You cite from number 2 from my post? What about the first part of my post? Nothing to say about idiot Taaffe? Here it is :<quoted text>
Ah Trayvon was also using 'lean' which is know to make the user aggressive. No, Trayvon did not deserve to die,,,,, but neither did GZ and just as soon as he thought he was endanger of dying or seriously being injured, he had the right to use deadly force to defend himself.
The assault from Trayvon stated not later than 7:16:11 and the gun shot was recorded at 7:16:55 which as 46 seconds later. During this period only one person was yelling for yelp and the one eye witness said it was GZ.
Jacqueau, how long should Travon been "allowed" to try and kill GZ before he was allowed to defend himself?
I wrote : "She did the fool a favour by cutting off his mike. Else, he would've made an even bigger fool of himself, as he proved when citing the 2nd amendment. Let's review some of it, or what Taaffe recounted: "Zimmerman “was on his way to the Target that night when he saw Trayvon,” whom he said “looks suspicious, and he's on drug,” WOW. And Taaffe would repeat THAT? Zimmerman, the super sleuth, doctor, behavioral scientist, could detect at 60 feet that Martin was on drugs? Wow. That, Rogue, is as incredulous as your constant insistence that you were there when the shooting occurred"
Strange, Rogue, how you edit and then pick what you BELIEVE you can answer, which you can't, as I will show :
I didn't know "lean" pot is "known" to make the user aggressive. Have you any scientific or medical data to back that up? You're again getting into an area of which you know nothing about yet come out with "aggressive?"
As to what went on, I have no say in this, accused or exonerated neither Z nor M, I WAS NOT THERE. But it appears you and Justice har har LRS were. So I guess I'll have to take your word for it that Martin attacked Zimmerman.