BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit ...

BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

There are 234003 comments on the Chicago Tribune story from Jan 8, 2009, titled BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen.... In it, Chicago Tribune reports that:

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chicago Tribune.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#165111 Jul 21, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
You're an extremely vile and disgusting individual. Quite mentally ill also. Tell us, do you often fantasize about having an orgasm while you shoot someone? You need a padded cell with no key. Seriously.
No, no, copying me, or plagiarizing me just won't do. You're the vile and pus-disgusting individual, wanting, praying, hoping, to execute someone. What a loser. Yes, sorry, but saying you suck fits the bill so well. How it must suck to be you, wanting to kill wojar, LTR, me and your president. And now 1st degree murderers. Did God, in your latest tête-à-tête with him, tell you all this? LMAO (LRS tm reg'd)

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#165112 Jul 21, 2013
Off to bed. Tomorrow ,to Mont Tremblant for a week of doing nothing.
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#165113 Jul 21, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
Off to bed. Tomorrow ,to Mont Tremblant for a week of doing nothing.
How's that any different than anyother week for you? Sleep tight lil slothman.

“Arm the homeless!”

Since: Jul 12

The internet

#165114 Jul 21, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
I agree, you should not send people off to die unless you are 100% sure of anything. And here are the Democarts who AGREED with Bush.
Democrats on Iraq + WMD's (Weapons of Mass Destruction)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =Cwqh4wQPoQkXX
I asked you for proof that Bush lied but you have shown nothing. What a sad little troll you are!!!
You are completely retarded. A video of him lying to millions of Americans isn't enough for you.

Prove it to yourself.

Bush lied as much as any other president in recent history..but that is impossible for you to believe. You can't remove your face from the guy's crotch cause he is a republican.

You are pretty much in line with any other idiot out there with a severe case of brain rot.

Guess what...Clinton never committed a crime either...by your own standards.

Prove he knew he was lying.

See how that works?

When your argument rest totally on a double standard you are a winner AND a loser.

Being ignorant will allow you to defend your position.(but you are the only one who will believe it.)
Being consistantly incorrect shows those around you what is happening in that burnt out grey matter.

You have fallen for the divide and conquer scam.

You aren't an American....you are a republican. EVERYTHING is the fault of the libitards. Pick a subject....libitards did it.

When the SAME SHYT happens under a guy you like...it was the libitard congress...

Guess what dimwit...President has the power of VETO. He is directly to blame for anything that happens under his administration.

Bush should have been executed for illegal wars.
Obama should share the same fate.

Must be nice to just lump everything you don't like under one enemy.

The right wing, christian, Nazis are somehow socialist/atheist to you.

It is like watching a kid denying what he had for breakfast. And you watched him eat it.

In the end it doesn't matter...you have zero credibility left after even the very first time someone watches you cover your ears and scream over the truth.

You are equivalent to a moon hoaxer.

Prove Clinton knew he was lying...dolt.

“Arm the homeless!”

Since: Jul 12

The internet

#165115 Jul 21, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Rhetorical and reality is what I was doing. I am thinking of assembly-line people. No American, Canadian or European worker, not to mention others, has worked on an electronics assembly line in decades. We bring back that kind of manufacturing here, you tell me who's gonna train new workers as it is false to claim that it is all computerized and robot-driven.
How about any graduate of a devry level institute?

Electronics aren't sorcery. They are simple machines.

I build most of my own electronics. I have built every computer my family owns. Yes, I do purchase parts. So do manufacturers. I have no formal education in the field. Just a hobby.

“Arm the homeless!”

Since: Jul 12

The internet

#165116 Jul 21, 2013
Linktv org wrote:
<quoted text>
The Iran-Contra Affair 20 Years On
Documents Spotlight Role of Reagan, Top Aides
Pentagon Nominee Robert Gates Among Many
Prominent Figures Involved in the Scandal
http://tinyurl.com/y9rduo
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB210...
Don't bother.

I have went through this before.
Once you do post your sources....he won't look at them anyway.
Even if he did...it would be socialist propaganda.

You can't reason with someone who doesn't value logic or evidence.

“Arm the homeless!”

Since: Jul 12

The internet

#165117 Jul 21, 2013
A real speech from a REAL Republican!



Outstanding.
EXPERT

Redding, CA

#165118 Jul 21, 2013
Scrutiny wrote:
A real speech from a REAL Republican!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =FqAF-Alc7CMXX
Outstanding.
How is that an answer to this?

http://www.youtube.com/watch...

http://www.youtube.com/watch...

“Arm the homeless!”

Since: Jul 12

The internet

#165119 Jul 21, 2013
EXPERT wrote:
<quoted text> How is that an answer to this?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =RYMQneyuPSMXX
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
Are you saying that the U.S.A. should declare war on Islam?

Be clear. Would you have us declare on religion rather than a nation?

Not saying that I would be against it, but you are going to need more than that to start ending people because they are believers.

How would we go about such a thing?

Do we lie to American's and give them BS reasons to invade individual countries?

Or just sell them on how this religion messes up the world?

What are our options for combating a population that is 100% Islamic?

Convince me.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Philippines

#165121 Jul 21, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
He was indited by the House of Reps. in the Bill of Impeachment. Just because the Democrats refused to convict him does not mean he did not do any of those crimes.
Next, Bill Clinton did sign a Consent Decree so he would not be indicted in the "Ken Starr" investigations. Now, can you show us another CRIMINAL case where someone sign a "consent decree"?
Happens all the time in civil lawsuits but I have never heard of it in a criminal case.
Sorry loser, but you wish to believe that because Bill Clinton was charged according to an indictment it means he was guilty but although George Zimmerman was charged, he was not guilty.

This is a prime example of Rouge Logic™. To be charged but not convicted means guilty if Rouge doesn't like the defendant, but it means innocent if he likes the defendant. Pure birtherism. Obama is not natural born because birfoons do not like the President.

I'll never forget when I was a 17-year old kid umpiring Babe Ruth League games. When there was a close play at first base, half the crowd thought the batter was safe and half thought he was out. What determined most people's perception was which team they were rooting for rather than objective reality.

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Philippines

#165122 Jul 21, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
You realize once we seize all power, our first priority is to make New Yawk State a prison, don't you?
"New Yawk State"?

That accent is a city accent, not state.
Have you ever been out of your back yard?

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#165123 Jul 21, 2013
I saved Detroit!!! Oh wait...

“Arm the homeless!”

Since: Jul 12

The internet

#165124 Jul 21, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry loser, but you wish to believe that because Bill Clinton was charged according to an indictment it means he was guilty but although George Zimmerman was charged, he was not guilty.
This is a prime example of Rouge Logic™. To be charged but not convicted means guilty if Rouge doesn't like the defendant, but it means innocent if he likes the defendant. Pure birtherism. Obama is not natural born because birfoons do not like the President.
I'll never forget when I was a 17-year old kid umpiring Babe Ruth League games. When there was a close play at first base, half the crowd thought the batter was safe and half thought he was out. What determined most people's perception was which team they were rooting for rather than objective reality.
Which is another reason eye-witness testimony holds the lowest form of value in science.

Been there Wojar...one set of bleachers are convinced he made it by a second and a half.
The opposite set say he was out by two paces.

And they are somehow willing to hurl threats, beer, and punches to make their point...willing to go to jail if they must.
Funniest damn thing I have ever seen.

To me...the parents were the best part of little league by far. Better than even victory ice cream/ pizza.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#165125 Jul 21, 2013
"If we want to keep our nation's secrets a 'SECRET' then we should store them where President Obama stores his college transcripts and birth certificate."
Gov. Mike Huckabee

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Philippines

#165126 Jul 21, 2013
American Lady wrote:
A VERY Sharp AND intelligent person said this:
OUR Pres had three options, three things he could have come out and 'identified' with:
1) being black,
2) being white (or right, lol),
or
3) the Rule of Law, which IS color blind.
as an attorney, he should have sided with the Law and the facts of the case, etc..
as a Law Professor, he should have sided with the Law, etc...
As an elected representative of over 300 million DIVERSE citizens, and having taken an Oath to the Rule of Law, the Constitution, he should have sided with #3.
I see NO reason, other then his being part of the 1% and the powerful elite, why he would pick #2.
and, now that he has picked option #1,
IMO,
he can no longer claim to be the President of ALL of the United States or a Protector of the Constitution.
a true UNITER would have picked #3...
hell, even a TRUE politician would have picked #3!
but, some of us already KNEW that about THIS failed president...
``````````
Another VERY sharp AND intelligent person wrote this:
``````````
I wonder if Obama would allow his daughters to date someone like Trayvon or if Trayvon had lived---date him.
Someone should ask him in front of a camera and watch as he...er, um, uh, duh, er again......
Sorry Birfoon Lady, the President did not fail to "identify with the rule of law". Recognition of a miscarriage of justice is not a failure to "identify with the rule of law." Any law that can be easily abused needs scrutiny.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#165127 Jul 21, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry loser, but you wish to believe that because Bill Clinton was charged according to an indictment it means he was guilty but although George Zimmerman was charged, he was not guilty.
This is a prime example of Rouge Logic™. To be charged but not convicted means guilty if Rouge doesn't like the defendant, but it means innocent if he likes the defendant. Pure birtherism. Obama is not natural born because birfoons do not like the President.
I'll never forget when I was a 17-year old kid umpiring Babe Ruth League games. When there was a close play at first base, half the crowd thought the batter was safe and half thought he was out. What determined most people's perception was which team they were rooting for rather than objective reality.
Ah, but why was George Zimmerman even arrested? No probable cause, no arrest!!! Zimmerman was tried based on public opinion, and nothing more. For the very same reason Bill Clinton was not convicted during his impeachment trial and why he was never indicted.
Again, show me another CRIMINAL CASE were a defendant is allowed to sign a CONSENT DECREE?!?

“Arm the homeless!”

Since: Jul 12

The internet

#165128 Jul 21, 2013
I was in West Virginia a few times...and man, they didn't disappoint.

I saw two guys totally try to kill each other...they were both too intoxicated to get the job done, but they were relentless.

This is how the fight started... I was lucky enough to be in earshot.

"You going to watch the big match friday?"

--"What big match"

"Goldberg is fighting the Undertaker for the belt!"

--"Wow, I won't miss that! I am a big Undertaker fan."

"What?!?...The Undertaker is the source of ALL evil! Goldberg is going to take him out."

Before you could count to three they were locked in mortal combat.(err..I am sure they thought it was.)

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

Philippines

#165130 Jul 21, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Ah, but why was George Zimmerman even arrested? No probable cause, no arrest!!! Zimmerman was tried based on public opinion, and nothing more. For the very same reason Bill Clinton was not convicted during his impeachment trial and why he was never indicted.
Again, show me another CRIMINAL CASE were a defendant is allowed to sign a CONSENT DECREE?!?
Thank you for proving my point Rouge.

If there had been sufficient evidence to convict Clinton, there would have been no consent decree. No conviction, loser.
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Sorry loser, but you wish to believe that because Bill Clinton was charged according to an indictment it means he was guilty but although George Zimmerman was charged, he was not guilty.
This is a prime example of Rouge Logic™. To be charged but not convicted means guilty if Rouge doesn't like the defendant, but it means innocent if he likes the defendant. Pure birtherism. Obama is not natural born because birfoons do not like the President.
I'll never forget when I was a 17-year old kid umpiring Babe Ruth League games. When there was a close play at first base, half the crowd thought the batter was safe and half thought he was out. What determined most people's perception was which team they were rooting for rather than objective reality.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#165131 Jul 21, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
Off to bed. Tomorrow ,to Mont Tremblant for a week of doing nothing.
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
How's that any different than anyother week for you? Sleep tight lil slothman.
The Abondance en fête looks like a good place for a pedophile to hook up.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#165132 Jul 21, 2013
It is sad to see a bunk of legless frogs on crutches!

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Obama's farewell speech in Chicago felt like th... 3 min TRUMPTRUMPTRUMP 27
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 5 min TRUMPTRUMPTRUMP 1,479,504
Double Word Game (Dec '11) 4 hr They cannot kill ... 3,523
{keep A word drop A word} (Oct '11) 4 hr Susanm 10,052
last post wins! (Dec '10) 4 hr They cannot kill ... 2,888
last post wins! (Apr '13) 4 hr They cannot kill ... 2,154
News Woman dies 7 months after Memorial Day Weekend ... 6 hr Nellie 1

Chicago Jobs

More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages