BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit ...

BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

There are 237647 comments on the Chicago Tribune story from Jan 8, 2009, titled BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen.... In it, Chicago Tribune reports that:

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chicago Tribune.

LCN Llin

United States

#166446 Aug 4, 2013
Karma is a_______ wrote:
<quoted text>
so corporations get fired when they don't do th job right.
I suggest you look at Haliburton's record in Iraq.
or the cost over runs for every weapon system the Defense department has ever brought. Heck check on the F-22 and how much each jet ended up costing. WBTW has not seen combat yet.
and when we farm out running prisons to corporate American, we get judges that are bribed to send more people to prison, like that judge in Pa.
sorry, but corporate America's CEO's turn out to be the biggest thieves, from Ken Lay to Wells Fargo manipulating the price of Aluminum.
It wasn't union officials that brought about the recent recession and housing market collapse
Valid suggestions

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#166447 Aug 4, 2013
GP org wrote:
Interesting . Very interesting. You know, we here in Canada are only 1/10th as crooked as you guys. Why? Easy. Our population is 1/10TH of yours, LMAO (LRS tm reg'd)

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#166448 Aug 4, 2013
El Gato wrote:
<quoted text>
I bet you can not intellectually explain one of Reagan's disasters? Cause and effect, cause and effect, cause and effect!!!
Let's start with Contra and the amnesia that ensued.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#166449 Aug 4, 2013
El Gato wrote:
<quoted text>
Now, what is wrong with shooting a bad guy who is trying to rob you? We save the government money as they won't have to try and incarcerate as many bad people.
I'd alter my moniker from Rogue to El Gato too if I were about to write anything as stupid as the above. Instead, when are you gonna come up with a reply as to why gun killing rates are so low in developed countries compared to yours?

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#166450 Aug 4, 2013
GP org wrote:
1. Reagan was a serial tax raiser.
2. Reagan nearly tripled the federal budget deficit
3. Unemployment soared after Reagan’s 1981 tax cuts.
4. Reagan grew the size of the federal government tremendously.
5. Reagan did little to fight a woman’s right to choose
6. Reagan was a "bellicose peacenik
7. Reagan gave amnesty to 3 million undocumented immigrants
8. Reagan illegally funneled weapons to Iran
9. Reagan vetoed a comprehensive anti-Apartheid act
10. Reagan helped create the Taliban and Osama Bin Laden.
1) Reagan had a net CUT in overall taxes!
2) The Democrat controlled Congress continued to stuff pork in the budget and they are responsible. Just like it was Newt Gigrich's four balanced budgets that Clinton signed in to law that gave us the recovery of the 1990's.
3) Initially unemployment went up but then it dropped. Unemployment was 7.9% when Reagan entered office and 5.5% when he left office.
4) The Democrat controlled Congress grew the federal government!
5) Reagan did nothing to stop women from having sex!!!
6) "bellicose peacenik" I think you are an oxymoron.
7) The Democrat controlled Congress drafted the bill, Reagan only signed it.
8) Prove Reagan did that? He would have been impeached if they had proved it!
9) Sooo, what is wrong with vetoing a bad law?
http://www.reagan.utexas.edu/archives/speeche...
10) Reagan created the Taliban and Osama Bin Laden? What are you smokin?
As I suspected. You are totally unable to engage in any intellectual honest discussion and can not prove "cause and effect". How sad.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#166451 Aug 4, 2013
El Gato wrote:
<quoted text>
Then you should have no problem showing us a copy of said document signed by the governor, would you?
Again, you ask for proof? YOU? Where are the proofs, odd fifty of them I've been asking you?

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#166452 Aug 4, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Interesting . Very interesting. You know, we here in Canada are only 1/10th as crooked as you guys. Why? Easy. Our population is 1/10TH of yours, LMAO (LRS tm reg'd)
Yep, there are more people in Kaliphonia than Canada but I bet Kaliphonia has more crooks in LA than there are in the hole of Canada!

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#166453 Aug 4, 2013
El Gato wrote:
Who caused the Cuban Missile crisis? Who won and who lost?
We caused the Cuban Missile crisis by installing our Saturn medium range ballistic missiles in Italy and Turkey. As a result the Soviets installed their medium range ballistic missiles in Cuba.
We lost the Cuban Missile Crisis and Russia won. Sure the Soviets had to remove their missiles, but not only did we with draw out ballistic missiles, we cancelled out first air-launched cruise missile system, the Skybolt.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GAM-87_Skybolt
We cancelled the Skybolt without consulting with the Brits. I was a joint project and this really miffed the Brits which caused the Skybolt Crisis!
http://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/55664/...
Do you REALLY save all your posts? Incredible. You know the old adage, Rogue, you freeze shit, you thaw out shit.

Second time you've come up with this one. I and others debunked it totally, but, thinking we are at the same low intellectual and clueless political level as you, you come back with this garbage like it was some kind of new revelation. NOT.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#166454 Aug 4, 2013
Karma is a_______ wrote:
<quoted text>
Heck check on the F-22 and how much each jet ended up costing. WBTW has not seen combat yet.
Hummmm, do you know what R&D is? How many F-22 did they expect to build? How many will they?
Did you know the Navy was originally in the F-22 project but they pulled out in favor of the F-35? The Air Force alone had planned on buying 750 of the F-22's but only 195 were built.
And further production was blocked by the DEMOCRAT controlled Congress.
Oh, the best things weapons do is to DETER wars. The B-36 Peacemakers never saw combat so they lived up to their name!!!
Japan attacked Pearl Harbor because we were no prepared for war because of FDR. We probably lost twice as many people because FDR would not develop our military until the last seconds before WWII started (after Europe was already at war).
Might I suggest you go back to high school and restudy WWII.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#166456 Aug 4, 2013
The Thursday before Memorial Day 1986 I took a bus load of troops for a tour of the Battle of the Bulge. We left at five am and arrived at the American cemetery at about eight. I chose that stop to set the tone for the rest tour having 5,000 Americans buried there along with General Patton.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Luxembourg_...
At noon we had arrived at Bastogne Belgium where the have a large museum. While there I had a black, female sergeant ask me who the tank with the white star belonged to and why it was here.
She had zero knowledge of WWII or why we were stationed in Germany. ZERO!!!

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#166457 Aug 4, 2013
Four those of you who still dew knot no!

Siege of Bastogne
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Siege of Bastogne was an engagement in December 1944 between American and German forces at the Belgian town of Bastogne, as part of the larger Battle of the Bulge. The goal of the German offensive was the harbour at Antwerp. In order to reach it before the Allies could regroup and bring their superior air power to bear, German mechanized forces had to seize the roadways through eastern Belgium. Because all seven main roads in the Ardennes mountain range converged on the small town of Bastogne, control of its crossroads was vital to the German attack. The siege lasted from December 20–27 when the besieged American forces were relieved by elements of General George Patton's Third Army.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#166458 Aug 4, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Again, you ask for proof? YOU? Where are the proofs, odd fifty of them I've been asking you?
Same place all the proofs I have asked you!!!

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#166459 Aug 4, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Same place all the proofs I have asked you!!!
You know something? You're a public liar. Through your teeth, like you breathe. You owe me countless proofs. You even wrote, yesterday or day before that sure, some were "general" . NOT When you state something, it's not general. Then, again backed against the wall, you followed with "there are exceptions". There are?

Name me ONE time when I didn't supply proof of what I stated. Not asking for 2 or 4 or 10, name me ONE instance where I did not supply proof of what I wrote. Last few times, with my link somehow not working, I supplied the whole damn article. Name me ONE I didn't supply, Mr Liars.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#166460 Aug 4, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Four those of you who still dew knot no!
Siege of Bastogne
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Siege of Bastogne was an engagement in December 1944 between American and German forces at the Belgian town of Bastogne, as part of the larger Battle of the Bulge. The goal of the German offensive was the harbour at Antwerp. In order to reach it before the Allies could regroup and bring their superior air power to bear, German mechanized forces had to seize the roadways through eastern Belgium. Because all seven main roads in the Ardennes mountain range converged on the small town of Bastogne, control of its crossroads was vital to the German attack. The siege lasted from December 20–27 when the besieged American forces were relieved by elements of General George Patton's Third Army.
Ever visited Bastogne? Ever walked around Place Gen McAuliffe ? See the Sherman in the town square? And the museum that shows American troops, in the snow, besieged by German troops? When are you gonna tell me something I don't know?

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#166461 Aug 4, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Hummmm, do you know what R&D is? How many F-22 did they expect to build? How many will they?
Did you know the Navy was originally in the F-22 project but they pulled out in favor of the F-35? The Air Force alone had planned on buying 750 of the F-22's but only 195 were built.
And further production was blocked by the DEMOCRAT controlled Congress.
Oh, the best things weapons do is to DETER wars. The B-36 Peacemakers never saw combat so they lived up to their name!!!
Japan attacked Pearl Harbor because we were no prepared for war because of FDR. We probably lost twice as many people because FDR would not develop our military until the last seconds before WWII started (after Europe was already at war).
Might I suggest you go back to high school and restudy WWII.
The thinking behind the above post is wrong from the first word, "Hmmmmm" to the last word, "WWII". All of it. And it's a repeat. I know we're in summer, Rogue, but you don't have to imitate the TV channels with all their worst reruns with your repeated and your utter failures at analysis. Stick with driving helicopters and thank your old man for getting you that job.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#166462 Aug 4, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Ever visited Bastogne? Ever walked around Place Gen McAuliffe ? See the Sherman in the town square? And the museum that shows American troops, in the snow, besieged by German troops? When are you gonna tell me something I don't know?
So you did visit it. I did a number of times. Instead of talking with today's young nitwit military, I spoke, often, to Belgian old timers who lived through the siege. Who were joyously liberated only to once again fall to the Germans who ransacked and stole all material and food they could find. The cold, the near-starvation, all of it.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#166463 Aug 4, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Four those of you who still dew knot no!
Siege of Bastogne
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The Siege of Bastogne was an engagement in December 1944 between American and German forces at the Belgian town of Bastogne, as part of the larger Battle of the Bulge. The goal of the German offensive was the harbour at Antwerp. In order to reach it before the Allies could regroup and bring their superior air power to bear, German mechanized forces had to seize the roadways through eastern Belgium. Because all seven main roads in the Ardennes mountain range converged on the small town of Bastogne, control of its crossroads was vital to the German attack. The siege lasted from December 20–27 when the besieged American forces were relieved by elements of General George Patton's Third Army.
Did you get a chance to visit the vehicular museum not too far away at Arlon? Tanks, half tracks, trucks, all of it. Splendid too.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#166465 Aug 4, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Ever visited Bastogne? Ever walked around Place Gen McAuliffe ? See the Sherman in the town square? And the museum that shows American troops, in the snow, besieged by German troops? When are you gonna tell me something I don't know?
Yes I have! May 2, 1986 to be exact! And I knew Gen MaAuliffe's G-3 (as if you know what a G-3 is). Oh he was a Major during the Battle of the Bulge but when I met him he as a Lieutenant .... General. He was the Aviation director at Combat Development Command at Fort Belvoir, VA. He passed on in Jan. 2009 and in March of that year he was interned at Arlington. And on July 5th. I visited his grave site.
GP org

Brooklyn, NY

#166466 Aug 4, 2013
All The President’s Liars: Where the Hell are The Washington Post and New York Times on McClellangate?
http://tinyurl.com/ypx3pf November 21, 2007
Do the investigative reporters at the Washington Post and New York Times fall under the Writers Guild Contract? Are Bernstein and Woodward too busy in makeup? Can the WGA and Producers get together and give satirical news an exemption?
While the Writers Strike keeps The Daily Show from cleverly pointing out the obvious, The Washington Post and New York Times ignore the obvious altogether.
We've been lied to by this White House.
Who says? Scott McClellan, the guy who was paid to lie for the guys who lied in the first place.
Of course, if he really wanted to bare his soul he would have let Helen Thomas write the foreword of "What Happened: Was I Lying Then Or Am I Lying Now?"
http://www.opednews.com/articles/opedne_steve...
GP org

Brooklyn, NY

#166467 Aug 4, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
1) Reagan had a net CUT in overall taxes!
2) The Democrat controlled Congress continued to stuff pork in the budget and they are responsible. Just like it was Newt Gigrich's four balanced budgets that Clinton signed in to law that gave us the recovery of the 1990's.
3) Initially unemployment went up but then it dropped. Unemployment was 7.9% when Reagan entered office and 5.5% when he left office.
4) The Democrat controlled Congress grew the federal government!
5) Reagan did nothing to stop women from having sex!!!
6) "bellicose peacenik" I think you are an oxymoron.
7) The Democrat controlled Congress drafted the bill, Reagan only signed it.
8) Prove Reagan did that? He would have been impeached if they had proved it!
9) Sooo, what is wrong with vetoing a bad law?
http://www.reagan.utexas.edu/archives/speeche...
10) Reagan created the Taliban and Osama Bin Laden? What are you smokin?
As I suspected. You are totally unable to engage in any intellectual honest discussion and can not prove "cause and effect". How sad.
You personally should kiss the ground Obama walks on.

He swept all the crimes of Bush/Cheney under the rug.

==========

Impeaching Richard B. Cheney, Vice President of the United States, of high crimes and misdemeanors.
H. RES. 799
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
November 6, 2007
Mr. KUCINICH submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary / http://tinyurl.com/32ubl2
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z... :

H.RES.333
Title: Impeaching Richard B. Cheney, Vice President of the United States, for high crimes and misdemeanors./ http://tinyurl.com/276yuo / 4/24/2007
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z... :@@@N

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 3 min Nostrillis Waxman 1,497,791
Finally help for Citizens 28 min Let Freedom Ring 1
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 54 min Mothra 63,374
Are democrats destroyed? 59 min Susanm 326
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 1 hr Susanm 10,362
Four letter word game (Dec '11) 1 hr GEORGIA 2,481
News Scientists say they have proved climate change ... (Dec '08) 1 hr Patriot AKA Bozo 8,008

Chicago Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages