No Rogue, what makes the whole document fraudulent is the addition of a 1982 statute that obviously wasn’t obtainable in 1961.Justice LRS wrote:
Notice line 23 - Evidence for delayed filing or alterations -
Description of HRS 338-17.8
Oh wow, a civil servant left out an "i" and that makes the whole document a fraudulent document.
But how would a birfoon know that?
The answer of course is he wouldn’t because he’s a birfoon.