BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit ...

BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

There are 241653 comments on the Chicago Tribune story from Jan 8, 2009, titled BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen.... In it, Chicago Tribune reports that:

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chicago Tribune.

Just me

Los Angeles, CA

#169586 Aug 29, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
All but one and he is an atheist, pot-smoking Libtard like you.
Well then why the Hell do you need so much attention from people you don't know?
Frank

Spokane, WA

#169587 Aug 29, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
In 1961 the US was not a newly formed nation.
You plagiarized a fool.
There was no Constitutional Convention convened to repeal the requirements of Article II Section 1 and the reason the founding fathers included those requirements are just as important in 1961,2008 and today as they were over two hundred thirty years ago. If those founding fathers knew what happened in 2008 they would believe the the citizens failed us and they would wonder why the media also failed us.

“Arm the homeless!”

Since: Jul 12

The internet

#169588 Aug 29, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
If Rouge was aware of modern biblical scholarship he wouldn't make such an ignorant comment.
<quoted text>
Well, it is sitting right in front of him.

You can watch biblical scholars go on and on right on youtube.

I am amazed how few people know about the history of the bible.

I mean, if I really thought that God wrote a book... I would want to know everything I could. Every minute detail of every extraction, every addition.

Most people who claim to be religious can't tell you squat except for a few of the tales from the new testament.
Just me

Los Angeles, CA

#169589 Aug 29, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
The French don't like none French words. Take for instance "potato". The French call it a "pomme de terre" which literally translates "apple of the earth"
Soooo, what do they call "French fries"? They call them "pomme fritz" which literally translates "apples fried?
Silly Frenchies
<quoted text>
It is silly how Libtards will bring out a modern interpretation of an archaic text and they think they know what it means.
You know, there are two forms of respect. A classic example is a police officer. Law-abiding citizens "respect" cops because they protect them whereas bad guys "respect" cops as they know what the cops will do if they commit a crime.
To be in "awe" of God can also mean two things. For people who respect God's laws, the are in awe (respect) of God. But for those who do not abide by God's laws, they are in awe (fear) God.
Isn't it funny how Libtards do not seem to understand simple English like, "the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed".
First of all you try and argue what an "arm" is, so much so that the definition has changed in dictionaries that were written over 100 years ago!
WTF?

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#169590 Aug 29, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh oh, how about proof that the UN, Germany and Russia approved the Iraqi invasion? Remember, YOU stated it, were sure of your facts. Should be easy which makes me wonder why it's taking so long. While you're at it, please supply the other 50 or so sources of proofs I've been requesting.
<quoted text>
Well Jacqueau, it has been over an hour and no reply? I have answered your question over a half dozen times before but you have an attention span of a Chihuahua and will have forgotten my post in another hour.
Oh, my Chihuahua likes to eat bugs and two or three hours after she does she usually gets sick. But she can not relate getting sick to eating that bug a few hours earlier.
A few years ago I was walking her an a bees was on a clover flower and she snapped the bee which stung her inside her mouth. She knew the bee stung her so now she avoids bees but she still eats other bugs.
Jacqueau, do I have to stick a hot poker up you butt to get you to remember what I post about the Russians, Germans, etc. saying that Iraq had WMD?!?
Read this carefully, Rogue , from you beloved Wikipedia :

Iraq and weapons of mass destruction

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Weapons of mass destruction

The fifth president of Iraq Saddam Hussein[1] was internationally known for his use of chemical weapons in the 1980s against Iranian and Kurdish civilians during and after the Iran–Iraq War. In the 1980s he pursued an extensive biological weapons program and a nuclear weapons program, though no nuclear bomb was built.

After the 1990-1991 Persian Gulf War, the United Nations located and destroyed large quantities of Iraqi chemical weapons and related equipment and materials throughout the early 1990s, with varying degrees of Iraqi cooperation and obstruction.[2] In response to diminishing Iraqi cooperation with UNSCOM, the United States called for withdrawal of all UN and IAEA inspectors in 1998, resulting in Operation Desert Fox. The United States and the UK asserted that Saddam Hussein still possessed large hidden stockpiles of WMD in 2003, and that he was clandestinely procuring and producing more. Inspections by the UN to resolve the status of unresolved disarmament questions restarted from November 2002 until March 2003,[3] under UN Security Council Resolution 1441, which demanded Saddam give "immediate, unconditional and active cooperation" with UN and IAEA inspections, shortly before his country was attacked.[4]

During the lead-up to war in March 2003, United Nations weapons inspector Hans Blix had found no stockpiles of WMD and had made significant progress toward resolving open issues of disarmament noting the "proactive" but not always "immediate" Iraqi cooperation as called for by UN Security Council Resolution 1441. He concluded that it would take “but months” to resolve the key remaining disarmament tasks.[5] The United States asserted this was a breach of Resolution 1441 but failed to convince the UN Security Council to pass a new resolution authorizing the use of force due to lack of evidence.[6][7][8]

Despite being unable to get a new resolution authorizing force and citing section 3 of the Joint Resolution passed by the U.S. Congress,[9] President George W. Bush asserted peaceful measures could not disarm Iraq of the weapons he alleged it to have and launched a second Gulf War,[10] despite multiple dissenting opinions[11] and questions of integrity[12][13][14] about the underlying intelligence.[15] Later U.S.-led inspections agreed that Iraq had earlier abandoned its WMD programs, but asserted Iraq had an intention to pursue those programs if UN sanctions were ever lifted.[16]

...2

==========

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#169591 Aug 29, 2013
2...

I'll emphasise the last paragraph of the above, Rogue :

Bush later said that the biggest regret of his presidency was "the intelligence failure" in Iraq,[17] while the Senate Intelligence Committee found in 2008 that his administration "misrepresented the intelligence and the threat from Iraq".[18] A key CIA informant in Iraq admitted that he lied about his allegations, "then watched in shock as it was used to justify the war".[
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#169592 Aug 29, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
It seems that way, to the psychotic.
<quoted text>
Good, then your DA understands completely!
Learn to Read

United States

#169593 Aug 29, 2013
Just me wrote:
<quoted text>Did that make you feel better?
If Romper didn't direct his anger towards "them" he might be forced to deal with his own pathetic, empty existence. Imagine how depressing that would be.
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#169594 Aug 29, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Birfoons just can't get enough of the false cause fallacy.
Hawaii became a state in 1959 and in 1961 Barack H. Obama II "came along".
Woo wee!
But birfoons have FAITH in their fables so their fables are just as valid as rational thought.:-)
Wise up, child.
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#169595 Aug 29, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
It does not make homosexuality any more right than heterosexuality, Rogue, it just makes it so. Not wrong, not right, just so. My gosh, you are so obsessed by homosexuality. You come up with it spontaneously, bring it up, regularly. Homosexuality does not kill, Rogue. Guns kill.
Nah, it's just a violation of nature, no biggie, right? Please look up and understand the meaning of the word "EXIT". Justify it Path! Justify! Are you an RSO?
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#169596 Aug 29, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Stop it,Rogue. There were no WMD, no Al Qaeda, no Taliban, no Iranians in Iraq during the Saddam era. None of the foregoing;
Hilary Clinton, and dems, and Repubs, no one had anything good to say about Saddam pre-2003. NO ONE. Does that mean they wanted to invade Iraq. Who now in the US had anything good to say about Putin? Yes, who wants to invade Russia?
Russia, Germany,the UN,France, never agreed that there were WMDs. Never. Drop it now before you look even sillier, if that is at all possible. And get some real sources, let go of wnd.com , Foxnews.com , theblaze.com , canadafreepress.com , globe.com , nationalenquirer.com
Others disagree with you psycho.

http://www.weeklystandard.com/articles/al-qae...

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#169597 Aug 29, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
It does not make homosexuality any more right than heterosexuality, Rogue, it just makes it so. Not wrong, not right, just so. My gosh, you are so obsessed by homosexuality. You come up with it spontaneously, bring it up, regularly. Homosexuality does not kill, Rogue. Guns kill.
I am not obsessed with homosexuality. I am upset that we get it rammed down our throats on a daily bases. We've had none Catholic gays and lesbians show up in Catholic churches in San Francisco and demand communion. They have no respect for anyone else's religion.
And when have I said homosexuality kills? How many times have we heard you Libtards say that Bush lied and people died and I have proven over and over again he did not lie yet you keep your mantra up.
Meanwhile Obama did lie about Ben Ghazi and people dies and you don't give a shit!

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#169598 Aug 29, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Nah, it's just a violation of nature, no biggie, right? Please look up and understand the meaning of the word "EXIT". Justify it Path! Justify! Are you an RSO?
YOU and some extreme-right holy rollers, and ayatollahs, your friends, maintain it's a "violation of nature". Just the fact you and your crazy allies say so makes it even less so.
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#169599 Aug 29, 2013
Scrutiny wrote:
<quoted text>
Man is a technological species, intelligence is the only thing we have going for us. No, we aren't that smart yet. But we will be if we aren't taken out by a gamma burst, or a super virus, or a gaddamn war over who's invisible celestial representative wields the most mojo.
NONE of which are you guys helping with.
And I do get it...
"That which you manifest lies before you."
You think you can will things into being so.
It is a crutch of the faith you speak so highly of. As a matter of fact it is the downright foundation of all of it. You think that whatever you think will happen in the end will happen. And I can't disprove that anymore than I could god, or ghost, or vampires.
But back here on planet Earth we call that
...magic.
Correction: you justify your denial by calling it magic. I think that is more likely what you meant. BTW, "will" has nothing to do with it. Study on it. I'll check back.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#169600 Aug 29, 2013
Just hope the link does not work, Rogue. If it does not, then you'll claim my links are no good, knowing full well, though, that all you have to do is type the link I supplied. Interesting, as it says GWB misrepresented the facts, Cheney and Grove pressured the CIA AND France, Germany and Russia did not believe there were WMDs, wanted more inspection, which they got, with the UN certifying that there were NO WMDs.

Iraqi Weapons of Mass Destruction | Center for American Progress

www.americanprogress.org › Issues › Media&#8206;

Jun 12, 2008 - Did they agree there were weapons of mass destruction in Iraq?... reported that Iraq had no active weapons of mass destruction program.... 2003, that,“France, Germany, and Russia have released an unprecedented joint

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#169601 Aug 29, 2013
You're lucky.But if you're honest, google it, type Centre for American Progress, weapons of mass destruction
Ellen1

Dedham, MA

#169602 Aug 29, 2013
Frank wrote:
<quoted text>There was no Constitutional Convention convened to repeal the requirements of Article II Section 1 and the reason the founding fathers included those requirements are just as important in 1961,2008 and today as they were over two hundred thirty years ago. If those founding fathers knew what happened in 2008 they would believe the the citizens failed us and they would wonder why the media also failed us.
Quite right, they are still important. Only one thing. They do not say that a person born on US soil needs two citizen parents to be a Natural Born Citizen. It simply does not say it, and there is no evidence that the writers of the US Constitution used Vattel's definition and not that of the common law (which was, duh, much more common). And the meaning of Natural Born in the common law refers to the place of birth, not to the citizenship of the parents.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#169603 Aug 29, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
How many times have I had to answer your questions but every time I do, you alter the question. Your original question was proof that Russia, Germany, etc. concurred that Bush that Iraq had WMD. And here is that answer..... AGAIN!!!! And please note, this comes from a LEFTY site too!!!
In fact, however, George Tenet, George W. Bush's CIA director, assured the President that the case for Saddam possessing WMD was “a slam dunk.” In this assessment, Tenet had the backing of all fifteen agencies involved in gathering intelligence for the United States. The National Intelligence Estimate of 2002, where their collective views were summarized, asserted with “high confidence” that "Iraq is continuing, and in some areas expanding its chemical, biological, nuclear, and missile programs contrary to UN resolutions.
The intelligence agencies of Britain, Germany, Russia, China, Israel, and France all agreed with this judgment. Even Hans Blix—who headed the UN team of inspectors trying to determine whether Saddam had complied with the demands of the Security Council that he dispose of the WMD he was known to have had in the past—lent further credibility to the case in a report he issued only a few months before the invasion:
"The discovery of a number of ... chemical rocket warheads in a bunker at a storage depot 170 km southwest of Baghdad was much publicized. This was a relatively new bunker, and therefore the rockets must have been moved there in the past few years, at a time when Iraq should not have had such munitions.... They could also be the tip of a submerged iceberg. The discovery … points to the issue of several thousands of chemical rockets that are unaccounted for."
The consensus on which President Bush relied was first fully formed in the Clinton administration, as these statements indicate:
http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/viewSubCat ...
<quoted text>
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
You wrote that the UN ,Germany and Russia approved the invasion of Iraq, Mr. Liars. BTW, show me where Russia, Germany and especially the UN said there were WMDs. You clearly stated that the UN approved the invasion. The UN SAID unequivocally that Iraq had NO WMDs, after more than 5 inspections. Let's see where it says Germany Russia and the UN stated Iraq had to WMDs. Show me.
There you go lying again. I have never said that Russia or Germany approved of the 1992 Iraq War. I DID say that they concurred that Saddamn Hussein did have WMD yet every time I show you proof, you change your question.
And the UN did NOT say that and you can not prove it. What they did say is they had not found an active WMD program or stock piles of chemical weapons.
The UN also said that Saddamn VIOLATED 27 UN mandates and was not cooperating with the inspectors.
Yes, the UN did approve of the invasion of 1992 and the 2002 re-invasion was a just a continuation of that war. There were 30 other countries who joined us the second time and our Congress approved it.
Do you have any idea how many battles there were in WWII? But it was still ONE war!
It is sad you will never accept the facts. But you will suck down anything Obama says as the Gospel truth.
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#169604 Aug 29, 2013
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
If Romper didn't direct his anger towards "them" he might be forced to deal with his own pathetic, empty existence. Imagine how depressing that would be.
Sorry spoogeboy, I'm not going to your twink bar. How many times must I tell you? Get those taters out of your ears, you don't know where those ears have been. How long have you suffered from queerism?
Ellen1

Dedham, MA

#169605 Aug 29, 2013
Truth Detector wrote:
KEW, SURREY, GB – The last place anyone would think to look for a birth record of someone claiming to be a “natural born” U.S. citizen is Great Britain. The very inclusion of the Article II eligibility mandate in the U.S. Constitution was explicitly intended by the founding fathers of America to prevent a then British-born enemy usurper from attaining the office of the U.S. presidency and thereby undermining the sovereignty of the newly formed nation.
There is no record of Obama having been born in Kew, Surrey. An unnamed group claimed that they looked into the British archives and found something that showed that Obama was born in Kenya. But they never proved it, and no one else has found anything. The claim turns out to be just another of the birther LIES, like the claim that Obama's Kenyan grandmother said that he was born in Kenya---when she said repeatedly that he was born IN HAWAII (birter sites simply never quoted her, and cut off the tape recording just before she said: "He was born in Hawaii, where his father was studying at the time."

So that's all crap.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 2 min John 1,549,277
Why are White men obsessed with Latina women? (Feb '10) 3 min LuvHardCock 207
TRUTH will be revealed, someday, maybe. 11 min WOWsomeStory 2
ex chicago police woman (Jul '16) 14 min ShootDaBitch 25
Spanx-they're for me. 27 min Fuegelgas pump 1
Illinois is in critical financial crisis. 1 hr Genl Forrest 17
last post wins! (Apr '13) 1 hr Hatti_Hollerand 2,547

Chicago Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages