BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

Jan 8, 2009 Read more: Chicago Tribune 186,847
The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ... Read more

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#168307 Aug 21, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't know and I don't care. But it will enter the world market whether or not it is refined in the U.S. or some other place.
Now that I have answered YOUR question, answer mine. What make oil tar sands anymore dirty than any other crude oil? The last time you said it was "gooey" but gooey does not mean it is dirty.
Oh, if it was not for Canada's oil exports, Canada would become another third world country!
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Easy. For starters, tail ponds.
www.albertasurfacerights.com/articles/... ;
About a dozen “ponds” rise 300 feet above the ground and cover 80 square miles ... Almost all the dikes in the tar sands are leaking, but the Alberta government ...
Damage to water table
Incredible emissions in the transformation of tard sands
Laying to waste millions of acres of good farm land or forests
Shall I go on?
Not one drop of Keystone Oil will be burned in the U.S. Who benefits please beside the oil multinationals?
I never said it was gooey. I don't talk like that.
Canada a third world country without its oil exports? If you think so. If you say so, it must be true. Incidentally, oil accounts for less than 7% of Canada's GDP.
See how quickly I answer questions? Now these following questions of mine have been asked and asked several times, Rogue, and they concern something you STATED, not guessed or reckoned or opined, no, STATED. So please supply proof right away that Russia and Germany plus the UN Security Council PLUS the UN General Assembly approved the invasion of Iraq. And, liar, don't tell me to prove they did not approve it. YOU stated it, now put up.
Yes, your link does work but who wrote it? Surface Rights Group, Alberta? I looked at their home page and they are anti-everything.
Are they factual? I don't know. Would you happen to have another source like from your federal government?
Good, oil contributes to 7% of you GDP but what does it contribute to your trade balance? Countries that import most or all of their oil are the poorest counties on this Earth.
Canada exported $98B worth of petroleum in 2011.
http://www.indexmundi.com/trade/exports/...
Out of a total exports of $457B.
http://www.statcan.gc.ca/tables-tableaux/sum-...
And that means oil made up 21.4% of Canada's exports in 2011 which is THREE times what YOU claimed.
And that also would have meant that that would have lead from a small negative import imbalance to an extremely large one if you did not export any petroleum and had to import 100% of your needs.
And yes, when I asked you what was so bad about tar sand petroleum you said it was "gooey"!
Now, prove that 100% of that oil, exported to the U.S., will be further exported out of the United States!

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#168308 Aug 21, 2013
Obviously Jacqueau does not know how they recover oil from tar sands. First of all, what is tar sand? Tar sand is petroleum that has seeped to the surface and the lower grades have evaporated leaving the heavier elements, tar!
To recover this they use surface mining. They scoop in up and transport it to the mill which uses hot water to remove most of the petroleum from the sand and then the cleaned sand is returned to the mine. Yes, the sand is CLEANER when it is returned. They then separate the oil from the water, reheat the water and do it all over again.
Now where Jacqueau gets upset is that to refine the heavy oil into usable products you need to "crack" the heavy oil which in itself uses more energy to do so. But they would not do so unless it can be done ... economically. And the U.S. has some of the toughest environmental laws, as does Canada.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#168309 Aug 21, 2013
More edification to you Libtards. Why does West Texas LIGHT SWEET crude get a premium price as compared to HEAVY SOUR crude oil? MONEY!!!!
You see, "light" crude oil has more gasoline than does "heavy" crude oil which means, less money to refine.
Further more "sour" crude oil contains more sulfur which also costs more to refine and remove that sulfur. The old timers use to stick their finger in the crude oil and if it tasted sour they knew it was high in sulfur. Sulfur is crude oil is in the form of sulfuric acid which is .... sour. Lobe sulfur crude oil tastes sweet.
Yes, most petroleum is NOT toxic in small amounts. Just like if you eat to much salt, you will die. In fact mineral oil is used in the food production to lubricate machinery, like meat grinders, that process out food.
They even use mineral oil (not made from plants or animals) as a laxative!

Mineral oil is used to treat constipation. It is known as a lubricant laxative. It works by keeping water in the stool and intestines. This helps to soften the stool and also makes it easier for stool to pass through the intestines.
This medication should not be used in older adults, children younger than 6 years, or in people who are bedridden.
How to use Mineral Oil Laxative Oral
Take this medication by mouth as directed by your doctor. If you are self-treating, follow all directions on the product package. If you are uncertain about any of the information, ask your doctor or pharmacist.

Since: Oct 09

Moreno Valley, CA

#168310 Aug 21, 2013
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
Why would a document issued in 2007 look 50 years old? Only in Stupidville - the wrong side of the tracks on Birfistan.
Mr. Liars is in full birfer mode where it’s impossible for him to make any sense. He assumes a page that’s been in a binder for 50 years should look like his old cowboy boots he’s had resoled for the umpteenth time.

Of course Rafael’s BC looks on the up and up, but who the hell is Ted? LOL
http://www.cbsnews.com/htdocs/pdf/Ted_Cruz_Bi...

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#168311 Aug 21, 2013
Hummm, watch someone yell "racism" because the light-colored kid was charged with a less offence and not murder like the other two.

Teens charged after allegedly killing Australian student in Oklahoma for the 'fun of it'
Published August 21, 2013
FoxNews.com

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/08/21/police-s...
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#168312 Aug 21, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>Geez Twit, do you comprehend anything in daily life? It is supposed to be a copy of the original, get it yet? Keyword: ORIGINAL! LMAO! Why would his COLB have been issued in 2007? That would make him all of 6 years old. LMAO! Never let anyone tell you that dodo birds are extinct. You're living proof they're still around!
And the moron was whining because the paper looked new and crisp. Stupider and stupider

Since: Oct 09

Moreno Valley, CA

#168313 Aug 21, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
LMAO! You're so confused on dates, you don't have a frickin' clue what I was talking about. LMAO! The other date was different because another extremely bright poster, such as yourself, thought I meant the person's DOB! That wasn't the date I was talking about. I was talking about the date the copy was issued which was the same time period as Obobblehead's DOB. Let me make it simple for ya. Shouldn't two copies of different COLBs, issued around the same time, look pretty similar? You can't make an original document suddenly appear on paper that wasn't even invented yet. All you would get is a copy of the ORIGINAL 50+ year old document. Are you picking up on any of this? I'm beginning to wonder if you know what a copy is. You're not pulling a Clinton move, are you? LMAO!
It’s impossible to understand you Mr. Liars because you make no sense. The short form issued was a computer generated printout.(System computerized in 2001)

The long form was copied directly from the original birth document.(Direct manual copy)

The birth facts on both documents are exactly the same and have been verified, certified, signed, sealed and delivered.

The facts will never change no matter how much you cry foul Mr. Liars because that’s the nature of facts.

Old indeed! Perhaps you should see my copy of the 1931 Dracula.
wojar

Incheon, Korea

#168314 Aug 21, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
LMAO! What difference does it make when it was issued? It should still look like a 50+ year old document, regardless! Twink thinks you can make an old document look new just by copying it! High res? LMAO!!!
My LFBC that I ordered in 2002 has different background than the first certified copy that was issued. It also was stamped and signed by a different person. Birfoons cannot understand why.

Since: Oct 09

Moreno Valley, CA

#168315 Aug 21, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Hummm, watch someone yell "racism" because the light-colored kid was charged with a less offence and not murder like the other two.
Teens charged after allegedly killing Australian student in Oklahoma for the 'fun of it'
Published August 21, 2013
FoxNews.com
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/08/21/police-s...
The thread will note that you were the first Rogue.

The question however if the story is correctly told will be why and it will have nothing to do with how light his skin is.
wojar

Incheon, Korea

#168316 Aug 21, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
LMAO! You're so confused on dates, you don't have a frickin' clue what I was talking about. LMAO! The other date was different because another extremely bright poster, such as yourself, thought I meant the person's DOB! That wasn't the date I was talking about. I was talking about the date the copy was issued which was the same time period as Obobblehead's DOB. Let me make it simple for ya. Shouldn't two copies of different COLBs, issued around the same time, look pretty similar? You can't make an original document suddenly appear on paper that wasn't even invented yet. All you would get is a copy of the ORIGINAL 50+ year old document. Are you picking up on any of this? I'm beginning to wonder if you know what a copy is. You're not pulling a Clinton move, are you? LMAO!
Print a copy on 2012 security paper and you get a copy on 2012 paper. Pretty wild, eh?
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#168317 Aug 21, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>My LFBC that I ordered in 2002 has different background than the first certified copy that was issued. It also was stamped and signed by a different person. Birfoons cannot understand why.
Come to think of it. Indiana just issued me a new Driver's License. It looks much different than the first one that I was issued. Obviously I am the victim of fraud!
Fox News Propaganda

Sayville, NY

#168318 Aug 21, 2013
Scrutiny wrote:
Primarily for Rouge...
I suggest you watch all of them.
You are going to love this guy!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =eu1cjp3hYcgXX
Are you trying to give him more Ammo?

I know he is in need because he continuously shoots blanks.

LOL

----------

Christopher Monckton

http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php...
Fox News Propaganda

Sayville, NY

#168319 Aug 21, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Have you ever thought about developing our own petroleum supplies so we would not have to worry about the oil from other countries?
And yes, the oil in Iraq,,,,,, and Iran,,,, and Kuwait,,,,, and Saudi Arabia all belong to the citizens of those counties. I have no problem with that.
But think about it, if we did not spend hundreds of billions of American dollars to buy oil from outside our country, they would not have our dollars to buy war supplies! And people like YOU help them buy war supplies.
Are you telling me that Alternative Energy is the answer?

Solar Power?

Wind Power?

Clean, clean, and more clean?

Drill Baby Drill is always on the wrong side of history that is why Fox News hired her.

You Betcha!

LOL

----------

Who Killed the Electric Car? New Documentary Looks at the Mysterious Disappearance of the EV-1/ http://tinyurl.com/ysmbvn April 13th, 2007
General Motors has been at the center of one of the nation's largest controversies over clean emissions-cars. In 1996 the company introduced the EV-1 electric car in California and Arizona. Hundreds of the electric cars were soon on the road. Then they all disappeared. The mystery behind their disappearance is the subject of the documentary “Who Killed the Electric Car?” We’re joined by the film’s director Chris Paine, and Chelsea Sexton, a former GM employee who worked on the EV-1 electric car.
http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl...

GREASECAR VEGETABLE FUEL SYSTEMS
http://tinyurl.com/6th4e
http://www.greasecar.com

THE GAS-GUZZLER LOBBY STOPS TIME
Is There a Model-T in Your Future?
http://tinyurl.com/yob53q
http://www.ww4report.com/node/4158

Airline Uses Biofuel Blend to Power Jet
1.07.2009 / http://www.cfmaeroengines.com/
http://www.cfmaeroengines.com/press/continent...
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#168320 Aug 21, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>Print a copy on 2012 security paper and you get a copy on 2012 paper. Pretty wild, eh?
More of that fancy "new math" you eggheads use to confuse little 2nd Graders like Romper
Fox News Propaganda

Sayville, NY

#168321 Aug 21, 2013

Since: Oct 09

Moreno Valley, CA

#168322 Aug 21, 2013
Fox News Propaganda wrote:
<quoted text>
Are you trying to give him more Ammo?
I know he is in need because he continuously shoots blanks.
LOL
----------
Christopher Monckton
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php...
Lord Monckton:‘I’m no birther,’ but Obama birth certificate ‘plainly a forgery’
http://dailycaller.com/2012/03/22/lord-monckt...

He knows because Sherriff Joe said it’s so. LOL

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#168323 Aug 21, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Hummm, watch someone yell "racism" because the light-colored kid was charged with a less offence and not murder like the other two.
Teens charged after allegedly killing Australian student in Oklahoma for the 'fun of it'
Published August 21, 2013
FoxNews.com
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/08/21/police-s...
Where, how'd the teens get the gun? What about the near-disaster at this Oklahoma school yesterday where this nut barged in to the school with, get this, and AK-47. I checked. Anyone over 18 is allowed to have an AK-47. Hmmm, how nice. Wonder how he got his AK-47?
Fox News Propaganda

Sayville, NY

#168324 Aug 21, 2013
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#168325 Aug 21, 2013
Poppo wrote:
<quoted text>The thread will note that you were the first Rogue.

The question however if the story is correctly told will be why and it will have nothing to do with how light his skin is.
The tint of his skin will ALWAYS matter to Rouge. That and the phallus are his two obsessions

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#168326 Aug 21, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't know and I don't care. But it will enter the world market whether or not it is refined in the U.S. or some other place.
Now that I have answered YOUR question, answer mine. What make oil tar sands anymore dirty than any other crude oil? The last time you said it was "gooey" but gooey does not mean it is dirty.
Oh, if it was not for Canada's oil exports, Canada would become another third world country!
<quoted text>
Yes, your link does work but who wrote it? Surface Rights Group, Alberta? I looked at their home page and they are anti-everything.
Are they factual? I don't know. Would you happen to have another source like from your federal government?
Good, oil contributes to 7% of you GDP but what does it contribute to your trade balance? Countries that import most or all of their oil are the poorest counties on this Earth.
Canada exported $98B worth of petroleum in 2011.
http://www.indexmundi.com/trade/exports/...
Out of a total exports of $457B.
http://www.statcan.gc.ca/tables-tableaux/sum-...
And that means oil made up 21.4% of Canada's exports in 2011 which is THREE times what YOU claimed.
And that also would have meant that that would have lead from a small negative import imbalance to an extremely large one if you did not export any petroleum and had to import 100% of your needs.
And yes, when I asked you what was so bad about tar sand petroleum you said it was "gooey"!
Now, prove that 100% of that oil, exported to the U.S., will be further exported out of the United States!
Full of holes is what your post is. But then what else is new? Read this :

www.cbc.ca/news/business/story/2012/01/25/pol...

(if link does not work, read this : I did not make it up):

Canada imports oil while battling over pipeline exports

CBC News

Posted: Jan 25, 2012 6:26 PM ET

Last Updated: Jan 25, 2012 8:34 PM ET

Play VideoCanada is one of the largest oil producers in the world but a complex business model means most oil used by Canadians comes from other countries Slick oil business2:21

Related Links
MAP | Canada's main pipeline networkNorthern Gateway pipeline: benefits vs. concerns TRANSCRIPT | Peter Mansbridge talks with Stephen Harper Radicals working against oil sands , Ottawa says LISTEN: The Current: Northen Gateway Pipeline

But the debates have also focused attention on how Canada uses the oil that it has.

Canada exports about two-thirds of its oil to the United States— while half of the oil used in Canada is imported from other countries.

Western Canada is self-sufficient, supplying its own oil before exporting the rest. But Eastern Canada relies on imported oil — despite the fact that some provinces are oil producers.

There are several offshore drilling operations in Newfoundland and Labrador, but none of the oil is actually used in Canada. The eastern provinces rely on an oil supply that's imported from Saudi Arabia, Africa and Venezuela.

So, Rogue, do your Canadian oil export figures include our import? Did you check it out? Is that a gross or net figure? Did you factor the imports of oil?

As to my link being biased, well, is saying Hitler was a criminal make me a biased Hitler hater?

1) do you deny that water tables are poisoned?
2) do you deny that tail ponds are deadly and not recyclable?
3) do you deny that huge amounts of HEATED water (how do you heat it?) are used to clean the sands - sands are returned clean as you state, but what about the water?
4) do you deny that the landscape is ravaged?
5) do you deny the noxious fumes emanating from the transformation of tar sands?
6) do you deny the environmental impact of burst pipelines carrying heavy oil tar sands? Have they lately happened? YES.

I never called the oil gooey. I don't write like that.

...2

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 10 min Mothra 52,695
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 10 min Major Payne 1,216,607
News Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 1 hr Cold Front 69,602
News From the scene of downtown shooting: 'It looked... 6 hr reality is a crutch 1
News Messianic Jews say they are persecuted in Israel (Jun '08) 6 hr timmy 71,939
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 10 hr curiousity 99,353
News 3 accused of murder in 2012 shooting 11 hr reality is a crutch 1
More from around the web

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]