!. Oh, I don't have to prove beyond a doubt. Under Florida's SYG law they must prove he was NOT!<quoted text>
1....the right to assault Zimmerman? Would you mind showing how it was proven without a doubt that Martin assaulted Z?;
2. Trayvon was a racist? How so? Because, being followed, he said "cracker"? That makes him a racist? Good try attempting to turn the tables on who and what is racist, As I wrote, read, research, learn;
3. You compare a cop following a suspect to a watch captain following someone who IS NOT A SUSPECT? In the darkraining...that is not scary? And a store detective does not follow at night, again, in the dark. Not dark in the store, many people milling around making it hard for the store detective to be over-zealous, no? No, it's not stalking;
2. They admitted that because of Trayvon's culture Trayvon used the term cracker all the time. Sorry, "cracker" is a racist term whether or not you agree. Isn't it funny is that something is offensive, if the person to whom it is directed finds it offensive .... unless it is directed against a cracker!!!
3. He was a suspect. A cop based on nothing more has the right to stop someone to ask them why they are in the area! Now, a neighborhood watch person does not have the right to stop someone, but he does have the right to follow someone.
Oh, how about a night watchman? Oh, but it is okay for a nightwatchman to follow someone because he is paid but Zimmerman can not (in your logic) because he is a volunteer!