BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit ...

BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

There are 239501 comments on the Chicago Tribune story from Jan 8, 2009, titled BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen.... In it, Chicago Tribune reports that:

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chicago Tribune.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#166675 Aug 6, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Here is another group of Libtards. Hey guys, it is an Aircraft Carrier, not a "flat-top destroyer"!!!
Sure it is to small for conventional jet fighter planes to operate off of but it is the size of WWII AIRCRAFT CARRIERS!!!
Liberals think if they call it something different, it will become what they call it. Like the Affordable Care Act which is anything but affordable!!!
Japan unveils largest warship since World War II
Eric Talmadge, Associated Press 6 hours ago
YOKOHAMA, Japan (AP)-- Japan on Tuesday unveiled its biggest warship since World War II, a huge flat-top destroyer that has raised eyebrows in China and elsewhere because it bears a strong resemblance to a conventional aircraft carrier.
The ship, which has a flight deck that is nearly 250 meters (820 feet) long, is designed to carry up to 14 helicopters. Japanese officials say it will be used in national defense particularly in anti-submarine warfare and border-area surveillance missions and to bolster the nation's ability to transport personnel and supplies in response to large-scale natural disasters, like the devastating earthquake and tsunami in 2011.
Though the ship dubbed "Izumo" has been in the works since 2009, its unveiling comes as Japan and China are locked in a dispute over several small islands located between southern Japan and Taiwan. For months, ships from both countries have been conducting patrols around the isles, called the Senkaku in Japan and the Diaoyutai in China.
http://news.yahoo.com/japan-unveils-largest-w...
Again you reveal your total ignorance of things political, treaties, things foreign and "language".

Japan pledged not to develop anything but a domestic military after WWII. This they did on their own volition.

Things are heating up now in Asia and many surrounding countries are staking claims on oil and mineral rights that Japan also covets. Add North Korea as a menace. As it cannot truly re-arm, Japan has increased its squadrons of F-15s, foir example, patrol aircraft, etc, claiming they need more for the country's protection. Now it's an aircraft carrier called a flat top destroyer. The Japanese know darn well the difference between a carrier and a destroyer. But they are calling it that so as not to be accused of building and floating an aircraft carrier which otherwise would clearly violate its pledge on re-armament. I believe that article is also enshrined in their Constitution which was approved by Gen McArthur and President Truman.

Stay out of foreign politics, Rogue, not your bag. Come to think of it, neither is US politics for that matter LMAO (LRS tm reg'd).

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#166676 Aug 6, 2013
You see, even monkeys know when it is not fair. And you expect people to work hard so Obama can give your money to some lazy azzed monkey!

Two Monkeys Were Paid Unequally: Excerpt from Frans de Waal'
#at=120

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#166677 Aug 6, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Here is another group of Libtards. Hey guys, it is an Aircraft Carrier, not a "flat-top destroyer"!!!
Sure it is to small for conventional jet fighter planes to operate off of but it is the size of WWII AIRCRAFT CARRIERS!!!
Liberals think if they call it something different, it will become what they call it. Like the Affordable Care Act which is anything but affordable!!!
Japan unveils largest warship since World War II
Eric Talmadge, Associated Press 6 hours ago
YOKOHAMA, Japan (AP)-- Japan on Tuesday unveiled its biggest warship since World War II, a huge flat-top destroyer that has raised eyebrows in China and elsewhere because it bears a strong resemblance to a conventional aircraft carrier.
The ship, which has a flight deck that is nearly 250 meters (820 feet) long, is designed to carry up to 14 helicopters. Japanese officials say it will be used in national defense particularly in anti-submarine warfare and border-area surveillance missions and to bolster the nation's ability to transport personnel and supplies in response to large-scale natural disasters, like the devastating earthquake and tsunami in 2011.
Though the ship dubbed "Izumo" has been in the works since 2009, its unveiling comes as Japan and China are locked in a dispute over several small islands located between southern Japan and Taiwan. For months, ships from both countries have been conducting patrols around the isles, called the Senkaku in Japan and the Diaoyutai in China.
http://news.yahoo.com/japan-unveils-largest-w ...
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Again you reveal your total ignorance of things political, treaties, things foreign and "language".
Japan pledged not to develop anything but a domestic military after WWII. This they did on their own volition.
Things are heating up now in Asia and many surrounding countries are staking claims on oil and mineral rights that Japan also covets. Add North Korea as a menace. As it cannot truly re-arm, Japan has increased its squadrons of F-15s, foir example, patrol aircraft, etc, claiming they need more for the country's protection. Now it's an aircraft carrier called a flat top destroyer. The Japanese know darn well the difference between a carrier and a destroyer. But they are calling it that so as not to be accused of building and floating an aircraft carrier which otherwise would clearly violate its pledge on re-armament. I believe that article is also enshrined in their Constitution which was approved by Gen McArthur and President Truman.
Stay out of foreign politics, Rogue, not your bag. Come to think of it, neither is US politics for that matter LMAO (LRS tm reg'd).
Well, I know at least as much as you do on political subjects and far more than you do about military subjects. My point being calling the Sun the Moon will not make it the Moon.
And aircraft carrier is NOT a destroyer! If their law says they should not have any ship larger than a destroyer but they need a larger ship that has a different mission, just change the friggin' law!
Tell me, does the U.S. have a "destroyer that weighs 19,000+ tons? NO!!! The Arleigh Burks weigh less than half that weight.
And Arleigh Burk can carry only TWO H-60 Seahawks whereas the Japanese "flat-top destroyers" can carry 14 helicopters (I am sure they are talking about medium sized helicopters like our Seahawks).

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#166678 Aug 6, 2013
Oh, in 1963 when I was twelve years old I could tell you all about the YOH-4, YOH-5 and the YOH-6. Yes, all saw all three of them side by side and I knew that they all had Allison 250 engines.
In 1968 I knew all about the YUH-60, YUH-61, YCH-62, YAH-63 and the YAH-64 and I knew that the GE T70 engines was going in all of them (except for the YCH-62 which would have had Allison T701 engines)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Boeing_XCH-...
Oh, the only YCH-62 air-frame was at the Army Aviation Museum at Fort Rucker until about fifteen years ago when the "post commander" had it destroyed. And when Boeing and Congress found out, he got his butt kicked!
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#166679 Aug 6, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Last time I checked the law passed constitutional muster. Mr. Play Justice is the ignorant fool. Play Law doesn't count.
Yes, wouldn't you love to know how much it took to buy him off? What's your running debit now? LMAO! I'm not the one who has been conned over and over! LMAO! That in itself tells us all we need to know about you.

You got to know when to hold 'em......Know when to fold 'em.......HEE HEE HEE

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#166680 Aug 6, 2013
It took me a while to find it but here is my point.

The Taming of The Shrew link

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#166681 Aug 6, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Japan unveils largest warship since World War II
Eric Talmadge, Associated Press 6 hours ago
YOKOHAMA, Japan (AP)-- Japan on Tuesday unveiled its biggest warship since World War II, a huge flat-top destroyer that has raised eyebrows in China and elsewhere because it bears a strong resemblance to a conventional aircraft carrier.
The ship, which has a flight deck that is nearly 250 meters (820 feet) long, is designed to carry up to 14 helicopters. Japanese officials say it will be used in national defense particularly in anti-submarine warfare and border-area surveillance missions and to bolster the nation's ability to transport personnel and supplies in response to large-scale natural disasters, like the devastating earthquake and tsunami in 2011.
Though the ship dubbed "Izumo" has been in the works since 2009, its unveiling comes as Japan and China are locked in a dispute over several small islands located between southern Japan and Taiwan. For months, ships from both countries have been conducting patrols around the isles, called the Senkaku in Japan and the Diaoyutai in China.
http://news.yahoo.com/japan-unveils-largest-w ...
<quoted text>

Well, I know at least as much as you do on political subjects and far more than you do about military subjects. My point being calling the Sun the Moon will not make it the Moon.
And aircraft carrier is NOT a destroyer! If their law says they should not have any ship larger than a destroyer but they need a larger ship that has a different mission, just change the friggin' law!
Tell me, does the U.S. have a "destroyer that weighs 19,000+ tons? NO!!! The Arleigh Burks weigh less than half that weight.
And Arleigh Burk can carry only TWO H-60 Seahawks whereas the Japanese "flat-top destroyers" can carry 14 helicopters (I am sure they are talking about medium sized helicopters like our Seahawks).
It's not a law, it's the constitution! And yes, you don't know politics and yes I don't know as much about driving a helicopter or plane as you do, I concede that, but I know as much or more about the military in general as you do, without for example knowing all the idiotic military acronyms which I never liked and refused to memorize.

Read article 9 of the Japanese Constitution :

Article 9

Japan Self-Defense Forces

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In theory, Japan's rearmament is prohibited by Article 9 of the Japanese constitution, which states:

"Aspiring sincerely to an international peace based on justice and order, the Japanese people forever renounce war as a sovereign right of the nation and the threat or use of force as means of settling international disputes.(2) To accomplish the aim of the preceding paragraph, land, sea, and air forces, as well as other war potential, will never be maintained. The right of belligerency of the state will not be recognized."

However, in practice the Diet,(or Parliament), which Article 41 of the Constitution defines as "the highest organ of the state power", established the Self-Defense Forces in 1954. Although they are equipped as a conventional military force, they are, by law, an extension of the police, created solely to ensure national security. Due to the constitutional debate concerning the Forces' status, any attempt at increasing the Forces' capabilities and budget tends to be controversial. Thus the JSDF's capabilities are mainly defensive, with only limited overseas capabilities. The JSDF lacks offensive capabilities such as aircraft carriers, long-range surface-to-surface missiles, ballistic missiles, strategic bombers,[18] marines, amphibious units, and large caches of ammunition. The Rules of Engagement are strictly defined by the Self-Defence Forces Act 1954.

Hope it's ok,I had to delete your 1st 7 lines,otherwise no room to stuff the Japanese constitution down your throat.Get it now,and why the "language" has to be specially-adapted? Called diplomacy.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#166682 Aug 6, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
It took me a while to find it but here is my point.
The Taming of The Shrew link
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =TE9uY6Z19fcXX
Wasted your time, Rogue. You see, it is whatever Petruchio says it is, and Japan IS Petruchio. Case closed, Kate.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#166683 Aug 6, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, wouldn't you love to know how much it took to buy him off? What's your running debit now? LMAO! I'm not the one who has been conned over and over! LMAO! That in itself tells us all we need to know about you.
You got to know when to hold 'em......Know when to fold 'em.......HEE HEE HEE
Sorry to butt in, but I'm curious. Would you mind naming who was bought off and your unimpeachable source please? I hope it's not deleted like that last one which you were finally able to post, confirming what I had stated about gun deaths. Ooookay, let's have the name and evidence. Thank you.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Philippines

#166684 Aug 6, 2013
Truth Detector wrote:
<quoted text>
Correction, believing that a fraudulent birth certificate is proof of a Hawaiian birth, along with 2 newspaper announcements that are NOT direct proof of a Hawaiian birth either, is insane idiocy!
Why do you continue to believe a known fraud and LIAR like Obama?
You are the epitome of nutty!
Yep, I'm SMellen1!
You don't believe Obama when he tells you that he was born a British citizen, and that he was born in Kenya, yet you believe that a fraudulent document proves what you believe to be true???
You are a spectacular example of a SHEEPLE, no wonder I'm SMellen1!
Believing that the BC is fraudulent when DOH has the original vital record on file stating birth in Kapiolani Hospital and the name of delivering physician is lunacy. It is also lunacy to think that the birth announcement which originated from DOH in 1961 was fraudulent. There was no motive for fraud because if Obama had been born in Kenya he would have been eligible for immediate naturalization in the US per federal law.

Duh!
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#166685 Aug 6, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry to butt in, but I'm curious. Would you mind naming who was bought off and your unimpeachable source please? I hope it's not deleted like that last one which you were finally able to post, confirming what I had stated about gun deaths. Ooookay, let's have the name and evidence. Thank you.
It wasn't the same link, Path. In your wildest dreams, who do you think I might be referring to? Did you ever learn how England records their murders? Probably not, which is why you're still in the dark! So be it. LMAO!
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#166686 Aug 6, 2013
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
A Birfoon fantasizing that he knows more about the Constitution and rule if law than CJ Roberts. Will the surprises never end?
Alas, the "PINK TWINK" repeats himself yet again! mumble-drool, mumble-drool, mumble-drool.....

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#166687 Aug 6, 2013
Hey Jacqueau, you still do not get it. Here in America you can put a sign up with nothing but French in it! Italian, okay! Chinese, super! But in Quebec, if you put any sign up in must be in French and if there is another language, the word must be half the size.
And since that is Quebec's law, at least half of the population has to agree with it and that mean at least half your population are BIGOTS!
Learn to Read

Nashville, IN

#166688 Aug 6, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>Alas, the "PINK TWINK" repeats himself yet again! mumble-drool, mumble-drool, mumble-drool.....
Taking English composition lessons from Jercque now Romper?

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Philippines

#166689 Aug 6, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
And as Hawaiian is an official language, they HAVE to administer the test in that language. Funny how defenders of the constitution like Rogue, when it suits them, can just chuck it aside and voice his criticism on someone ascertaining his first constitutional rights. It's what birthers do.
Rogue concluded that Mr. Anthony must be a liberal because he insisted on the State following the rule of law. Rethugs insist on enforcing only laws they personally approve of.
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#166690 Aug 6, 2013
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
Taking English composition lessons from Jercque now Romper?
With his lisp? Are you kidding?

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Philippines

#166691 Aug 6, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, wouldn't you love to know how much it took to buy him off? What's your running debit now? LMAO! I'm not the one who has been conned over and over! LMAO! That in itself tells us all we need to know about you.
You got to know when to hold 'em......Know when to fold 'em.......HEE HEE HEE
The two-year-old cries foul whenever he cannot get his way.

Grow up and learn to respect the rule of law.
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Last time I checked the law passed constitutional muster. Mr. Play Justice is the ignorant fool. Play Law doesn't count.
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#166692 Aug 6, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Rogue concluded that Mr. Anthony must be a liberal because he insisted on the State following the rule of law. Rethugs insist on enforcing only laws they personally approve of.
So, how much are you out? LMAO!!!

*Make sure you get some Pen before you leave!

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Philippines

#166693 Aug 6, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
It's not a law, it's the constitution! And yes, you don't know politics and yes I don't know as much about driving a helicopter or plane as you do, I concede that, but I know as much or more about the military in general as you do, without for example knowing all the idiotic military acronyms which I never liked and refused to memorize.
Read article 9 of the Japanese Constitution :
Article 9
Japan Self-Defense Forces
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
In theory, Japan's rearmament is prohibited by Article 9 of the Japanese constitution, which states:
"Aspiring sincerely to an international peace based on justice and order, the Japanese people forever renounce war as a sovereign right of the nation and the threat or use of force as means of settling international disputes.(2) To accomplish the aim of the preceding paragraph, land, sea, and air forces, as well as other war potential, will never be maintained. The right of belligerency of the state will not be recognized."
However, in practice the Diet,(or Parliament), which Article 41 of the Constitution defines as "the highest organ of the state power", established the Self-Defense Forces in 1954. Although they are equipped as a conventional military force, they are, by law, an extension of the police, created solely to ensure national security. Due to the constitutional debate concerning the Forces' status, any attempt at increasing the Forces' capabilities and budget tends to be controversial. Thus the JSDF's capabilities are mainly defensive, with only limited overseas capabilities. The JSDF lacks offensive capabilities such as aircraft carriers, long-range surface-to-surface missiles, ballistic missiles, strategic bombers,[18] marines, amphibious units, and large caches of ammunition. The Rules of Engagement are strictly defined by the Self-Defence Forces Act 1954.
Hope it's ok,I had to delete your 1st 7 lines,otherwise no room to stuff the Japanese constitution down your throat.Get it now,and why the "language" has to be specially-adapted? Called diplomacy.
That part in the Japanese constitution renouncing war was imposed by the US. As such it isn't worth much as it was not the will of the Japanese people.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Philippines

#166694 Aug 6, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Hey Jacqueau, you still do not get it. Here in America you can put a sign up with nothing but French in it! Italian, okay! Chinese, super! But in Quebec, if you put any sign up in must be in French and if there is another language, the word must be half the size.
And since that is Quebec's law, at least half of the population has to agree with it and that mean at least half your population are BIGOTS!
Mr. Pot calls the kettle black.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 2 min Julia 1,509,380
Double Word Game (Dec '11) 53 min Breezy _Soul 3,630
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 1 hr Into The Night 63,568
News Scientists say they have proved climate change ... (Dec '08) 1 hr Into The Night 8,070
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 2 hr Sublime1 105,060
Graduation in Detroit. 3 hr BHO is EVIL 4
News Pie Five Pizza closes all but one suburban Chic... 4 hr Emeril LaGas 2

Chicago Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages