BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit ...

BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

There are 219793 comments on the Chicago Tribune story from Jan 8, 2009, titled BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen.... In it, Chicago Tribune reports that:

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chicago Tribune.

“Arm the homeless!”

Since: Jul 12

The internet

#165117 Jul 21, 2013
A real speech from a REAL Republican!



Outstanding.
EXPERT

Redding, CA

#165118 Jul 21, 2013
Scrutiny wrote:
A real speech from a REAL Republican!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =FqAF-Alc7CMXX
Outstanding.
How is that an answer to this?

http://www.youtube.com/watch...

http://www.youtube.com/watch...

“Arm the homeless!”

Since: Jul 12

The internet

#165119 Jul 21, 2013
EXPERT wrote:
<quoted text> How is that an answer to this?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =RYMQneyuPSMXX
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
Are you saying that the U.S.A. should declare war on Islam?

Be clear. Would you have us declare on religion rather than a nation?

Not saying that I would be against it, but you are going to need more than that to start ending people because they are believers.

How would we go about such a thing?

Do we lie to American's and give them BS reasons to invade individual countries?

Or just sell them on how this religion messes up the world?

What are our options for combating a population that is 100% Islamic?

Convince me.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Philippines

#165121 Jul 21, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
He was indited by the House of Reps. in the Bill of Impeachment. Just because the Democrats refused to convict him does not mean he did not do any of those crimes.
Next, Bill Clinton did sign a Consent Decree so he would not be indicted in the "Ken Starr" investigations. Now, can you show us another CRIMINAL case where someone sign a "consent decree"?
Happens all the time in civil lawsuits but I have never heard of it in a criminal case.
Sorry loser, but you wish to believe that because Bill Clinton was charged according to an indictment it means he was guilty but although George Zimmerman was charged, he was not guilty.

This is a prime example of Rouge Logic™. To be charged but not convicted means guilty if Rouge doesn't like the defendant, but it means innocent if he likes the defendant. Pure birtherism. Obama is not natural born because birfoons do not like the President.

I'll never forget when I was a 17-year old kid umpiring Babe Ruth League games. When there was a close play at first base, half the crowd thought the batter was safe and half thought he was out. What determined most people's perception was which team they were rooting for rather than objective reality.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Philippines

#165122 Jul 21, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
You realize once we seize all power, our first priority is to make New Yawk State a prison, don't you?
"New Yawk State"?

That accent is a city accent, not state.
Have you ever been out of your back yard?

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#165123 Jul 21, 2013
I saved Detroit!!! Oh wait...

“Arm the homeless!”

Since: Jul 12

The internet

#165124 Jul 21, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry loser, but you wish to believe that because Bill Clinton was charged according to an indictment it means he was guilty but although George Zimmerman was charged, he was not guilty.
This is a prime example of Rouge Logic™. To be charged but not convicted means guilty if Rouge doesn't like the defendant, but it means innocent if he likes the defendant. Pure birtherism. Obama is not natural born because birfoons do not like the President.
I'll never forget when I was a 17-year old kid umpiring Babe Ruth League games. When there was a close play at first base, half the crowd thought the batter was safe and half thought he was out. What determined most people's perception was which team they were rooting for rather than objective reality.
Which is another reason eye-witness testimony holds the lowest form of value in science.

Been there Wojar...one set of bleachers are convinced he made it by a second and a half.
The opposite set say he was out by two paces.

And they are somehow willing to hurl threats, beer, and punches to make their point...willing to go to jail if they must.
Funniest damn thing I have ever seen.

To me...the parents were the best part of little league by far. Better than even victory ice cream/ pizza.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#165125 Jul 21, 2013
"If we want to keep our nation's secrets a 'SECRET' then we should store them where President Obama stores his college transcripts and birth certificate."
Gov. Mike Huckabee

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Philippines

#165126 Jul 21, 2013
American Lady wrote:
A VERY Sharp AND intelligent person said this:
OUR Pres had three options, three things he could have come out and 'identified' with:
1) being black,
2) being white (or right, lol),
or
3) the Rule of Law, which IS color blind.
as an attorney, he should have sided with the Law and the facts of the case, etc..
as a Law Professor, he should have sided with the Law, etc...
As an elected representative of over 300 million DIVERSE citizens, and having taken an Oath to the Rule of Law, the Constitution, he should have sided with #3.
I see NO reason, other then his being part of the 1% and the powerful elite, why he would pick #2.
and, now that he has picked option #1,
IMO,
he can no longer claim to be the President of ALL of the United States or a Protector of the Constitution.
a true UNITER would have picked #3...
hell, even a TRUE politician would have picked #3!
but, some of us already KNEW that about THIS failed president...
``````````
Another VERY sharp AND intelligent person wrote this:
``````````
I wonder if Obama would allow his daughters to date someone like Trayvon or if Trayvon had lived---date him.
Someone should ask him in front of a camera and watch as he...er, um, uh, duh, er again......
Sorry Birfoon Lady, the President did not fail to "identify with the rule of law". Recognition of a miscarriage of justice is not a failure to "identify with the rule of law." Any law that can be easily abused needs scrutiny.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#165127 Jul 21, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry loser, but you wish to believe that because Bill Clinton was charged according to an indictment it means he was guilty but although George Zimmerman was charged, he was not guilty.
This is a prime example of Rouge Logic™. To be charged but not convicted means guilty if Rouge doesn't like the defendant, but it means innocent if he likes the defendant. Pure birtherism. Obama is not natural born because birfoons do not like the President.
I'll never forget when I was a 17-year old kid umpiring Babe Ruth League games. When there was a close play at first base, half the crowd thought the batter was safe and half thought he was out. What determined most people's perception was which team they were rooting for rather than objective reality.
Ah, but why was George Zimmerman even arrested? No probable cause, no arrest!!! Zimmerman was tried based on public opinion, and nothing more. For the very same reason Bill Clinton was not convicted during his impeachment trial and why he was never indicted.
Again, show me another CRIMINAL CASE were a defendant is allowed to sign a CONSENT DECREE?!?

“Arm the homeless!”

Since: Jul 12

The internet

#165128 Jul 21, 2013
I was in West Virginia a few times...and man, they didn't disappoint.

I saw two guys totally try to kill each other...they were both too intoxicated to get the job done, but they were relentless.

This is how the fight started... I was lucky enough to be in earshot.

"You going to watch the big match friday?"

--"What big match"

"Goldberg is fighting the Undertaker for the belt!"

--"Wow, I won't miss that! I am a big Undertaker fan."

"What?!?...The Undertaker is the source of ALL evil! Goldberg is going to take him out."

Before you could count to three they were locked in mortal combat.(err..I am sure they thought it was.)

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Philippines

#165130 Jul 21, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Ah, but why was George Zimmerman even arrested? No probable cause, no arrest!!! Zimmerman was tried based on public opinion, and nothing more. For the very same reason Bill Clinton was not convicted during his impeachment trial and why he was never indicted.
Again, show me another CRIMINAL CASE were a defendant is allowed to sign a CONSENT DECREE?!?
Thank you for proving my point Rouge.

If there had been sufficient evidence to convict Clinton, there would have been no consent decree. No conviction, loser.
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry loser, but you wish to believe that because Bill Clinton was charged according to an indictment it means he was guilty but although George Zimmerman was charged, he was not guilty.
This is a prime example of Rouge Logic™. To be charged but not convicted means guilty if Rouge doesn't like the defendant, but it means innocent if he likes the defendant. Pure birtherism. Obama is not natural born because birfoons do not like the President.
I'll never forget when I was a 17-year old kid umpiring Babe Ruth League games. When there was a close play at first base, half the crowd thought the batter was safe and half thought he was out. What determined most people's perception was which team they were rooting for rather than objective reality.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#165131 Jul 21, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
Off to bed. Tomorrow ,to Mont Tremblant for a week of doing nothing.
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
How's that any different than anyother week for you? Sleep tight lil slothman.
The Abondance en fête looks like a good place for a pedophile to hook up.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#165132 Jul 21, 2013
It is sad to see a bunk of legless frogs on crutches!

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#165133 Jul 22, 2013
Scrutiny wrote:
<quoted text>
Guess what...Clinton never committed a crime either...by your own standards.
Prove he knew he was lying.
See how that works?
Prove Bill Clinton was lying about sex with Monica Lewinsky? Why was Bill found in contempt of court? Ah, selective memory, it's a Libtardian thing!

Judge Finds Clinton in Contempt of Court
By Roberto Suro and Joan Biskupic
Washington Post Staff Writers, April 13, 1999;

A federal judge yesterday held President Clinton in contempt of court for giving "intentionally false" testimony about his relationship with Monica S. Lewinsky in the Paula Jones lawsuit, marking the first time that a sitting president has been sanctioned for disobeying a court order.
.....
In finding that Clinton deliberately lied in the Jones deposition and his written answers to questions posed by her lawyers, Wright ordered Clinton to pay "any reasonable expenses, including attorneys' fees, caused by his willful failure to obey this court's discovery orders." Wright also said Clinton should repay the $1,202 she incurred in traveling to Washington at Clinton's request to oversee the deposition and said she was referring the matter to state judicial authorities in Arkansas who could disbar Clinton for violating the legal profession's rules of conduct.
......
.....After Jones appealed the dismissal, Clinton settled the lawsuit for $850,000 last November, just as Congress began impeachment proceedings.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics...

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#165134 Jul 22, 2013
Scrutiny wrote:
A real speech from a REAL Republican!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =FqAF-Alc7CMXX
Outstanding.
Both Ron and Rand Paul are Libertarians who are in the Republican Party. As them, they will tell you that as they know if you are not in either the Democrat or Republican Parties, you are not likely to be elected to Congress.
Yes, I believe in about 90% of their economics but I am a moderate when it comes to Social and Religious issues.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#165135 Jul 22, 2013
Hummmm, the Shanghai Composite dropped 1% this morning. Doesn't look good for the American markets when they open later today.

Since: Oct 11

Location hidden

#165136 Jul 22, 2013
His birth certificate is a poor job done in Photoshop. If he had nothing to hide why are his college records locked? Because they show him as a foreign exchange student?

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#165137 Jul 22, 2013

“Arm the homeless!”

Since: Jul 12

The internet

#165138 Jul 22, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Prove Bill Clinton was lying about sex with Monica Lewinsky? Why was Bill found in contempt of court? Ah, selective memory, it's a Libtardian thing!
Judge Finds Clinton in Contempt of Court
By Roberto Suro and Joan Biskupic
Washington Post Staff Writers, April 13, 1999;
A federal judge yesterday held President Clinton in contempt of court for giving "intentionally false" testimony about his relationship with Monica S. Lewinsky in the Paula Jones lawsuit, marking the first time that a sitting president has been sanctioned for disobeying a court order.
.....
In finding that Clinton deliberately lied in the Jones deposition and his written answers to questions posed by her lawyers, Wright ordered Clinton to pay "any reasonable expenses, including attorneys' fees, caused by his willful failure to obey this court's discovery orders." Wright also said Clinton should repay the $1,202 she incurred in traveling to Washington at Clinton's request to oversee the deposition and said she was referring the matter to state judicial authorities in Arkansas who could disbar Clinton for violating the legal profession's rules of conduct.
......
.....After Jones appealed the dismissal, Clinton settled the lawsuit for $850,000 last November, just as Congress began impeachment proceedings.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics...
Prove he knew he was lying. You have already established that not speaking the truth doesn't mean you are lying.

Bill very well could have believed every word he wrote.

Was he convicted?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 2 min mdbuilder 1,406,297
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 11 min mdbuilder 60,673
News Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 27 min Ize Found 70,846
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 1 hr pundit 103,171
Al Sharpton 1 hr ky man 10
last post wins! (Dec '10) 2 hr Red_Forman 2,285
last post wins! (Apr '13) 2 hr Red_Forman 1,273

Chicago Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages