BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ... Full Story
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#165793 Jul 29, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Unlike you, I consider those 200 dead Mexicans a tragedy for them, their friends, family and country. I also consider that Fast and Furious or not, they still would've been killed, though that fact does not justify Fast and Furious, whose origins are at best murky. Over 60,000 Mexicans have died as a result of cartel drug wars in the last 8 years. Do you really think that the Fast and Furious programme has even made a dent in those 60,000 deaths?
jackfish just broke my BS meter! "They still would have been killed". Really? And you "know" this unattainable fact how? Peering into the future again with you eyes wide shut? Ijit!
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#165794 Jul 29, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Prove BP and/or Halliburton are totally responsible for that disaster? It is only because of you hatred of BP and Halliburton that you, the Lame Stream Press and Obama have focus on them.
How many times have you judged people, or entities, before all the facts were know? Can you say George Zimmerman?!?
Again, what crime did GZ commit? Trayvon assaulted GZ and that is indisputable.
Well, you know jackfish is God, Judge and Jury.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#165795 Jul 29, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Unlike you, I consider those 200 dead Mexicans a tragedy for them, their friends, family and country. I also consider that Fast and Furious or not, they still would've been killed, though that fact does not justify Fast and Furious, whose origins are at best murky. Over 60,000 Mexicans have died as a result of cartel drug wars in the last 8 years. Do you really think that the Fast and Furious programme has even made a dent in those 60,000 deaths?
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
jackfish just broke my BS meter! "They still would have been killed". Really? And you "know" this unattainable fact how? Peering into the future again with you eyes wide shut? Ijit!
Maybe if he stopped buy drugs from South of the Border, there would be less violence!
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#165796 Jul 29, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
The federal inspectors were supposed to be there when the faulty pump was installed? Yes, maybe the U.S. military SHOULD be called in to protect poor hapless workers from their greedy criminal masters.
More envious mentions of testicles from the balless boor.
Crotch Rot, this is so typical for you dumbazz Dims. Ignore the facts at all costs then lie about everything else. Very predictable. Very juvenile also. But that is a DIM! Now, if only you lil boys would learn to wipe your own azz instead of calling out for "Mommie"!

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#165797 Jul 29, 2013
I have no problem helping people out in NATURAL disasters. Here in Florida we have hurricanes, California has earthquakes, other areas have tornadoes, floods, etc. but to bail out some people because they want to spend out people's money, sorry, you made your bed, go sleep in it!!!

$444 Million Hockey Stadium To Be Built In Bankrupt Detroit Posted 11 Hours Ago by Chris Graham

From CNN comes the news that the once-great city of Detroit, which recently filed for the largest municipal bankruptcy in American history because of President George W. Bush’s economy (he’s still president, right?), is moving forward with its plan to build a nearly half-billion-dollar hockey stadium for the city’s home team, the Red Wings.
Detroit’s unemployment rate for June was 9.4 percent. The argument that managed to convince Michigan’s Republican governor, Rick Snyder, not to halt the construction plans is that building an arena for the whitest sport in America in one of the blackest cities in America will supposedly help boost Detroit’s economy and create jobs. Never mind that most of those will be temporary construction jobs. Gov. Snyder’s cognitive functions seem to have been adversely affected by being surrounded by Democrats.

Read more: http://politicaloutcast.com/2013/07/444-milli...

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#165798 Jul 29, 2013
If the IRS scandal is phony, why are people refusing to testify before Congress? You can only evoke your Fifth Amendment rights if you have something to hide!

Lois Lerner's Summer Vacation; July 25, 2013,

By ANGELA HUNT
Lawmakers investigating the political targeting of conservative groups by the Internal Revenue Service are demanding to know exactly who asked IRS employees like Lois Lerner to leave their positions after the scandal broke, and why.

Republicans Dave Camp, the Ways and Means Committee chairman, and Darrell Issa, the Oversight and Government Reform Committee chairman, sent a letter to acting IRS Commissioner Danny Werfel Wednesday asking what action has been taken against three employees implicated in the targeting: Ms. Lerner, director of Exempt Organizations at the IRS; Holly Paz, the director of Ruling and Agreements; and Joseph Grant, the former commissioner for Tax Exempt & Government Entities.

All three played a part in the targeting of conservative groups, and all three have left their positions by administrative leave or resignation. But have they been held accountable? If not, what is to prevent the IRS from putting its thumb on the scale again in some future election?

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000142412788...

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#165799 Jul 29, 2013
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
As you may have noticed, these morons love to toss around all manner of words that they obviously don't comprehend
Like "phony crises"?

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#165800 Jul 29, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Prove BP and/or Halliburton are totally responsible for that disaster? It is only because of you hatred of BP and Halliburton that you, the Lame Stream Press and Obama have focus on them.
How many times have you judged people, or entities, before all the facts were know? Can you say George Zimmerman?!?
Again, what crime did GZ commit? Trayvon assaulted GZ and that is indisputable.
Prove? Er, why did they both plead guilty to criminal negligence, both paying huge fines (BP more than $30 billion alone). Prove? Courts found them guilty, proved it, not me. Poor little meek vassal-serf.

And I don't claim anyone's guilty until I have proof. Show me one instance where I've done that. But you and your birther ilk, you've found Obama guilty of winning the election through fraud,(no proof yet submitted), of democrats being more fraudulent than Republicans (no proof yet submitted), of Trayvon Martin assaulting George Zimmerman (the jury, the prosecutor, the defence, the judge, all of them found no proof this is how it happened) and you've submitted no proof. Want more, you who claims to submit ALL the links?

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#165801 Jul 29, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
jackfish just broke my BS meter! "They still would have been killed". Really? And you "know" this unattainable fact how? Peering into the future again with you eyes wide shut? Ijit!
60,000 dead in 8 years clearly show they would've been killed anyhow. Or, would the number be 59,800?. Ijit?

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#165802 Jul 29, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, you know jackfish is God, Judge and Jury.
Correction. The court that found BP and Halliburton guilty and heavily fined them, no contest by the two litigants, WAS Judge and Jury, not me. Do you dispute their admittance of guilt (Rogue said they pleaded guilty so they could resume their business. False) and the fines paid? Would you pay a fine for not stopping at a red light if you were sitting at home when it supposedly happened? Why'd they pay up?
Citizen org

Sayville, NY

#165803 Jul 29, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Several points here. Are you saying Barack Obama never used ILLEGAL drugs? No evidence that Rush Limbaugh did.
Did Bush/Cheney commit acts of war in Yemen, Libya and Syria?
Do you know why Pelosi took impeachment off the table for Bush/Cheney? No ligament reason to!!!
Oh, Bush had the approval of the U.S. Congress and the U.N. to go back into Iraq and into Afghanistan! What authority did Obama have to bomb Yemen and Libya?
Oh, it is not that Obama continued most of Bush's policies but he expanded several of them. What is that big building the NSA is building in Utah for? Was that started under Bush?
Read My Lips you space cadet.

Bush and Cheney destroyed the Magna Carta, United States Constitution, et cetera, and you have the nerve to bring up bombing Yemen and smoking pot but no addiction.

The Magna Carta (The Great Charter)
http://www.constitution.org/eng/magnacar.htm

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#165804 Jul 29, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Crotch Rot, this is so typical for you dumbazz Dims. Ignore the facts at all costs then lie about everything else. Very predictable. Very juvenile also. But that is a DIM! Now, if only you lil boys would learn to wipe your own azz instead of calling out for "Mommie"!
Would you, for once, dissect what is written and write a reasonable semi-intelligent reply, taking each point into account as I do every time, instead of hurling ad hominems, anal comments and other times death threats? When you're wrong, you either say so, or just "stifle yourself" as your hero ole Archie Bunker used to say.
Citizen org

Sayville, NY

#165805 Jul 29, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Samller gov't? Is that a new republican slogan? How come the Nixons, Reagans and Bushes had the biggest gov'ts of them all? And the biggest and most numerous deficits? Repubs don't know the meaning of "smaller" and surplus, what with all those PAC friends of theirs.
You will not find any truer words on the world wide web.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#165806 Jul 29, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Unlike you, I consider those 200 dead Mexicans a tragedy for them, their friends, family and country. I also consider that Fast and Furious or not, they still would've been killed, though that fact does not justify Fast and Furious, whose origins are at best murky. Over 60,000 Mexicans have died as a result of cartel drug wars in the last 8 years. Do you really think that the Fast and Furious programme has even made a dent in those 60,000 deaths?
<quoted text>
Maybe if he stopped buy drugs from South of the Border, there would be less violence!
South of whose border? Mine? You mean in the US?
Citizen org

Sayville, NY

#165807 Jul 29, 2013
Justice Dept. Lawyers Join Chorus Criticizing Gonzales
July 28, 2007 http://tinyurl.com/33u45p
WASHINGTON, July 27 — Daniel J. Metcalfe, a lawyer who began his government career in the Nixon administration and retired from the Justice Department last winter, said morale at the department was worse under Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales than during Watergate.
John S. Koppel, who continues to work at the department as a civil appellate lawyer in Washington, wrote this month that he was “ashamed” of the department and that if Mr. Gonzales told the truth in recent Congressional testimony,“he has been derelict in the performance of his duties and is not up to the job.”
Even though they worry that it may hinder their career prospects, a few current and former Justice Department lawyers have begun to add to the chorus of Mr. Gonzales's critics who say that the furor over his performance as attorney general, and questions about his truthfulness under oath, could do lasting damage to the department's work.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/28/washington/...

Acting on Impeachment
by Ralph Nader July 28, 2007 http://tinyurl.com/23oxoh
Most readers of The Washington Post probably missed it. But probably not Attorney General Alberto Gonzales. Fifty-six of his law school classmates (Harvard Law School, class of 1982) bought space for an open letter in mid-May that excoriated his “cavalier handling of our freedoms time and again.”
It read like an indictment, to wit:

“Witness your White House memos sweeping aside the Geneva Conventions to justify torture, endangering our own servicemen and women;
“Witness your advice to the President effectively reading Habeas Corpus out of our constitutional protections;

“Witness your support of presidential statements claiming inherent power to wiretap American citizens without warrants (and the Administration’s stepped-up wiretapping campaign, taking advantage of those statements, which continues on your watch to this day); and
“Witness your dismissive explanation of the troubling firings of numerous U.S. Attorneys, and their replacement with other more ‘loyal’ to the President’s politics, as merely ‘an overblown personal matter.’
http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2007/07/2...

FBI Director Contradicts Gonzales' Testimony
Jul 26, 2007 / http://tinyurl.com/kvclm9t
(CBS News) WASHINGTON FBI Director Robert S. Mueller said Thursday the government's terrorist surveillance program was the topic of a 2004 hospital room dispute between top Bush administration officials, contradicting Attorney General Alberto Gonzales' sworn Senate testimony.
Mueller was not in the hospital room at the time of the dramatic March 10, 2004, confrontation between then-Attorney General John Ashcroft and presidential advisers Andy Card and Gonzales, who was then serving as White House counsel. Mueller told the House Judiciary Committee he arrived shortly after they left, and spoke with the ailing Ashcroft. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/...

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#165808 Jul 29, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>Samller gov't? Is that a new republican slogan? How come the Nixons, Reagans and Bushes had the biggest gov'ts of them all? And the biggest and most numerous deficits? Repubs don't know the meaning of "smaller" and surplus, what with all those PAC friends of theirs.
<quoted text>
First of all, Nixon was a PROGRESSIVE just like YOU! Next Reagan's Congress was dominated by ... Democarts. Next, both Bush's are Country Clubbers.
IMHO, Reagn would have down sized our government if the Democrat controlled Congress would have allowed it. You Libtards seem to forget NO present can sign into law any bill that did not pass Congress.
Case in point is Bill Clinton who signed into law four of Newt Gingrich's balanced budgets, seven of the Contract with America points to include Welfare Reform and the 1997 Taxpayer Relief Act!
Tell us, would ObamaCare have even come to a vote if Boehner had been the Speaker and the Republicans had been in control of the House?
Again, Rogue, and since 1900, name the true conservative Republican presidents. C'mon.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#165809 Jul 29, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Unlike you, I consider those 200 dead Mexicans a tragedy for them, their friends, family and country. I also consider that Fast and Furious or not, they still would've been killed, though that fact does not justify Fast and Furious, whose origins are at best murky. Over 60,000 Mexicans have died as a result of cartel drug wars in the last 8 years. Do you really think that the Fast and Furious programme has even made a dent in those 60,000 deaths?
<quoted text>

Maybe if he stopped buy drugs from South of the Border, there would be less violence!
South from me as in the USA?

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#165810 Jul 29, 2013
Citizen org wrote:
Justice Dept. Lawyers Join Chorus Criticizing Gonzales
July 28, 2007 http://tinyurl.com/33u45p
WASHINGTON, July 27 — Daniel J. Metcalfe, a lawyer who began his government career in the Nixon administration and retired from the Justice Department last winter, said morale at the department was worse under Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales than during Watergate.
John S. Koppel, who continues to work at the department as a civil appellate lawyer in Washington, wrote this month that he was “ashamed” of the department and that if Mr. Gonzales told the truth in recent Congressional testimony,“he has been derelict in the performance of his duties and is not up to the job.”
Even though they worry that it may hinder their career prospects, a few current and former Justice Department lawyers have begun to add to the chorus of Mr. Gonzales's critics who say that the furor over his performance as attorney general, and questions about his truthfulness under oath, could do lasting damage to the department's work.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/07/28/washington/...
Acting on Impeachment
by Ralph Nader July 28, 2007 http://tinyurl.com/23oxoh
Most readers of The Washington Post probably missed it. But probably not Attorney General Alberto Gonzales. Fifty-six of his law school classmates (Harvard Law School, class of 1982) bought space for an open letter in mid-May that excoriated his “cavalier handling of our freedoms time and again.”
It read like an indictment, to wit:
“Witness your White House memos sweeping aside the Geneva Conventions to justify torture, endangering our own servicemen and women;
“Witness your advice to the President effectively reading Habeas Corpus out of our constitutional protections;
“Witness your support of presidential statements claiming inherent power to wiretap American citizens without warrants (and the Administration’s stepped-up wiretapping campaign, taking advantage of those statements, which continues on your watch to this day); and
“Witness your dismissive explanation of the troubling firings of numerous U.S. Attorneys, and their replacement with other more ‘loyal’ to the President’s politics, as merely ‘an overblown personal matter.’
http://www.commondreams.org/archive/2007/07/2...
FBI Director Contradicts Gonzales' Testimony
Jul 26, 2007 / http://tinyurl.com/kvclm9t
(CBS News) WASHINGTON FBI Director Robert S. Mueller said Thursday the government's terrorist surveillance program was the topic of a 2004 hospital room dispute between top Bush administration officials, contradicting Attorney General Alberto Gonzales' sworn Senate testimony.
Mueller was not in the hospital room at the time of the dramatic March 10, 2004, confrontation between then-Attorney General John Ashcroft and presidential advisers Andy Card and Gonzales, who was then serving as White House counsel. Mueller told the House Judiciary Committee he arrived shortly after they left, and spoke with the ailing Ashcroft. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/...
Rogue, Justice ha ha LRS, Frank, GB , American commie Lady, etc , never ever speak of Att Gen Gonzalez and his mysterious resignation, he of the special laws protecting Halliburton and its various subsidiaries, suppliers and security agents in Iraq and Afghanistan, from being sued by gov't, citizens, soldiers, aid workers, or anyone.(See lengthy investigations and articles in Vanity Fair). Noooo, they are concentrating on the actual ATT Gen. Why not? No Republican is he.
Citizen org

Sayville, NY

#165811 Jul 29, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Rogue, Justice ha ha LRS, Frank, GB , American commie Lady, etc , never ever speak of Att Gen Gonzalez and his mysterious resignation, he of the special laws protecting Halliburton and its various subsidiaries, suppliers and security agents in Iraq and Afghanistan, from being sued by gov't, citizens, soldiers, aid workers, or anyone.(See lengthy investigations and articles in Vanity Fair). Noooo, they are concentrating on the actual ATT Gen. Why not? No Republican is he.
It is fascinating how they can see every little thing Obama is doing and yet NOTHING what Bush, Cheney, and the Republican Congress did for 6 out of 8 years.

They keep talking about this liberal media that does not exist.

Who kept Limbaugh on the air all these years?

ROTFL

----------

Rush Limbaugh rushing out of Cumulus Media to WOR, with Sean Hannity in tow

Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity are set to leave Cumulus Media and WABC and move to competitor WOR.

http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/rush...
Citizen org

Sayville, NY

#165812 Jul 29, 2013
Alison Lundergan Grimes for Senate in Kentucky instead of Mitch 'Wall Street' McConnell

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 2 min Teaman 1,127,218
Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 4 min Jonah1 50,651
Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 18 min Ratloder 68,672
Rattlesnake Logic 2 hr i need a bump to 22
food for thought 2 hr reality is a crutch 2
John Wick Brings Stylish Bloody Mayhem to Chica... 3 hr Culture Auditor 1
Amy 10-24 3 hr Sublime1 14
Chicago Dating
Find my Match

Chicago Jobs

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]