BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

Full story: Chicago Tribune

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...
Comments
144,301 - 144,320 of 177,247 Comments Last updated 46 min ago
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#164032
Jul 15, 2013
 
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Please explain how I cry like a butt-sore loser. I said he'd probably walk (you did not acknowledge I wrote it, yet called me a liar - apologies coming?). I've said yesterday and today "case closed, carry on, etc a number of times)...strange sore loser. Am I as sore as you were Nov 7 following the presidential ballot? You called it FRAUD, even though Obama had a 6.5 million vote majority. SORE LOSER. LOSER. Did I criticize the prosecution, did I criticize the defence, did I criticize the jury, did I criticize the judge? Did I criticize the court clerk, the court stenographer, the court policemen? Did I call the whole thing a fraud?
What a sore loser you are. Never mind sore. What a loser you are.
Dip, I asked for a post number. That's calling someone a liar? Maybe to you but not to the rest of world. The voter fraud convictions stand. Check Ohio if you're interested. In fact, just do a google search for "Obama voter fraud" and you'll find plenty. Hard for you to admit the truth? Must be a vile mind lurking in the darkness of the abyss inside your head. Who cares who you criticized? Means nothing. Hey, do you ever let out an internal scream and wait to hear the echos bouncing around in your head? Butt-sore loser. Run like a scalded-azz ape, spanky.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#164033
Jul 15, 2013
 
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
Okay, there are THREE points.
One, witness John saw Trayvon on top of KZ and said it was KZ who was the one screaming.
Next, recorded over a phone to 911 the SAME scream continued for 40-45 seconds and did not change voice which means the ONLY voice was GZ's.
Next, GZ had the broken nose and cuts to his head and a wet back with grass clippings while Trayvon had no injuries except to his hands and the gun shot wound. Using normal logic, GZ did not hurt himself which means Trayvon must have.
To prove that GZ did not have the right to us self defence you have to prove that GZ started the assault and there is no evidence that he did. All the evidence and eyewitness says Trayvon did!!
And Trayvon's motive, well, he didn't like creepy azz crackers (which makes it a racial hate crime on the part of Tryvon).
Assault is a crime and Trayvon created the ONLY crime that night. The jury has ruled it was self defence and the jury would not have done that if they were convinced that GZ assaulted Trayvon, get over it!!!
You are not solely pro-white, anti-black and racist to the hilt, you are dumb. Doesn't help make your point, does it? I told you a hundred times that because Z was on the bottom and M on top, THAT DOES NOT MEAN M INSTIGATED it. And sure Zimmerman was screaming his head off, 155-lbd Martin was beating the living sh*t out of 210-lb martial arts expert Zimmerman. Again, for the, hmm, 8th or 9th time, example only : I jump, attack you. You fight back, wrestle me to the ground, on top of me (ewwww). Does that mean you aggressed me? You just don't get it, do you?

I repeat, fact he was on top of Z DOES NOT MEAN HE ATTACKED. Not at all. And, again, I was not there, YOU were not there. Stop saying M attacked Z because M was on top and Z was screaming. What does that prove? I don't know who aggressed who, I was not present. News for you, YOU don't know who aggressed who, YOU WERE NOT THERE.

Case I closed. I predicted he'd probably walk. He did. Why keep talking about it?

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#164034
Jul 15, 2013
 
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
But she was not on a commercial flight. She was on Air Force One Foxtrot. Do you know what USAF 1F is? The suffix "F" denotes "Family" and to ATC (Air Traffic Control, they are Air Force (or Marine) One Foxtrot!
In a foregoing post, I wrote you were dumb. Well, now your above reply makes you dumber. Re-read my post. It's not clear enough that I believe SHE SHOULD NOT FLY COMMERCIAL? How did the previous first ladies fly if not on gov't aircraft? Why should Ms Obama be different? Dumb, dumber and dumbest, the first lady should not, does not and will not fly commercial, no matter who is president.

Footnote : I seem to recall, though not sure, that when Ms Obama was vacationing in Spain, she received an invitation from the Queen. Do you think she should have turned it down? Would turning it down have helped relations with Spain?
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#164035
Jul 15, 2013
 
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
You are not solely pro-white, anti-black and racist to the hilt, you are dumb. Doesn't help make your point, does it? I told you a hundred times that because Z was on the bottom and M on top, THAT DOES NOT MEAN M INSTIGATED it. And sure Zimmerman was screaming his head off, 155-lbd Martin was beating the living sh*t out of 210-lb martial arts expert Zimmerman. Again, for the, hmm, 8th or 9th time, example only : I jump, attack you. You fight back, wrestle me to the ground, on top of me (ewwww). Does that mean you aggressed me? You just don't get it, do you?
I repeat, fact he was on top of Z DOES NOT MEAN HE ATTACKED. Not at all. And, again, I was not there, YOU were not there. Stop saying M attacked Z because M was on top and Z was screaming. What does that prove? I don't know who aggressed who, I was not present. News for you, YOU don't know who aggressed who, YOU WERE NOT THERE.
Case I closed. I predicted he'd probably walk. He did. Why keep talking about it?
DAB! Martial arts expert? LMAO! You're the one that cannot understand what the evidence says because you're blinded by hatred. You're the one that doesn't get it, spanky. The problem lies in your head!

Since: Dec 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#164036
Jul 15, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Hey birthers, how is that suit going?

Only been 6 years LMAO
Frank

Spokane, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#164038
Jul 15, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

1

Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
I hate to come back on this, but do tell us how you know he assaulted Zimmerman. He may or may have not, I have no idea, I WAS NOT THERE like YOU were. Did you tape it? Yes, do present the proof that M assaulted Z. And don't tell us, please, that because M was on top on the ground, he was the aggressor. That could mean Martin got the upper hand. Tell us exactly what happened, you are so sure.
But unlike you, and for me and most "libtards" (Rogue, tm reg'd), it's over, the jury has ruled, case closed.
Since there was no witness to the contrary,this case should never had made it to court. The officer at the scene did not see sufficient evidence that George Zimmerman did any thing illegal.
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#164039
Jul 15, 2013
 
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
In a foregoing post, I wrote you were dumb. Well, now your above reply makes you dumber. Re-read my post. It's not clear enough that I believe SHE SHOULD NOT FLY COMMERCIAL? How did the previous first ladies fly if not on gov't aircraft? Why should Ms Obama be different? Dumb, dumber and dumbest, the first lady should not, does not and will not fly commercial, no matter who is president.
Footnote : I seem to recall, though not sure, that when Ms Obama was vacationing in Spain, she received an invitation from the Queen. Do you think she should have turned it down? Would turning it down have helped relations with Spain?
In this case, yes, turning down the invitation is the proper thing to do. Wonder why they invited her in the first place.
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#164040
Jul 15, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Impeach Obumbler and Holder immediately! They have no business running a car wash much less a political office! These two clowns are the real "dumb" and dumber"!

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#164041
Jul 15, 2013
 

Judged:

2

1

1

Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
No, it is not official unless they make it official. by stopping at the Spanish royal family for less than an hour accomplished that.
Just like my friend and his business trips. His wife acts as his secretary so it makes there whole trip to LA, to include the stop at Las Vegas, as business trip and it is a 100% tax write-off.
YOU the unwashed are going to teach me protocol? You will determine what is a business, personal or official travel by the first lady or any other head of state or his/her spouse? Really?

FYI, and it's very clear, the president and his spouse are working for their country 24/7/365. When they travel, the US embassy is alerted and believe me, what goes on has nothing to do with non-official. You have no idea of the nervousness of the whole chancery. And always, even though it may be a middle echelon rep, the host country has someone at the airport waiting to usher her through the V.I.P. lounge and thereafter a police escort. Many reasons for that, not the least the visiting country's responsibility for, in this case, Ms Obama's and her family's safety/security and simply hospitality. Can you imagine if she was attacked , in this case, on Spanish soil? There are unofficial visits that are just that, but not my the president of the USA and his wife/family, or at least 10 leaders of the world's countries. Our PM and his family can travel pretty much unimpeded by protocol, but not the US, Russia, Japan, China, France, UK, Germany heads of gov't or their families.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#164042
Jul 15, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
You can't help but make an even bigger twit of yourself, can you? BTW, have you ever made a sound and legitimate point? I haven't seen one from you. Just BS and twisted perversions!
grateful if you could address my post in a, minimum, semi-intelligent manner. The above is embarrassing. For you.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#164043
Jul 15, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

loose cannon wrote:
Jacques,
In a perfect world the First Lady would take the train.
loose
In a perfect world, Rogue would abstain from commenting on EVERYTHING except driving helicopters.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#164044
Jul 15, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Now, can any of you Libtards tell us what model of helicopter this is?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Sea_King_VH...
Army One
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Army One is the callsign of any United States Army aircraft carrying the President of the United States. From 1957 until 1976, this was usually an Army helicopter transporting the President. Prior to 1976, responsibility for helicopter transportation of the President was divided between the Army and the U.S. Marine Corps until the Marine Corps was given the sole responsibility of transporting the President by helicopter.
Wherever Army One flies, it is met on the ground by at least one soldier in full dress uniform.[citation needed] An Army aircraft carrying the Vice President is designated Army Two.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Army_One
Canada just purchased three or four of those antiquated presidential helicopters to use as spare parts of our even more aging fleet of Sea Kings.
Frank

Spokane, WA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#164045
Jul 15, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
What is worse, Rogue, burning the American flag or a brawny WWE wrassler wearing a brief star-spangled speedo, with one of the stars right on his crotch? Isn't burning the flag the only way to retire a worn one?
Until Congress passes a Flag Desecration Amendment;courts have ruled that freedom of speech is protected,but desecration of the flag is considered a public outrage. If someone hates our country so much that they would disrespect the very symbol of freedom,independence and loyalty and American nationalism for the United States as a nation, state, government, and set of policies, but also as a set of ideals they should self deport or move to any place in the world that doesn't hold honor our principles as set forth in The Declaration of Independence and The Constitution. That includes Barack Obama,Bon Voyage.
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#164046
Jul 15, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
grateful if you could address my post in a, minimum, semi-intelligent manner. The above is embarrassing. For you.
I did batboy. Sorry if it was over your head. Help us out here, what exactly is NOT over your head?

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

RationalState

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#164047
Jul 15, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Ellen1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Or was it because he had grown three legs (and Navy uniforms only allow for two). Or was it because the men on his ship could not stand his whistling? Or was it because the Navy let him go early to attend school or run for Congress?
The difference between the possibility of a court martial being the cause and whistling or three legs being the cause is that if you there is a court martial, there are RECORDS of their being a court martial. And if no one has found such records for Kerry, the chance of their being a secret court martial or all the records of one having been scrapped are slim to none.
In Rougie's mind it's such a nice fable it MUST be true!

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#164048
Jul 15, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Remember the DC-9? The DC-9 was made by Douglas who merged with McDonald and the DC-9 became the MD80/88. And then McDonald-Douglas merged with Boeing and it became the Boeing B717.
The only thing, there was another B717 which is the C/KC-135s.
Yea, they had the Boeing 707, 727, 737, 747, 757, 767, 777 and the 787 but they also had the 717 which was a narrow-body 707 for the military.
So you have one B717 with four engines on the wing while another has two engines on the tail. Most confusing!
Please tell me something I don't know.

Incidentally, the DC9 and MD airplanes are probably the best-built and most endurable machines ever built, as per the DC 8. Even though they burn kerosene like it was going out of style, Delta, American, and many other airline worldwide still fly 100s of them because they are so durable, so dependable and passenger-friendly. Pilots love 'em, they liken them to flying sports cars.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#164049
Jul 15, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

rollin wrote:
Hey birthers, how is that suit going?
Only been 6 years LMAO
LMAO (LRs tm reg'd)
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#164050
Jul 15, 2013
 
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>I never opined on the legality of illegality of following. So it's moot to me. I said it could be scary, yes.

But he thinks that gave Trayvon the right to assault GZ!!!
Sure he does. More Rouge fables.
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#164051
Jul 15, 2013
 
rollin wrote:
Hey birthers, how is that suit going?

Only been 6 years LMAO
Any day now
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#164053
Jul 15, 2013
 
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
Any day now
Any day now? I'm afraid not pantywaste. UPS will not be delivering your mail-order bride to you. Check with jackfish, he knows the black market of Qatar quite well. He even ordered his blow-up doll (imaginary wife) from there! Are you looking for an entire doll or just a butt?

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••

Chicago Jobs

•••
Enter and win $5000
•••
•••

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago
•••

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]
•••