BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

Full story: Chicago Tribune

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...

Comments (Page 7,529)

Showing posts 150,561 - 150,580 of167,502
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
wojar

Wallingford, CT

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170717
Sep 7, 2013
 
http://www.cnn.com/2010/HEALTH/02/26/liberals...

The study found that young adults who said they were "very conservative" had an average adolescent IQ of 95, whereas those who said they were "very liberal" averaged 106.
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170718
Sep 7, 2013
 
Quoting the article:
"A new study conducted at Harvard University shows that in America,
Liberals have a significantly lower IQ than Conservatives. The study was
conducted on 100,000 registered voters in 40 different states over the
last twelve years, and has concluded its results.

The first part of the study lists the correlation between political
beliefs and intelligence. Subjects of the study were chosen at random
and requested to come to an unmarked van to take a test and answer some
questions for a reasonable amount of money.

Of the 100,000 people, there were people from many doctrines, from
conservative to liberal to marxist to fascist. Socialists came out on
bottom, with an average IQ of 87. The second worst were Liberals and
then Marxists, with 88 and 89 respectively. Conservatives received an
average score of 110, which is significantly above average. "

Also,

"
Other parts of the study included the daily activities of the various
people based on their doctrines. Apparently, Liberals are five times
more likely to commit a crime, steal or cheat on a test than anybody
else except for Socialists, 52% of which have committed a major felony
while being watched. Conservatives not only did not commit any crimes,
but they actually prevented them, as the few events where a Conservative
was threatened by a thief or mugger was hindered by a concealed
handgun. Also, Communists are the most likely to commit rape or sexual
assault, second to socialists.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170719
Sep 7, 2013
 
I frequently email Fox News and I have gotten several replies. I also email USA Today and have been published once. Oh, I am T. Nadeau.
http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/printedition/n...
But try and email someone like Gawker with a dissenting opinion and it will not be published. Libtards only talk about Freedom of Speech!

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170720
Sep 7, 2013
 
wojar wrote:
http://www.cnn.com/2010/HEALTH/02/26/liberals...
The study found that young adults who said they were "very conservative" had an average adolescent IQ of 95, whereas those who said they were "very liberal" averaged 106.
And that study was taken by ..... Social Psychology Quarterly .... which has a progressive agenda. What would you expect someone with an agenda to say?
By the way, it is true that atheists, in general, have above average IQs but they over analyze everything! And atheist also tend be be sexual deviants like homosexuals, pedophiles, etc. and they are trying to justify their deviant behavior so they have to discount the Bible.
Project Censored org

Oakdale, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170721
Sep 7, 2013
 
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
I disagree with you. Gen. Ike was a Republican and was a straight shooter whereas Wesley Clark is a Democrat and could not shoot straight even if he had to.
Oh, you quote is a little out of context. Not that that matters to you but here is what he said.
Wesley Clark US will attack 7 countries in 5 years.
http://www.youtube.com/watch...<quoted text>
Two points. What proof do you have that Wesley Clark was a Republican?
Next, McCain could not fool the military. We all knew he was a Country Club RINO. Just because someone had been in the military, does not mean the active military support him.
Oh, I did not donate one red cent to McCain either!!!
General Clark said so publicly many times and changed when the draft dodgers Bush and Cheney administration shunned him.

==========

Bush's Guard Service In Question
Democrats Say President Shirked His Duty in 1972
February 3, 2004 / http://tinyurl.com/37uhr
It was an era when service in the Guard was a coveted assignment, often associated with efforts to avoid active duty in Vietnam. Bush was accepted for pilot training after having scored only 25 percent on the pilot's aptitude test, the lowest acceptable grade.
In 2000, the Boston Globe examined a period from May 1972 to May 1973 and found no record that Bush performed any Guard duties, either in Alabama or Houston, although he was still enlisted.
In August 1972, Bush was suspended from flying because he failed to complete an annual medical exam. A month later, Bush requested to be assigned to a different unit in Alabama and was approved. Although he was required to attend periodic drills in Alabama, there is no official record in his file that he did.
According to the records, Bush had been instructed to report to William Turnipseed, an officer in the Montgomery unit. "Had he reported in, I would have had some recall and I do not," Turnipseed, a retired brigadier general, told the Globe in 2000. "I had been in Texas, done my flight training there. If we had a first lieutenant from Texas, I would have remembered." http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles...

------

Chicken Hawks - Hall of Shame
BUSH- CHENEY- RUDY- LIMBAUGH- O’REILLY- HANNITY LIEBERMAN & REAGAN / http://tinyurl.com/m69ww29
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
Project Censored org

Oakdale, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170722
Sep 7, 2013
 
CIA moonlights in corporate world
2/1/10 http://tinyurl.com/y99oxt9
In the midst of two wars and the fight against Al Qaeda, the CIA is offering operatives a chance to peddle their expertise to private companies on the side — a policy that gives financial firms and hedge funds access to the nation’s top-level intelligence talent, POLITICO has learned.
In one case, these active-duty officers moonlighted at a hedge-fund consulting firm that wanted to tap their expertise in “deception detection,” the highly specialized art of telling when executives may be lying based on clues in a conversation.
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0110/322...

---------

The CIA and the Media
by Carl Bernstein / Rolling Stone, Oct. 20, 1977 / http://tinyurl.com/r3yon
- Employees of so-called CIA "proprietaries." During the past twenty-five years, the Agency has secretly bankrolled numerous foreign press services, periodicals and newspapers -- both English and foreign language -- which provided excellent cover for CIA operatives.
Columnists and commentators. There are perhaps a dozen well-known columnists and broadcast commentators whose relationships with the CIA go far beyond those normally maintained between reporters and their sources. They are referred to at the Agency as "known assets" and can be counted on to perform a variety of undercover tasks; they are considered receptive to the Agency"s point of view on various subjects.

Murky details of CIA relationships with individuals and news organizations began trickling out in 1973 when it was first disclosed that the CIA had, on occasion, employed journalists. Those reports, combined with new information, serve as casebook studies of the Agency's use of journalists for intelligence purposes.

The New York Times -- The Agency's relationship with the Times was by far its most valuable among newspapers, according to CIA officials.[It was] general Times policy ... to provide assistance to the CIA whenever possible.

... CIA officials cite two reasons why the Agency's working relationship with the Times was closer and more extensive than with any other paper: the fact that the Times maintained the largest foreign news operation in American daily journalism; and the close personal ties between the men who ran both institutions ....

The Columbia Broadcasting System -- CBS was unquestionably the CIA's most valuable broadcasting asset. CBS president William Paley and Allen Dulles enjoyed an easy working and social relationship. Over the years, the network provided cover for CIA employees, including at least one well-known foreign correspondent and several stringers; it supplied outtakes of newsfilm to the CIA; established a formal channel of communication between the Washington bureau chief and the Agency; gave the Agency access to the CBS newsfilm library; and allowed reports by CBS correspondents to the Washington and New York newsrooms to be routinely monitored by the CIA. Once a year during the 1950s and early 1960s, CBS correspondents joined the CIA hierarchy for private dinners and briefings.

... At the headquarters of CBS News in New York, Paley's cooperation with the CIA is taken for granted by many news executives and reporters, despite the denials. Paley, 76, was not interviewed by Salant's investigators. "It wouldn't do any good," said one CBS executive. "It is the single subject about which his memory has failed."
http://danwismar.com/uploads/Bernstein%20-%20...

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170723
Sep 7, 2013
 
Every time I see the words "peer-reviewed", I know it is a loony-lefty site. You see, they surround themselves with like minded people who review each others works so it only means "they" all agree.
The same when I read "non-affiliated" which implies they are politically neutral but they actually have a progressive agenda.

Social Psychology Quarterly
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Social Psychology Quarterly is a peer-reviewed academic journal that publishes theoretical and empirical papers in the field of social psychology. The editors-in-chief are Karen A. Hegtvedt (Emory University) and Cathryn Johnson (Emory University). It is published by SAGE Publications on behalf of the American Sociological Association, of which this is an official journal.
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170724
Sep 7, 2013
 
Project Censored org wrote:
<quoted text>
General Clark said so publicly many times and changed when the draft dodgers Bush and Cheney administration shunned him.
==========
Bush's Guard Service In Question
Democrats Say President Shirked His Duty in 1972
February 3, 2004 / http://tinyurl.com/37uhr
It was an era when service in the Guard was a coveted assignment, often associated with efforts to avoid active duty in Vietnam. Bush was accepted for pilot training after having scored only 25 percent on the pilot's aptitude test, the lowest acceptable grade.
In 2000, the Boston Globe examined a period from May 1972 to May 1973 and found no record that Bush performed any Guard duties, either in Alabama or Houston, although he was still enlisted.
In August 1972, Bush was suspended from flying because he failed to complete an annual medical exam. A month later, Bush requested to be assigned to a different unit in Alabama and was approved. Although he was required to attend periodic drills in Alabama, there is no official record in his file that he did.
According to the records, Bush had been instructed to report to William Turnipseed, an officer in the Montgomery unit. "Had he reported in, I would have had some recall and I do not," Turnipseed, a retired brigadier general, told the Globe in 2000. "I had been in Texas, done my flight training there. If we had a first lieutenant from Texas, I would have remembered." http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles...
------
Chicken Hawks - Hall of Shame
BUSH- CHENEY- RUDY- LIMBAUGH- O’REILLY- HANNITY LIEBERMAN & REAGAN / http://tinyurl.com/m69ww29
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
Got OCD?
wojar

Bristol, CT

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170725
Sep 7, 2013
 
Justice LRS wrote:
Quoting the article:
"A new study conducted at Harvard University shows that in America,
Liberals have a significantly lower IQ than Conservatives. The study was
conducted on 100,000 registered voters in 40 different states over the
last twelve years, and has concluded its results.
The first part of the study lists the correlation between political
beliefs and intelligence. Subjects of the study were chosen at random
and requested to come to an unmarked van to take a test and answer some
questions for a reasonable amount of money.
Of the 100,000 people, there were people from many doctrines, from
conservative to liberal to marxist to fascist. Socialists came out on
bottom, with an average IQ of 87. The second worst were Liberals and
then Marxists, with 88 and 89 respectively. Conservatives received an
average score of 110, which is significantly above average. "
Also,
"
Other parts of the study included the daily activities of the various
people based on their doctrines. Apparently, Liberals are five times
more likely to commit a crime, steal or cheat on a test than anybody
else except for Socialists, 52% of which have committed a major felony
while being watched. Conservatives not only did not commit any crimes,
but they actually prevented them, as the few events where a Conservative
was threatened by a thief or mugger was hindered by a concealed
handgun. Also, Communists are the most likely to commit rape or sexual
assault, second to socialists.
Hoax.

Where published? Which authors?

Gullible conservative racists with low IQs fall for hoaxes. They're called birthers.
Project Censored org

Oakdale, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170726
Sep 7, 2013
 
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Got OCD?
No, do you?

----------

Bush defends military service record in NBC interview /
President also backs Tenet, war against Iraq
http://tinyurl.com/2zyjug Feb. 9, 2004

President Bush defended his service in the National Guard during an interview aired Sunday on NBC’s “Meet the Press” and offered to produce evidence to counter allegations raised by political opponents that he was AWOL for a time in 1972.

On “Meet the Press,” Bush said,“I put in my time, proudly so.” When pressed by Russert on why news reporters who previously investigated the charge could find no records of his Alabama service, Bush said,“They’re just wrong. There may be no evidence, but I did report; otherwise, I wouldn’t have been honorably discharged.

In other words, you don’t just say ‘I did something’ without there being verification. Military doesn’t work that way. I got an honorable discharge, and I did show up in Alabama.” http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4209283/

When asked why he served less than the six-year commitment, Bush responded,“I was going to Harvard Business School and worked it out with the military.”

MILITARY 101:

The military releases individuals for the convenience of the military, NOT FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE INDIVIDUAL ( e.g., so someone could attend business school).

Because the 111th FIS had a need for pilots at the time Bush was discharged, and because his early release could not have been for his own convenience, there must have been a reason the military could no longer use the services of Dumbya Bush.

Listen to ignorant Bush in his own words:

On “Meet the Press,” Bush said,“I put in my time, proudly so.” When pressed by Russert on why news reporters who previously investigated the charge could find no records of his Alabama service, Bush said,“They’re just wrong. There may be no evidence, but I did report; otherwise, I wouldn’t have been honorably discharged.

----------

Bush said,“They’re just wrong. There may be no evidence, but I did report; otherwise, I wouldn’t have been honorably discharged.

----------
There may be no evidence,
----------
There may be no evidence,
----------
There may be no evidence,
----------
There may be no evidence,
----------
There may be no evidence,

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170727
Sep 7, 2013
 
Grand Birther wrote:
Lol, Rogue Moron will go to any length to justify his deeply held racist beliefs.
It's ok, Rogue Moron. No need to explain. You can just be racist.
And you can not articulate why you think I am a racist. Just because I do not trust ghetto people? I don't much care for 'village' people either. Does that mean I am anti-white? Nor do I like criminals (who are mostly Libtards), so does that mean I am a racist too?
Project Censored org

Oakdale, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170728
Sep 7, 2013
 
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Every time I see the words "peer-reviewed", I know it is a loony-lefty site. You see, they surround themselves with like minded people who review each others works so it only means "they" all agree.
The same when I read "non-affiliated" which implies they are politically neutral but they actually have a progressive agenda.
Social Psychology Quarterly
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Social Psychology Quarterly is a peer-reviewed academic journal that publishes theoretical and empirical papers in the field of social psychology. The editors-in-chief are Karen A. Hegtvedt (Emory University) and Cathryn Johnson (Emory University). It is published by SAGE Publications on behalf of the American Sociological Association, of which this is an official journal.
So you reject all peer-reviewed subjects and believe everything out of the mouth of Rush 'From Drugs' Lying Corporatist Limbaugh and Fox News Rightwing Propaganda Channel?

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170729
Sep 7, 2013
 
Oh, if you want to get Neal Cavuto to read your letters on the air, just mention is big head, ugly ties or mention pretty Foxy Ladies. And if you mention all three, he will probably read your letter first.
Oh, he has read at least three of my letters.
wojar

Bristol, CT

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170730
Sep 7, 2013
 
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
And that study was taken by ..... Social Psychology Quarterly .... which has a progressive agenda. What would you expect someone with an agenda to say?
By the way, it is true that atheists, in general, have above average IQs but they over analyze everything! And atheist also tend be be sexual deviants like homosexuals, pedophiles, etc. and they are trying to justify their deviant behavior so they have to discount the Bible.
Ad hominem. Favorite tactic of low IQ racist conservative birthers.
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170731
Sep 7, 2013
 
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>Hoax.
Where published? Which authors?
Gullible conservative racists with low IQs fall for hoaxes. They're called birthers.
Now Twinkie, why would anyone believe you? You've proven yourself to be a liar. Silly kid. Liberals and lying, two peas in a pod! Looks like the study was right to me! LMAO! Quit before you're lapped.
wojar

Bristol, CT

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170732
Sep 7, 2013
 
Justice LRS wrote:
Quoting the article:
"A new study conducted at Harvard University shows that in America,
Liberals have a significantly lower IQ than Conservatives. The study was
conducted on 100,000 registered voters in 40 different states over the
last twelve years, and has concluded its results.
The first part of the study lists the correlation between political
beliefs and intelligence. Subjects of the study were chosen at random
and requested to come to an unmarked van to take a test and answer some
questions for a reasonable amount of money.
Of the 100,000 people, there were people from many doctrines, from
conservative to liberal to marxist to fascist. Socialists came out on
bottom, with an average IQ of 87. The second worst were Liberals and
then Marxists, with 88 and 89 respectively. Conservatives received an
average score of 110, which is significantly above average. "
Also,
"
Other parts of the study included the daily activities of the various
people based on their doctrines. Apparently, Liberals are five times
more likely to commit a crime, steal or cheat on a test than anybody
else except for Socialists, 52% of which have committed a major felony
while being watched. Conservatives not only did not commit any crimes,
but they actually prevented them, as the few events where a Conservative
was threatened by a thief or mugger was hindered by a concealed
handgun. Also, Communists are the most likely to commit rape or sexual
assault, second to socialists.
Play Justice didn't read bottom of article.

"Oh yeah, and everything in that bullshit you just read is completely and totally false. There has been no such conclusive study, and all of the “Finds” are based on public paranoia. Chances are good that if you are a conservative, you were empowered by this new find.
If you, even for a second, thought this find might be true, you are probably an idiot."
wojar

Bristol, CT

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170733
Sep 7, 2013
 
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Now Twinkie, why would anyone believe you? You've proven yourself to be a liar. Silly kid. Liberals and lying, two peas in a pod! Looks like the study was right to me! LMAO! Quit before you're lapped.
Moron Boy evidently didn't read all the way to the end.

"Oh yeah, and everything in that bullshit you just read is completely and totally false. There has been no such conclusive study, and all of the “Finds” are based on public paranoia. Chances are good that if you are a conservative, you were empowered by this new find.
If you, even for a second, thought this find might be true, you are probably an idiot."

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170734
Sep 7, 2013
 
Project Censored org wrote:
<quoted text>
No, do you?
----------
Bush defends military service record in NBC interview /
President also backs Tenet, war against Iraq
http://tinyurl.com/2zyjug Feb. 9, 2004
President Bush defended his service in the National Guard during an interview aired Sunday on NBC’s “Meet the Press” and offered to produce evidence to counter allegations raised by political opponents that he was AWOL for a time in 1972.
On “Meet the Press,” Bush said,“I put in my time, proudly so.” When pressed by Russert on why news reporters who previously investigated the charge could find no records of his Alabama service, Bush said,“They’re just wrong. There may be no evidence, but I did report; otherwise, I wouldn’t have been honorably discharged.
In other words, you don’t just say ‘I did something’ without there being verification. Military doesn’t work that way. I got an honorable discharge, and I did show up in Alabama.” http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4209283/
When asked why he served less than the six-year commitment, Bush responded,“I was going to Harvard Business School and worked it out with the military.”
MILITARY 101:
The military releases individuals for the convenience of the military, NOT FOR THE CONVENIENCE OF THE INDIVIDUAL ( e.g., so someone could attend business school).
Because the 111th FIS had a need for pilots at the time Bush was discharged, and because his early release could not have been for his own convenience, there must have been a reason the military could no longer use the services of Dumbya Bush.
Listen to ignorant Bush in his own words:
On “Meet the Press,” Bush said,“I put in my time, proudly so.” When pressed by Russert on why news reporters who previously investigated the charge could find no records of his Alabama service, Bush said,“They’re just wrong. There may be no evidence, but I did report; otherwise, I wouldn’t have been honorably discharged.
----------
Bush said,“They’re just wrong. There may be no evidence, but I did report; otherwise, I wouldn’t have been honorably discharged.
----------
There may be no evidence,
----------
There may be no evidence,
----------
There may be no evidence,
----------
There may be no evidence,
----------
There may be no evidence,
Talking about someone who does not know the difference between the National Guard and the Air National Guard. You probably have no idea what a Genie rocket was much less the difference between a V-102 and a F-101.
I have rebutted every one of those points over and over again but you are still hooked on Bush. Face it, Obama is the President and he is totally responsible for the current economy.
Yes, when his unit was converting from F-102s to F-101s, G.W. informed his commander he would not extend his obligation beyond his six year commitment.
You see, in 1980 when I went to the Chinook course, I incurred an additional two year obligation. The same thing happened when I accepted promotion to CW3 and CW4.
Since Bush did not wan't to accept the extra obligation which would have required of him if he had transitioned into the F-101, they no longer needed his service.
Now, John Kerry accepted a six year obligation if he went through Navy OCS. They why did John F-up Kerry serve only four years, 1966-1970, of his six year obligation. WHY???
Project Censored org

Oakdale, NY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170735
Sep 7, 2013
 
President Bush Holds Town Hall Meeting
December 4, 2001 / http://tinyurl.com/5obfj

Thank you, Jordan (ph).

Well, Jordan (ph), you're not going to believe what state I was in when I heard about the terrorist attack. I was in Florida. And my chief of staff, Andy Card -- actually I was in a classroom talking about a reading program that works. And I was sitting outside the classroom waiting to go in, and I saw an airplane hit the tower -- the TV was obviously on, and I use to fly myself, and I said, "There's one terrible pilot." And I said, "It must have been a horrible accident."

But I was whisked off there -- I didn't have much time to think about it, and I was sitting in the classroom, and Andy Card, my chief who was sitting over here walked in and said, "A second plane has hit the tower. America's under attack."

And Jordan (ph), I wasn't sure what to think at first. You know, I grew up in a period of time where the idea of America being under attack never entered my mind -- just like your daddy and mother's mind probably. And I started thinking hard in that very brief period of time about what it meant to be under attack. I knew that when I got all the facts that we were under attack, there would be hell to pay for attacking America.
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0112/0...
Grand Birther

Greenfield, OH

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#170736
Sep 7, 2013
 
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
And you can not articulate why you think I am a racist. Just because I do not trust ghetto people? I don't much care for 'village' people either. Does that mean I am anti-white? Nor do I like criminals (who are mostly Libtards), so does that mean I am a racist too?
LOL, Rogue Moron's favourite tactic is to pretend all these reasons have not been articulated a million times over.

It's fun to play pretend when you're a birfoon, huh?

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 150,561 - 150,580 of167,502
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

31 Users are viewing the Chicago Forum right now

Search the Chicago Forum:
Topic Updated Last By Comments
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 19 min shinningelectr0n 1,033,329
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 38 min Lord Hater 42,961
Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 1 hr JOEL 65,068
Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 2 hr Dusty Mangina 47,034
Who Dodged the SHOE Better? 3 hr ThomasA 17
Song Title Game (Dec '11) 3 hr SLY WEST 1,020
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 3 hr loose cannon 96,071
•••
•••
•••

Chicago Jobs

•••
•••
•••

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••