No need to apologize, Sonicfilter! Fluffybritches, it's as easy as ringing a dinner bell. LMAO!<quoted text>
Isn't it comical when a fool clings to a foolish obsession and sees another poster behind every comment?
Oh - sorry
That probably hit close to home, huh Romper?
#170376 Sep 4, 2013
#170377 Sep 4, 2013
0 - 308! I think JD is right, you're the most confused azz on this entire board! LMAO! Give us an idea of your goal. What are you shooting for, something like 0 - 400? LOL!
#170378 Sep 4, 2013
LMAO!!! I found your theme song, enjoy!!!
#170379 Sep 4, 2013
And Romper proves my point again
Note to Canada - if you don't wish to continue to appear as foolish as Romper you might try learning from his mistakes (there are certainly plenty of opportunities)
#170380 Sep 4, 2013
I can do about it? Unlike the pathetic clueless Birfoon I don't pretend that:
1. There is an issue;
2. That I could do anything about it if there were; or
3. That I would want to do anything about Dufus' fake issue (except laugh at Dufus)
#170381 Sep 4, 2013
Answer: "Wrong again! ALL people in the US that are subject to its jurisdiction not just its citizens. Re: "All others are controlled by treaties between the US and their country of origin." The USA does not have to have a treaty with a foreign country in order to require that its citizens when visiting the USA (or here illegally) MUST obey our laws.
Bingham and Trumbull and Meese and Hatch and Graham and former senator Fred Thompson and ten appeals courts and the US Supreme Court in the Wong Kim Ark case all are right, and you are wrong.
“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”
Since: Feb 12
#170382 Sep 4, 2013
CON, dictionnaire Larousse (I will refrain from translating as I did the last time, in the hope that you can do it yourself.)
FIRST definition :
CON : stupide. Inepte. Ex : CONservateur
SECOND definition :
CON : Sexe de la femme. May as well ask the LRS genie to turn you into a toilet too LMAO (LRS/buddy LTR tm reg'd)
Strange, you were quiet lately, no cheap shots, you had seemingly recovered from your Topix battle wounds, and yet you come back from the dead for more medicine. Sigh. Not sure I feel up to it, as LRS is boring enough as it is.
And so I'm referred to as "Canada" now? Hmmm, not unlike the irrepressible LRS, you paint the whole country according to what you think of one individual. Very mature, brilliant. Well, don't count on my addressing you Mr. USA. I refuse to blemish your country thus.
#170383 Sep 4, 2013
And Jercque shows how he earned his name.
Shrug. Try to help a guy out, but it really is true - you can't fix stupid.
Speaking of - since Topix assures you that I can't delete my posts would you care to admit your ignorance or just resort to your favorite magic phrase?
“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”
Since: Feb 12
#170384 Sep 4, 2013
Ah, how lame a reply. How weak. How devoid of grey matter and so unimaginative! How, how LRS. Passons.
Topix has assured me of nothing. As I predicted, they did not reply.
How about I let you stew in your own CONservative cluelessness and ignore you totally for another month?
#170385 Sep 4, 2013
What is the National Initiative for Democracy?
The National Initiative for Democracy (NI4D) is a proposal which will permit the People to make or change laws by initiative./ http://tinyurl.com/ksw63c3
ALL Executive Orders
The Corporation in The Grade 8 Classroom
Cartoon Predicts the Future 50 Years Ago This is Amazing Insight
George W. Obama
January 12th 2010 / http://tinyurl.com/yjyz645
Before President Obama, it was grimly accurate to write, as I often did in the Voice, that George W. Bush came into the presidency with no discernible background in constitutional civil liberties or any acquaintance with the Constitution itself. Accordingly, he turned the "war on terror" over to Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld—ardent believers that the Constitution presents grave obstacles in a time of global jihad.
But now, Bush's successor—who actually taught constitutional law at the University of Chicago—is continuing much of the Bush-Cheney parallel government and, in some cases, is going much further in disregarding our laws and the international treaties we've signed./ http://www.villagevoice.com/2010-01-12/column...
When Bush took office in 2001, the federal budget had a $128 billion surplus; when he left in 2009, the annual deficit was projected to exceed $1 trillion, according to the CBO./
The Real Boston Tea Party was Against the Wal-Mart of the 1770s
http://tinyurl.com/y6r3pvz / April 2009
The real Boston Tea Party was a protest against huge corporate tax cuts for the British East India Company, the largest trans-national corporation then in existence. This corporate tax cut threatened to decimate small Colonial businesses by helping the BEIC pull a Wal-Mart against small entrepreneurial tea shops, and individuals began a revolt that kicked-off a series of events that ended in the creation of The United States of America.
Although schoolchildren are usually taught that the American Revolution was a rebellion against “taxation without representation,” akin to modern day conservative taxpayer revolts, in fact what led to the revolution was rage against a transnational corporation that, by the 1760s, dominated trade from China to India to the Caribbean, and controlled nearly all commerce to and from North America, with subsidies and special dispensation from the British crown.
#170386 Sep 4, 2013
Check Topix FAQ (which I previously provided to you). Caution - their answer is in English and again proves your ignorance
#170387 Sep 4, 2013
proof you can spoon feed an idiot but you can't fix stupid
#170388 Sep 4, 2013
That looks a little like Rouges house.
#170389 Sep 4, 2013
You have it quite right.
The tragedy and real story of Iraq 2003-2013 is the Shiites took over control who are loyal to Iran.
Saddam had them second class citizens.
Saddam had Woman in his government, Woman scientist, Woman teachers, etc.
Teenagers and young adults in Iraq were allowed to frequent bars and clubs, go to movies, drive cars, etc. all because Saddam was a Secular Muslim.
Saddam was despised by al Qaeda and was isolated with no friends in the region.
Dr. Germ and Mrs. Anthrax Set Free
http://tinyurl.com/7nzsn Dec 27, 2005
Why is it not bigger news that those infamous Iraqi female scientists once routinely referred to in the media as “Dr. Germ” and “Mrs. Anthrax” have been quietly released from imprisonment in Iraq without any charges being brought by their U.S. captors? Don’t the newspapers and TV networks that all but pre-convicted them of crimes against humanity owe them—and us—the courtesy of an explanation for the sudden presumption of their innocence?
After all, it was to stop these mad leaders of Saddam Hussein’s allegedly booming weapons-of-mass-destruction programs that the United States invaded Iraq in March 2003. We were told at the time by the White House that the U.N. inspectors scouring the country were being blocked by lying officials and scientists, themselves complicit in breaking U.N. sanctions, and so we wouldn’t get the truth until we could interrogate them as prisoners. http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/12282005_...
#170390 Sep 4, 2013
BTW - exactly how did we have "numerous exchanges (Jercque tm)" if you were "ignoring me totally for a month"?
Logik like that qualifies you for a seat on the Birfistan city council
#170391 Sep 4, 2013
Most of the Apostles and first followers were Jewish.
My point was simply the same Jesus 2000 years ago will come back and many Billions of people are waiting for the Messiah to return.
The Source of Truth
#170392 Sep 4, 2013
Man is a little lower than the angels and GOD created both.
Jesus Made Fully Human
5 It is not to angels that he has subjected the world to come, about which we are speaking. 6 But there is a place where someone has testified:
“What is mankind that you are mindful of them,
a son of man that you care for him?
7 You made them a little[a] lower than the angels;
you crowned them with glory and honor
8 and put everything under their feet.”[
In putting everything under them,[God left nothing that is not subject to them.[ Yet at present we do not see everything subject to them.[ 9 But we do see Jesus, who was made lower than the angels for a little while, now crowned with glory and honor because he suffered death, so that by the grace of God he might taste death for everyone.
#170393 Sep 4, 2013
Yes Billions and Billions are believers all over the world and many different religions.
Only GOD knows the hearts and minds.
“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”
Since: Feb 12
#170394 Sep 4, 2013
Apostles : What did they have to do to become Jesus's disciples?
Why did Jesus say a person must hate his father and mother, wife and children, brothers and sisters, in order to be his disciple?
AMP - 26 If anyone comes to Me and does not hate his [own] father and mother [in the sense of indifference to or relative disregard for them in comparison with his attitude toward God] and [likewise] his wife and children and brothers and sisters--[yes] and even his own life also--he cannot be My disciple.
2 Comments • Share • Spam • Asked June 30 2013 • 1358034260 Asabe Tahir
NOTE : DID JESUS INSERT THAT PARENTHESE WHICH READS "[in the sense of indifference to or relative disregard for them in comparison with his attitude toward God] and [likewise]" Who dares to read, interpret God'd mind and His words? Seems to me what he said is pretty clear. He does not say to love him more, which of course is wrong, but never mind, He says to HATE their families. To hate themselves!
Carrying-the-cross-daily Michael Owens Luke 14:26 just cross reference that with Matthew 10:37 "Anyone who loves their father or mother more than me is not worthy of me; anyone who loves their son or daughter more than me is not worthy of me"
Jesus is teaching His disciples in this chapter and HE does not mean hatred as one would think..After all, 1 John 4:7-8 says "Beloved, let us love one another for love is from God and everyone that loves is born of God and knows God.
Jesus may have chosen the word "hate" to show us that this is how a mother or father will perceive the actions of a child who chooses the Lord above them. They will see it as disloyal, especially if we try to witness to them. The love of a Christian for a non-Christian is almost always seen as hatred, intolerance, bigotry, etc. But we must be okay with being seen as "hating." After all, our unbelieving relatives are part of the world, and Jesus said,“"If the world hates you, keep in mind that it hated me first” John 15:18
What gibberish. What pretexts. What long-winded old bag. Jesus told the apostles to hate their families, plain and simple.
Fact is, though, God never said He created man in His own Image. Were that true, what a colossal boner, what a mistake - oh, well, before unleashing the great flood, did He not say he regretted creating man? As to Jesus telling his disciples to hate their families, again, a Revelation to senile old Evangelists or worse, they made it up. I 'm betting on the latter rather than the former.
#170395 Sep 4, 2013
DIM: any questions?
Add your comments below
|Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08)||6 min||SobieskiSavedEurope||1,155,507|
|Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09)||39 min||cheluzal||98,870|
|Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08)||1 hr||JOEL||71,186|
|Chicago Pizza Blows||1 hr||joey||2|
|Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10)||2 hr||KiMare||51,279|
|AP Exclusive: Union members appointed after $10... (Mar '08)||2 hr||IUEC||7,564|
|Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08)||3 hr||OzRitz||49,304|
Find what you want!
Search Chicago Forum Now
Copyright © 2014 Topix LLC