BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

Full story: Chicago Tribune

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...

Comments (Page 7,411)

Showing posts 148,201 - 148,220 of167,393
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#168208
Aug 20, 2013
 

Judged:

1

Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
I hate to tell you but if you are born in South Korea and your father is not Korean, you do not exist. You see, in Korea they do not have birth certificates. They have Family Registries.
When a child is born, if he has a Korean father, he is placed on his father's registry regardless of where he is born. If the Child is born in Korea and his father is not Korean, he has no family registry to be placed on and therefore, does not exist!
And child born to a Mexican citizen is also automatically a Mexican citizen regardless of where he is born. And if you born out side the U.S. or it's territories, and are given a DS-1350 after you are born, you are a Natural Born Citizen
You wrote : " hate to tell you but if you are born in South Korea and your father is not Korean, you do not exist. You see, in Korea they do not have birth certificates. They have Family Registries."

Re-read, Rogue. I wrote "in most countries". Probably also Switzerland where getting citizenship is well nigh impossible if you're not born there from both Swiss parents. But, what I wrote hold in MOST countries, though not all. Got it? Based on Birther claims, where they have lost 209 times, Obama is more American than Cruz, as he had to renounce nothing.

Since: Oct 09

Moreno Valley, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#168209
Aug 20, 2013
 
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Yeah that was cute Rogue, but they were poking fun at the birfoon.

And yes I do know “a few” Hillary supporters were the original birfoon until they found the birth announcements and common sense afforded them only one conclusion.

“On Deck”

Since: Aug 08

French Polynesia

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#168210
Aug 20, 2013
 
Poppo,
I never once questioned Barack Obama's place of birth.
It didn't matter to me. I knew all along he could not be trusted not matter where he was form.
That makes me better than the Clintons by far.
loose

“On Deck”

Since: Aug 08

French Polynesia

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#168211
Aug 20, 2013
 
That's right, Poppo.
Barack Obama is a big letdown.
I knew it all along.
Egypt and Syria will be his legacy.
loose

“On Deck”

Since: Aug 08

French Polynesia

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#168213
Aug 20, 2013
 
Poppo,
There is no middle of the road in the Middle East.
Barack Obama's Middle East foreign policy is an epic failure.
Learn to Read

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#168215
Aug 20, 2013
 
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually I wish he runs and that the Libtards challenge him in court as it might just backfire on them.
Oh, you are sure it will come from "birfistan"? You do know the original Birthers were Clintonestas (democrats), don't you? Oh course you are think there are no Black people or Democrats in the TEA Party movement too!
I bet Ted is really happy none of the States passed their "present proof you are NBC using a LFBC issued by a State" or "two citizen parents" teaquirements. That could have been embarrassing

“zero nuclear weapons”

Since: Sep 08

Perryville

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#168217
Aug 20, 2013
 

Judged:

1

Rouge here is something to read
Climate Panel Cites Near Certainty on Warming
An international panel of scientists has found with near certainty that human activity is the cause of most of the temperature increases of recent decades, and warns that sea levels could conceivably rise by more than three feet by the end of the century if emissions continue at a runaway pace.
The scientists, whose findings are reported in a draft summary of the next big United Nations climate report, largely dismiss a recent slowdown in the pace of warming, which is often cited by climate change doubters, attributing it most likely to short-term factors.
The report emphasizes that the basic facts about future climate change are more established than ever, justifying the rise in global concern. It also reiterates that the consequences of escalating emissions are likely to be profound.
“It is extremely likely that human influence on climate caused more than half of the observed increase in global average surface temperature from 1951 to 2010,” the draft report says.“There is high confidence that this has warmed the ocean, melted snow and ice, raised global mean sea level and changed some climate extremes in the second half of the 20th century.”
The draft comes from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, a body of several hundred scientists that won the Nobel Peace Prize in 2007, along with Al Gore. Its summaries, published every five or six years, are considered the definitive assessment of the risks of climate change, and they influence the actions of governments around the world. Hundreds of billions of dollars are being spent on efforts to reduce greenhouse emissions, for instance, largely on the basis of the group’s findings.
The coming report will be the fifth major assessment from the group, created in 1988. Each report has found greater certainty that the planet is warming and greater likelihood that humans are the primary cause.
The 2007 report found “unequivocal” evidence of warming, but hedged a little on responsibility, saying the chances were at least 90 percent that human activities were the cause. The language in the new draft is stronger, saying the odds are at least 95 percent that humans are the principal cause.
On sea level, which is one of the biggest single worries about climate change, the new report goes well beyond the assessment published in 2007, which largely sidestepped the question of how much the ocean could rise this century.
The new report also reiterates a core difficulty that has plagued climate science for decades: While averages for such measures as temperature can be predicted with some confidence on a global scale, the coming changes still cannot be forecast reliably on a local scale. That leaves governments and businesses fumbling in the dark as they try to plan ahead.
On another closely watched issue, the scientists retreated slightly from their 2007 position.
Regarding the question of how much the planet could warm if carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere doubled, the previous report largely ruled out any number below 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit. The new draft says the rise could be as low as 2.7 degrees, essentially restoring a scientific consensus that prevailed from 1979 to 2007.
But the draft says only that the low number is possible, not that it is likely. Many climate scientists see only a remote chance that the warming will be that low, with the published evidence suggesting that an increase above 5 degrees Fahrenheit is more likely if carbon dioxide doubles.
The level of carbon dioxide, the main greenhouse gas, is up 41 percent since the Industrial Revolution, and if present trends continue it could double in a matter of decades.
Warming the entire planet by 5 degrees Fahrenheit would add a stupendous amount of energy to the climate system. Scientists say the increase would be greater over land and might exceed 10 degrees at the poles.

“zero nuclear weapons”

Since: Sep 08

Perryville

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#168218
Aug 20, 2013
 

Judged:

1

Warming the entire planet by 5 degrees Fahrenheit would add a stupendous amount of energy to the climate system. Scientists say the increase would be greater over land and might exceed 10 degrees at the poles.

They add that such an increase would lead to widespread melting of land ice, extreme heat waves, difficulty growing food and massive changes in plant and animal life, probably including a wave of extinctions.

The new document is not final and will not become so until an intensive, closed-door negotiating session among scientists and government leaders in Stockholm in late September. But if the past is any guide, most of the core findings of the document will survive that final review.

The document was leaked over the weekend after it was sent to a large group of people who had signed up to review it. It was first reported on in detail by the Reuters news agency, and The New York Times obtained a copy independently to verify its contents.

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change does no original research, but instead periodically assesses and summarizes the published scientific literature on climate change.

The draft document “is likely to change in response to comments from governments received in recent weeks and will also be considered by governments and scientists at a four-day approval session at the end of September,” the panel’s spokesman, Jonathan Lynn, said in a statement Monday.“It is therefore premature and could be misleading to attempt to draw conclusions from it.”

After winning the Nobel Peace Prize six years ago, the group became a political target for climate doubters, who helped identify minor errors in the 2007 report. This time, the panel adopted rigorous procedures in the hope of preventing such mistakes.

Some climate doubters challenge the idea that the earth is warming at all; others concede that it is, but deny human responsibility; still others acknowledge a human role, but assert that the warming is likely to be limited and the impacts manageable. Every major scientific academy in the world has warned that global warming is a serious problem.

The panel shifted to a wider range for the potential warming, dropping the plausible low end to 2.7 degrees, after a wave of recent studies saying higher estimates were unlikely. But those studies are contested, and scientists at Stockholm are likely to debate whether to stick with that language.

Michael E. Mann, a climate scientist at Pennsylvania State University, said he feared the intergovernmental panel, in writing its draft, had been influenced by criticism from climate doubters, who advocate even lower numbers.“I think the I.P.C.C. on this point has once again erred on the side of understating the degree of the likely changes,” Dr. Mann said.

However, Christopher B. Field, a researcher at the Carnegie Institution for Science who serves on the panel but was not directly involved in the new draft, said the group had to reflect the full range of plausible scientific views.

“I think that the I.P.C.C. has a tradition of being very conservative,” Dr. Field said.“They really want the story to be right.”

Regarding the likely rise in sea level over the coming century, the new report lays out several possibilities. In the most optimistic, the world’s governments would prove far more successful at getting emissions under control than they have been in the recent past, helping to limit the total warming.

In that circumstance, sea level could be expected to rise as little as 10 inches by the end of the century, the report found. That is a bit more than the eight-inch increase in the 20th century, which proved manageable even though it caused severe erosion along the world’s shorelines.

“zero nuclear weapons”

Since: Sep 08

Perryville

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#168219
Aug 20, 2013
 

Judged:

1

In that circumstance, sea level could be expected to rise as little as 10 inches by the end of the century, the report found. That is a bit more than the eight-inch increase in the 20th century, which proved manageable even though it caused severe erosion along the world’s shorelines.

At the other extreme, the report considers a chain of events in which emissions continue to increase at a swift pace. Under those conditions, sea level could be expected to rise at least 21 inches by 2100 and might increase a bit more than three feet, the draft report said.

Hundreds of millions of people live near sea level, and either figure would represent a challenge for humanity, scientists say. But a three-foot rise in particular would endanger many of the world’s great cities — among them New York; London; Shanghai; Venice; Sydney, Australia; Miami; and New Orleans.

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/20/science/ear...
Forum

Carlsbad, NM

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#168220
Aug 20, 2013
 
Poppo wrote:
<quoted text>
Rafael will run and “if” he’s challenged it will no doubt come from birfistan. We’ve been trying to educate you on this issue for years. It is you who have now apparently come around just as we always knew you would just as soon the candidates got a little lighter.
Creator of the radiant
light.
Fountain of bliss,
essential sight,
Emitting splendor's o r i e n t
beam.
The world's creation to pro-
claim.
Who, with the morn's enliv'ning
ray,
Dispell'st the
s h a d e s and
call'st the day:
Approaching
night o'er-
s p re a d s the
spheres.
N o w graciously
hear our sighs
and tears.
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#168221
Aug 20, 2013
 
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
So sparky. Want to actually say something or just going to blather? How is it you fantasize his us sooooooo different?
Poor pathetic puss boi pasting web links with no clue
If you can't see the difference, you're every bit as stupid as I thought.
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#168222
Aug 20, 2013
 
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Dufus Dale was duly appointed Justice Dale by Justice ha ha LRS, aka Justice ho ho Dale.
Congratulations Path! You are now 0 - 300!

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#168224
Aug 20, 2013
 
Businessman Kills Five Robbers in Four Separate Incidents
Written by Gary North on August 20, 2013

Five robbers made bad decisions. They decided to rob this man’s watch repair shop. They came in armed. They went out feet first.
One of them was wearing a pair of Nike shoes. Nike was the name of a Greek Olympic god. It means victory. The shoes did the wearer no good. He lost.
The Discovery Channel did a segment on him.
http://www.youtube.com/watch...

Read more at http://teapartyeconomist.com/2013/08/20/busin...
Learn to Read

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#168226
Aug 20, 2013
 
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>If you can't see the difference, you're every bit as stupid as I thought.
One pic is a high res photo. One pic on your latest and greatest paste is a bad copy of a scan. The fact that you don't even pretend that you can name one significant difference between your new "real COLB" and Obama's COLB speaks volumes.

Blather on Birfoon full of stupid

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#168227
Aug 20, 2013
 
nebka wrote:
In that circumstance, sea level could be expected to rise as little as 10 inches by the end of the century, the report found. That is a bit more than the eight-inch increase in the 20th century, which proved manageable even though it caused severe erosion along the world’s shorelines.
At the other extreme, the report considers a chain of events in which emissions continue to increase at a swift pace. Under those conditions, sea level could be expected to rise at least 21 inches by 2100 and might increase a bit more than three feet, the draft report said.
Hundreds of millions of people live near sea level, and either figure would represent a challenge for humanity, scientists say. But a three-foot rise in particular would endanger many of the world’s great cities — among them New York; London; Shanghai; Venice; Sydney, Australia; Miami; and New Orleans.
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/20/science/ear...
The only problem is that we have been in Global Cooling for about fifteen years now and will be for another 20-50 years!

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#168228
Aug 20, 2013
 
nebka wrote:
Warming the entire planet by 5 degrees Fahrenheit would add a stupendous amount of energy to the climate system. Scientists say the increase would be greater over land and might exceed 10 degrees at the poles.
They add that such an increase would lead to widespread melting of land ice, extreme heat waves, difficulty growing food and massive changes in plant and animal life, probably including a wave of extinctions.
The new document is not final and will not become so until an intensive, closed-door negotiating session among scientists and government leaders in Stockholm in late September. But if the past is any guide, most of the core findings of the document will survive that final review.
The document was leaked over the weekend after it was sent to a large group of people who had signed up to review it. It was first reported on in detail by the Reuters news agency, and The New York Times obtained a copy independently to verify its contents.
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change does no original research, but instead periodically assesses and summarizes the published scientific literature on climate change.
The draft document “is likely to change in response to comments from governments received in recent weeks and will also be considered by governments and scientists at a four-day approval session at the end of September,” the panel’s spokesman, Jonathan Lynn, said in a statement Monday.“It is therefore premature and could be misleading to attempt to draw conclusions from it.”
After winning the Nobel Peace Prize six years ago, the group became a political target for climate doubters, who helped identify minor errors in the 2007 report. This time, the panel adopted rigorous procedures in the hope of preventing such mistakes.
Some climate doubters challenge the idea that the earth is warming at all; others concede that it is, but deny human responsibility; still others acknowledge a human role, but assert that the warming is likely to be limited and the impacts manageable. Every major scientific academy in the world has warned that global warming is a serious problem.
The panel shifted to a wider range for the potential warming, dropping the plausible low end to 2.7 degrees, after a wave of recent studies saying higher estimates were unlikely. But those studies are contested, and scientists at Stockholm are likely to debate whether to stick with that language.
Michael E. Mann, a climate scientist at Pennsylvania State University, said he feared the intergovernmental panel, in writing its draft, had been influenced by criticism from climate doubters, who advocate even lower numbers.“I think the I.P.C.C. on this point has once again erred on the side of understating the degree of the likely changes,” Dr. Mann said.
However, Christopher B. Field, a researcher at the Carnegie Institution for Science who serves on the panel but was not directly involved in the new draft, said the group had to reflect the full range of plausible scientific views.
“I think that the I.P.C.C. has a tradition of being very conservative,” Dr. Field said.“They really want the story to be right.”
Regarding the likely rise in sea level over the coming century, the new report lays out several possibilities. In the most optimistic, the world’s governments would prove far more successful at getting emissions under control than they have been in the recent past, helping to limit the total warming.
In that circumstance, sea level could be expected to rise as little as 10 inches by the end of the century, the report found. That is a bit more than the eight-inch increase in the 20th century, which proved manageable even though it caused severe erosion along the world’s shorelines.
The only problem is that the Earth has cooled to the same level it was in the 1950s and the sea levels are going down. Remember Obama saved the Earth and now it is healing!
Frank

Spokane, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#168229
Aug 20, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
So you're saying it's okay for Cruz, your family and sundry but not Obama. Oh well.
Obama has never had allegiance to the United States. He was born the son of a Kenyan British Subject and has had allegiance to Indonesia,but thru words and deeds has never done any thing to show that he cares about our flag,our country,or The Constitution. Every thing he has ever done has been done with the express intention of destroying our country.
Forum

Carlsbad, NM

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#168230
Aug 20, 2013
 
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Businessman Kills Five Robbers in Four Separate Incidents
Written by Gary North on August 20, 2013
Five robbers made bad decisions. They decided to rob this man’s watch repair shop. They came in armed. They went out feet first.?
One of them was wearing a pair of Nike shoes. Nike was the name of a Greek Olympic god. It means victory. The shoes did the wearer no good. He lost.
The Discovery Channel did a segment on him.
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
Read more at http://teapartyeconomist.com/2013/08/20/busin...
Who cares?

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#168231
Aug 20, 2013
 
Hey Nebka, you do know that your friend, Dr. James Hansen, use to claim in 1971 that we will be in another Little Ice age in 50-60 years. Well 50-60 after 1971 is .... 2021-31 which is not that far off from now, now!

NASA Scientists Predicted a New Ice Age in 1971
By Noel Sheppard | September 19, 2007 |

This seems destined to be ignored by today's climate change obsessed media: Scientists from NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies - the very organization now presaging gloom and doom at the hands of global warming - predicted a new ice age back in 1971.

Think this will be a focus of tonight's evening news broadcasts?

Regardless of the answer, the Washington Times wonderfully reported Wednesday (emphasis added throughout, h/t Marc Morano):

NASA scientist James E. Hansen, who has publicly criticized the Bush administration for dragging its feet on climate change and labeled skeptics of man-made global warming as distracting "court jesters," appears in a 1971 Washington Post article that warns of an impending ice age within 50 years.
The Post archives do indeed identify the existence of such a piece, with the following preview:

The world could be as little as 50 or 60 years away from a disastrous new ice age, a leading atmospheric scientist predicts. Dr. S. I. Rasool of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and Columbia University says that...
The Times piece continued:

The scientist was S.I. Rasool, a colleague of Mr. Hansen's at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. The article goes on to say that Mr. Rasool came to his chilling conclusions by resorting in part to a new computer program developed by Mr. Hansen that studied clouds above Venus.
The 1971 article, discovered this week by Washington resident John Lockwood while he was conducting related research at the Library of Congress, says that "in the next 50 years" - or by 2021 - fossil-fuel dust injected by man into the atmosphere "could screen out so much sunlight that the average temperature could drop by six degrees," resulting in a buildup of "new glaciers that could eventually cover huge areas."
It turns out the Post was referring specifically to an article published at the journal Science that day, which was written by Rasool and S. H. Schneider.

Science archives identified the following abstract of the piece entitled "Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide and Aerosols: Effects of Large Increases on Global Climate," and indicated the authors were from "Institute for Space Studies, Goddard Space Flight Center, National Aeronautics and Space Administration" (emphasis added):

Effects on the global temperature of large increases in carbon dioxide and aerosol densities in the atmosphere of Earth have been computed. It is found that, although the addition of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere does increase the surface temperature, the rate of temperature increase diminishes with increasing carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. For aerosols, however, the net effect of increase in density is to reduce the surface temperature of Earth. Because of the exponential dependence of the backscattering, the rate of temperature decrease is augmented with increasing aerosol content. An increase by only a factor of 4 in global aerosol background concentration may be sufficient to reduce the surface temperature by as much as 3.5 ° K. If sustained over a period of several years, such a temperature decrease over the whole globe is believed to be sufficient to trigger an ice age.
How marvelous. Yet, 36 years later, this same organization is predicting a planetary cataclysm at the hands of global warming.

Which one of this agency's warnings should we heed?

Read more: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/20...

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#168232
Aug 20, 2013
 
Isn't that a hoot that the same Global Warming alarmist, Dr. James Hansen, use to think we were heading for another Little Ice Age. Ya know, there are people who make a living off of scaring Libtards. Just look at Owl Gore and how much money he has made since he left the White House in 2001 off of scaring the Idiotards into think we were in Global Warming.
And the Idiotards have not figured out why they changed the name from Global Warming to Climate Change in 2007!!! They did it because the real scientists know that the Sun was switching from a hot cycle to a cool cycle and the Climate would Change to a cooling trend!

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 148,201 - 148,220 of167,393
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

47 Users are viewing the Chicago Forum right now

Search the Chicago Forum:
Topic Updated Last By Comments
snapchat gay names 4 min nolovecity74 1
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 9 min harmonious 1,033,598
Abby 4-14 12 min PEllen 52
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 56 min Whiny1 4,021
Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 1 hr KiMare 47,001
Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 1 hr Frijoles 64,956
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 1 hr prognosticator 96,010
•••
•••
•••

Chicago Jobs

•••
•••
•••

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••