BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

Full story: Chicago Tribune

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...

Comments (Page 7,535)

Showing posts 150,681 - 150,700 of167,711
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170840
Sep 8, 2013
 
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
truman wrote:
<quoted text>Surely you realize by now that Teabaggers will believe virtrually any nonsense or propaganda without question so long as its something they WANT to hear.
Rupert Murdoch built the Fox empire based solely on that principal.
Rush Limbaugh has made a career of it and the wealthy special interests whose fingers House Republicans lick depend on it.
Why should LRS be any different?
The truth of any of it is completly irrelevant to them as long as they think they can mke as many idiots as possible BELIEVE it.
He just got excited about posting it and never bothered to read to the bottom and is too much of a limp wristed Glenn Beckian fan-girl to admit it.LMAO!!!Hilarious!
<quoted text>

He is just jealous that Fox News has four times as many viewers as CNN does and that Rush Limbaugh has ten times as many listeners as the nearest loony-left radio talk show host (whom ever that is).
WWE wrestling has 1000 times more viewers than the Metropolitan Opera Saturday afternoon presentations. Fox has more viewers than PBS and Discovery Channel combined. What does that prove, Rogue? What does that say to you?

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170841
Sep 8, 2013
 
Justice LRS wrote:
This really puts the lid on it!
http://www.moonbattery.com/archives/2008/02/p...
Futile attempt to show how the Harvard I.Q. study was a joke. Sorry, doesn't work. Everyone here knows, including your buddy Rogue, that you were dead serious. Read past the titles, basket head, try to suppress your love and affection for headlines that cater to and suit your hate biases.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170842
Sep 8, 2013
 
Justice LRS wrote:
This really puts the lid on it!
http://www.moonbattery.com/archives/2008/02/p...
Yea, I have noted that Jacqueau will never accept proof of anything. An example is that I have shown he good sources that say that Russian and Germany concluded that Saddamn did have an active WMD program just before the 1982 resumption of the Persian Gulf War but a few weeks later he will claim otherwise ..... again.
Or that HPV, which causes cervical cancer in women, is also the cause of rectal cancer in gay men and for the same reason. Heterosexual men almost never get HPV rectal cancer!
http://www.analcancerfoundation.org/

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170843
Sep 8, 2013
 
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Yep, with 90+% of people calling their Congressmen to tell them to stay out of Syria, Obama releases video tapes to CNN. I've seen enough dead people so I am not interested in seeing anymore but if that is what you want to see, go ahead.
Are Obama’s sarin videos released to CNN propaganda?
http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/...
canadafreepress.com/ now? How low will you sink? And don't come back with "killing the messenger" BS. Marshall McLuhan : "The medium is the message"

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170844
Sep 8, 2013
 
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>

He is just jealous that Fox News has four times as many viewers as CNN does and that Rush Limbaugh has ten times as many listeners as the nearest loony-left radio talk show host (whom ever that is).
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
WWE wrestling has 1000 times more viewers than the Metropolitan Opera Saturday afternoon presentations. Fox has more viewers than PBS and Discovery Channel combined. What does that prove, Rogue? What does that say to you?
You do know there is a bog difference between Fox Network, Fox Sports and Fox News, don't you? Apparently knot!

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170845
Sep 8, 2013
 
I don't think is is really just a gay/straight man problem. It is putting your pecker in someplace that nature did not intend it be put in! I don't put my love tool in any woman's tail hole and I am not about to let anyone put anything in mine!

Hepatitis B and C Virus Sexual Transmission Among Homosexual Men
http://www.nature.com/ajg/journal/v93/n1/abs/...
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170846
Sep 8, 2013
 
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Futile attempt to show how the Harvard I.Q. study was a joke. Sorry, doesn't work. Everyone here knows, including your buddy Rogue, that you were dead serious. Read past the titles, basket head, try to suppress your love and affection for headlines that cater to and suit your hate biases.
Even you pointed out how out of place that "communist" statement was! Whether you and Twinkie admit it or not, you got a healthy dose of your own medicine. And you're choking on it! LMAO! See what constantly being an AHole does for you? HEE HEE HEE

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170847
Sep 8, 2013
 
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
canadafreepress.com/ now? How low will you sink? And don't come back with "killing the messenger" BS. Marshall McLuhan : "The medium is the message"
It is NOT Canada Free Press that is showing these videos, it is CNN!
http://www.cnn.com/video/data/2.0/video/polit...

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170848
Sep 8, 2013
 
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
canadafreepress.com/ now? How low will you sink? And don't come back with "killing the messenger" BS. Marshall McLuhan : "The medium is the message"
Yep, "The medium is the message" and CNN is it!!!

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170849
Sep 8, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Yea, I have noted that Jacqueau will never accept proof of anything. An example is that I have shown he good sources that say that Russian and Germany concluded that Saddamn did have an active WMD program just before the 1982 resumption of the Persian Gulf War but a few weeks later he will claim otherwise ..... again.
Or that HPV, which causes cervical cancer in women, is also the cause of rectal cancer in gay men and for the same reason. Heterosexual men almost never get HPV rectal cancer!
http://www.analcancerfoundation.org/
What a weasel liar you are. You claimed that Germany and Russia AND the UN approved the invasion of Iraq. Prove it now.

You also claimed that Russia and Germany agreed that Iraq had WMDs. Well, that is also false and you still have not proved it.

Read this, Rogue, just a reminder, not the 1st time :

Iraq and weapons of mass destruction

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The fifth president of Iraq Saddam Hussein[1] was internationally known for his use of chemical weapons in the 1980s against Iranian and Kurdish civilians during and after the Iran–Iraq War. In the 1980s he pursued an extensive biological weapons program and a nuclear weapons program, though no nuclear bomb was built.

After the 1990-1991 Persian Gulf War, the United Nations located and destroyed large quantities of Iraqi chemical weapons and related equipment and materials throughout the early 1990s, with varying degrees of Iraqi cooperation and obstruction.[2] In response to diminishing Iraqi cooperation with UNSCOM, the United States called for withdrawal of all UN and IAEA inspectors in 1998, resulting in Operation Desert Fox. The United States and the UK asserted that Saddam Hussein still possessed large hidden stockpiles of WMD in 2003, and that he was clandestinely procuring and producing more. Inspections by the UN to resolve the status of unresolved disarmament questions restarted from November 2002 until March 2003,[3] under UN Security Council Resolution 1441, which demanded Saddam give "immediate, unconditional and active cooperation" with UN and IAEA inspections, shortly before his country was attacked.[4]

During the lead-up to war in March 2003, United Nations weapons inspector Hans Blix had found no stockpiles of WMD and had made significant progress toward resolving open issues of disarmament noting the "proactive" but not always "immediate" Iraqi cooperation as called for by UN Security Council Resolution 1441. He concluded that it would take “but months” to resolve the key remaining disarmament tasks.[5] The United States asserted this was a breach of Resolution 1441 but failed to convince the UN Security Council to pass a new resolution authorizing the use of force due to lack of evidence.[6][7][8]

And :from Center for American Progress,By Eric Alterman and George Zornick | June 12, 2008

&#9726;The Guardian reported on October 12, 2002 that,“Vladimir Putin yesterday rejected Anglo-American claims that Saddam Hussein already possesses weapons of mass destruction … With a tense Mr. Blair alongside him at his dacha near Moscow, the Russian president took the unusual step of citing this week’s sceptical CIA report on the Iraqi military threat to assert:‘Fears are one thing, hard facts are another.’”
&#9726;The BBC reported on February 11, 2003, that,“France, Germany, and Russia have released an unprecedented joint declaration on the Iraq crisis, demanding more weapons inspectors and more technical assistance for them ...‘Nothing today justifies a war,’ Mr Chirac told a joint news conference with Mr Putin.‘This region really does not need another war.’ He said France did not have ‘undisputed proof’ that Iraq still held weapons of mass destruction.”
==========

You see, Rogue, I ALWAYS document what I state. You don't. You stonewall, and words like 'hypocrite" come out. Sigh.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170850
Sep 8, 2013
 
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
He is just jealous that Fox News has four times as many viewers as CNN does and that Rush Limbaugh has ten times as many listeners as the nearest loony-left radio talk show host (whom ever that is).
<quoted text>
You do know there is a bog difference between Fox Network, Fox Sports and Fox News, don't you? Apparently knot!
Could you, just once, please, JUST ONCE, be relevant?

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170851
Sep 8, 2013
 
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
I don't think is is really just a gay/straight man problem. It is putting your pecker in someplace that nature did not intend it be put in! I don't put my love tool in any woman's tail hole and I am not about to let anyone put anything in mine!
Hepatitis B and C Virus Sexual Transmission Among Homosexual Men
http://www.nature.com/ajg/journal/v93/n1/abs/...
What in heaven's name propels you to spontaneously come up with such stuff? Do you have AIDS, or any venereal disease and want to come out with it? You need to talk about it? Go ahead. We'll try to help LMAO (LRS tm reg'd). Maybe get one of those dumb leftist low-IQ oncologist examine you.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170852
Sep 8, 2013
 
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
It is NOT Canada Free Press that is showing these videos, it is CNN!
http://www.cnn.com/video/data/2.0/video/polit...
I know that, but YOU don't know the difference. CNN shows it as news, canadafreepress.com shows it as sensationalist trash for its lower-cast readers and viewers. You still don't see it, do you?

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170853
Sep 8, 2013
 
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Yep, "The medium is the message" and CNN is it!!!
CNN was all for the invasion of Iraq, how well I recall. Then it started to see the truth in light of obvious cracks in the invasion justifications. It changed and turned anti-Iraq war. That kind of change is refreshing, not wishy-washy. Fox and its adorators, you, for example, have not deviated one inch from your obstinate stance that invasion of Iraq was a good thing, in spite of irrefutable evidence, look at Iraq today, that the whole thing was a huge mistake.

You guys, unless Obama comes to his senses, are about to repeat the blunders of history. Cripes, not even history, other disasters still fresh and out there as can be.

“On Deck”

Since: Aug 08

French Polynesia

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170854
Sep 8, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Jacques,
Whatever war Barack Obama is trying to sell, we are not buying.
I will literally go ballistic if that man drags America off to war.
I think it's a foregone conclusion and that he is using Congress as a mere formality to sink the United States even deeper into that Islamic pit of puke.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170855
Sep 8, 2013
 
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Yea, I have noted that Jacqueau will never accept proof of anything. An example is that I have shown he good sources that say that Russian and Germany concluded that Saddamn did have an active WMD program just before the 1982 resumption of the Persian Gulf War but a few weeks later he will claim otherwise ..... again.
Or that HPV, which causes cervical cancer in women, is also the cause of rectal cancer in gay men and for the same reason. Heterosexual men almost never get HPV rectal cancer!
http://www.analcancerfoundation.org/
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
What a weasel liar you are. You claimed that Germany and Russia AND the UN approved the invasion of Iraq. Prove it now.
You also claimed that Russia and Germany agreed that Iraq had WMDs. Well, that is also false and you still have not proved it.

==========
You see, Rogue, I ALWAYS document what I state. You don't. You stonewall, and words like 'hypocrite" come out. Sigh.
How Many times have do I have to show this to you?!?
"The National Intelligence Estimate of 2002, where their collective views were summarized, asserted with “high confidence” that "Iraq is continuing, and in some areas expanding its chemical, biological, nuclear, and missile programs contrary to UN resolutions.

The intelligence agencies of Britain, Germany, Russia, China, Israel, and France all agreed with this judgment."
http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/viewSubCat...
Next, I NEVER said German and Russia approved of the re-invasion of Iraq and YOU CAN NOT PROVE I SAID THAT EITHER so shut the F-up you weasel sh*t!

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170856
Sep 8, 2013
 
Hey Jacqueau, please note RUSSIA is mentioned several times here again!!!
Iraq and Weapons of Mass Destruction

National Security Archive Electronic Briefing Book No. 80

Updated - February 11, 2004

Edited by Jeffrey Richelson
Originally posted December 20, 2002
Previously updated February 26, 2003

xxxxxx

Subsequent to George W. Bush's assumption of the presidency in January 2001, the U.S. made it clear that it would not accept what had become the status quo with respect to Iraq - a country ruled by Saddam Hussein and free to attempt to reconstitute its assorted weapons of mass destruction programs. As part of their campaign against the status quo, which included the clear threat of the eventual use of military force against the Iraqi regime, the U.S. and Britain published documents and provided briefings detailing their conclusions concerning Iraq's WMD programs and its attempts to deceive other nations about those programs.

As a result of the U.S. and British campaign, and after prolonged negotiations between the United States, Britain, France, Russia and other U.N. Security Council members, the United Nations declared that Iraq would have to accept even more intrusive inspections than under the previous inspection regime - to be carried out by the U.N. Monitoring, Verification, and Inspection Commission (UNMOVIC) and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)- or face "serious consequences." Iraq agreed to accept the U.N. decision and inspections resumed in late November 2002. On December 7, 2002, Iraq submitted its 12,000 page declaration, which claimed that it had no current WMD programs. Intelligence analysts from the United States and other nations immediately began to scrutinize the document, and senior U.S. officials quickly rejected the claims.(Note 2)

Over the next several months, inspections continued in Iraq, and the chief inspectors, Hans Blix (UNMOVIC) and Mohammed El Baradei (IAEA) provided periodic updates to the U.N. Security Council concerning the extent of Iraqi cooperation, what they had or had not discovered, and what they believed remained to be done. During that period the Bush administration, as well as the Tony Blair administration in the United Kingdom, charged that Iraq was not living up to the requirement that it fully disclose its WMD activities, and declared that if it continued along that path, "serious consequences" - that is, invasion - should follow.
http://www2.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB80...

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170857
Sep 8, 2013
 
Oh, the United Nations approved of the Persian Gulf War in 1991. The Persian Gulf War was put on hold because Iraq signed a cease fire based on compliance on U.N. mandate of which Saddamn Hussein violated 27 times.
Bush-43 did not need the U.N.'s approval to resume the war but our Congress approved of it in 1991 and again in 2002.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170858
Sep 8, 2013
 
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Yea, I have noted that Jacqueau will never accept proof of anything. An example is that I have shown he good sources that say that Russian and Germany concluded that Saddamn did have an active WMD program just before the 1982 resumption of the Persian Gulf War but a few weeks later he will claim otherwise ..... again.
Or that HPV, which causes cervical cancer in women, is also the cause of rectal cancer in gay men and for the same reason. Heterosexual men almost never get HPV rectal cancer!
http://www.analcancerfoundation.org/
<quoted text>
How Many times have do I have to show this to you?!?
<quoted text>
Next, I NEVER said German and Russia approved of the re-invasion of Iraq and YOU CAN NOT PROVE I SAID THAT EITHER so shut the F-up you weasel sh*t!
so, you wrote : "so shut the F-up you weasel sh*t! " Hmm, adopting LRS language out of sheer frustration, are you? Good for you, puts you in character.

My source and the fact that Putin said it with Blair at his side is better. Russia said plainly that there was no proof of WNDs, much to Blair's discomfiture. And yes, Liar, you STATED Germany and Russia approved the invasion of Iraq. You even went as far as incredibly STATING that the invasion was also approved by UN resolution. What a crock. Notice I don't bottom-feed like you do by hurling cute phrases like "so shut the F-up you weasel sh*t! ". That's for birthers and their ilk to do.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170859
Sep 8, 2013
 
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Hey Jacqueau, please note RUSSIA is mentioned several times here again!!!
<quoted text>
You really only read headlines do you? And even then, I'm not sure if you understand them. Much less the story that follows. Read the second paragraph you posted, note the dates and what it says :

As a result of the U.S. and British campaign, and after prolonged negotiations between the United States, Britain, France, Russia and other U.N. Security Council members, the United Nations declared that Iraq would have to accept even more intrusive inspections than under the previous inspection regime - to be carried out by the U.N. Monitoring, Verification, and Inspection Commission (UNMOVIC) and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)- or face "serious consequences." Iraq agreed to accept the U.N. decision and inspections resumed in late November 2002. On December 7, 2002, Iraq submitted its 12,000 page declaration, which claimed that it had no current WMD programs. Intelligence analysts from the United States and other nations immediately began to scrutinize the document, and senior U.S. officials quickly rejected the claims.(Note 2)
==========

Stick to driving airplanes and helicopters.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 150,681 - 150,700 of167,711
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••
•••

Chicago Jobs

•••
•••
•••

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••