BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit ...

BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

There are 190161 comments on the Chicago Tribune story from Jan 8, 2009, titled BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen.... In it, Chicago Tribune reports that:

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chicago Tribune.

Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#168221 Aug 20, 2013
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
So sparky. Want to actually say something or just going to blather? How is it you fantasize his us sooooooo different?
Poor pathetic puss boi pasting web links with no clue
If you can't see the difference, you're every bit as stupid as I thought.
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#168222 Aug 20, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Dufus Dale was duly appointed Justice Dale by Justice ha ha LRS, aka Justice ho ho Dale.
Congratulations Path! You are now 0 - 300!

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#168224 Aug 20, 2013
Businessman Kills Five Robbers in Four Separate Incidents
Written by Gary North on August 20, 2013

Five robbers made bad decisions. They decided to rob this man’s watch repair shop. They came in armed. They went out feet first.
One of them was wearing a pair of Nike shoes. Nike was the name of a Greek Olympic god. It means victory. The shoes did the wearer no good. He lost.
The Discovery Channel did a segment on him.


Read more at http://teapartyeconomist.com/2013/08/20/busin...
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#168226 Aug 20, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>If you can't see the difference, you're every bit as stupid as I thought.
One pic is a high res photo. One pic on your latest and greatest paste is a bad copy of a scan. The fact that you don't even pretend that you can name one significant difference between your new "real COLB" and Obama's COLB speaks volumes.

Blather on Birfoon full of stupid

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#168227 Aug 20, 2013
nebka wrote:
In that circumstance, sea level could be expected to rise as little as 10 inches by the end of the century, the report found. That is a bit more than the eight-inch increase in the 20th century, which proved manageable even though it caused severe erosion along the world’s shorelines.
At the other extreme, the report considers a chain of events in which emissions continue to increase at a swift pace. Under those conditions, sea level could be expected to rise at least 21 inches by 2100 and might increase a bit more than three feet, the draft report said.
Hundreds of millions of people live near sea level, and either figure would represent a challenge for humanity, scientists say. But a three-foot rise in particular would endanger many of the world’s great cities — among them New York; London; Shanghai; Venice; Sydney, Australia; Miami; and New Orleans.
http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/20/science/ear...
The only problem is that we have been in Global Cooling for about fifteen years now and will be for another 20-50 years!

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#168228 Aug 20, 2013
nebka wrote:
Warming the entire planet by 5 degrees Fahrenheit would add a stupendous amount of energy to the climate system. Scientists say the increase would be greater over land and might exceed 10 degrees at the poles.
They add that such an increase would lead to widespread melting of land ice, extreme heat waves, difficulty growing food and massive changes in plant and animal life, probably including a wave of extinctions.
The new document is not final and will not become so until an intensive, closed-door negotiating session among scientists and government leaders in Stockholm in late September. But if the past is any guide, most of the core findings of the document will survive that final review.
The document was leaked over the weekend after it was sent to a large group of people who had signed up to review it. It was first reported on in detail by the Reuters news agency, and The New York Times obtained a copy independently to verify its contents.
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change does no original research, but instead periodically assesses and summarizes the published scientific literature on climate change.
The draft document “is likely to change in response to comments from governments received in recent weeks and will also be considered by governments and scientists at a four-day approval session at the end of September,” the panel’s spokesman, Jonathan Lynn, said in a statement Monday.“It is therefore premature and could be misleading to attempt to draw conclusions from it.”
After winning the Nobel Peace Prize six years ago, the group became a political target for climate doubters, who helped identify minor errors in the 2007 report. This time, the panel adopted rigorous procedures in the hope of preventing such mistakes.
Some climate doubters challenge the idea that the earth is warming at all; others concede that it is, but deny human responsibility; still others acknowledge a human role, but assert that the warming is likely to be limited and the impacts manageable. Every major scientific academy in the world has warned that global warming is a serious problem.
The panel shifted to a wider range for the potential warming, dropping the plausible low end to 2.7 degrees, after a wave of recent studies saying higher estimates were unlikely. But those studies are contested, and scientists at Stockholm are likely to debate whether to stick with that language.
Michael E. Mann, a climate scientist at Pennsylvania State University, said he feared the intergovernmental panel, in writing its draft, had been influenced by criticism from climate doubters, who advocate even lower numbers.“I think the I.P.C.C. on this point has once again erred on the side of understating the degree of the likely changes,” Dr. Mann said.
However, Christopher B. Field, a researcher at the Carnegie Institution for Science who serves on the panel but was not directly involved in the new draft, said the group had to reflect the full range of plausible scientific views.
“I think that the I.P.C.C. has a tradition of being very conservative,” Dr. Field said.“They really want the story to be right.”
Regarding the likely rise in sea level over the coming century, the new report lays out several possibilities. In the most optimistic, the world’s governments would prove far more successful at getting emissions under control than they have been in the recent past, helping to limit the total warming.
In that circumstance, sea level could be expected to rise as little as 10 inches by the end of the century, the report found. That is a bit more than the eight-inch increase in the 20th century, which proved manageable even though it caused severe erosion along the world’s shorelines.
The only problem is that the Earth has cooled to the same level it was in the 1950s and the sea levels are going down. Remember Obama saved the Earth and now it is healing!
Frank

Spokane, WA

#168229 Aug 20, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
So you're saying it's okay for Cruz, your family and sundry but not Obama. Oh well.
Obama has never had allegiance to the United States. He was born the son of a Kenyan British Subject and has had allegiance to Indonesia,but thru words and deeds has never done any thing to show that he cares about our flag,our country,or The Constitution. Every thing he has ever done has been done with the express intention of destroying our country.
Forum

Carlsbad, NM

#168230 Aug 20, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Businessman Kills Five Robbers in Four Separate Incidents
Written by Gary North on August 20, 2013
Five robbers made bad decisions. They decided to rob this man’s watch repair shop. They came in armed. They went out feet first.?
One of them was wearing a pair of Nike shoes. Nike was the name of a Greek Olympic god. It means victory. The shoes did the wearer no good. He lost.
The Discovery Channel did a segment on him.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =pkWgp2abM2wXX
Read more at http://teapartyeconomist.com/2013/08/20/busin...
Who cares?

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#168231 Aug 20, 2013
Hey Nebka, you do know that your friend, Dr. James Hansen, use to claim in 1971 that we will be in another Little Ice age in 50-60 years. Well 50-60 after 1971 is .... 2021-31 which is not that far off from now, now!

NASA Scientists Predicted a New Ice Age in 1971
By Noel Sheppard | September 19, 2007 |

This seems destined to be ignored by today's climate change obsessed media: Scientists from NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies - the very organization now presaging gloom and doom at the hands of global warming - predicted a new ice age back in 1971.

Think this will be a focus of tonight's evening news broadcasts?

Regardless of the answer, the Washington Times wonderfully reported Wednesday (emphasis added throughout, h/t Marc Morano):

NASA scientist James E. Hansen, who has publicly criticized the Bush administration for dragging its feet on climate change and labeled skeptics of man-made global warming as distracting "court jesters," appears in a 1971 Washington Post article that warns of an impending ice age within 50 years.
The Post archives do indeed identify the existence of such a piece, with the following preview:

The world could be as little as 50 or 60 years away from a disastrous new ice age, a leading atmospheric scientist predicts. Dr. S. I. Rasool of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration and Columbia University says that...
The Times piece continued:

The scientist was S.I. Rasool, a colleague of Mr. Hansen's at the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. The article goes on to say that Mr. Rasool came to his chilling conclusions by resorting in part to a new computer program developed by Mr. Hansen that studied clouds above Venus.
The 1971 article, discovered this week by Washington resident John Lockwood while he was conducting related research at the Library of Congress, says that "in the next 50 years" - or by 2021 - fossil-fuel dust injected by man into the atmosphere "could screen out so much sunlight that the average temperature could drop by six degrees," resulting in a buildup of "new glaciers that could eventually cover huge areas."
It turns out the Post was referring specifically to an article published at the journal Science that day, which was written by Rasool and S. H. Schneider.

Science archives identified the following abstract of the piece entitled "Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide and Aerosols: Effects of Large Increases on Global Climate," and indicated the authors were from "Institute for Space Studies, Goddard Space Flight Center, National Aeronautics and Space Administration" (emphasis added):

Effects on the global temperature of large increases in carbon dioxide and aerosol densities in the atmosphere of Earth have been computed. It is found that, although the addition of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere does increase the surface temperature, the rate of temperature increase diminishes with increasing carbon dioxide in the atmosphere. For aerosols, however, the net effect of increase in density is to reduce the surface temperature of Earth. Because of the exponential dependence of the backscattering, the rate of temperature decrease is augmented with increasing aerosol content. An increase by only a factor of 4 in global aerosol background concentration may be sufficient to reduce the surface temperature by as much as 3.5 ° K. If sustained over a period of several years, such a temperature decrease over the whole globe is believed to be sufficient to trigger an ice age.
How marvelous. Yet, 36 years later, this same organization is predicting a planetary cataclysm at the hands of global warming.

Which one of this agency's warnings should we heed?

Read more: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/noel-sheppard/20...

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#168232 Aug 20, 2013
Isn't that a hoot that the same Global Warming alarmist, Dr. James Hansen, use to think we were heading for another Little Ice Age. Ya know, there are people who make a living off of scaring Libtards. Just look at Owl Gore and how much money he has made since he left the White House in 2001 off of scaring the Idiotards into think we were in Global Warming.
And the Idiotards have not figured out why they changed the name from Global Warming to Climate Change in 2007!!! They did it because the real scientists know that the Sun was switching from a hot cycle to a cool cycle and the Climate would Change to a cooling trend!
Frank

Spokane, WA

#168233 Aug 20, 2013
Poppo wrote:
<quoted text>
No need to explain Frank. Rafael Cruz can have Cuban, Canadian and US citizenship just so long as he’s not black. The two citizen parent rule has been abolished in birfistand, a long form BC is no longer required and the birfoon favorite can be born anywhere in the world. I get it Frank. Always have.
Cruz's father no longer has allegiance to Cuba,he immigrated to the United States. Obama's father never immigrated to the United States,he still held allegiance only to Kenya until his 1982 death in Kenya. Why is this statement so confusing to you?

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#168234 Aug 20, 2013
What is funny is that Libtards believe that Dr. James Hansen was some sort of weather scientist when in fact he is a mathematician.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:NasaHansenF...

...On July 9, 1971, the Post published a story headlined "U.S. Scientist Sees New Ice Age Coming." It told of a prediction by NASA and Columbia University scientist S.I. Rasool. The culprit: man's use of fossil fuels.
The Post reported that Rasool, writing in Science, argued that in "the next 50 years" fine dust that humans discharge into the atmosphere by burning fossil fuel will screen out so much of the sun's rays that the Earth's average temperature could fall by six degrees.

Sustained emissions over five to 10 years, Rasool claimed, "could be sufficient to trigger an ice age."

Aiding Rasool's research, the Post reported, was a "computer program developed by Dr. James Hansen," who was, according to his resume, a Columbia University research associate at the time...
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#168235 Aug 20, 2013
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
One pic is a high res photo. One pic on your latest and greatest paste is a bad copy of a scan. The fact that you don't even pretend that you can name one significant difference between your new "real COLB" and Obama's COLB speaks volumes.
Blather on Birfoon full of stupid
You really are dense, aren't you? Dumber than dirt. High Res??? LMAO! Does Obobblehead's COLB look like a copy of a 50+ year old document, you know, like the other two on the page? Not even close. Why not? What was "pasted" other than the link itself? Differences? Certificate # for one. It's dumbazzes like you that are responsible for where this country is right now. Now, why don't you spout off a list of Obobblehead's major achievements as president? This should be some really good humor! megaidiot
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#168236 Aug 20, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>You really are dense, aren't you? Dumber than dirt. High Res??? LMAO! Does Obobblehead's COLB look like a copy of a 50+ year old document, you know, like the other two on the page? Not even close. Why not? What was "pasted" other than the link itself? Differences? Certificate # for one. It's dumbazzes like you that are responsible for where this country is right now. Now, why don't you spout off a list of Obobblehead's major achievements as president? This should be some really good humor! megaidiot
And the moron whines because the cert number on the bad copy of the scan is blacked out. Of course this doesn't mean that Obama's COLB doesn't have a cert number - it just means that Romper's joke web site didn't want to compare the "real COLB" to a readily available high res photo (well several actually) of Obama's COLB

http://www.factcheck.org/2008/08/born-in-the-...

Well what do you know! Cert number, raised seal .... Looks just like Romper's "real COLB". I can certainly understand why bigotsrus.com wouldn't acknowledge such an obvious fact - it doesn't fit well with uber-stupid fables
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#168237 Aug 20, 2013
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
And the moron whines because the cert number on the bad copy of the scan is blacked out. Of course this doesn't mean that Obama's COLB doesn't have a cert number - it just means that Romper's joke web site didn't want to compare the "real COLB" to a readily available high res photo (well several actually) of Obama's COLB
http://www.factcheck.org/2008/08/born-in-the-...
Well what do you know! Cert number, raised seal .... Looks just like Romper's "real COLB". I can certainly understand why bigotsrus.com wouldn't acknowledge such an obvious fact - it doesn't fit well with uber-stupid fables
Yea, it only took them about four or five attempts to come up with something that looked somewhat correct. LMAO! You're not bright enough to know when you're being conned and lied to. That's what you call stupid, twink. BTW, there is no cure for stupid! MEGAidiot
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#168238 Aug 20, 2013
The genius of Lewis Black:

"The Democrats are dumb and the Republicans are stupid. The difference between dumb and stupid is dumb isn't funny," Black said. "Stupid is seriously funny."

http://politi.co/155hcr8

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#168239 Aug 20, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
You really are dense, aren't you? Dumber than dirt. High Res??? LMAO! Does Obobblehead's COLB look like a copy of a 50+ year old document, you know, like the other two on the page? Not even close. Why not? What was "pasted" other than the link itself? Differences? Certificate # for one. It's dumbazzes like you that are responsible for where this country is right now. Now, why don't you spout off a list of Obobblehead's major achievements as president? This should be some really good humor! megaidiot
Now, look very carefully at the document that is on that site. Where is the seal? Where is the authenticating signature? Again, that is not a copy of any document, it is an original "fraudulent" document.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#168240 Aug 20, 2013
Learn to Read wrote:
The genius of Lewis Black:
"The Democrats are dumb and the Republicans are stupid. The difference between dumb and stupid is dumb isn't funny," Black said. "Stupid is seriously funny."
http://politi.co/155hcr8
Well Ted Crews will never be as funny as Bill "I did not have sex with that woman" Clinton. Nor as funny as Hillary "I did not have sex with Bill" Clinton.
Hey, did you hear that Chelsea's cat Socks died? It froze to death on Hillary's lap. That is one might cold poocy and we ain't talkin' about the damn cat either.
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#168241 Aug 20, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>Yea, it only took them about four or five attempts to come up with something that looked somewhat correct. LMAO! You're not bright enough to know when you're being conned and lied to. That's what you call stupid, twink. BTW, there is no cure for stupid! MEGAidiot
4 or 5 attempts? Published in 2008. Long before bigotsrus.com decided to publish their comparison of a high res photi to a bad copy of a scan

I am bright enough to know an ignorant puss when I see one - you might as well wear a sign board

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#168243 Aug 20, 2013
Did you hear about Hillary planning Chelsea's wedding? Hillary went to Bill and said, "Bill, I am doing all the planning. You just need to stay on the couch and write the checks."
And Bill replied, "Okay Hill, but I need to be more involved. Oh, I know. I can plan the bachelor party!"

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 8 min A duck 1,234,093
amy 5-28 57 min Kuuipo 12
Abby 5-28 1 hr Mister Tonka 11
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 4 hr those who can- teach 99,568
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 4 hr IB DaMann 53,489
any cute emo girls wana talk? 6 hr kay 2
News Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 7 hr TRD 70,035
More from around the web

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]