BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

Full story: Chicago Tribune

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...
Comments
148,061 - 148,080 of 176,770 Comments Last updated 1 hr ago

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#168284
Aug 20, 2013
 
Frito Bandito wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, can you put water in your car and drive off? Iraq was a threat to the entire Persian Gulf. Just look at what just the threat of closing the Suez Canal does to the oil market!!!
Why did Saudi Arabia build an oil pipeline that goes through the Golan Heights and into Lebanon for? They were afraid that if the Persian Gulf was closed, or the Suez Canal, their oil could not be delivered.
And that is just one more reason why we should complete the Keystone Pipeline!!!
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Quit being an apologist for GWB and his gang, fabrications, lies, all of it. You remind me of the Catholic Church that for over 150 years was an apologist for the Inquisition. Chickens have come home to roost, Rogue. Get with it. Invasion of Iraq was fraudulent, built on fabrication and lies.
Still looking for proof, based on your statement, that Russia and Germany plus the UN general assembly plus the security council approved the invasion of Iraq. Come on, out with it.
There you go like a typical Libtard. Don't want to answer a question, run, dodge and jump over it. Anything but answer the question.
If you use petroleum in any matter, you are a flaming hypocrite. If you use electricity in any matter, you are a flaming hypocrite.
If you breath out carbon dioxide, you are a flaming hypocrite becasue you contribute to Global Warming!(your belief, not mine)

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#168285
Aug 20, 2013
 
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
He's scoffing, mocking you birthers, slug. At least he has a sense of humour. Not only do you not have any, you have no sense, period.
Saw that little caption on Biden where he makes a booboo in his speech and of course, the Nazi media swoop onto it. Sad. Sigh. It must suck so to be a birther birfoon buffoon, in other words, you.
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't think so, Path. He didn't sound like he was mocking anyone. Who said that was a "slip" by Biden? LMAO!!! "it must suck", "how it must suck", LMAO!!! What really sucks is being an outsider, like you! psychotwit

Since: Oct 09

Moreno Valley, CA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#168286
Aug 20, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

ORLY TAITZ GETS LAUGHED OUT OF COURT

Acknowledging the existence of a document that shows the President was born in Hawaii, Plaintiff alleges that the document “cannot be verified as genuine, and should be presumed fraudulent.”

In further support of her claim, Plaintiff relies upon “the general opinion in the rest of the world” that “Barack Hussein Obama has, in essence, slipped through the guardrails to become President.”

Moreover, as though the “general opinion in the rest of the world” were not enough, Plaintiff alleges in her Complaint that according to an “AOL poll 85% of Americans believe that Obama was not vetted, needs to be vetted and his vital records need to be produced.”

Finally, in a remarkable shifting of the traditional legal burden of proof, Plaintiff unashamedly alleges that Defendant has the burden to prove his “natural born” status. Thus, Plaintiff’s counsel, who champions herself as a defender of liberty and freedom, seeks to use the power of the judiciary to compel a citizen, albeit the President of the United States, to “prove his innocence” to “charges” that are based upon conjecture and speculation.

Any middle school civics student would readily recognize the irony of abandoning fundamental principles upon which our Country was founded in order to purportedly “protect and preserve” those very principles ….

Plaintiff’s complaint is not plausible on its face. To the extent that it alleges any “facts,” the Complaint does not connect those facts to any actual violation of Plaintiff’s individual constitutional rights.“UNLIKE IN ALICE IN WONDERLAND, SIMPLY SAYING SOMETHING IS SO DOES NOT MAKE IT SO”
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE CLAY LAND, SEP, 2009

TAITZ’S RESPONSE TO ALL THIS? SHE TOLD A LOCAL TELEVISION STATION THAT LAND “SHOULD BE TRIED FOR TREASON WITH OBAMA” AND THAT HIS DECISION “SHOWED A TOTAL DISRESPECT FOR THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.”
HTTP://WWW.SALON.COM/2009/09/16/GA_DISMISSAL/

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#168287
Aug 20, 2013
 
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
He's scoffing, mocking you birthers, slug. At least he has a sense of humour. Not only do you not have any, you have no sense, period.
Saw that little caption on Biden where he makes a booboo in his speech and of course, the Nazi media swoop onto it. Sad. Sigh. It must suck so to be a birther birfoon buffoon, in other words, you.
<quoted text>
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =HWlSX9TT2eoXX
If you are the kind of rot that's on the inside, the outside looks pretty good. I'll stay there and continue commenting on losers like you.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#168288
Aug 20, 2013
 
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Frito Bandito wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, can you put water in your car and drive off? Iraq was a threat to the entire Persian Gulf. Just look at what just the threat of closing the Suez Canal does to the oil market!!!
Why did Saudi Arabia build an oil pipeline that goes through the Golan Heights and into Lebanon for? They were afraid that if the Persian Gulf was closed, or the Suez Canal, their oil could not be delivered.
And that is just one more reason why we should complete the Keystone Pipeline!!!
<quoted text>
There you go like a typical Libtard. Don't want to answer a question, run, dodge and jump over it. Anything but answer the question.
If you use petroleum in any matter, you are a flaming hypocrite. If you use electricity in any matter, you are a flaming hypocrite.
If you breath out carbon dioxide, you are a flaming hypocrite becasue you contribute to Global Warming!(your belief, not mine)
Answer this question, Rogue, and we'll see who does not answer questions and runs and dodges and jumps. Here goes : Keystone : How much of that dirty oil sands oil is going to U.S. markets and who stands to make a big buck on it all?
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#168290
Aug 20, 2013
 
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>LMAO! What difference does it make when it was issued? It should still look like a 50+ year old document, regardless! Twink thinks you can make an old document look new just by copying it! High res? LMAO!!!
Why would a document issued in 2007 look 50 years old? Only in Stupidville - the wrong side of the tracks on Birfistan.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#168291
Aug 20, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Answer this question, Rogue, and we'll see who does not answer questions and runs and dodges and jumps. Here goes : Keystone : How much of that dirty oil sands oil is going to U.S. markets and who stands to make a big buck on it all?
I don't know and I don't care. But it will enter the world market whether or not it is refined in the U.S. or some other place.
Now that I have answered YOUR question, answer mine. What make oil tar sands anymore dirty than any other crude oil? The last time you said it was "gooey" but gooey does not mean it is dirty.
Oh, if it was not for Canada's oil exports, Canada would become another third world country!

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#168292
Aug 20, 2013
 
The U.S. is only 4.5% of the world's population but contribute 22% of the World's GDP/
Learn to Read

Greenwood, IN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#168293
Aug 20, 2013
 
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>Say Twink, what date was that copy issued? Thank you, now be seated, Twink.
Gee. The date that the document was issued was VITAL when Romper was comparing Obama's COLB to a baseball scorecard. When comparing to another COLB .... Not so much

Poor ignorant puss. You get stupider by the minute

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#168294
Aug 20, 2013
 
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't know and I don't care. But it will enter the world market whether or not it is refined in the U.S. or some other place.
Now that I have answered YOUR question, answer mine. What make oil tar sands anymore dirty than any other crude oil? The last time you said it was "gooey" but gooey does not mean it is dirty.
Oh, if it was not for Canada's oil exports, Canada would become another third world country!
Easy. For starters, tail ponds.

www.albertasurfacerights.com/articles/... ;

About a dozen “ponds” rise 300 feet above the ground and cover 80 square miles ... Almost all the dikes in the tar sands are leaking, but the Alberta government ...

Damage to water table
Incredible emissions in the transformation of tard sands
Laying to waste millions of acres of good farm land or forests

Shall I go on?

Not one drop of Keystone Oil will be burned in the U.S. Who benefits please beside the oil multinationals?

I never said it was gooey. I don't talk like that.

Canada a third world country without its oil exports? If you think so. If you say so, it must be true. Incidentally, oil accounts for less than 7% of Canada's GDP.

See how quickly I answer questions? Now these following questions of mine have been asked and asked several times, Rogue, and they concern something you STATED, not guessed or reckoned or opined, no, STATED. So please supply proof right away that Russia and Germany plus the UN Security Council PLUS the UN General Assembly approved the invasion of Iraq. And, liar, don't tell me to prove they did not approve it. YOU stated it, now put up.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#168295
Aug 20, 2013
 
P.S.: re my above post number 168294 . So sorry, Rogue, the link works. What will your excuse be this time?
Grand Birther

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#168296
Aug 20, 2013
 
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
You do know that since Obama pulled our troops out of Iraq two years ago, it has gotten worse? But you don't care about anything that went bad that happened after Obama entered the White House.
LOL, Rogue Moron is still in denial about the status of forces agreement that Bush agreed to.
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#168298
Aug 20, 2013
 
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
Why would a document issued in 2007 look 50 years old? Only in Stupidville - the wrong side of the tracks on Birfistan.
Geez Twit, do you comprehend anything in daily life? It is supposed to be a copy of the original, get it yet? Keyword: ORIGINAL! LMAO! Why would his COLB have been issued in 2007? That would make him all of 6 years old. LMAO! Never let anyone tell you that dodo birds are extinct. You're living proof they're still around!
chair

Hanoi, Vietnam

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#168299
Aug 20, 2013
 
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#168300
Aug 20, 2013
 
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
Gee. The date that the document was issued was VITAL when Romper was comparing Obama's COLB to a baseball scorecard. When comparing to another COLB .... Not so much
Poor ignorant puss. You get stupider by the minute
LMAO! You're so confused on dates, you don't have a frickin' clue what I was talking about. LMAO! The other date was different because another extremely bright poster, such as yourself, thought I meant the person's DOB! That wasn't the date I was talking about. I was talking about the date the copy was issued which was the same time period as Obobblehead's DOB. Let me make it simple for ya. Shouldn't two copies of different COLBs, issued around the same time, look pretty similar? You can't make an original document suddenly appear on paper that wasn't even invented yet. All you would get is a copy of the ORIGINAL 50+ year old document. Are you picking up on any of this? I'm beginning to wonder if you know what a copy is. You're not pulling a Clinton move, are you? LMAO!
Slick Rick

Munster, IN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#168302
Aug 20, 2013
 
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't know and I don't care. But it will enter the world market whether or not it is refined in the U.S. or some other place.
Now that I have answered YOUR question, answer mine. What make oil tar sands anymore dirty than any other crude oil? The last time you said it was "gooey" but gooey does not mean it is dirty.
Oh, if it was not for Canada's oil exports, Canada would become another third world country!
I'm going to blast something "gooey" on your wifes chest.

“Arm the homeless!”

Since: Jul 12

The internet

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#168303
Aug 20, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Slick Rick wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm going to blast something "gooey" on your wifes chest.
Hopefully, you are referring to your grey matter after the fatal gunshot.

Who the hell talks like that?

“Arm the homeless!”

Since: Jul 12

The internet

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#168304
Aug 20, 2013
 
Primarily for Rouge...

I suggest you watch all of them.

You are going to love this guy!

Slick Rick

Munster, IN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#168306
Aug 20, 2013
 
Scrutiny wrote:
<quoted text>
Who the hell talks like that?
Ooooh oooooh ooooh I think I know.

Is the answer Slick Rick?

;-)

Since: May 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#168307
Aug 21, 2013
 
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't know and I don't care. But it will enter the world market whether or not it is refined in the U.S. or some other place.
Now that I have answered YOUR question, answer mine. What make oil tar sands anymore dirty than any other crude oil? The last time you said it was "gooey" but gooey does not mean it is dirty.
Oh, if it was not for Canada's oil exports, Canada would become another third world country!
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Easy. For starters, tail ponds.
www.albertasurfacerights.com/articles/... ;
About a dozen “ponds” rise 300 feet above the ground and cover 80 square miles ... Almost all the dikes in the tar sands are leaking, but the Alberta government ...
Damage to water table
Incredible emissions in the transformation of tard sands
Laying to waste millions of acres of good farm land or forests
Shall I go on?
Not one drop of Keystone Oil will be burned in the U.S. Who benefits please beside the oil multinationals?
I never said it was gooey. I don't talk like that.
Canada a third world country without its oil exports? If you think so. If you say so, it must be true. Incidentally, oil accounts for less than 7% of Canada's GDP.
See how quickly I answer questions? Now these following questions of mine have been asked and asked several times, Rogue, and they concern something you STATED, not guessed or reckoned or opined, no, STATED. So please supply proof right away that Russia and Germany plus the UN Security Council PLUS the UN General Assembly approved the invasion of Iraq. And, liar, don't tell me to prove they did not approve it. YOU stated it, now put up.
Yes, your link does work but who wrote it? Surface Rights Group, Alberta? I looked at their home page and they are anti-everything.
Are they factual? I don't know. Would you happen to have another source like from your federal government?
Good, oil contributes to 7% of you GDP but what does it contribute to your trade balance? Countries that import most or all of their oil are the poorest counties on this Earth.
Canada exported $98B worth of petroleum in 2011.
http://www.indexmundi.com/trade/exports/...
Out of a total exports of $457B.
http://www.statcan.gc.ca/tables-tableaux/sum-...
And that means oil made up 21.4% of Canada's exports in 2011 which is THREE times what YOU claimed.
And that also would have meant that that would have lead from a small negative import imbalance to an extremely large one if you did not export any petroleum and had to import 100% of your needs.
And yes, when I asked you what was so bad about tar sand petroleum you said it was "gooey"!
Now, prove that 100% of that oil, exported to the U.S., will be further exported out of the United States!

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Other Recent Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 3 min Toj 97,781
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 4 min fetch almighty 1,095,699
last post wins! (Apr '13) 10 min boundary painter 319
Song Titles Only (group/artist in parenthesis m... (Mar '10) 17 min boundary painter 7,733
Abby 8-21 26 min Toj 12
Amy 8-21 42 min Toj 8
Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 1 hr Frankie Rizzo 49,255

Search the Chicago Forum:
•••
•••

Chicago Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••