalism and Progresses.
----------
Who You Calling Deranged?
October 16, 2009 / http://tinyurl.com/yfvx5v5
Democracy Corps has a very interesting survey about the worldview of conservative Republicans. The focus group interviews show that the Republican right, which consists of about a fifth of the electorate, is held together by a set of beliefs that goes well beyond small government and traditional values. "Our groups showed that they explicitly believe [Obama] is purposely and ruthlessly executing a hidden agenda to weaken and ultimately destroy the foundations of our country," reports the survey. Conservatives further believe that Obama’s policies are not merely misguided but "purposely designed to fail."
Conservatives pundits tend to be extremely touchy about the subject of right-wing paranoia. In response to a typically measured column by E.J. Dionne early this week ("Middle-income men, especially those who are not college graduates, have borne the brunt of economic change bred by both globalization and technological transformation," he sensibly observed), George W. Bush’s former minister of propaganda, Peter Wehner, exploded at Dionne’s "condescension." Wehner lashed back:
http://www.tnr.com/blog/the-plank/who-you-cal...
==========
Chart: Almost Every Obama Conspiracy Theory Ever
Fake birth certificates, ghostwriters, teleprompters, a teenage trip to Mars, and more of the most paranoid and bizarro Obama conspiracy theories out there.
http://tinyurl.com/cqtkqxs /
http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2012/10/c...
Obama's promises in 2008 were that he would never sign a bill without bipartisan support and that he would get all sides of Congress to work together. On October 31,2008, Obama publicly announced his intention to destroy our country and The Constitution that our country was founded upon. Obama has been following his plan to destroy our country and our way of life.

Since: Mar 08

Location hidden

#171767 Sep 15, 2013
Economically, Could Obama Be America's Best President?

Q- Bob, how much credit should Americans give President Obama for today’s improved equity values?

BBBB – Our research reviewed American economic performance since President Roosevelt installed the first Federal Reserve Board Chairman – Republican Marriner Eccles. We observed that even though there are multiple impacts on the economy, it was clear that policy decisions within each administration, from FDR forward, made a clear difference on performance. And relatively quickly.

Presidents universally take credit when the economy does well (such as Reagan,) and choose to blame other factors when the economy does poorly (such as Carter.) But there was a clear pattern, and link, between policy and financial market performance.

Although we hear almost no one in the Obama administration taking credit for record index highs, they should. Because the President deserves attention for how well this economy has done during his leadership.

The auto rescue plan has worked. American car manufacturers are still dominant and employing millions directly and in supplier companies. Wall Street reform has been painful but it has re-instated faith amongst investors. The markets are far more predictable than they were four years ago, as VIX numbers demonstrate greater faith and less risk.

Even for small investors, such as those limited to their 401(k) or IRA investments, the average annual compound return on stocks under President Obama has been more than 24% since the lows of March, 2009. This is a better result than either Clinton, Reagan or FDR – who were the prior winners in our book.

Q- Bob, what policies do you think were most important toward achieving today’s new highs?

BBBB – Firstly, let’s review just how bad things were in 2009. In 2000 America was completing the longest bull market in history. But by the end of President Bush’s tenure the country had witnessed 2 stock market crashes, and the DJIA had fallen 58%. This was the second worst market decline in history (exceeded only by the Great Depression,) and hence the term “Great Recession” was born.

In 2000, at the end of Clinton’s administration, the Consumer Confidence Index was at a record high 140. By January, 2009 this index had fallen to an historic low of 25.3. Comparatively, when Reagan took office at the end of the economically weak Carter years the Confidence Index was still at 74.4! Today this measure of how people feel about the country is still nowhere near 2000 levels, but it is almost 3 times better than 4 years ago.

Significantly, in 2000 America had a budget surplus. By 2009 surpluses were long gone and the country was racking up historic deficits as taxes were cut while simultaneously outlays for defense skyrocketed to cover costs of wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Additionally, banks were on the edge of failing due to unregulated real estate speculation and massive derivative losses.

Today the Congressional Budget Office is reporting a $200B decrease in the deficit almost entirely due to increased revenue from a growing economy and higher taxes on the wealthiest Americans. The deficit is now only 4% of the GDP, down from over 10% at the end of Bush’s administration – and projections are for it to be only 2% by 2015 (before Obama leaves office.) America’s “debt problem” seems largely solved, and almost all due to growth rather than austerity.

We can largely thank a fairer tax code, improved regulation and consistent SEC enforcement. Also, major strides in health care reform – something no other President has accomplished – has given American’s more faith in their future, and an increased willingness to invest.

More: http://www.forbes.com/sites/adamhartung/2013/...

Since: Mar 08

Location hidden

#171768 Sep 15, 2013
INTERVIEW: How The Stimulus Remade America Without Anyone Noticing

Have your thoughts on the stimulus evolved at all since Obama’s re-election?

Not really on the substance. I still think it was a huge deal, as important as Obamacare, and I still think it was a huge success, as a short-term boost to the economy and as a long-term driver of change. But the re-election did get me thinking about the politics. The stimulus was hideously unpopular. And when it was done, Obama bailed out the auto industry, also hideously unpopular. Then he started with health care, even more unpopular. He kept doing all kinds of controversial things—pulling out of Iraq, pushing cap-and-trade, endorsing gay marriage—and pundits kept accusing him of political malpractice. But he got re-elected anyway—partly because the stimulus (and the auto bailout) made the economy much better than it would have been, partly because some bartender dude brought an iPhone to a fundraiser in Boca. My takeaway is that when you’ve got power, you might as well try to do stuff, rather than obsess about the political ramifications. Because really, who knows how the politics are going to play out?

More: http://www.nationalmemo.com/interview-how-the...

Since: Mar 08

Location hidden

#171770 Sep 15, 2013
Obama Obliterates The Republican Myth That Putin Saved Him on Syria

The president confirmed again that he discussed this with Putin a year ago. He talked to Putin about this at the G20. The notion that Putin saved Obama is political spin by his critics who are trying to tarnish his diplomatic victory in any way that they can. It is a display of how deeply Republicans hate this president that they are so willing to label Putin a hero, not even a year after their presidential nominee called Russia our biggest rival.

Republicans are out to score cheap political points, and they can’t fathom that they were again routed by a president who has spent his presidency ten steps ahead of them. This Putin saved Obama story line is fiction that created to further the Republican agenda of making the president look weak at every turn.

Obama also confirmed that his administration got Russia to take the risk and responsibility of delivering Syrian compliance on the deal. Making Russia shift from denying the existence of Syria’s chemical weapons and Assad’s responsibility for the attack in less than a week is a sign of presidential strength.

To Republicans, diplomacy equals weakness. The right is trying to turn Obama’s strength into a shortcoming, and sacrificing facts, the truth, and consistency while trying to score cheap political points. Obama’s critics are stunned, and the comprehensiveness of the president’s victory can be seen in their retreat back to old talking points.

http://www.politicususa.com/2013/09/15/obama-...
Frank

Spokane, WA

#171771 Sep 15, 2013
commenter2001 wrote:
Obama Obliterates The Republican Myth That Putin Saved Him on Syria
The president confirmed again that he discussed this with Putin a year ago. He talked to Putin about this at the G20. The notion that Putin saved Obama is political spin by his critics who are trying to tarnish his diplomatic victory in any way that they can. It is a display of how deeply Republicans hate this president that they are so willing to label Putin a hero, not even a year after their presidential nominee called Russia our biggest rival.
Republicans are out to score cheap political points, and they can’t fathom that they were again routed by a president who has spent his presidency ten steps ahead of them. This Putin saved Obama story line is fiction that created to further the Republican agenda of making the president look weak at every turn.
Obama also confirmed that his administration got Russia to take the risk and responsibility of delivering Syrian compliance on the deal. Making Russia shift from denying the existence of Syria’s chemical weapons and Assad’s responsibility for the attack in less than a week is a sign of presidential strength.
To Republicans, diplomacy equals weakness. The right is trying to turn Obama’s strength into a shortcoming, and sacrificing facts, the truth, and consistency while trying to score cheap political points. Obama’s critics are stunned, and the comprehensiveness of the president’s victory can be seen in their retreat back to old talking points.
http://www.politicususa.com/2013/09/15/obama-...
Obama can't open his mouth without lies coming out. He wouldn't have to lie all the time if he wasn't so incompetent. He campaigned on his promise for diplomacy but instead relies on tyranny.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#171772 Sep 15, 2013
commenter2001 wrote:
Economically, Could Obama Be America's Best President?
Q- Bob, how much credit should Americans give President Obama for today’s improved equity values?
BBBB – Our research reviewed American economic performance since President Roosevelt installed the first Federal Reserve Board Chairman – Republican Marriner Eccles. We observed that even though there are multiple impacts on the economy, it was clear that policy decisions within each administration, from FDR forward, made a clear difference on performance. And relatively quickly.
Presidents universally take credit when the economy does well (such as Reagan,) and choose to blame other factors when the economy does poorly (such as Carter.) But there was a clear pattern, and link, between policy and financial market performance.
Although we hear almost no one in the Obama administration taking credit for record index highs, they should. Because the President deserves attention for how well this economy has done during his leadership.
The auto rescue plan has worked. American car manufacturers are still dominant and employing millions directly and in supplier companies. Wall Street reform has been painful but it has re-instated faith amongst investors. The markets are far more predictable than they were four years ago, as VIX numbers demonstrate greater faith and less risk.
Even for small investors, such as those limited to their 401(k) or IRA investments, the average annual compound return on stocks under President Obama has been more than 24% since the lows of March, 2009. This is a better result than either Clinton, Reagan or FDR – who were the prior winners in our book.
Q- Bob, what policies do you think were most important toward achieving today’s new highs?
BBBB – Firstly, let’s review just how bad things were in 2009. In 2000 America was completing the longest bull market in history. But by the end of President Bush’s tenure the country had witnessed 2 stock market crashes, and the DJIA had fallen 58%. This was the second worst market decline in history (exceeded only by the Great Depression,) and hence the term “Great Recession” was born.
In 2000, at the end of Clinton’s administration, the Consumer Confidence Index was at a record high 140. By January, 2009 this index had fallen to an historic low of 25.3. Comparatively, when Reagan took office at the end of the economically weak Carter years the Confidence Index was still at 74.4! Today this measure of how people feel about the country is still nowhere near 2000 levels, but it is almost 3 times better than 4 years ago.
Significantly, in 2000 America had a budget surplus. By 2009 surpluses were long gone and the country was racking up historic deficits as taxes were cut while simultaneously outlays for defense skyrocketed to cover costs of wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Additionally, banks were on the edge of failing due to unregulated real estate speculation and massive derivative losses.
Today the Congressional Budget Office is reporting a $200B decrease in the deficit almost entirely due to increased revenue from a growing economy and higher taxes on the wealthiest Americans. The deficit is now only 4% of the GDP, down from over 10% at the end of Bush’s administration – and projections are for it to be only 2% by 2015 (before Obama leaves office.) America’s “debt problem” seems largely solved, and almost all due to growth rather than austerity.
We can largely thank a fairer tax code, improved regulation and consistent SEC enforcement. Also, major strides in health care reform – something no other President has accomplished – has given American’s more faith in their future, and an increased willingness to invest.
More: http://www.forbes.com/sites/adamhartung/2013/...
See reply below, not enough characters left

...2

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#171773 Sep 15, 2013
...2

to commenter's 171771 :

Forbes, uh? Birthers will not believe this commie socialist Marxist sold-to-Obama organisation. Everyone including birthers will agree that Forbes has fallen to the likes of socialist lefties, hence the above report.
Joe OBiden

Jacksonville, FL

#171774 Sep 15, 2013
commenter2001 wrote:
Obama Obliterates The Republican Myth That Putin Saved Him on Syria
The president confirmed again that he discussed this with Putin a year ago. He talked to Putin about this at the G20. The notion that Putin saved Obama is political spin by his critics who are trying to tarnish his diplomatic victory in any way that they can. It is a display of how deeply Republicans hate this president that they are so willing to label Putin a hero, not even a year after their presidential nominee called Russia our biggest rival.
Republicans are out to score cheap political points, and they can’t fathom that they were again routed by a president who has spent his presidency ten steps ahead of them. This Putin saved Obama story line is fiction that created to further the Republican agenda of making the president look weak at every turn.
Obama also confirmed that his administration got Russia to take the risk and responsibility of delivering Syrian compliance on the deal. Making Russia shift from denying the existence of Syria’s chemical weapons and Assad’s responsibility for the attack in less than a week is a sign of presidential strength.
To Republicans, diplomacy equals weakness. The right is trying to turn Obama’s strength into a shortcoming, and sacrificing facts, the truth, and consistency while trying to score cheap political points. Obama’s critics are stunned, and the comprehensiveness of the president’s victory can be seen in their retreat back to old talking points.
http://www.politicususa.com/2013/09/15/obama-...
Ya know, iffin' Obama doesn't stop spinnin' so fast, he might drill himself all the way ta China.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#171776 Sep 15, 2013
Nation of Change org wrote:
<quoted text>
The problem is your thought process and premises are wrong for the most part.
You are 100% correct about Bill Clinton being a Centrist Blue Dog which is also true of Barack Obama, and Jimmy Carter.
Libertarians are authentic Conservatives and not RINOs like 99% of the Republican party, The Bush Family, and Ronald Reagan.
Nixon and TR were not left of center.
Colonel Wilkerson and General Powell are Republicans.
Ron Paul was authentic his whole career and his son Rand is a corporate hack prostitute just like the other Tea Bags who sold out to Wall Street.
P.S. All The Generals against Rumsfeld and the Cheney / Bush administration were all Republicans, including CIA.
==========
Who Is The Smallest Government Spender Since Eisenhower? Would You Believe It's Barack Obama?/ 5/24/2012 / http://tinyurl.com/c6b2acy
It’s enough to make even the most ardent Obama cynic scratch his head in confusion.
Amidst all the cries of Barack Obama being the most prolific big government spender the nation has ever suffered, Marketwatch is reporting that our president has actually been tighter with a buck than any United States president since Dwight D. Eisenhower.
In fiscal 2010 (the first Obama budget) spending fell 1.8% to $3.46 trillion. In fiscal 2011, spending rose 4.3% to $3.60 trillion. In fiscal 2012, spending is set to rise 0.7% to $3.63 trillion, according to the Congressional Budget Office’s estimate of the budget that was agreed to last August. Finally in fiscal 2013 — the final budget of Obama’s term — spending is scheduled to fall 1.3% to $3.58 trillion. Read the CBO’s latest budget outlook.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/rickungar/2012/05...
There ya go again, thinkin' linear again. Politics is three dimensional. You has Fiscal, Religion and Social issues and Libertarians are ultra-conservative on fiscal issues but ultra-liberal on social and religious issues.
http://www.theadvocates.org/quiz/quiz.php
And Obama is a flaming progressive. His goal is that the federal government to control every issue.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#171777 Sep 15, 2013
Oh oh 232 at the Reno air races backfired in flight and blew out it's induction system and is out of the big race. The Hawker Seafury was the fastest WWII single engined fighter plane of WWII and 232 is a highly modified version of one.
But now she is out of the final Reno air rack of 2013.
http://www.lewisairlegends.com/aircraft/hawke...
It has not even hit the internet news yet. A friend just sent me some pictures.
Wild Bill and I were flight school buddies but about twenty years ago he pranged in a plane and was so seriously injured he has been unable to fly since. But he still volunteers at the Reno air races every year.
Oh, he is a Southerner and does not like black people what so ever. He knows how I feel on racial issues and he avoids the race issues when I'm around.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#171778 Sep 15, 2013
Oh, Wild Bill is in pictures 40 & 41. He's the one in the wheel chair.
http://www.rgj.com/article/20130914/NEWS1801/...

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#171779 Sep 15, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
...2
to commenter's 171771 :
Forbes, uh? Birthers will not believe this commie socialist Marxist sold-to-Obama organisation. Everyone including birthers will agree that Forbes has fallen to the likes of socialist lefties, hence the above report.
He is talking specifically about the stock market and nothing else. With someone like Bernanke to print out trillions of Obama Bucks, you can't lose in the stock market. But sooner or later Bernanke will have to stop printing Obama Bucks and the bigger the balloon, the bigger the pop!
Just look what happened to Jimmy Cater in 1980 and he printed only $500 Billion!!!

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#171780 Sep 15, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
Rogue, LRS, Alaska girl , and various birthers, FYI, no comment.
The Happiest (and Saddest) Countries
LiveScience Staff | September 09, 2013 07:04am
8452
The United Nations General Assembly's second World Happiness Report ranks countries based on several measures of well-being and analyzes the factors that contribute to that well-being. Here are the country rankings, based on a scale of 0 to 10, with 10 being the most satisfied with life. The scores are an average of results between 2010 and 2012. Read the full story on country happiness.
1. Denmark (7.693)
2. Norway (7.655)
3. Switzerland (7.650)
4. Netherlands (7.512)
5. Sweden (7.480)
6. Canada (7.477)
7. Finland (7.389)
8. Austria (7.369)
9. Iceland (7.355)
10. Australia (7.350)
11. Israel (7.301)
12. Costa Rica (7.257)
13. New Zealand (7.221)
14. United Arab Emirates (7.144)
15. Panama (7.143)
16. Mexico (7.088)
17. United States (7.082)
18. Ireland (7.076)
19. Luxembourg (7.054)
20. Venezuela (7.039)
21. Belgium (6.967)
22. United Kingdom (6.883)
23. Oman (6.853)
24. Brazil (6.849)
25. France (6.764)
26. Germany (6.672)
27. Qatar (6.666)
28. Chile (6.587)
29. Argentina (6.562)
30. Singapore (6.546)
31. Trinidad and Tobago (6.519)
32. Kuwait (6.515)
33. Saudi Arabia (6.480)
34. Cyprus (6.466)
35. Colombia (6.416)
36. Thailand (6.371)
37. Uruguay (6.355)
38. Spain (6.322)
39. Czech Republic (6.290)
40. Surinam (6.269
==========
I know it's just a U.N. survey, therefore not valid and biased, but there it is just the same.
Yep, and LiveScience, being a loony-lefty site, will sure publish anything that makes America look bad.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#171781 Sep 15, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
U.S.laws did. And who passed those laws? Democrats in 1977 and in 1993 signed by Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton.
President did not change the laws, Congress does.
New, even if Bush was responsible, what has Obama done to fix the economy? NOT A DAMN THING!!!
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
What laws did Carter and Clinton pass? The mortgage laws? Yes. Who abused them? Carter, Clinton? No. Guess who?
What other laws? The reduced oversight of financial corporations? Did Carter or Clinton "oversee" the oversight of these crooked financial corporations? No. Guess who did?
Hey, how about answering my query for proof that gun laws in Canada have given the same results as in the U.S.? Never mind, you cant. How does your thought process work? I think I know. "Ok, right now", says Rogue, "I want to take a shot at stupid gun laws and Canada. How's that? Gun regulations or not, Canada has the same result gun-murder wise as Canada. Now believe it, Rogue, say it often, okay, now make a post in Topix and hope no one will ask me to prove it. Like the Obamacare supreme court, like Roberts being coerced by Obama inauguration day about BC, like being present during the Z-M confrontation --- oh I could go on and on.
Actually Carter's laws had no real teeth so Bill Clinton came in and "fixed" that and made it real easy for a "minority" person to sue based on racial discrimination. The results was zero-down, sub-rime loans.
In fact the lawyer Barrack Obama represented over 200 clients and the banks settled out of court and by 2008 only 18 of over 200 were still in their homes. The rest being foreclosed upon or sold short.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#171782 Sep 15, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
2...
Canada AAA Stable 2012-02-20 [4][5]
United Kingdom AAA Negative 2012-04-13 [4][5]
United States AA+ Stable 2013-06-10 [4][5]
Have you noticed that both Canada and the U.K. have a higher rating than the U.S.? Please note, we were not down graded until two and a half years AFTER Bush left the White House!!!!

“8 point Buck”

Since: Sep 13

Location hidden

#171783 Sep 15, 2013
You folks are lacing educational skills to waste your time with Obamas birth certificate. You folks need to gather around and let me be clear. Who really cares where he was borned.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#171784 Sep 15, 2013
Frank wrote:
<quoted text>The last time a right (wing) agenda was accepted was before prohibition,and that was repealed. The republican influence that was so prominent from 1860's through the early 20th century has succumbed to the hedonism of the democrats for over a century. Morals,values and principles have always baffled the understanding of democrats.
The 18th Amendment was passed in 1917 by the 65th Congress and Woodrow Wilson was not only a Democrat but a PROGRESSIVE. In the House about 70% of both Democrats and Republicans voted for it so it can not be considered a REPUBLICAN bill.

65th United States Congress
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The Sixty-fifth United States Congress was a meeting of the legislative branch of the United States federal government, composed of the United States Senate and the United States House of Representatives. It met in Washington, DC from March 4, 1917 to March 4, 1919, during the fourth and fifth years of Woodrow Wilson's presidency. The apportionment of seats in this House of Representatives was based on the Thirteenth Census of the United States in 1910. The Senate had a Democratic majority, and the House had a Republican plurality but the Democrats remained in control with the support of the Progressives and Socialist Representative Meyer London.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#171785 Sep 15, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Yep, and LiveScience, being a loony-lefty site, will sure publish anything that makes America look bad.
Well, Rogue, it was on all radio and TV station of every political persuasion, and in every newspaper . Are you in a position to deny this report? That only loony-lefty sides pick it up and post it? Why don't you google 2012 happiest nations on earth? So many sites.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#171786 Sep 15, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Have you noticed that both Canada and the U.K. have a higher rating than the U.S.? Please note, we were not down graded until two and a half years AFTER Bush left the White House!!!!
So? You really believe that the downgrading was NOT caused by GWB's administration. Really?

In fact, I did not point out our AAA rating. You did. I don't do that unless challenged. As to the UK, its AAA rating is something I don't understand.

Since: Mar 08

Location hidden

#171787 Sep 15, 2013
Rogue illiterate 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
He is talking specifically about the stock market and nothing else. With someone like Bernanke to print out trillions of Obama Bucks, you can't lose in the stock market. But sooner or later Bernanke will have to stop printing Obama Bucks and the bigger the balloon, the bigger the pop!
Just look what happened to Jimmy Cater in 1980 and he printed only $500 Billion!!!
Go back to 1st grade and learn to read. He talks about a lot more than the stock market.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 5 min EasyEed 1,265,037
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 6 min Sublime1 100,326
abby8-4-15 1 hr Julie 11
CDXC Johnson George Opens New Chicago Area Center 1 hr mike blaine 4
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 3 hr Red_Forman 6,264
Word (Dec '08) 3 hr Red_Forman 5,386
Review: Unlimited Marketing Services 3 hr tooprofessional5 1
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages