You just wrote : "would you circle the building, come up behind the person you were afraid of and then assault him".Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Oh, the prosecutor just admitted that Zimmerman committed "no crime" by following Trayvon!!!
Okay, let's say he was scared. If you were scared would you circle the building, come up behind the person you were afraid of and then assault him? The FIRST, and only, crime was committed is when Trayvon assaulted Zimmerman!!!
And the proof is George Zimmerman's injuries and the lack of injuries to his hands while the only injuries to Trayvon, before the shot was fired, were on his HANDS!
If they were "fighting", they would both have injuries on their hands!!!
And then, if Trayvon was afraid of Zimmerman, why would he have attacked him if Zimmerman had displayed his gun??? I have pointed a loaded gun at a person and they got as far away from me as fast as they could.
And this happened according to who, exactly? How do you know this is how it went? Witnesses? Which ones? Injuries? Contradictions among doctors. Let the jury decide, the judge judge. Don't jump to conclusions. As I said, I have no answers to these questions, I was not there, you have no answers either , just made-up guesses.