BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit ...

BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

There are 230928 comments on the Chicago Tribune story from Jan 8, 2009, titled BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen.... In it, Chicago Tribune reports that:

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chicago Tribune.

“Arm the homeless!”

Since: Jul 12

The internet

#171638 Sep 13, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Canadian Queer, no matter how often you dream of me and lust for me (sick), I don't need any lubs cause ain't nothing been up my azz nor will it be! Ashamed of yourself, I see. As well you should be! How come none of you lil pansies will answer my question? Who taught you to be gay? HEE HEE HEE
Don't pass the buck Justice.

This is you. Not Jacques.

Weird that you moved right to deflection.

“Arm the homeless!”

Since: Jul 12

The internet

#171639 Sep 13, 2013
then acussed me of it.

“Arm the homeless!”

Since: Jul 12

The internet

#171640 Sep 13, 2013
then got the hell out of dodge.

“ROCK ON ROCKERS!!”

Since: Mar 11

Rockin' USA ;)

#171641 Sep 13, 2013
Hopefully..this WILL be cleared up..BEFORE we allow a second term President get us into the Syrian War!!

This is BS..He can find Bin Laden..shoot And kill him....

BUT, Can't PRODUCE his Birth Certificate!!!

“Arm the homeless!”

Since: Jul 12

The internet

#171642 Sep 13, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
I bet you're wearing pink panties right now, aren't you? Are you another gay lil raggy? I bet you are..........
Now, I had to look up the word "raggy" because LRS's vocabulary is infinitely superior to my own.

It turns out it means... rough.

Look it up if you have to. I did.

""I bet you're wearing pink panties right now, aren't you? Are you another rough lil gay? I'll bet you are.....""

If ANY straight male out there thinks this sounds more like a threat than a sexual advance...

I want you to tell me. Reply to this post an tell me why this is threatening in the least bit.

The threat may NOT include any form of rape.

If LRS means to say that he intended to rape me... that qualifies as a sexual advance and proves my point to the limit that it could possibly be proven.
Just me

Mission Viejo, CA

#171644 Sep 13, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Hmm, so defensive. Wonder why? Show me where I said she/he was you. Show me. I really did not think it was you, Rush rather or the phoney Sioux, but now I'm not so sure
My bet is it's American Lady and she also posted above as Colorado Chick. Remember, AL is addicted to ellipses usage. She apparently is also addicted to the usage of a geographical location and a word synonymous with the female gender. Also, as far as I know, neither of those posters has posted here before (at least not recently) and then two very similar posters start posting on the same day. Anyway, she then has the audacity to accuse you and Wojar as being one and the same. I don't think that's the first time AL has made that accusation.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#171645 Sep 14, 2013
Scrutiny wrote:
Correction... page 7584.
That is when you were fantasizing about me in women's undergarments.
He will deny it.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#171646 Sep 14, 2013
AlaskaGirl wrote:
<quoted text>Wow, still starving for attention, both you and your sock. I am new to topix, but whatever. You have your own issues such as paranoia, multi personality and now projecting your gender identity crisis disorder on me. What other speculations do you have? You apparently have everything figured out...... lol I don't know who these other people are, but they apparently got under your skin, lol
March 2003 is "new to Topix"? Excuse me, hell, I even remember you. Unpleasant , no wit, ultra right wing and totally bereft of intelligence. One does not exactly forget those "qualities".(For a birther, they are qualities).

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#171647 Sep 14, 2013
Just me wrote:
<quoted text>
My bet is it's American Lady and she also posted above as Colorado Chick. Remember, AL is addicted to ellipses usage. She apparently is also addicted to the usage of a geographical location and a word synonymous with the female gender. Also, as far as I know, neither of those posters has posted here before (at least not recently) and then two very similar posters start posting on the same day. Anyway, she then has the audacity to accuse you and Wojar as being one and the same. I don't think that's the first time AL has made that accusation.
Your guess is as good as mine. You could be right. However this Alaska phoney does, it seems to me, is a better writer. Who knows? Wojar must be laughing, what with her/him saying we are one and the same.
Sunlight Foundation com

Edison, NJ

#171648 Sep 14, 2013
Justice Dale wrote:
<quoted text>LMAO! Al Qaeda is fair game. Now how will you find them?
Naturally this is just speculation on my part but al Qaeda does not communicate with any electronic devices.

They learned that from La Cosa Nostra.

Which proves the Patriot Act is useless.

----------

"The individual is handicapped by coming face-to-face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists." J. Edgar Hoover
Sunlight Foundation com

Edison, NJ

#171649 Sep 14, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
And this coming from a Democrat?!? What would you expect a Democrat to say. You assume that everyone in the military is a Republican but that ain't so.
Colonel Wilkerson and General Powell are both Republicans.
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#171650 Sep 14, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>What say YOU, Twink? C'mon let's see that yellow streak grow a little wider! Gas is paid for, Twink. Better hurry over to your circlejerk group party!
Stop in when ever you want puss. Buy your own beer
Sunlight Foundation com

Edison, NJ

#171651 Sep 14, 2013
Scrutiny wrote:
<quoted text>
I put Kucinich right in between Ron Paul and Alan Grayson.
Elite politicians. The very best of what America has.
You have good taste.

I admire all three for their authenticity and honesty.

The liars are the Bush's, the Clinton's, Obama and Reagan in collusion with corporate talking air heads in Mainstream and Rightwing Media.

Fox News and MSNBC comes to mind.

They have to divide and conquer our ignorant masses and are doing an excellent job unfortunately.
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#171652 Sep 14, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>Dale has a hobby. He's disproving the first law of thermodynamics in his basement -- someday.
That's bound to be more successful than his pursuit of a law degree
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#171653 Sep 14, 2013
Justice Dale wrote:
<quoted text>LMAO!!! How can one get a clue from a liar, like you!
Not my fault you can't comprehend English moron. Even spoon feeding your foolish ass the facts didn't help - no surprise
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#171654 Sep 14, 2013
Justice Dale wrote:
<quoted text>LMAO!!! OK, OK!!! I give up you can join my Fan Club!
Wow. Do I get a secret Dufus decoder ring?
Sunlight Foundation com

Edison, NJ

#171655 Sep 14, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
You did not show any proof that any Republican interfered with the CIA/DIA's intelligence. It was not until the Patriot Act removed a Jimmy Carter law that prevented the FBI and the CIA/DIA from talking to each other.
Jimmy Carter almost totally dismantled the CIA and it took Reagan almost his whole eight years to restore the CIA.
How the CIA Created a Ruling, Corporate Overclass in America
1/18/2008 / http://tinyurl.com/c7ex8ce
The Bush administration will be forever associated with a "ruling overclass" --oligarchs who were the sole beneficiaries of Ronald Reagan's infamous tax cut of 1982 and, later, several equally inequitable tax cuts during the Bush regime. It is no coincidence that the oligarchs likewise benefited in various ways from Bush's military adventures in the Middle East. GOP tax cuts are typically called "trickle down" theory. Reagan's Budget Director David Stockman called the theory that justifies them a "trojan horse".
Since Ronald Reagan's infamous tax cut of 1982, "conservatives" myopically cite a mythical "Reagan Recovery" as proof of "Reaganomics", otherwise called supply-side economics. The right wing argument is simplistic and fallacious. It must be pointed out that following the tax cut, the nation plunged into recession, the worst since Herbert Hoover's Great Depression of 1929. Nevertheless, conservatives will persist in citing a three percent growth rate following two years of severe recession as proof that "wealth trickles down". This assertion fails to address key questions.

Who benefited from the recovery?
At some 3 percent how long did it take for the nation to regain lost ground?
Did Reagan's tax cuts bring about more growth than would have normally occurred?
http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_len_h...
Sunlight Foundation com

Edison, NJ

#171656 Sep 14, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
You do know the largest oil speculator are .... governments? No you didn't know and you don't care to know because it conflicts with you idea of reality.
Tell me, are governments/people who speculate in food comodities equally evil?
Have you ever heard of OPEC?

http://www.opec.org/opec_web/en/

“Arm the homeless!”

Since: Jul 12

The internet

#171657 Sep 14, 2013
Just me wrote:
<quoted text>
My bet is it's American Lady and she also posted above as Colorado Chick. Remember, AL is addicted to ellipses usage. She apparently is also addicted to the usage of a geographical location and a word synonymous with the female gender. Also, as far as I know, neither of those posters has posted here before (at least not recently) and then two very similar posters start posting on the same day. Anyway, she then has the audacity to accuse you and Wojar as being one and the same. I don't think that's the first time AL has made that accusation.
And "Jockstrap" is one of her favorites. She thinks it is overwhelmingly clever.

Time will tell.
Sunlight Foundation com

Edison, NJ

#171658 Sep 14, 2013
Justice Dale wrote:
<quoted text>LMAO! We don't need their oil, the only reason we by it is to keep them from starving, the more we by the stronger they get. What is the logic with us buying foreign oil?
If it were in my power, I would regulate the price of oil in the US at 35 dollars a barrel, I can remember when it was under three bucks.
We buy it because we need it and that is the way a free market is suppose to operate.

Oil and Water are big commodities.

==========

Those who control oil and water will control the world
New superpowers are competing for diminishing resources as Britain becomes a bit-player. The outcome could be deadly March 30 2008 / http://tinyurl.com/ywydqm
This article appeared in the Observer on Sunday March 30 2008 on p33 of the Comment section. It was last updated at 00:03 on March 30 2008.
History may not repeat itself, but, as Mark Twain observed, it can sometimes rhyme. The crises and conflicts of the past recur, recognizably similar even when altered by new conditions. At present, a race for the world's resources is underway that resembles the Great Game that was played in the decades leading up to the First World War. Now, as then, the most coveted prize is oil and the risk is that as the contest heats up it will not always be peaceful. But this is no simple rerun of the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Today, there are powerful new players and it is not only oil that is at stake.
It was Rudyard Kipling who brought the idea of the Great Game into the public mind in Kim, his cloak-and-dagger novel of espionage and imperial geopolitics in the time of the Raj. Then, the main players were Britain and Russia and the object of the game was control of central Asia's oil. Now, Britain hardly matters and India and China, which were subjugated countries during the last round of the game, have emerged as key players. The struggle is no longer focused mainly on central Asian oil. It stretches from the Persian Gulf to Africa, Latin America, even the polar caps, and it is also a struggle for water and depleting supplies of vital minerals. Above all, global warming is increasing the scarcity of natural resources. The Great Game that is afoot today is more intractable and more dangerous than the last.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/...

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 6 min sonicfilter 1,457,747
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 3 hr Sam 104,501
Word (Dec '08) 3 hr PEllen 6,836
Double Word Game (Dec '11) 3 hr PEllen 3,443
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 3 hr PEllen 9,839
Four letter word game (Dec '11) 3 hr PEllen 2,272
Why does Chicago want to harbor illegal criminals 5 hr ThomasA 10

Chicago Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages