BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

There are 189756 comments on the Chicago Tribune story from Jan 8, 2009, titled BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen.... In it, Chicago Tribune reports that:

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chicago Tribune.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#170856 Sep 8, 2013
Hey Jacqueau, please note RUSSIA is mentioned several times here again!!!
Iraq and Weapons of Mass Destruction

National Security Archive Electronic Briefing Book No. 80

Updated - February 11, 2004

Edited by Jeffrey Richelson
Originally posted December 20, 2002
Previously updated February 26, 2003

xxxxxx

Subsequent to George W. Bush's assumption of the presidency in January 2001, the U.S. made it clear that it would not accept what had become the status quo with respect to Iraq - a country ruled by Saddam Hussein and free to attempt to reconstitute its assorted weapons of mass destruction programs. As part of their campaign against the status quo, which included the clear threat of the eventual use of military force against the Iraqi regime, the U.S. and Britain published documents and provided briefings detailing their conclusions concerning Iraq's WMD programs and its attempts to deceive other nations about those programs.

As a result of the U.S. and British campaign, and after prolonged negotiations between the United States, Britain, France, Russia and other U.N. Security Council members, the United Nations declared that Iraq would have to accept even more intrusive inspections than under the previous inspection regime - to be carried out by the U.N. Monitoring, Verification, and Inspection Commission (UNMOVIC) and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)- or face "serious consequences." Iraq agreed to accept the U.N. decision and inspections resumed in late November 2002. On December 7, 2002, Iraq submitted its 12,000 page declaration, which claimed that it had no current WMD programs. Intelligence analysts from the United States and other nations immediately began to scrutinize the document, and senior U.S. officials quickly rejected the claims.(Note 2)

Over the next several months, inspections continued in Iraq, and the chief inspectors, Hans Blix (UNMOVIC) and Mohammed El Baradei (IAEA) provided periodic updates to the U.N. Security Council concerning the extent of Iraqi cooperation, what they had or had not discovered, and what they believed remained to be done. During that period the Bush administration, as well as the Tony Blair administration in the United Kingdom, charged that Iraq was not living up to the requirement that it fully disclose its WMD activities, and declared that if it continued along that path, "serious consequences" - that is, invasion - should follow.
http://www2.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB80...

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#170857 Sep 8, 2013
Oh, the United Nations approved of the Persian Gulf War in 1991. The Persian Gulf War was put on hold because Iraq signed a cease fire based on compliance on U.N. mandate of which Saddamn Hussein violated 27 times.
Bush-43 did not need the U.N.'s approval to resume the war but our Congress approved of it in 1991 and again in 2002.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#170858 Sep 8, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Yea, I have noted that Jacqueau will never accept proof of anything. An example is that I have shown he good sources that say that Russian and Germany concluded that Saddamn did have an active WMD program just before the 1982 resumption of the Persian Gulf War but a few weeks later he will claim otherwise ..... again.
Or that HPV, which causes cervical cancer in women, is also the cause of rectal cancer in gay men and for the same reason. Heterosexual men almost never get HPV rectal cancer!
http://www.analcancerfoundation.org/
<quoted text>
How Many times have do I have to show this to you?!?
<quoted text>
Next, I NEVER said German and Russia approved of the re-invasion of Iraq and YOU CAN NOT PROVE I SAID THAT EITHER so shut the F-up you weasel sh*t!
so, you wrote : "so shut the F-up you weasel sh*t! " Hmm, adopting LRS language out of sheer frustration, are you? Good for you, puts you in character.

My source and the fact that Putin said it with Blair at his side is better. Russia said plainly that there was no proof of WNDs, much to Blair's discomfiture. And yes, Liar, you STATED Germany and Russia approved the invasion of Iraq. You even went as far as incredibly STATING that the invasion was also approved by UN resolution. What a crock. Notice I don't bottom-feed like you do by hurling cute phrases like "so shut the F-up you weasel sh*t! ". That's for birthers and their ilk to do.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#170859 Sep 8, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Hey Jacqueau, please note RUSSIA is mentioned several times here again!!!
<quoted text>
You really only read headlines do you? And even then, I'm not sure if you understand them. Much less the story that follows. Read the second paragraph you posted, note the dates and what it says :

As a result of the U.S. and British campaign, and after prolonged negotiations between the United States, Britain, France, Russia and other U.N. Security Council members, the United Nations declared that Iraq would have to accept even more intrusive inspections than under the previous inspection regime - to be carried out by the U.N. Monitoring, Verification, and Inspection Commission (UNMOVIC) and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)- or face "serious consequences." Iraq agreed to accept the U.N. decision and inspections resumed in late November 2002. On December 7, 2002, Iraq submitted its 12,000 page declaration, which claimed that it had no current WMD programs. Intelligence analysts from the United States and other nations immediately began to scrutinize the document, and senior U.S. officials quickly rejected the claims.(Note 2)
==========

Stick to driving airplanes and helicopters.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#170860 Sep 8, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Oh, the United Nations approved of the Persian Gulf War in 1991. The Persian Gulf War was put on hold because Iraq signed a cease fire based on compliance on U.N. mandate of which Saddamn Hussein violated 27 times.
Bush-43 did not need the U.N.'s approval to resume the war but our Congress approved of it in 1991 and again in 2002.
Who said the UN didn't approve the 1991 Gulf War? Not me. Or anyone here.

As to the "resuming the war", you are of course wrong, so wrong it's not even funny. The Gulf war entailed the liberation of Kuwait, as approved by the UN and almost the entire world. The totally-unrelated invasion of Iraq concerned itself with Iraqi internal matters, period and was approved by a handful of countries and NOT the UN as you claimed. Was WWI the continuation of the French-Prussian war of 1870-71?

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#170863 Sep 8, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Even you pointed out how out of place that "communist" statement was! Whether you and Twinkie admit it or not, you got a healthy dose of your own medicine. And you're choking on it! LMAO! See what constantly being an AHole does for you? HEE HEE HEE
Birfoon Boy: "Looks like the study was right to me!"

Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!

Birfoon Boy trips over his own feet and Jacques and I got a dose of ...?

Talk about delusional!

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/del...
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Futile attempt to show how the Harvard I.Q. study was a joke. Sorry, doesn't work. Everyone here knows, including your buddy Rogue, that you were dead serious. Read past the titles, basket head, try to suppress your love and affection for headlines that cater to and suit your hate biases.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#170864 Sep 8, 2013
Forgot to mention this is also the definition of Birfoon.

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/del...

"Can you hear us coming?" Hee hee.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#170865 Sep 8, 2013
wojar wrote:
Forgot to mention this is also the definition of Birfoon.
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/del...
"Can you hear us coming?" Hee hee.
LRS's delusions have delusions.
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#170866 Sep 8, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
so, you wrote : "so shut the F-up you weasel sh*t! " Hmm, adopting LRS language out of sheer frustration, are you? Good for you, puts you in character.
My source and the fact that Putin said it with Blair at his side is better. Russia said plainly that there was no proof of WNDs, much to Blair's discomfiture. And yes, Liar, you STATED Germany and Russia approved the invasion of Iraq. You even went as far as incredibly STATING that the invasion was also approved by UN resolution. What a crock. Notice I don't bottom-feed like you do by hurling cute phrases like "so shut the F-up you weasel sh*t! ". That's for birthers and their ilk to do.
The hell you don't bottom-feed! Most of it is just done under one of your sock's names. Liar. Lying scumbag, and that's putting it nicely! I don't call you Path for nothing.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#170867 Sep 8, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
The hell you don't bottom-feed! Most of it is just done under one of your sock's names. Liar. Lying scumbag, and that's putting it nicely! I don't call you Path for nothing.
Name my other names. I dare you. Path? Flattery will get you everywhere. I like Pathfinder. Gracias, perdedor and in many other languages.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#170868 Sep 8, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
so, you wrote : "so shut the F-up you weasel sh*t! " Hmm, adopting LRS language out of sheer frustration, are you? Good for you, puts you in character.
My source and the fact that Putin said it with Blair at his side is better. Russia said plainly that there was no proof of WNDs, much to Blair's discomfiture. And yes, Liar, you STATED Germany and Russia approved the invasion of Iraq. You even went as far as incredibly STATING that the invasion was also approved by UN resolution. What a crock. Notice I don't bottom-feed like you do by hurling cute phrases like "so shut the F-up you weasel sh*t! ". That's for birthers and their ilk to do.
Then you should have no problem showing me a link, will you? Probably you will refuse claiming I never show links!
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#170869 Sep 8, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Birfoon Boy: "Looks like the study was right to me!"
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!
Birfoon Boy trips over his own feet and Jacques and I got a dose of ...?
Talk about delusional!
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/del...
<quoted text>
That's exactly right Twinkie. Can't handle your own medicine, Twinkie? Nope. Can't handle the truth that you got played? Nope. Are you mentally defective? Yep! Got a problem with the truth? Yep! You're just a lying scumbag like Path. Two peas in a pod. LMAO! Clinch those wittle fists, now! LMAO! What a frickin' crybaby! LMAO!

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#170870 Sep 8, 2013
Well Jacqueau, Apparently Putin did say that. I looked it up as I doubted if you would.

Russian rebuff for Blair over Iraq
theguardian.com , Friday 11 October 2002

Asked what he thought of the British government's dossier, which claims President Saddam does have such weapons and plans to use them, Mr Putin replied: "Russia does not have in its possession any trustworthy data which would support the existence of nuclear weapons or any weapons of mass destruction in Iraq and we have not received from our partners such information as yet.

http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2002/oct/...
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#170871 Sep 8, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Name my other names. I dare you. Path? Flattery will get you everywhere. I like Pathfinder. Gracias, perdedor and in many other languages.
Your dumbazz would like it. Pathological liar! I know several of your other names, 100% verified! And you know what? You're FOS, Path! You're nothing more than an irrelevant pile of dogshyt which Twinkie fell in face first! You two tweeners are jokes. LMAO! Sad and pathetic but true. LMAO!

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#170872 Sep 8, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
You really only read headlines do you? And even then, I'm not sure if you understand them. Much less the story that follows. Read the second paragraph you posted, note the dates and what it says :
As a result of the U.S. and British campaign, and after prolonged negotiations between the United States, Britain, France, Russia and other U.N. Security Council members, the United Nations declared that Iraq would have to accept even more intrusive inspections than under the previous inspection regime - to be carried out by the U.N. Monitoring, Verification, and Inspection Commission (UNMOVIC) and the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)- or face "serious consequences." Iraq agreed to accept the U.N. decision and inspections resumed in late November 2002. On December 7, 2002, Iraq submitted its 12,000 page declaration, which claimed that it had no current WMD programs. Intelligence analysts from the United States and other nations immediately began to scrutinize the document, and senior U.S. officials quickly rejected the claims.(Note 2)
==========
Stick to driving airplanes and helicopters.
Actually "driving airplanes and helicopters" is a joy. I do what many people wish they could do.
Oh, it is a favorite tactic for the Muslims to say they will comply at the last second ...... and then they stall, shuffle the walnut shells, etc. The fact is that Iraq violated 27 U.N. mandates and breached the cease fire agreement. Saddamn's time was up!!!!

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#170873 Sep 8, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
That's exactly right Twinkie. Can't handle your own medicine, Twinkie? Nope. Can't handle the truth that you got played? Nope. Are you mentally defective? Yep! Got a problem with the truth? Yep! You're just a lying scumbag like Path. Two peas in a pod. LMAO! Clinch those wittle fists, now! LMAO! What a frickin' crybaby! LMAO!
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!

Moron got played by himself. Little paranoid narcissistic twerp.

Please tell me again how I got played by a moronic twerp who cited a fake study I was already aware was a hoax. Too funny.

Loser.

Birfoon Boy: "Looks like the study was right to me!"

Birfoon Boy: "Studies such as this one and the one you posted are BS. Get it now, Twinkie?"

Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!

Do you need the post number, Jagoff?

FYI, everyone is laughing at you. Have a nice delusion.
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Birfoon Boy: "Looks like the study was right to me!"
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!
Birfoon Boy trips over his own feet and Jacques and I got a dose of ...?
Talk about delusional!
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/del ...
<quoted text>

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Bristol, CT

#170874 Sep 8, 2013
So how long will Birfoon Boy insist he didn't put his foot in it?

Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!

Clinical example of Narcissistic Personality Disorder.

Watch him squirm.
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#170876 Sep 8, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>Your dumbazz would like it. Pathological liar! I know several of your other names, 100% verified! And you know what? You're FOS, Path! You're nothing more than an irrelevant pile of dogshyt which Twinkie fell in face first! You two tweeners are jokes. LMAO! Sad and pathetic but true. LMAO!
And the fool obsessed with multiple monikers fantasies accuses another fool obsessed with multiple moniker fantasies

I hear banjos ....
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#170877 Sep 8, 2013
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
And the fool obsessed with multiple monikers fantasies accuses another fool obsessed with multiple moniker fantasies
I hear banjos ....
Just like ringing the dinner bell. LMAO!
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#170878 Sep 8, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!
Moron got played by himself. Little paranoid narcissistic twerp.
Please tell me again how I got played by a moronic twerp who cited a fake study I was already aware was a hoax. Too funny.
Loser.
Birfoon Boy: "Looks like the study was right to me!"
Birfoon Boy: "Studies such as this one and the one you posted are BS. Get it now, Twinkie?"
Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!
Do you need the post number, Jagoff?
FYI, everyone is laughing at you. Have a nice delusion.
<quoted text>
Kid, here's a tissue, wipe that shyt off your face. You'll definitely be played again and, without doubt, you'll have no clue! LMAO! Still wearing your leprechaun outfit? LMAO! Hone those AHole skills, the Grand Prize is between you and Path. Pucker up, kid! LMAO!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 12 min RealDave 1,232,307
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 52 min Patriot AKA Bozo 53,482
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 9 hr Net Workit 5,994
Amy 5-23 18 hr mrs gladys kravitz 3
Abby 5-23 18 hr mrs gladys kravitz 2
News AP Exclusive: Union members appointed after $10... (Mar '08) 19 hr RICO 7,567
Word (Dec '08) 21 hr Dream Crystal 5,239
More from around the web

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]