BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ... Full Story
Linktv org

Sayville, NY

#170320 Sep 3, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Tell me Tootsie, IYHO, are Trade Unions 'Special Interests'? Obama consorted with Trade Unions to deny Delphi non-union employees their pensions and they are suing the U.S. government for $450 Mln and they will probably will and instead of the money being taken away from the Trade Unions, it will be taken away from U.S. taxpayers instead.
Stop being an apologist for the wealthy.

Fox News cares and supports Wall Street.

The S&L Crisis: A Chrono-Bibliography
http://www.fdic.gov/bank/historical/s&l/

==========

ABC News Poll: More Americans Prefer Public Option to Bipartisan Bill
October 30, 2009 / http://tinyurl.com/kc6jch2
Fifty one percent said they preferred the public option; 37 percent said they preferred a bill with some support from Republicans in Congress. Six percent said neither and seven percent expressed no opinion.
http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2009/...

Most support public option for health insurance, poll finds
October 20, 2009 / http://tinyurl.com/yg4vq9y
A new Washington Post-ABC News poll shows that support for a government-run health-care plan to compete with private insurers has rebounded from its summertime lows and wins clear majority support from the public.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/...

Poll: Key States Greatly Prefer Public Option Over Senate Health Care Plan
06/30/10 / http://tinyurl.com/m6neahs
http://article.wn.com/view/2010/02/22/Poll_Ke...

Public Support for the Public Option / 6.20.2009 / http://tinyurl.com/m7fynm
A major, though by no means the only, substantive point of debate regarding health care reform is whether the plan considered by Congress will include a "public option" -- a government-run insurance program that would compete with private plans. Barack Obama's plan on the campaign trail included a public option: "any American will have the opportunity to enroll in the new public plan or an approved private plan," it said.
http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2009/06/public...

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#170321 Sep 3, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Hey, did anyone noticed what happened to the NYSE at about 1120 am EDT? It took a DIVE! Why, well Speaker Bonehead and Mitch "Miller" McConnell said they would recommend that Congress support the president on his Syria Miss-adventure.
Yep, the stock market does not like it, the majority of Americans do not like it, the the entrenched politicians like it and that is all that counts!!!
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Hmm, and what happened afterwards? Well, DJIA opened at +50,closed at +25. I can't predict these things, you can't , except the manipulators, and you're not one of them, so just let the roulette wheel spin.
But tell me this : Why the triumphant reaction to the news that the bombing may be on and the DJIA tanked? Whose side are you on anyhow? If Obama bombs, will you support him? If Obama does not bomb, will you support him? Lose-lose for Obama with you, right?
I am on the side of staying out of this civil war. It is of no threat to us or our interests. The real problem is Iran.
How many times did I hear you Libtards we should not have gone into Iraq as the real problem was al-Qaeda who was in Afghanistan and Pakistan. WELL???? If the real problem (threat to the U.S. and our interests), then why worry about Syria?!?
Isn't it funny that when I turn around the argument that you yourselves used, you will still side with the Democrats.
Linktv org

Sayville, NY

#170322 Sep 3, 2013
IRAQ: Women Miss Saddam / http://tinyurl.com/ykpudl5
BAGHDAD, Mar 12, 2010 (IPS)- Under Saddam Hussein, women in government got a year's maternity leave; that is now cut to six months. Under the Personal Status Law in force since Jul. 14, 1958, when Iraqis overthrew the British-installed monarchy, Iraqi women had most of the rights that Western women do.

Now they have Article 2 of the Constitution: "Islam is the official religion of the state and is a basic source of legislation." Sub-head A says "No law can be passed that contradicts the undisputed rules of Islam." Under this Article the interpretation of women's rights is left to religious leaders – and many of them are under Iranian influence.

"The U.S. occupation has decided to let go of women's rights," Yanar Mohammed who campaigns for women's rights in Iraq says. "Political Islamic groups have taken southern Iraq, are fully in power there, and are using the financial support of Iran to recruit troops and allies. The financial and political support from Iran is why the Iraqis in the south accept this, not because the Iraqi people want Islamic law."
http://www.ipsnews.net/news.asp...

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#170323 Sep 3, 2013
Linktv org wrote:
<quoted text>
Stop being an apologist for the wealthy.
Fox News cares and supports Wall Street.
The S&L Crisis: A Chrono-Bibliography
http://www.fdic.gov/bank/historical/s&l/
==========
ABC News Poll: More Americans Prefer Public Option to Bipartisan Bill
October 30, 2009 / http://tinyurl.com/kc6jch2
Fifty one percent said they preferred the public option; 37 percent said they preferred a bill with some support from Republicans in Congress. Six percent said neither and seven percent expressed no opinion.
http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2009/...
Most support public option for health insurance, poll finds
October 20, 2009 / http://tinyurl.com/yg4vq9y
A new Washington Post-ABC News poll shows that support for a government-run health-care plan to compete with private insurers has rebounded from its summertime lows and wins clear majority support from the public.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/...
Poll: Key States Greatly Prefer Public Option Over Senate Health Care Plan
06/30/10 / http://tinyurl.com/m6neahs
http://article.wn.com/view/2010/02/22/Poll_Ke...
Public Support for the Public Option / 6.20.2009 / http://tinyurl.com/m7fynm
A major, though by no means the only, substantive point of debate regarding health care reform is whether the plan considered by Congress will include a "public option" -- a government-run insurance program that would compete with private plans. Barack Obama's plan on the campaign trail included a public option: "any American will have the opportunity to enroll in the new public plan or an approved private plan," it said.
http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2009/06/public...
Why do you keep posting out of date polls? We have read ObamaCare now that it has passed and the more people who read it, do not like it!!! Now here is a poll that is less than two months old and done by CBS which is not a right-wing source.

CBS News poll finds more Americans than ever want Obamacare repealed / July 24, 2013

(CBS News) A new CBS News poll finds more Americans than ever want the Affordable Care Act repealed.

According to the poll, 36 percent of Americans want Congress to expand or keep the health care law while 39 percent want Congress to repeal it - the highest percentage seen in CBS News polls. The poll also found a majority of Americans - 54 percent - disapprove of the health care law, 36 percent of Americans approve of it and 10 percent said they don't know about it.

The health care law is a chronic issue for the White House, CBS News political director John Dickerson said on "CBS This Morning." "There's an operational part to this, which is that the White House has got to get people to sign up for these health exchanges, particularly younger, healthier Americans, and so they are tactically running a campaign much like the presidential campaign, reaching out, using the techniques of that campaign to get younger people to sign up for these health exchanges."

http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-505267_162-575952...
Tm Clmns

Victoria, Canada

#170324 Sep 3, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Hey, did anyone noticed what happened to the NYSE at about 1120 am EDT? It took a DIVE! Why, well Speaker Bonehead and Mitch "Miller" McConnell said they would recommend that Congress support the president on his Syria Miss-adventure.
Yep, the stock market does not like it, the majority of Americans do not like it, the the entrenched politicians like it and that is all that counts!!!
Unbelievable.. when have Americans, particularly right-wingers and Republicans not been enthusiastic

about bombing the hell out of someone.

Remember: " The business of America is War" ...the NRA members paarticularly see it as a vicarious and joyful activity.
Tm Clmns

Victoria, Canada

#170325 Sep 3, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Why do you keep posting out of date polls? We have read ObamaCare now that it has passed and the more people who read it, do not like it!!! Now here is a poll that is less than two months old and done by CBS which is not a right-wing source.
CBS News poll finds more Americans than ever want Obamacare repealed / July 24, 2013
(CBS News) A new CBS News poll finds more Americans than ever want the Affordable Care Act repealed.
According to the poll, 36 percent of Americans want Congress to expand or keep the health care law while 39 percent want Congress to repeal it - the highest percentage seen in CBS News polls. The poll also found a majority of Americans - 54 percent - disapprove of the health care law, 36 percent of Americans approve of it and 10 percent said they don't know about it.
The health care law is a chronic issue for the White House, CBS News political director John Dickerson said on "CBS This Morning." "There's an operational part to this, which is that the White House has got to get people to sign up for these health exchanges, particularly younger, healthier Americans, and so they are tactically running a campaign much like the presidential campaign, reaching out, using the techniques of that campaign to get younger people to sign up for these health exchanges."
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-505267_162-575952...
You only polled Republican Congressmen who have the best healthcare plan paid by the taxpayers.

Of course, they don't want any changes..

Why not poll ordinary people
Linktv org

Sayville, NY

#170326 Sep 3, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Why do you keep posting out of date polls? We have read ObamaCare now that it has passed and the more people who read it, do not like it!!! Now here is a poll that is less than two months old and done by CBS which is not a right-wing source.
CBS News poll finds more Americans than ever want Obamacare repealed / July 24, 2013
(CBS News) A new CBS News poll finds more Americans than ever want the Affordable Care Act repealed.
According to the poll, 36 percent of Americans want Congress to expand or keep the health care law while 39 percent want Congress to repeal it - the highest percentage seen in CBS News polls. The poll also found a majority of Americans - 54 percent - disapprove of the health care law, 36 percent of Americans approve of it and 10 percent said they don't know about it.
The health care law is a chronic issue for the White House, CBS News political director John Dickerson said on "CBS This Morning." "There's an operational part to this, which is that the White House has got to get people to sign up for these health exchanges, particularly younger, healthier Americans, and so they are tactically running a campaign much like the presidential campaign, reaching out, using the techniques of that campaign to get younger people to sign up for these health exchanges."
http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-505267_162-575952...
See the liberal/progressives were 100% right with Single Payer or Public Option.

Obama passed a Republican health care with not one Republican voting for it.

The truth is the truth either back in 2009, 2010, or whatever.

----------

Grand Illusion: The Myth of Voter Choice in a Two-Party Tyranny
Third-party candidates are effectively shut out of the presidential race by the two major parties designed to squash the competition.

July 7, 2009 / http://tinyurl.com/y89nfb7

In the run up to the 2004 elections article after article appeared documenting the reigning chaos in our electoral procedures, and surmising that another “Florida 2000” could happen. After the election, questions were raised in Ohio and in the gubernatorial race in Washington State, but in 2008, the infatuation with the electoral system was otherwise directed to the early primaries and the “historic” potential to elect Barack Obama or Hillary Clinton. With neither election as razor-close as the 537 vote discrepancy in Florida 2000, some of the prior attention paid to our electoral systems has waned.

To the extent concern is shown, it tends to focus on the mechanics of registering to vote, keeping accurate lists, and having votes counted by machines of better-than-dubious programming or security. Less concern is directed to the far more disenfranchising systemic problems of having a “winner-take-all” system that results in uncompetitive elections in most congressional and local races. Nor is there a widespread movement toward choice maximizing voting systems, or just better competition by structuring campaign finance systems to encourage participation for more than our millionaires or those who have access to them.

In this country, we are really just at the beginning of understanding the deep flaws with our arcane electoral processes. Virtually none of the attention is on the rights of third-party or independent candidates to compete on a level playing field with the major parties so that all voters, not just two-party voters, have a chance to vote for whom they want. This book is written for third party and Independents candidates, their voters, the election law reformers and chroniclers, and all those who have tried or will try to grapple with the stunning incompetence and injustice of the broken, two-party dominated American electoral system.
http://thenewpress.com/index.php...
Linktv org

Sayville, NY

#170329 Sep 3, 2013
A Rancid Deal with Big Pharma
August 6, 2009 / http://tinyurl.com/kydtv7j
So now we know why the president wants everyone to make nice in the healthcare debate. His White House has cut a deal with Big Pharma that smells like the same old rotten politics that candidate Obama regularly denounced and promised to end. The drug industry agrees to deliver $80 billion in future savings and the president promises the government will not use its awesome purchasing power to negotiate lower drug prices.
Wow. This is roughly the same deal that George W. Bush cut with the drug makers when he was legislating Medicare's new coverage of drug purchases. It is the same bargain that Democrats in Congress universally condemned as wasteful and corrupt. The deal does not smell any better now that a Democratic president is embracing it.
In effect, Obama wants to give away one of the principal objectives of strong reform. The details were spelled out in today's New York Times and revealed by Big Pharma's top-dog lobbyist, Billy Tauzin, a former Republican congressman who leads the industry association. Tauzin called it a "rock-solid deal," and the White House did not dispute as much. But that is not the last word.
http://www.thenation.com/article/rancid-deal-... #

--------

Dorgan Amendment Slashed After Last Minute Pharma Deall Hasn’t Agreed To / December 16, 2009 / http://tinyurl.com/yhmpexf
Ryan Grim has a good tick-tock on the failure of the Dorgan amendment last night, delivering a huge victory for the pharmaceutical industry and a blow to consumers who could have saved over $100 billion in prescription drug costs. 30 Democrats and Joe Lieberman ended up voting against this amendment, preserving a backroom deal between PhRMa and the White House to limit their exposure to profit reductions in the overall health care bill.
Grim confirms that the linchpin to this treachery was a deal discussed by Senate leadership the night before, as I surmised previously
http://news.firedoglake.com/2009/12/16/dorgan...

Max Baucus WellPoint/Liz Fowler Plan"
September 8, 2009 / http://tinyurl.com/md9or8
All this time I’ve been calling Max Tax health care Max Baucus’ health care plan.
But, as William Ockham points out, it’s actually Liz Fowler’s health care plan (if you open the document and look under document properties, it lists her as author). At one level, it’s not surprising that Bad Max’s Senior Counsel would have authored the Max Tax plan. Here’s how Politico described her role in Bad Max’s health care plan earlier this year / http://emptywheel.firedoglake.com/2009/09/08/...

Evidence makes Dorgan’s charge against the White House seem entirely plausible / Dec 18, 2009 / http://tinyurl.com/ylz32mr
Yesterday, we reported that Sen. Byron Dorgan (D-ND) is making an extremely serious accusation - he essentially asserts that the White House political staff coerced the Food and Drug Administration into issuing a safety warning, not on the basis of sound science, but in order to protect the pharmaceutical industry's profits. If this accusation is true, it would mean that the Obama White House engaged in precisely the kind of politicization of science that the Rove White House engaged in.
Details about exactly what happened are going to come out on this in the next few weeks. When they do, we'll report on them. But in the meantime, let's look at two important pieces of circumstantial evidence that supports Dorgan's accusation:
http://openleft.com/diary/16574/evidence-make...
Linktv org

Sayville, NY

#170331 Sep 3, 2013
List of 51 Senate Democrats Who Support a Public Option: What’s Stopping Them Now?/ January 29, 2010 / http://tinyurl.com/lrczx37
Some day, just for kicks, I’m going to collect quotes from every scold who called upon their volumes of wisdom about Senate procedure to decree that Joe Lieberman must be the ultimate decider on any health care bill, because after all it took 60 votes to pass anything. Because now, as we’ve known all along, that’s a self-imposed limitation that the Senate can surmount if they want to.
But let’s remember that back in August, when Chuck Schumer was pushing to pass health care through reconciliation, here was the guy who was running the health care show on behalf of the White House:
[Rahm Emanuel] acknowledged the political realities that have made the Finance Committee’s still-unfinished cooperative plan a center of attention.
“We have heard from both chambers that the House sees a public plan as essential for the final product, and the Senate believes it cannot pass it as constructed and a co-op is what they can do,” Mr. Emanuel said.“We are cognizant of that fact.”
And then he handed the keys over to Joe Lieberman and Blanche Lincoln to write a wildly unpopular bill that is threatening to take down the party.
When he voted against a public option on the Senate Finance Committe, Max Baucus — who has supported a public option in the past — said he did so because it couldn’t get 60 votes in the Senate. And now they can’t even get 50 votes to agree to change the bill in any way.
http://fdlaction.firedoglake.com/2010/01/29/l...

The six Republican ideas already in the health-care reform bill
February 8, 2010 / http://tinyurl.com/y93863b
At this point, I don't think it's well understood how many of the GOP's central health-care policy ideas have already been included as compromises in the health-care bill. But one good way is to look at the GOP's "Solutions for America" homepage, which lays out its health-care plan in some detail. It has four planks. All of them -- yes, you read that right -- are in the Senate health-care bill.
http://voices.washingtonpost.com/ezra-klein/2...
Linktv org

Sayville, NY

#170332 Sep 3, 2013
Evan Bayh’s Wife Reaping the benefits of Health Care Reform
12-22-09 / http://tinyurl.com/y9lmve8
Just to put this boon to health insurance stocks in perspective: according [to] an Indianapolis Star article from June, Evan Bayh's wife, Susan, "owns from $500,001 to $1 million in employee stock in WellPoint, the Indianapolis-based insurance giant on whose board she sits." That would mean that the value of her personal holdings in that one health insurance company alone, in the last six weeks alone (since [Senator Joseph] Lieberman and her husband began menacing the public option), would have increased by a value of between $125,000 and $250,000. As part of the bonanza of health care industry board positions she magically received since her husband became a Senator, Susan Bayh is given a quarter-million dollars each year in stocks and stock options from Wellpoint. That's just a microcosm for considering how well Obama's so-called "special interests" have done as a result of this health care bill.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/12/22/evan...

========

Bush's Uncle Earned Millions in War Firm Sale
An SEC filing shows William H.T. Bush collected about $1.9 million in cash, plus stock valued at $800,000, from the deal. March 23, 2006 / http://tinyurl.com/k7rwlrz
WASHINGTON — As President Bush embarks on a new effort to shore up public support for the war in Iraq, an uncle of the commander in chief is collecting $2.7 million in cash and stock from the recent sale of a company that profited from the war.
A report filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission shows that William H.T. Bush collected just under $1.9 million in cash plus stock valued at more than $800,000 from the sale of Engineered Support Systems Inc. to DRS Technologies of New Jersey./ http://articles.latimes.com/2006/mar/23/natio...

==========

Revolving door for health care aides /
9/15/09 / http://tinyurl.com/q243zq
Some of the most influential aides in the closed-door Senate Finance Committee negotiations over health care reform have ties to interests that would be directly affected by the legislation.
Before she was hired last year as senior counsel to Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus (D-Mont.), Liz Fowler worked as a highly paid public policy adviser for WellPoint Inc., the nation’s largest publicly traded health benefits company.
Mark Hayes, health policy director and chief health counsel for Finance Committee ranking member Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), is married to a registered lobbyist for a firm that represents drug companies and hospital groups, although the couple says she doesn’t lobby Grassley’s office.
Frederick Isasi, a health policy adviser to Sen. Jeff Bingaman (D-N.M.), was a registered lobbyist at Powell Goldstein, where his clients included public hospitals and the American Stroke Association.
Kate Spaziani, senior health policy aide to Sen. Kent Conrad (D-N.D.), was also a registered lobbyist at Powell Goldstein, although Conrad’s office says she worked as a lawyer — not as a lobbyist — for public hospitals on Medicare issues.
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0909/271...

“Arm the homeless!”

Since: Jul 12

The internet

#170337 Sep 3, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Wow, the Earth's population is made up of all Angels! And I thought the Bible said, God created man. Got a clue, bonehead?
You said it was laughable that god would create a world full of minigods.

According to the Bible, he did. It is called Heaven the little gods are called angels.

Then he sent 1/3 of that population to the Earth. So, yes. I have a clue. Read more, speak less.

“Arm the homeless!”

Since: Jul 12

The internet

#170338 Sep 3, 2013
Linktv org wrote:
<quoted text>
Jews call Him Moshiach
Muslims call Him Mahdi
Christians call Him Jesus
and all are waiting for His return.
Ah, I was under the impression the Jews interviewed Jesus and found him not to be up to snuff.

I know there is a sect of Jews that believe Jesus was the messiah. But Jews do not allow them to call themselves Jewish.

“Arm the homeless!”

Since: Jul 12

The internet

#170339 Sep 3, 2013
Linktv org wrote:
<quoted text>
I believe there could be life on other planets and it would not change any of my beliefs.
I do accept the age of the earth but you cannot prove it is 4.5 Billion, 3 billion, 2, billion, 1 billion, or even Millions.
According to the Bible it is in the thousands. So What.
Even your evolution does not disprove God one way or the other.
Also agnostics and atheists are in the minority with almost 7 Billion believers.
All your facts and figures might be wrong just like the scientist of old who assumed the earth was flat.
Yes I can prove the age of the Earth is 4.5 million years old. And I just told you how. Maybe you glossed over it.

I have already covered that no amount of knowledge can disprove any God.

We may be a minority, but we are the fastest growing demographic I know of.

Science never determined the world to be flat. Mythology is responsible for the flat Earth society.

You say 7 billion like they all believe in your God. Of that number a majority don't give Jesus the time of day. You know that includes people who think their leaders are God... right?

“Arm the homeless!”

Since: Jul 12

The internet

#170340 Sep 3, 2013
sorry.. billion.. not million

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#170341 Sep 3, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Hey, did anyone noticed what happened to the NYSE at about 1120 am EDT? It took a DIVE! Why, well Speaker Bonehead and Mitch "Miller" McConnell said they would recommend that Congress support the president on his Syria Miss-adventure.
Yep, the stock market does not like it, the majority of Americans do not like it, the the entrenched politicians like it and that is all that counts!!!
<quoted text>
I am on the side of staying out of this civil war. It is of no threat to us or our interests. The real problem is Iran.
How many times did I hear you Libtards we should not have gone into Iraq as the real problem was al-Qaeda who was in Afghanistan and Pakistan. WELL???? If the real problem (threat to the U.S. and our interests), then why worry about Syria?!?
Isn't it funny that when I turn around the argument that you yourselves used, you will still side with the Democrats.
Then, if Obama decides to stay out, you will agree with him and praise his decision, right?

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#170342 Sep 3, 2013
Linktv org wrote:
IRAQ: Women Miss Saddam / http://tinyurl.com/ykpudl5
BAGHDAD, Mar 12, 2010 (IPS)- Under Saddam Hussein, women in government got a year's maternity leave; that is now cut to six months. Under the Personal Status Law in force since Jul. 14, 1958, when Iraqis overthrew the British-installed monarchy, Iraqi women had most of the rights that Western women do.
Now they have Article 2 of the Constitution: "Islam is the official religion of the state and is a basic source of legislation." Sub-head A says "No law can be passed that contradicts the undisputed rules of Islam." Under this Article the interpretation of women's rights is left to religious leaders – and many of them are under Iranian influence.
"The U.S. occupation has decided to let go of women's rights," Yanar Mohammed who campaigns for women's rights in Iraq says. "Political Islamic groups have taken southern Iraq, are fully in power there, and are using the financial support of Iran to recruit troops and allies. The financial and political support from Iran is why the Iraqis in the south accept this, not because the Iraqi people want Islamic law."
http://www.ipsnews.net/news.asp...
Yes, Rogue still hangs on to his illusions, namely that Iraq post-Saddam is much better off.

Yes, better for a few aparichiks raking in the oil money.
Meantime, Al Qaeda and Iranians circulate freely in Iraq. They were not there before, incidentally, as Saddam, possessive tyrant that he was, tolerated no adversaries. He wanted to be the number ONE killer. Well, Saddam must be spinning in his grave, outdone, his killing field by now well surpassed by whatever it is that replaced him. 47 more killed by bombs today. Happens almost daily now. Christians persecuted and forced out. What was a secular regime under Saddam, s you correctly point out, allowing liberties for women only seen in Morocco in North Moslem Africa is now a thing of the past, the country has slipped the bonds of freedom and a dark Moslem veil has descended upon it. "Mission Accomplished". Indeed. Muslim mission accomplished, yes.
wojar

Boston, MA

#170343 Sep 3, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Huh? Do you have a hearing problem? Who has said it was YOUR problem, Twinkie? No one. You make it your problem, that's why I asked if you just had a problem with believers or just people who don't believe like you. Try and keep up. Fossils that are 3.5B years old have been found, you twit! BTW, the majority of the population on Earth believe. Where does that leave you? Right where you reside, on the fringe with the other nutjobs! You're doing an excellent job building that prison. Carry on. LMAO!
There's, ignorance, blind ignorance, and then the play justice who seems to believe the existence of billion year old fossils should mean fossilization of ancient hominins and humans was less than rare. Idiotic.

Now where are Adam, Eve, Cain, Abel?

Moron.
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Huh? If you wish to remain willfully ignorant that is your right; it is NOT my problem. You can resolve the problem that your fables are in conflict with the evidence by closing your eyes. Again, that is not my problem.
It is truly curious that anyone would cling to their cherished fable with no evidence in the face of conclusive evidence to the contrary. The population bottleneck evidence DISPROVES the Adam & Eve fable. The molecular evidence previously elaborated clearly establishes an ancestor common to humans and chimpanzees. The DNA tells the story.
The believe that fossils of a specific founder population of thousands from millions of years ago should be expected to be found is naive at best, and I'm being very kind. It is certainly not the belief of anyone with any credibility in the sciences.
The vast majority of living things die without leaving fossil remains. Yet they left evidence that can be found in the DNA of living thing on this Earth today. The fossil evidence is strong but the molecular evidence is a dead lock cinch.
Like it or not, your ignorance is your problem, not mine.
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#170344 Sep 3, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
There's, ignorance, blind ignorance, and then the play justice who seems to believe the existence of billion year old fossils should mean fossilization of ancient hominins and humans was less than rare. Idiotic.
Now where are Adam, Eve, Cain, Abel?
Moron.
<quoted text>
Yawn! You still have no remains. Get back to me when you do.

BTW, if I wanted to listen to an azzhole, I'd fart!
Justice Dale

Wichita, KS

#170345 Sep 3, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Yawn! You still have no remains. Get back to me when you do.
BTW, if I wanted to listen to an azzhole, I'd fart!
LMAO!!!! Now that was a great return, no one can get any better than that, it was better than Bee-tuthans 5th!!!!

Since: Oct 09

Moreno Valley, CA

#170347 Sep 4, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Condos on islands never good? What a dumb ass statement. Lots of great condo island properties around the world.
Never? Ever hear of Oahu, or Kaua'i?
You don't know crap about Cebu.
<quoted text>
Mr. Liars was probably thinking about that condo his cousin Jed purchased for a little of nothing last week.
http://tinyurl.com/p5zs9gj

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 25 min well 50,657
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 1 hr Yeah 1,127,252
Amy 10-24 2 hr your poor wife 15
Last word + 2 (Mar '12) 3 hr Wolverine33 654
Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 4 hr Ratloder 68,672
Rattlesnake Logic 6 hr i need a bump to 22
food for thought 6 hr reality is a crutch 2
Chicago Dating
Find my Match

Chicago Jobs

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]