BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit ...

BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

There are 191794 comments on the Chicago Tribune story from Jan 8, 2009, titled BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen.... In it, Chicago Tribune reports that:

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chicago Tribune.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#168291 Aug 20, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Answer this question, Rogue, and we'll see who does not answer questions and runs and dodges and jumps. Here goes : Keystone : How much of that dirty oil sands oil is going to U.S. markets and who stands to make a big buck on it all?
I don't know and I don't care. But it will enter the world market whether or not it is refined in the U.S. or some other place.
Now that I have answered YOUR question, answer mine. What make oil tar sands anymore dirty than any other crude oil? The last time you said it was "gooey" but gooey does not mean it is dirty.
Oh, if it was not for Canada's oil exports, Canada would become another third world country!

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#168292 Aug 20, 2013
The U.S. is only 4.5% of the world's population but contribute 22% of the World's GDP/
Learn to Read

Greenwood, IN

#168293 Aug 20, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>Say Twink, what date was that copy issued? Thank you, now be seated, Twink.
Gee. The date that the document was issued was VITAL when Romper was comparing Obama's COLB to a baseball scorecard. When comparing to another COLB .... Not so much

Poor ignorant puss. You get stupider by the minute

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#168294 Aug 20, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't know and I don't care. But it will enter the world market whether or not it is refined in the U.S. or some other place.
Now that I have answered YOUR question, answer mine. What make oil tar sands anymore dirty than any other crude oil? The last time you said it was "gooey" but gooey does not mean it is dirty.
Oh, if it was not for Canada's oil exports, Canada would become another third world country!
Easy. For starters, tail ponds.

www.albertasurfacerights.com/articles/... ;

About a dozen ďpondsĒ rise 300 feet above the ground and cover 80 square miles ... Almost all the dikes in the tar sands are leaking, but the Alberta government ...

Damage to water table
Incredible emissions in the transformation of tard sands
Laying to waste millions of acres of good farm land or forests

Shall I go on?

Not one drop of Keystone Oil will be burned in the U.S. Who benefits please beside the oil multinationals?

I never said it was gooey. I don't talk like that.

Canada a third world country without its oil exports? If you think so. If you say so, it must be true. Incidentally, oil accounts for less than 7% of Canada's GDP.

See how quickly I answer questions? Now these following questions of mine have been asked and asked several times, Rogue, and they concern something you STATED, not guessed or reckoned or opined, no, STATED. So please supply proof right away that Russia and Germany plus the UN Security Council PLUS the UN General Assembly approved the invasion of Iraq. And, liar, don't tell me to prove they did not approve it. YOU stated it, now put up.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#168295 Aug 20, 2013
P.S.: re my above post number 168294 . So sorry, Rogue, the link works. What will your excuse be this time?
Grand Birther

United States

#168296 Aug 20, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
You do know that since Obama pulled our troops out of Iraq two years ago, it has gotten worse? But you don't care about anything that went bad that happened after Obama entered the White House.
LOL, Rogue Moron is still in denial about the status of forces agreement that Bush agreed to.
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#168298 Aug 20, 2013
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
Why would a document issued in 2007 look 50 years old? Only in Stupidville - the wrong side of the tracks on Birfistan.
Geez Twit, do you comprehend anything in daily life? It is supposed to be a copy of the original, get it yet? Keyword: ORIGINAL! LMAO! Why would his COLB have been issued in 2007? That would make him all of 6 years old. LMAO! Never let anyone tell you that dodo birds are extinct. You're living proof they're still around!
chair

Hanoi, Vietnam

#168299 Aug 20, 2013
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#168300 Aug 20, 2013
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
Gee. The date that the document was issued was VITAL when Romper was comparing Obama's COLB to a baseball scorecard. When comparing to another COLB .... Not so much
Poor ignorant puss. You get stupider by the minute
LMAO! You're so confused on dates, you don't have a frickin' clue what I was talking about. LMAO! The other date was different because another extremely bright poster, such as yourself, thought I meant the person's DOB! That wasn't the date I was talking about. I was talking about the date the copy was issued which was the same time period as Obobblehead's DOB. Let me make it simple for ya. Shouldn't two copies of different COLBs, issued around the same time, look pretty similar? You can't make an original document suddenly appear on paper that wasn't even invented yet. All you would get is a copy of the ORIGINAL 50+ year old document. Are you picking up on any of this? I'm beginning to wonder if you know what a copy is. You're not pulling a Clinton move, are you? LMAO!
Slick Rick

Munster, IN

#168302 Aug 20, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't know and I don't care. But it will enter the world market whether or not it is refined in the U.S. or some other place.
Now that I have answered YOUR question, answer mine. What make oil tar sands anymore dirty than any other crude oil? The last time you said it was "gooey" but gooey does not mean it is dirty.
Oh, if it was not for Canada's oil exports, Canada would become another third world country!
I'm going to blast something "gooey" on your wifes chest.

“Arm the homeless!”

Since: Jul 12

The internet

#168303 Aug 20, 2013
Slick Rick wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm going to blast something "gooey" on your wifes chest.
Hopefully, you are referring to your grey matter after the fatal gunshot.

Who the hell talks like that?

“Arm the homeless!”

Since: Jul 12

The internet

#168304 Aug 20, 2013
Primarily for Rouge...

I suggest you watch all of them.

You are going to love this guy!

Slick Rick

Munster, IN

#168306 Aug 20, 2013
Scrutiny wrote:
<quoted text>
Who the hell talks like that?
Ooooh oooooh ooooh I think I know.

Is the answer Slick Rick?

;-)

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#168307 Aug 21, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't know and I don't care. But it will enter the world market whether or not it is refined in the U.S. or some other place.
Now that I have answered YOUR question, answer mine. What make oil tar sands anymore dirty than any other crude oil? The last time you said it was "gooey" but gooey does not mean it is dirty.
Oh, if it was not for Canada's oil exports, Canada would become another third world country!
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Easy. For starters, tail ponds.
www.albertasurfacerights.com/articles/... ;
About a dozen ďpondsĒ rise 300 feet above the ground and cover 80 square miles ... Almost all the dikes in the tar sands are leaking, but the Alberta government ...
Damage to water table
Incredible emissions in the transformation of tard sands
Laying to waste millions of acres of good farm land or forests
Shall I go on?
Not one drop of Keystone Oil will be burned in the U.S. Who benefits please beside the oil multinationals?
I never said it was gooey. I don't talk like that.
Canada a third world country without its oil exports? If you think so. If you say so, it must be true. Incidentally, oil accounts for less than 7% of Canada's GDP.
See how quickly I answer questions? Now these following questions of mine have been asked and asked several times, Rogue, and they concern something you STATED, not guessed or reckoned or opined, no, STATED. So please supply proof right away that Russia and Germany plus the UN Security Council PLUS the UN General Assembly approved the invasion of Iraq. And, liar, don't tell me to prove they did not approve it. YOU stated it, now put up.
Yes, your link does work but who wrote it? Surface Rights Group, Alberta? I looked at their home page and they are anti-everything.
Are they factual? I don't know. Would you happen to have another source like from your federal government?
Good, oil contributes to 7% of you GDP but what does it contribute to your trade balance? Countries that import most or all of their oil are the poorest counties on this Earth.
Canada exported $98B worth of petroleum in 2011.
http://www.indexmundi.com/trade/exports/...
Out of a total exports of $457B.
http://www.statcan.gc.ca/tables-tableaux/sum-...
And that means oil made up 21.4% of Canada's exports in 2011 which is THREE times what YOU claimed.
And that also would have meant that that would have lead from a small negative import imbalance to an extremely large one if you did not export any petroleum and had to import 100% of your needs.
And yes, when I asked you what was so bad about tar sand petroleum you said it was "gooey"!
Now, prove that 100% of that oil, exported to the U.S., will be further exported out of the United States!

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#168308 Aug 21, 2013
Obviously Jacqueau does not know how they recover oil from tar sands. First of all, what is tar sand? Tar sand is petroleum that has seeped to the surface and the lower grades have evaporated leaving the heavier elements, tar!
To recover this they use surface mining. They scoop in up and transport it to the mill which uses hot water to remove most of the petroleum from the sand and then the cleaned sand is returned to the mine. Yes, the sand is CLEANER when it is returned. They then separate the oil from the water, reheat the water and do it all over again.
Now where Jacqueau gets upset is that to refine the heavy oil into usable products you need to "crack" the heavy oil which in itself uses more energy to do so. But they would not do so unless it can be done ... economically. And the U.S. has some of the toughest environmental laws, as does Canada.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#168309 Aug 21, 2013
More edification to you Libtards. Why does West Texas LIGHT SWEET crude get a premium price as compared to HEAVY SOUR crude oil? MONEY!!!!
You see, "light" crude oil has more gasoline than does "heavy" crude oil which means, less money to refine.
Further more "sour" crude oil contains more sulfur which also costs more to refine and remove that sulfur. The old timers use to stick their finger in the crude oil and if it tasted sour they knew it was high in sulfur. Sulfur is crude oil is in the form of sulfuric acid which is .... sour. Lobe sulfur crude oil tastes sweet.
Yes, most petroleum is NOT toxic in small amounts. Just like if you eat to much salt, you will die. In fact mineral oil is used in the food production to lubricate machinery, like meat grinders, that process out food.
They even use mineral oil (not made from plants or animals) as a laxative!

Mineral oil is used to treat constipation. It is known as a lubricant laxative. It works by keeping water in the stool and intestines. This helps to soften the stool and also makes it easier for stool to pass through the intestines.
This medication should not be used in older adults, children younger than 6 years, or in people who are bedridden.
How to use Mineral Oil Laxative Oral
Take this medication by mouth as directed by your doctor. If you are self-treating, follow all directions on the product package. If you are uncertain about any of the information, ask your doctor or pharmacist.

Since: Oct 09

Moreno Valley, CA

#168310 Aug 21, 2013
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
Why would a document issued in 2007 look 50 years old? Only in Stupidville - the wrong side of the tracks on Birfistan.
Mr. Liars is in full birfer mode where itís impossible for him to make any sense. He assumes a page thatís been in a binder for 50 years should look like his old cowboy boots heís had resoled for the umpteenth time.

Of course Rafaelís BC looks on the up and up, but who the hell is Ted? LOL
http://www.cbsnews.com/htdocs/pdf/Ted_Cruz_Bi...

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#168311 Aug 21, 2013
Hummm, watch someone yell "racism" because the light-colored kid was charged with a less offence and not murder like the other two.

Teens charged after allegedly killing Australian student in Oklahoma for the 'fun of it'
Published August 21, 2013
FoxNews.com

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/08/21/police-s...
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#168312 Aug 21, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>Geez Twit, do you comprehend anything in daily life? It is supposed to be a copy of the original, get it yet? Keyword: ORIGINAL! LMAO! Why would his COLB have been issued in 2007? That would make him all of 6 years old. LMAO! Never let anyone tell you that dodo birds are extinct. You're living proof they're still around!
And the moron was whining because the paper looked new and crisp. Stupider and stupider

Since: Oct 09

Moreno Valley, CA

#168313 Aug 21, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
LMAO! You're so confused on dates, you don't have a frickin' clue what I was talking about. LMAO! The other date was different because another extremely bright poster, such as yourself, thought I meant the person's DOB! That wasn't the date I was talking about. I was talking about the date the copy was issued which was the same time period as Obobblehead's DOB. Let me make it simple for ya. Shouldn't two copies of different COLBs, issued around the same time, look pretty similar? You can't make an original document suddenly appear on paper that wasn't even invented yet. All you would get is a copy of the ORIGINAL 50+ year old document. Are you picking up on any of this? I'm beginning to wonder if you know what a copy is. You're not pulling a Clinton move, are you? LMAO!
Itís impossible to understand you Mr. Liars because you make no sense. The short form issued was a computer generated printout.(System computerized in 2001)

The long form was copied directly from the original birth document.(Direct manual copy)

The birth facts on both documents are exactly the same and have been verified, certified, signed, sealed and delivered.

The facts will never change no matter how much you cry foul Mr. Liars because thatís the nature of facts.

Old indeed! Perhaps you should see my copy of the 1931 Dracula.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 4 min THE DEVIL 1,249,918
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 20 min Earthling-1 53,891
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 1 hr White_Lightning 6,131
Word (Dec '08) 1 hr White_Lightning 5,317
News Should we really be OK with the surgical remova... 2 hr Snip Snip Snip 65
Even U-locks aren't safe anymore to lock bicycl... 4 hr Observer 2
Ya gotta listen to the BIG TRUTH. 5 hr Someone U Know 1
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 14 hr Sublime1 99,856
More from around the web

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages