BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

Full story: Chicago Tribune

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...
Comments
145,961 - 145,980 of 174,974 Comments Last updated 3 min ago

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#166011
Jul 31, 2013
 

Judged:

1

Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
Worst economic record? Reagan vs Carter? Really? You may disagree with policy but your subjective judgement is way way way off in my opinion
policy smholicy. Results are what counts. Carter had one average to bad economic term, the others I named increased govt size, spending, and none had one single surplus.
American Lady

Danville, KY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#166012
Jul 31, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

"Continued adherence to a policy of compulsory education is utterly incompatible with efforts to establish lasting peace." - Liberalism
~~Ludwig von Mises

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#166013
Jul 31, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

American Lady wrote:
"Continued adherence to a policy of compulsory education is utterly incompatible with efforts to establish lasting peace." - Liberalism
~~Ludwig von Mises
Here is the complete quote by von Mises :

"There is, in fact, only one solution: the state, the government, the laws must not in any way concern themselves with schooling or education. Public funds must not be used for such purposes. The rearing and instruction of youth must be left entirely to parents and to private associations and institutions."

So you agree that even primary schools should not be funded by the collectivity, much less college and university? You want to go back to 19th century norms when 3/4 of the population was illiterate like you, correct? When only the rich parents could send their kids to private schools or the poor to religious schools that churned out misplaced priests, brothers and nuns. Wonderful. How does that jibe with your communist philosophy, commie Pravda lady?

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#166015
Jul 31, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
Worst economic record? Reagan vs Carter? Really? You may disagree with policy but your subjective judgement is way way way off in my opinion
Okay, numbers from Wikipedia

Carter's total deficits for 4 years :$230 billion, or yearly average of + or -$80 billion;

Reagan's total deficits for 8 years, 1.4 trillion, or yearly average of _ or -$170 billion. Double Carter.

Republican administrations ALWAYS come in with bigger gov'ts and bigger deficits. Always.
Truth Detector

Louisville, KY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#166016
Jul 31, 2013
 
Poppo wrote:
<quoted text>
Alabama Birthers Very Excited: State Supreme Court Justice Roy Moore Will Make Obama Just Go Away
http://wonkette.com/514607/alabama-birthers-v...
You funny man GB! Make me laugh long time.
Mike Lee:‘What we have is an elected president who thinks he’s a king’
Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2013/07/30/mike-lee-wh ...

Correction, we have a fraudulently elected usurper who believes that he is a king because no one in Congress has the balls to call the fraud out for his crimes, but I think this is what Rep Lee really meant.

At least we have a start now, and how long before Congress starts to realize the truth?
ObamaCare may force the Congress to ask the questions that they should have asked all along, WHY is Obama acting like a queen?

ObamaCare is an illegal law created by the Administration of a usurper who had no right to sign any legislation into law, much less an illegally created one, huh Poopoo stain?
Learn to Read

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#166017
Jul 31, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>Okay, numbers from Wikipedia

Carter's total deficits for 4 years :$230 billion, or yearly average of + or -$80 billion;

Reagan's total deficits for 8 years, 1.4 trillion, or yearly average of _ or -$170 billion. Double Carter.

Republican administrations ALWAYS come in with bigger gov'ts and bigger deficits. Always.
Economic record is not the same thing as deficit. Not even close.

True the Republicans have shown no interest in reducing the size of government - but that was not your claim. Or to quote you "policy schmolicy"

See stagflation, Carter's malaise and interest rates ... That is Carter's economic record and the reason he had no chance for reelection.

You see Jacques - unlike you or Rouge I don't blindly support or criticize one party or the other.
Learn to Read

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#166018
Jul 31, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Ok numbers from Wikipedia

"Led by Volcker, the Federal Reserve raised the discount rate from 10% when Volcker assumed the chairmanship in August 1979 to 12% within two months.[52] The prime rate outstripped the Federal funds rate, reaching 20% in March 1980. Carter then enacted an austerity program by executive order, justifying these measures by observing that inflation had reached a "crisis stage"; both inflation and short-term interest rates reached 18 percent in February and March 1980.[53] Investments in fixed income (both bonds held by Wall Street and pensions paid to retired people) were becoming less valuable in real terms, and on March 14, 1980, President Carter announced the first credit control measures since World War II.

The policy, as well as record interest rates, would lead to a sharp recession in the spring of 1980. The sudden fall in GDP during the second quarter caused unemployment to jump from 6% to 7.5% by May, with output in the auto and housing sectors falling by over 20% and to their weakest level since the 1975 recession."

Yep - results are what count. Many things were outside of Carter's control (true for every POTUS) but the facts are what they are and this is not an economic record that gets one reelected

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#166020
Jul 31, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
Economic record is not the same thing as deficit. Not even close.
True the Republicans have shown no interest in reducing the size of government - but that was not your claim. Or to quote you "policy schmolicy"
See stagflation, Carter's malaise and interest rates ... That is Carter's economic record and the reason he had no chance for reelection.
You see Jacques - unlike you or Rouge I don't blindly support or criticize one party or the other.
Whoa, and correction while we are at it. Deficits are an indication of how the economy is run, not just inflation, stagflation or what have you. And yes, most assuredly, it WAS my claim that Republicans were the biggest growers of gov't, starting with Reagan when he was CA governor, heights of gov't growth never seen before, kept it rolling when he got to Washington

You say I was subjective. I try not to be and am not most of the time. And when I am subjective, I try to be subjective of the good stuff, not the negative.

And you pissed me off, thought you were a better judge of character. I'm more disappointed than pissed off. You compared me to Rogue as a blind supporter. I know you know squat about any politics but your own country's ,but I'll let you in on a few facts. We have three main parties in Canada : The conservatives, the Liberals and the NDP (socialist party). In my life, true, I've voted Liberal more often than the other two, but have found myself supporting the Conservatives and NDP many times at both the provincial (state for you) and federal levels. You sound very Republican-conservative, my friend, guess it was bound to come out in the wash.
Learn to Read

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#166021
Jul 31, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Bad news Birfoons. Another loss became official.

http://www.scribd.com/mobile/doc/157271249
Learn to Read

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#166022
Jul 31, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>Whoa, and correction while we are at it. Deficits are an indication of how the economy is run, not just inflation, stagflation or what have you. And yes, most assuredly, it WAS my claim that Republicans were the biggest growers of gov't, starting with Reagan when he was CA governor, heights of gov't growth never seen before, kept it rolling when he got to Washington

You say I was subjective. I try not to be and am not most of the time. And when I am subjective, I try to be subjective of the good stuff, not the negative.

And you pissed me off, thought you were a better judge of character. I'm more disappointed than pissed off. You compared me to Rogue as a blind supporter. I know you know squat about any politics but your own country's ,but I'll let you in on a few facts. We have three main parties in Canada : The conservatives, the Liberals and the NDP (socialist party). In my life, true, I've voted Liberal more often than the other two, but have found myself supporting the Conservatives and NDP many times at both the provincial (state for you) and federal levels. You sound very Republican-conservative, my friend, guess it was bound to come out in the wash.
You don't know squat about my knowledge of other countries. Have I spouted my opinion of the economic conditions in Sweden? My observation is that you are blinded by party based on your posts. You don't like it? Perhaps you should ask yourself why an observer thinks you are
(Rouge will also insist that he is not)

I am very conservative and very non republican. I have never maintained otherwise. I'm sure you intended that as an insult. It failed.

Deficits are an indication. They do not equal economic record - certainly not in my opinion.

Whoa all you want. Your pretend correction is as lame as the one Rouge will paste in later today

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#166023
Jul 31, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
You don't know squat about my knowledge of other countries. Have I spouted my opinion of the economic conditions in Sweden? My observation is that you are blinded by party based on your posts. You don't like it? Perhaps you should ask yourself why an observer thinks you are
(Rouge will also insist that he is not)
I am very conservative and very non republican. I have never maintained otherwise. I'm sure you intended that as an insult. It failed.
Deficits are an indication. They do not equal economic record - certainly not in my opinion.
Whoa all you want. Your pretend correction is as lame as the one Rouge will paste in later today
Lesson on Canada was gratis. Don't bother asking for another one.

I thought we could disagree courteously. We could, until I attacked your hero, Ronald Reagan. Then "conservative" sprouted forth. I digress.

You wrote : "Deficits are an indication. They do not equal economic record - certainly not in my opinion." Your opinion? Do you think that is shared world-wide? Deficits and its consequent borrowing costs have nothing to do with the economy? Well, well. It's part of the economic package, DOH. And 1.3 trillion, how much is that in 2013 dollars, is a lot of greenbacks.

I can see why you were so taken aback when I said Reagan's record, along with the Bush father and son team and Nixon were among the worst. You are conservative but not Republican? Interesting. How did you vote? If you did not because you liked neither candidate, you skirted your civic duty, unless you spoiled your ballot. But you didn't , did you? Name me ONE conservative Republican president of the 20th century. Right. You must be as frustrated as Rogue, which puts the two of you in the same boat, no? Very Rogue-like.

I liked you, liked what you wrote, didn't care whether you were conservative, liberal, progressive, republican, democrat, or socialist. Little did I know you were pretending, putting on an act. You wrote I was subjective, yet I have lauded AND criticized Obama as much as the next person, frowned on his policies on Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria, relations with Canada, said he had wasted what credit he had post-2008 with other nations. I said GWB had better and more courteous relations with Canada. And that his aid to Africa was a plus for him. I can be even-handed, you're just too conservative (translation: blind) to have seen it. Yes, I liked you. Then you compared me to ...Rogue. The idiot birthers, with LRS in the lead, have called me all sorts of , to them, derogatory names, and the worst the names got, the more flattered I became, like a badge of honour. But you have, in one word, surpassed them all by calling me "Rogue" instead of politely and civilly disagreeing. Very birther of you indeed. Yes, calling me Rogue is the birther hallmark, namely, ad hominem. I'm tempted to be birther-like so you'll understand and end this post in the same vein you ended yours, with STFU, but I'm too polite for that. Don't bother replying.
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#166024
Jul 31, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>Lesson on Canada was gratis. Don't bother asking for another one.

I thought we could disagree courteously. We could, until I attacked your hero, Ronald Reagan. Then "conservative" sprouted forth. I digress.

You wrote : "Deficits are an indication. They do not equal economic record - certainly not in my opinion." Your opinion? Do you think that is shared world-wide? Deficits and its consequent borrowing costs have nothing to do with the economy? Well, well. It's part of the economic package, DOH. And 1.3 trillion, how much is that in 2013 dollars, is a lot of greenbacks.

I can see why you were so taken aback when I said Reagan's record, along with the Bush father and son team and Nixon were among the worst. You are conservative but not Republican? Interesting. How did you vote? If you did not because you liked neither candidate, you skirted your civic duty, unless you spoiled your ballot. But you didn't , did you? Name me ONE conservative Republican president of the 20th century. Right. You must be as frustrated as Rogue, which puts the two of you in the same boat, no? Very Rogue-like.

I liked you, liked what you wrote, didn't care whether you were conservative, liberal, progressive, republican, democrat, or socialist. Little did I know you were pretending, putting on an act. You wrote I was subjective, yet I have lauded AND criticized Obama as much as the next person, frowned on his policies on Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria, relations with Canada, said he had wasted what credit he had post-2008 with other nations. I said GWB had better and more courteous relations with Canada. And that his aid to Africa was a plus for him. I can be even-handed, you're just too conservative (translation: blind) to have seen it. Yes, I liked you. Then you compared me to ...Rogue. The idiot birthers, with LRS in the lead, have called me all sorts of , to them, derogatory names, and the worst the names got, the more flattered I became, like a badge of honour. But you have, in one word, surpassed them all by calling me "Rogue" instead of politely and civilly disagreeing. Very birther of you indeed. Yes, calling me Rogue is the birther hallmark, namely, ad hominem. I'm tempted to be birther-like so you'll understand and end this post in the same vein you ended yours, with STFU, but I'm too polite for that. Don't bother replying.
Blather on fool. If anyone attempts to decipher your rant I pity them

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#166026
Jul 31, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
Blather on fool. If anyone attempts to decipher your rant I pity them
How Justice ha ha LRS

How birther

No reply = an ad hominem riposte

Go join your little birther clones.
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#166027
Jul 31, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
How Justice ha ha LRS
How birther
No reply = an ad hominem riposte
Go join your little birther clones.
What's happin' Path? Out making new friends, I see. LMAO!
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#166028
Jul 31, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>How Justice ha ha LRS

How birther

No reply = an ad hominem riposte

Go join your little birther clones.
You definitely have learned from Romper. Poor illiterate fool - too bad they don't teach English in Canada
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#166029
Jul 31, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>What's happin' Path? Out making new friends, I see. LMAO!
I thought you must have been teaching him English comprehension
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#166030
Jul 31, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
I thought you must have been teaching him English comprehension
Path doesn't require "comprehension" as he already "knows" all!
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#166031
Jul 31, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>What's happin' Path? Out making new friends, I see. LMAO!
I guess it should not be a surprise. This is the same fool that spent weeks insisting that you and CMor were one and the same. Even after I explained his error and (using you as the perfect example) pointed out how foolish it made him appear to "see you" behind every post - and Poppo assured him that I was correct - he still continued with his fantasy hunting adventure. Comprehension has never been a strength for Jercque
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#166032
Jul 31, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>Path doesn't require "comprehension" as he already "knows" all!
And if you ask nicely he may offer you a lesson "gratis"

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#166033
Jul 31, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Got it, LRS, you fooled me. I did identify the "blather on" phrase but blamed LTR. What does one say to an innocent naughty child like you who thinks it's funny to steal monikers? I can see it now, slapping your birhter thighs, telling your birther ilk how smarter you are and how "intelligently' you "got" me.

No apologies to LTR, though. He likened me to Rogue. Even you can't top that, loser.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

37 Users are viewing the Chicago Forum right now

Search the Chicago Forum:
Title Updated Last By Comments
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 4 min Buroc Millhouse Obama 1,082,445
IL Who do you support for Governor in Illinois in ... (Oct '10) 12 min Nono 3,836
Chicago the murder capital of the U.S.? Let's g... 50 min Mr Magoo 1
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 1 hr edogxxx 97,563
Abby 7-29 1 hr edogxxx 1
Amy 7-28 1 hr edogxxx 17
Am 7-29 1 hr edogxxx 1
•••
•••
Chicago Dating

more search filters

less search filters

•••

Chicago Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••