BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit ...

BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

There are 197120 comments on the Chicago Tribune story from Jan 8, 2009, titled BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen.... In it, Chicago Tribune reports that:

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chicago Tribune.

Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#166022 Jul 31, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>Whoa, and correction while we are at it. Deficits are an indication of how the economy is run, not just inflation, stagflation or what have you. And yes, most assuredly, it WAS my claim that Republicans were the biggest growers of gov't, starting with Reagan when he was CA governor, heights of gov't growth never seen before, kept it rolling when he got to Washington

You say I was subjective. I try not to be and am not most of the time. And when I am subjective, I try to be subjective of the good stuff, not the negative.

And you pissed me off, thought you were a better judge of character. I'm more disappointed than pissed off. You compared me to Rogue as a blind supporter. I know you know squat about any politics but your own country's ,but I'll let you in on a few facts. We have three main parties in Canada : The conservatives, the Liberals and the NDP (socialist party). In my life, true, I've voted Liberal more often than the other two, but have found myself supporting the Conservatives and NDP many times at both the provincial (state for you) and federal levels. You sound very Republican-conservative, my friend, guess it was bound to come out in the wash.
You don't know squat about my knowledge of other countries. Have I spouted my opinion of the economic conditions in Sweden? My observation is that you are blinded by party based on your posts. You don't like it? Perhaps you should ask yourself why an observer thinks you are
(Rouge will also insist that he is not)

I am very conservative and very non republican. I have never maintained otherwise. I'm sure you intended that as an insult. It failed.

Deficits are an indication. They do not equal economic record - certainly not in my opinion.

Whoa all you want. Your pretend correction is as lame as the one Rouge will paste in later today

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#166023 Jul 31, 2013
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
You don't know squat about my knowledge of other countries. Have I spouted my opinion of the economic conditions in Sweden? My observation is that you are blinded by party based on your posts. You don't like it? Perhaps you should ask yourself why an observer thinks you are
(Rouge will also insist that he is not)
I am very conservative and very non republican. I have never maintained otherwise. I'm sure you intended that as an insult. It failed.
Deficits are an indication. They do not equal economic record - certainly not in my opinion.
Whoa all you want. Your pretend correction is as lame as the one Rouge will paste in later today
Lesson on Canada was gratis. Don't bother asking for another one.

I thought we could disagree courteously. We could, until I attacked your hero, Ronald Reagan. Then "conservative" sprouted forth. I digress.

You wrote : "Deficits are an indication. They do not equal economic record - certainly not in my opinion." Your opinion? Do you think that is shared world-wide? Deficits and its consequent borrowing costs have nothing to do with the economy? Well, well. It's part of the economic package, DOH. And 1.3 trillion, how much is that in 2013 dollars, is a lot of greenbacks.

I can see why you were so taken aback when I said Reagan's record, along with the Bush father and son team and Nixon were among the worst. You are conservative but not Republican? Interesting. How did you vote? If you did not because you liked neither candidate, you skirted your civic duty, unless you spoiled your ballot. But you didn't , did you? Name me ONE conservative Republican president of the 20th century. Right. You must be as frustrated as Rogue, which puts the two of you in the same boat, no? Very Rogue-like.

I liked you, liked what you wrote, didn't care whether you were conservative, liberal, progressive, republican, democrat, or socialist. Little did I know you were pretending, putting on an act. You wrote I was subjective, yet I have lauded AND criticized Obama as much as the next person, frowned on his policies on Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria, relations with Canada, said he had wasted what credit he had post-2008 with other nations. I said GWB had better and more courteous relations with Canada. And that his aid to Africa was a plus for him. I can be even-handed, you're just too conservative (translation: blind) to have seen it. Yes, I liked you. Then you compared me to ...Rogue. The idiot birthers, with LRS in the lead, have called me all sorts of , to them, derogatory names, and the worst the names got, the more flattered I became, like a badge of honour. But you have, in one word, surpassed them all by calling me "Rogue" instead of politely and civilly disagreeing. Very birther of you indeed. Yes, calling me Rogue is the birther hallmark, namely, ad hominem. I'm tempted to be birther-like so you'll understand and end this post in the same vein you ended yours, with STFU, but I'm too polite for that. Don't bother replying.
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#166024 Jul 31, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>Lesson on Canada was gratis. Don't bother asking for another one.

I thought we could disagree courteously. We could, until I attacked your hero, Ronald Reagan. Then "conservative" sprouted forth. I digress.

You wrote : "Deficits are an indication. They do not equal economic record - certainly not in my opinion." Your opinion? Do you think that is shared world-wide? Deficits and its consequent borrowing costs have nothing to do with the economy? Well, well. It's part of the economic package, DOH. And 1.3 trillion, how much is that in 2013 dollars, is a lot of greenbacks.

I can see why you were so taken aback when I said Reagan's record, along with the Bush father and son team and Nixon were among the worst. You are conservative but not Republican? Interesting. How did you vote? If you did not because you liked neither candidate, you skirted your civic duty, unless you spoiled your ballot. But you didn't , did you? Name me ONE conservative Republican president of the 20th century. Right. You must be as frustrated as Rogue, which puts the two of you in the same boat, no? Very Rogue-like.

I liked you, liked what you wrote, didn't care whether you were conservative, liberal, progressive, republican, democrat, or socialist. Little did I know you were pretending, putting on an act. You wrote I was subjective, yet I have lauded AND criticized Obama as much as the next person, frowned on his policies on Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Syria, relations with Canada, said he had wasted what credit he had post-2008 with other nations. I said GWB had better and more courteous relations with Canada. And that his aid to Africa was a plus for him. I can be even-handed, you're just too conservative (translation: blind) to have seen it. Yes, I liked you. Then you compared me to ...Rogue. The idiot birthers, with LRS in the lead, have called me all sorts of , to them, derogatory names, and the worst the names got, the more flattered I became, like a badge of honour. But you have, in one word, surpassed them all by calling me "Rogue" instead of politely and civilly disagreeing. Very birther of you indeed. Yes, calling me Rogue is the birther hallmark, namely, ad hominem. I'm tempted to be birther-like so you'll understand and end this post in the same vein you ended yours, with STFU, but I'm too polite for that. Don't bother replying.
Blather on fool. If anyone attempts to decipher your rant I pity them

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#166026 Jul 31, 2013
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
Blather on fool. If anyone attempts to decipher your rant I pity them
How Justice ha ha LRS

How birther

No reply = an ad hominem riposte

Go join your little birther clones.
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#166027 Jul 31, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
How Justice ha ha LRS
How birther
No reply = an ad hominem riposte
Go join your little birther clones.
What's happin' Path? Out making new friends, I see. LMAO!
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#166028 Jul 31, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>How Justice ha ha LRS

How birther

No reply = an ad hominem riposte

Go join your little birther clones.
You definitely have learned from Romper. Poor illiterate fool - too bad they don't teach English in Canada
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#166029 Jul 31, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>What's happin' Path? Out making new friends, I see. LMAO!
I thought you must have been teaching him English comprehension
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#166030 Jul 31, 2013
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
I thought you must have been teaching him English comprehension
Path doesn't require "comprehension" as he already "knows" all!
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#166031 Jul 31, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>What's happin' Path? Out making new friends, I see. LMAO!
I guess it should not be a surprise. This is the same fool that spent weeks insisting that you and CMor were one and the same. Even after I explained his error and (using you as the perfect example) pointed out how foolish it made him appear to "see you" behind every post - and Poppo assured him that I was correct - he still continued with his fantasy hunting adventure. Comprehension has never been a strength for Jercque
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#166032 Jul 31, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>Path doesn't require "comprehension" as he already "knows" all!
And if you ask nicely he may offer you a lesson "gratis"

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#166033 Jul 31, 2013
Got it, LRS, you fooled me. I did identify the "blather on" phrase but blamed LTR. What does one say to an innocent naughty child like you who thinks it's funny to steal monikers? I can see it now, slapping your birhter thighs, telling your birther ilk how smarter you are and how "intelligently' you "got" me.

No apologies to LTR, though. He likened me to Rogue. Even you can't top that, loser.
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#166034 Jul 31, 2013
I don't even know who CMor is. Seriously.
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#166035 Jul 31, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
Got it, LRS, you fooled me. I did identify the "blather on" phrase but blamed LTR. What does one say to an innocent naughty child like you who thinks it's funny to steal monikers? I can see it now, slapping your birhter thighs, telling your birther ilk how smarter you are and how "intelligently' you "got" me.
No apologies to LTR, though. He likened me to Rogue. Even you can't top that, loser.
Wrong again, Path. You're closing in on that 0 - 300 mark yourself! LOL
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#166036 Jul 31, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
I don't even know who CMor is. Seriously.
CMor is the fool from kelseyville

Congrats on now being confused for me. What do they put in the water up in Canada?

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#166037 Jul 31, 2013

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#166039 Jul 31, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Rogue also refuses to acknowledge that the presidents with the most business people on staff had the worst economic records -hmm, Reagan, GHB, GWB. He forgot Hoover. Wonder how many HE had?
Reagan's administration was worse than Carter's?
GHB had, as did Reagan, had a Democrat controlled Congress which controls the budgetary process. Just look what Speaker Pelosi did to Bush's FY2009 Budget proposal. Bush submitted a budget of $2.7T and by the time she got finished with it, and Obama signed it into law, it had balloooned to $3.7T.
But I do agree with Hoover, but FDR out did him and extended the Depression until 1940 so they were both idiots.
We would have been totally out of the Great Depression if FDR had not pushed his progressive agenda.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#166040 Jul 31, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Reagan's administration was worse than Carter's?
GHB had, as did Reagan, had a Democrat controlled Congress which controls the budgetary process. Just look what Speaker Pelosi did to Bush's FY2009 Budget proposal. Bush submitted a budget of $2.7T and by the time she got finished with it, and Obama signed it into law, it had balloooned to $3.7T.
But I do agree with Hoover, but FDR out did him and extended the Depression until 1940 so they were both idiots.
We would have been totally out of the Great Depression if FDR had not pushed his progressive agenda.
FTI, I never aid Reagan's admin was worse than Carter's. I just said Reagan had much higher annual deficits. The rest was under discussion until he called me Rogue.
Frank

Spokane, WA

#166041 Jul 31, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
FTI, I never aid Reagan's admin was worse than Carter's. I just said Reagan had much higher annual deficits. The rest was under discussion until he called me Rogue.
Carter was the worst ever until Obama started occupying The White House.
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#166042 Jul 31, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>FTI, I never aid Reagan's admin was worse than Carter's. I just said Reagan had much higher annual deficits. The rest was under discussion until he called me Rogue.
No. You claimed that Reagan had a worse economic record than Carter and then went ape shit when I disagreed. There is no question that Reagan ran higher deficits. That is a simple fact. You seem to think that is the only measure of the economy. You obviously never felt the impact of interest rates in excess of 20 percent

It is not my fault that you either can't comprehend English or just have a hard on for Carter. He is a good man who - IMO - was way overmatched by the office
Truth Detector

Louisville, KY

#166043 Jul 31, 2013
America, we are squandering the legacy we inherited from our forefathers.- See more at: http://rare.us/story/interview-with-sen-ted-c...

America Got STUPID as proven by the fact that the American dream is being destroyed by an unconstitutional fraudulent Trojan horse usurper who has no legal authority to do so.

SHEEPLE are brainless one-celled amoeba's!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 36 min Realtime 1,278,294
I Remember Mel Reynolds. 1 hr Indicted Again 1
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 7 hr Mothra 54,601
News Should prostitution be less illegal-or more? 7 hr robert 4
"Slave clothes" My New, Original Work by Patric... 8 hr Outlaw Entitlements 2
Kim K has such a large azz, it turns me OFF. 8 hr Condoms unnecessary 1
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 12 hr contrary opinion 100,673
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages