BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ... Full Story
Grand Birther

United States

#170736 Sep 7, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
And you can not articulate why you think I am a racist. Just because I do not trust ghetto people? I don't much care for 'village' people either. Does that mean I am anti-white? Nor do I like criminals (who are mostly Libtards), so does that mean I am a racist too?
LOL, Rogue Moron's favourite tactic is to pretend all these reasons have not been articulated a million times over.

It's fun to play pretend when you're a birfoon, huh?

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#170737 Sep 7, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
And that study was taken by ..... Social Psychology Quarterly .... which has a progressive agenda. What would you expect someone with an agenda to say?
By the way, it is true that atheists, in general, have above average IQs but they over analyze everything! And atheist also tend be be sexual deviants like homosexuals, pedophiles, etc. and they are trying to justify their deviant behavior so they have to discount the Bible.
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Ad hominem. Favorite tactic of low IQ racist conservative birthers.
Can't rebut any of my points, can you? Can't carry on an intellectually honest discussion, can you? How sad.
In fact you allegation that I made an ad hominem attack, is, in itself, an ad hominem attack. Just like your allegation that I am a racist is because YOU are a racist who can not accept the truth,
Grand Birther

United States

#170738 Sep 7, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Oh, if you want to get Neal Cavuto to read your letters on the air, just mention is big head, ugly ties or mention pretty Foxy Ladies. And if you mention all three, he will probably read your letter first.
Oh, he has read at least three of my letters.
WOW! Who cares?

*crickets*
Project Censored org

West Sayville, NY

#170739 Sep 7, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Talking about someone who does not know the difference between the National Guard and the Air National Guard. You probably have no idea what a Genie rocket was much less the difference between a V-102 and a F-101.
I have rebutted every one of those points over and over again but you are still hooked on Bush. Face it, Obama is the President and he is totally responsible for the current economy.
Yes, when his unit was converting from F-102s to F-101s, G.W. informed his commander he would not extend his obligation beyond his six year commitment.
You see, in 1980 when I went to the Chinook course, I incurred an additional two year obligation. The same thing happened when I accepted promotion to CW3 and CW4.
Since Bush did not wan't to accept the extra obligation which would have required of him if he had transitioned into the F-101, they no longer needed his service.
Now, John Kerry accepted a six year obligation if he went through Navy OCS. They why did John F-up Kerry serve only four years, 1966-1970, of his six year obligation. WHY???
VA-111 Shkval torpedo
http://tinyurl.com/bdgooh2
https://www.militaryperiscope.com/mdb-smpl/we...
Project Censored org

West Sayville, NY

#170740 Sep 7, 2013
The Military-Industrial-Congressio nal Complex Pt3
Col. Larry Wilkerson: Will the empire end with good leadership or blood?


The Military-Industrial-Congressio nal Complex Pt2
Colonel Larry Wilkerson
http://www.youtube.com/watch...

The Military-Industrial-Congressio nal Complex Pt1
Colonel Larry Wilkerson American Imperialism and Rome
http://www.youtube.com/watch...

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

RationalState

#170741 Sep 7, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Ad hominem. Favorite tactic of low IQ racist conservative birthers.
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
And that study was taken by ..... Social Psychology Quarterly .... which has a progressive agenda. What would you expect someone with an agenda to say?
By the way, it is true that atheists, in general, have above average IQs but they over analyze everything! And atheist also tend be be sexual deviants like homosexuals, pedophiles, etc. and they are trying to justify their deviant behavior so they have to discount the Bible.
<quoted text>
Can't rebut any of my points, can you? Can't carry on an intellectually honest discussion, can you? How sad.
In fact you allegation that I made an ad hominem attack, is, in itself, an ad hominem attack. Just like your allegation that I am a racist is because YOU are a racist who can not accept the truth,
Huh?

Rogue goes off on an ad hominem rant and thinks there's a "point" to rebut?

And who does Rogue think should review papers submitted to the Journal of Biological Chemistry? Truck drivers?

Ludicrous.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#170742 Sep 7, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Does anyone want to guess how many Democrats and Republicans will vote in the House for Obama's intervention into Syria?
I'm not in favor of our intervention in Syria but I suspect a greater percentage of Republicans will vote 'yea' than Democrats.
Now in the Senate Democrats who are not up for reelection next year will probably vote 'yea' too.
You've so far been wrong every time you predicted anything, from the 2008 and 2012 elections, to the sure-fire mayoral victory of the tea party candidate in Jacksonville, to the Supreme Court decision on Obamacare to the Stock Market and so many others. Best you predict on how many more guns will kill innocent Americans.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#170743 Sep 7, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Play Justice didn't read bottom of article.
"Oh yeah, and everything in that bullshit you just read is completely and totally false. There has been no such conclusive study, and all of the “Finds” are based on public paranoia. Chances are good that if you are a conservative, you were empowered by this new find.
If you, even for a second, thought this find might be true, you are probably an idiot."
Yes, and Justice ha ha LRS added this to the study, "Also, Communists are the most likely to commit rape or sexual assault, second to socialists. " for good measure, thinking that anyone with a brain and an a**hole would believe Harvard would publish that kind of birther talk.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

RationalState

#170744 Sep 7, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Now Twinkie, why would anyone believe you? You've proven yourself to be a liar. Silly kid. Liberals and lying, two peas in a pod! Looks like the study was right to me! LMAO! Quit before you're lapped.
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Moron Boy evidently didn't read all the way to the end.

"Oh yeah, and everything in that bullshit you just read is completely and totally false. There has been no such conclusive study, and all of the “Finds” are based on public paranoia. Chances are good that if you are a conservative, you were empowered by this new find.
If you, even for a second, thought this find might be true, you are probably an idiot."
But it shouldn't be necessary to read all the way to the end in order to figure out that it's obviously bogus. The outlandish numbers could not possibly be true. Add to that no authors or journal. Duh!

But Play Justice stepped right in it.

From that scientist who is looking for Adam's dead body.

Maybe Noah put it in the ark?

“Arm the homeless!”

Since: Jul 12

The internet

#170745 Sep 7, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Sudden change of heart when the door slams shut?
LOL...

Bullshit, but very funny.

“Arm the homeless!”

Since: Jul 12

The internet

#170746 Sep 7, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
I frequently email Fox News and I have gotten several replies. I also email USA Today and have been published once. Oh, I am T. Nadeau.
http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/printedition/n...
But try and email someone like Gawker with a dissenting opinion and it will not be published. Libtards only talk about Freedom of Speech!
Excellent work.

“Arm the homeless!”

Since: Jul 12

The internet

#170747 Sep 7, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Every time I see the words "peer-reviewed", I know it is a loony-lefty site. You see, they surround themselves with like minded people who review each others works so it only means "they" all agree.
The same when I read "non-affiliated" which implies they are politically neutral but they actually have a progressive agenda.
Social Psychology Quarterly
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Social Psychology Quarterly is a peer-reviewed academic journal that publishes theoretical and empirical papers in the field of social psychology. The editors-in-chief are Karen A. Hegtvedt (Emory University) and Cathryn Johnson (Emory University). It is published by SAGE Publications on behalf of the American Sociological Association, of which this is an official journal.
Peer review happens in science Rouge. It is just not the same without it.

Not claiming psychology is a hard science or anything... just saying.

Peer review offers an attempt to dispute, not agree.

But if it is just a website... who knows?

“Arm the homeless!”

Since: Jul 12

The internet

#170748 Sep 7, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Talking about someone who does not know the difference between the National Guard and the Air National Guard. You probably have no idea what a Genie rocket was much less the difference between a V-102 and a F-101.
I have rebutted every one of those points over and over again but you are still hooked on Bush. Face it, Obama is the President and he is totally responsible for the current economy.
Yes, when his unit was converting from F-102s to F-101s, G.W. informed his commander he would not extend his obligation beyond his six year commitment.
You see, in 1980 when I went to the Chinook course, I incurred an additional two year obligation. The same thing happened when I accepted promotion to CW3 and CW4.
Since Bush did not wan't to accept the extra obligation which would have required of him if he had transitioned into the F-101, they no longer needed his service.
Now, John Kerry accepted a six year obligation if he went through Navy OCS. They why did John F-up Kerry serve only four years, 1966-1970, of his six year obligation. WHY???
Rouge, Its not about rockets and promotions or John Kerry.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

RationalState

#170749 Sep 7, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Now Twinkie, why would anyone believe you? You've proven yourself to be a liar. Silly kid. Liberals and lying, two peas in a pod! Looks like the study was right to me! LMAO! Quit before you're lapped.
Looks like the study was right?

"The holder of second place were Communists with an average I.Q of 115, and the first place was apolitical people who did not follow any specific doctrine, who received a whopping score on average of 135."

Play Justice swallowed it whole.

"The study was conducted on 100,000 registered voters in 40 different states over the last twelve years, and has concluded its results."

A TWELVE YEAR study? 40 different states? Not a telephone poll, but ON SITE QUESTIONNAIRES where they **PAID** the subjects?

Play Justice: "Looks like the study was right to me! LMAO!"

The joke was on the Play Justice. Keep on laughing, moron.

----------

"Subjects of the study were chosen at random and requested to come to an unmarked van to take a test and answer some questions for a reasonable amount of money."

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha ha.

Of course if Play Justice had a clue he would have realized that there is only one article ever published by IAHYM News network.

“Arm the homeless!”

Since: Jul 12

The internet

#170750 Sep 7, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Looks like the study was right?
"The holder of second place were Communists with an average I.Q of 115, and the first place was apolitical people who did not follow any specific doctrine, who received a whopping score on average of 135."
Play Justice swallowed it whole.
"The study was conducted on 100,000 registered voters in 40 different states over the last twelve years, and has concluded its results."
A TWELVE YEAR study? 40 different states? Not a telephone poll, but ON SITE QUESTIONNAIRES where they **PAID** the subjects?
Play Justice: "Looks like the study was right to me! LMAO!"
The joke was on the Play Justice. Keep on laughing, moron.
----------
"Subjects of the study were chosen at random and requested to come to an unmarked van to take a test and answer some questions for a reasonable amount of money."
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha ha.
Of course if Play Justice had a clue he would have realized that there is only one article ever published by IAHYM News network.
Just wanted to add a little something for those less streetwise.

NEVER get in the unmarked free money van.

I am not going to tell you twice and I won't entertain arguments.

“Arm the homeless!”

Since: Jul 12

The internet

#170751 Sep 7, 2013
They should have gotten points deducted for participating.

:)

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#170752 Sep 7, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
<quoted text>
But it shouldn't be necessary to read all the way to the end in order to figure out that it's obviously bogus. The outlandish numbers could not possibly be true. Add to that no authors or journal. Duh!
But Play Justice stepped right in it.
From that scientist who is looking for Adam's dead body.
Maybe Noah put it in the ark?
Justice ha ha Dale/LRS thinks sane people are laughing WITH him. LMAO (LRS tm reg'd). He actually posted that bogus study, proud, sure of himself. Ahhh, birthers, they imagine it, believe it, broadcast it. Yes, proud, no shame. Sigh.
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#170753 Sep 7, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Moron Boy evidently didn't read all the way to the end.
"Oh yeah, and everything in that bullshit you just read is completely and totally false. There has been no such conclusive study, and all of the “Finds” are based on public paranoia. Chances are good that if you are a conservative, you were empowered by this new find.
If you, even for a second, thought this find might be true, you are probably an idiot."
Sorry Skippy, you missed the point entirely. Studies such as this one and the one you posted are BS. Get it now, Twinkie? Go find another BS study and I'll post one that says the opposite. Do try harder to pick up on at least the major points, otay? LMAO! I suggest you try "firm-hold" hairspray! LMAO! The DoDo Bird does exist!
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#170755 Sep 7, 2013
Scrutiny wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL...
Bullshit, but very funny.
BS? Really? How do you know? You don't. But I'm sure Twinkie can find a "study" to back you up! LMAO!
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#170756 Sep 7, 2013
Scrutiny wrote:
<quoted text>
Just wanted to add a little something for those less streetwise.
NEVER get in the unmarked free money van.
I am not going to tell you twice and I won't entertain arguments.
Pay attention Twinkie! LMAO

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Amy 9-18 5 min edogxxx 31
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 10 min Teaman 1,110,573
Abby 9-19 15 min ralph 4
Amy 9-19 26 min Toj 5
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 28 min Who 46,682
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 36 min Toj 98,230
Four letter word game (Dec '11) 36 min shadow 1,279
•••
Chicago Dating

more search filters

less search filters

•••

Chicago Jobs

•••
•••
•••

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••