BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ... Full Story

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#162753 Jul 5, 2013
I think Obama sees the big problems that Obamacare is creating and that is why he illegally extended the Business part of Obamacare. If he had not, we would have gone back into a recession just in time for the 2014 elections.
But without the tax revenue, the national debt will go even higher. Either way, Obama is in a no win situation!

Obamacare to blame for more part-time jobs in June?
July 5, 2013

Has Obamacare caused businesses to hire more part-time workers instead of full-time employees to avoid tax penalties? Critics think so – and they point to the latest U.S. jobs report as evidence.

A closer look at the numbers, however, suggests critics lack convincing proof. Their arguments might eventually prove true, but for now, there’s little evidence that President Obama’s signature health-care law is causing a big shift toward part-time job creation.

Let’s review the numbers. The jobs report for June showed a 360,000 increase in part-time workers to a record high 28.06 million. So far this year the number of part-time jobs has climbed by 557,000.

By contrast, the number of full-time U.S. workers fell by 240,000 in June. And they are only up 130,000 through the first six months of the year compared to the end of 2012.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#162754 Jul 5, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
So now he changes back his story. Brilliant.
This is what counts, loser:
"Section 776.041 “[s]ubsection (2) precludes the initial aggressor
from asserting self-defense where he or she is the individual who provoked the use of force” contemporaneously to the actions of the victim to which the defendant claims self-defense."
Johnson v. State of Florida, 65 So.3d 1147, 1149 (3rd Dist. 2011).
So you can shove the statute wherever you want.
<quoted text>
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Pout a little harder. Waa Waa Waa! Sorry there lil man, you still lose. Would you like me to post the part about the aggressor being able to claim self-defense? It's written very neatly and is easy to understand, even for complete imbeciles or moronic midgets! LMAO!
What he does not understand is that Zimmerman was NOT the aggressor. It is not against the law to walk in the same direction as other people are. It is against the law to assault people and that is what Trayvon.
Again, not one of these Libtards can explain what gave Trayvon the right to assault Zimmerman!!! COWARDS, ONE AND ALL!!!

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#162755 Jul 5, 2013
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
So now he changes back his story. Brilliant.
This is what counts, loser:
"Section 776.041 “[s]ubsection (2) precludes the initial aggressor
from asserting self-defense where he or she is the individual who provoked the use of force” contemporaneously to the actions of the victim to which the defendant claims self-defense."
Johnson v. State of Florida, 65 So.3d 1147, 1149 (3rd Dist. 2011).
So you can shove the statute wherever you want.
<quoted text>
Again, what crime did Zimmerman commit? Following someone is not a crime. He was a neighborhood watch captain. Can a cop follow a suspicious person? And why can a civilian NOT do the same?
Zimmerman did nothing to cause Trayvon to assault him!
You see, Libtards think that if someone offends them, they have the right to assault them, key their car, steal their TEA Party sign or sic the IRS on them!!!
American Lady

Danville, KY

#162756 Jul 5, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Lynching the likes of garbage wnd.com sounds a lot better.
Whatever happened to Pravda, commie er hmmm Lady?
US threatened by Russia's Christianity
01.07.2013

If you ever wonder why the weasel west media always calls Putin a dictator or demonizes him, just look at what has been happening recently. By watching the US news last week one would think all of America has turned gay with the Supreme Court ruling on married same-sex couples. The New York Times called it a, "major victories for the gay rights movement". Some even compare it to racial equality. If Putin was the dictator the West claims, the new law that defends Christianity would have been in effect immediately after the pussy riot blasphemy which happened last year. Recently President Putin signed a 'gay propaganda' ban and law criminalizing insult of religious feelings.

MORE:
http://english.pravda.ru/opinion/columnists/0...

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#162757 Jul 5, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Yep, both Wojo and Poopo are black but they will not comment ....
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
Wherever did Rogue get that idea? Irish-German-Polish.
You are a WHITE Irish-German-Polish? If I was incorrect about your race/color of skin, I apologize.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#162758 Jul 5, 2013
Ellen1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Re: "And why did Eric Holder squash the investigation into the New Black Panthers who were intimidating voters in Philadelphia..."
Answer: Because, duh, it is a state issue, an alleged STATE crime, not a federal crime. And, duh, there isn't any evidence. The notion that Black Panthers stood in front of a BLACK polling place to intimidate people is illogical. Did they want fewer black people to vote?
Oh, and finally, there are more than 100,000 polling places in a federal election. The alleged incident took place at one of the 100,000 in the 2008 election, and if it took place, it was a state issue.
Ah, it involved a FEDERAL election.
Next, the solicitation for murder/kidnapping across a state line is also a federal crime!

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

RationalState

#162759 Jul 5, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Pout a little harder. Waa Waa Waa! Sorry there lil man, you still lose. Would you like me to post the part about the aggressor being able to claim self-defense? It's written very neatly and is easy to understand, even for complete imbeciles or moronic midgets! LMAO!
Sorry, nowhere does 776.041 state that the aggressor is entitled to self-defense but rather states when justification under preceding sections may be available to an aggressor. 776.041 does not undo holdings wherein an aggressor relinquishes claim to justifications under those preceding sections. So you can post 776.041(b) as often as you want, but it will not change anything.
wojar wrote:
<quoted text>
So now he changes back his story. Brilliant.
This is what counts, loser:
"Section 776.041 “[s]ubsection (2) precludes the initial aggressor
from asserting self-defense where he or she is the individual who provoked the use of force” contemporaneously to the actions of the victim to which the defendant claims self-defense."
Johnson v. State of Florida, 65 So.3d 1147, 1149 (3rd Dist. 2011).
So you can shove the statute wherever you want.
<quoted text>
Truth Detector

Louisville, KY

#162760 Jul 5, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
<quoted text>
If Obamacare is not a train-wreck, why is Obama illegally delaying implementation ?
Obama is doing it because he can!
He has usurped the Constitution, so Congress is nothing!

Obama Skips Past Congress Again With Health Mandate Delay - See more at: http://cdn.rollcall.com/news/obama_bypasses_c...

“Facts trump speculation”

Since: Dec 08

RationalState

#162761 Jul 5, 2013
"§ 776.041, Fla. Stat.(2007)(emphasis supplied).
Subsection (2) precludes the initial aggressor
from asserting self-defense where he or she
is the individual who provoked the use of force.
Hence, subsection (2) governs the circumstance
where the defendant initiated the assault...."

Martinez v. Florida, 981 So.2d 449. 452 (Fla. 2008)

But Li'l Romper overrules the Florida Supreme Court.
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#162762 Jul 5, 2013
wojar wrote:
"§ 776.041, Fla. Stat.(2007)(emphasis supplied).
Subsection (2) precludes the initial aggressor
from asserting self-defense where he or she
is the individual who provoked the use of force.
Hence, subsection (2) governs the circumstance
where the defendant initiated the assault...."
Martinez v. Florida, 981 So.2d 449. 452 (Fla. 2008)
But Li'l Romper overrules the Florida Supreme Court.
Why don't you post the section that we're talking about? I've posted it twice for you but you don't seem to want to accept Florida's law as it is written. What a butt-sore lil loser you are! LMAO!
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#162763 Jul 6, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>Why don't you post the section that we're talking about? I've posted it twice for you but you don't seem to want to accept Florida's law as it is written. What a butt-sore lil loser you are! LMAO!
Romper also doesn't comprehend statutory construction. Shocking
El Cid

Mcdonough, GA

#162764 Jul 6, 2013
Truth Detector wrote:
<quoted text>
Obama is doing it because he can!
He has usurped the Constitution, so Congress is nothing!
Obama Skips Past Congress Again With Health Mandate Delay - See more at: http://cdn.rollcall.com/news/obama_bypasses_c...
Oh, but Congress can do something. All they had to do is go to the federal courts but Speaker Bonehead has no ballz.
The only thing transparent about the Obama administration is the corruption.
GW Bush

Mcdonough, GA

#162765 Jul 6, 2013
Listen up. I am only going to say this one more time.
I am no longer the President! Suck it up and take responsibility for your own mistakes!!!
El Cid

Mcdonough, GA

#162766 Jul 6, 2013
wojar wrote:
"§ 776.041, Fla. Stat.(2007)(emphasis supplied).
Subsection (2) precludes the initial aggressor
from asserting self-defense where he or she
is the individual who provoked the use of force.
Hence, subsection (2) governs the circumstance
where the defendant initiated the assault...."
Martinez v. Florida, 981 So.2d 449. 452 (Fla. 2008)
But Li'l Romper overrules the Florida Supreme Court.
But Martin was the initial aggressor!!!
And you still have not explained what Zimmerman did that gave Martin the right to assault him?
El Cid

Mcdonough, GA

#162767 Jul 6, 2013
American Lady wrote:
RUMBLINGS OF 'LYNCHINGS' OVER TRAYVON VERDICT
'Threats that some supporters are making are absolutely chilling'
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/07/rumblings-of-lynch ...
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
Lynching the likes of garbage wnd.com sounds a lot better.
Whatever happened to Pravda, commie er hmmm Lady?
Again you attack the messenger because you are lame and can not attack the message. Anyone with half a brain knows that most probably Zimmerman will not be convicted! And if he is convicted, it will be for political expediency!
El Cid

Mcdonough, GA

#162768 Jul 6, 2013
nebka wrote:
<quoted text>
Rouge Scholar
Here is something about (OUR FRIEND ISREALI WAS GOING TO DO TO AMERICANS)
The Lavon Affair refers to a failed Israeli covert operation, code named Operation Susannah, conducted in Egypt in the Summer of 1954. As part of the false flag operation, a group of Egyptian Jews were recruited by Israeli military intelligence for plans to plant bombs inside Egyptian, American and British-owned civilian targets, cinema, library and American educational center. The attacks were to be blamed on the Muslim Brotherhood, Egyptian Communists, "unspecified malcontents" or "local nationalists" with the aim of creating a climate of sufficient violence and instability to induce the British government to retain its occupying troops in Egypt's Suez Canal zone. The operation caused no casualties, except for those members of the cell who committed suicide after being captured.
They were going to do terror attacks that would have kill Americns Civilans!! If they are our friends???? would a friends do that???
I know Jacques accuses of us Birthers of plagiarism so I will accuse you. This is obviously taken from Wikipedia. Why can you not admit it is not your work?
But you also did not post the second paragraph. WHY? I know. As it shows who in the Israel government was punished!
The operation ultimately became known as the Lavon Affair after the Israeli defense minister Pinhas Lavon was forced to resign as a consequence of the incident. Before Lavon's resignation, the incident had been euphemistically referred to in Israel as the "Unfortunate Affair" or "The Bad Business" (Hebrew: &#1492;&#1506;&#15 05;&#1511; &#1492;&#1489;&#14 97;&#1513;&#8206;, HaEsek HaBish). After Israel publicly denied any involvement in the incident for 51 years, the surviving agents were officially honored in 2005 by being awarded certificates of appreciation by Israeli President Moshe Katzav.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lavon_Affair
Now, did they intend to kill Americans, Brits, etc. or did they attempt to do minor damage to their property? Now planting bombs is not good but there is a lesser of two evils.
El Cid

Mcdonough, GA

#162769 Jul 6, 2013
NO ORDINARY AMERICAN CARES ABOUT THEIR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS
VP Joe Biden Feb. 21, 2013
http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-TV/2013/02...

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#162770 Jul 6, 2013
El Cid wrote:
American Lady wrote:
RUMBLINGS OF 'LYNCHINGS' OVER TRAYVON VERDICT
'Threats that some supporters are making are absolutely chilling'
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/07/rumblings-of-lynch ...
<quoted text>
Again you attack the messenger because you are lame and can not attack the message. Anyone with half a brain knows that most probably Zimmerman will not be convicted! And if he is convicted, it will be for political expediency!
1. When someone or something is trash, and you say so, that is not attacking the messenger. Trashy media will carry trashy reports. Wnd.com is pure trash;

2. Now, for you, the Zimmerman thing is a lose-lose affair for the prosecution. Zimmerman wins, prosecution loses. Zimmerman loses, prosecution loses as political expediency will prevail. Reminds one of birther Nov 6 predictions. Romney wins, victory. Romney loses, it's fraud. With extreme right-wingers and readers of trash media and watchers of trash TV like FoxNews.com and Honey Boo Boo, it's a win-win situation. A bunch of uncultured ignorant redneck boors, and that is an understatement;

3. You've stated a number of times that Zimmerman was attacked, relying solely on Zimmerman's confused testimony. What does Martin have to say in his defence? Oh, that's right, he can't, he's dead. Zimmerman shot him dead. And, you keep babbling about it like you were the star eyewitness, like you were there when the whole thing happened. LET THE JURY DECIDE. Bad enough you're as bitter sore loser, as you showed post 2008 presidential election, but you're repeating yourself, sensing defeat, already calling the whole thing "fixed"...in case it doesn't go your way;

4. Now you're El Cid. Do you at least know who El Cid was? And you're in Georgia now? Why the constant masquerade? When are you gonna grow up, let those testicles fall where they may?

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#162771 Jul 6, 2013
El Cid wrote:
<quoted text>
I know Jacques accuses of us Birthers of plagiarism so I will accuse you. This is obviously taken from Wikipedia. Why can you not admit it is not your work?
But you also did not post the second paragraph. WHY? I know. As it shows who in the Israel government was punished!
<quoted text>
Now, did they intend to kill Americans, Brits, etc. or did they attempt to do minor damage to their property? Now planting bombs is not good but there is a lesser of two evils.
And I will continue accusing you of plagiarism, as you do it all the time, not caring that it's dishonest to steal intellectual property. And, hey, plagiarism? He gave a link, you favourite link, Wikipedia.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#162772 Jul 6, 2013
El Cid wrote:
NO ORDINARY AMERICAN CARES ABOUT THEIR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS
VP Joe Biden Feb. 21, 2013
http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-TV/2013/02...
Biden is right. What'd he say wrong?

That is, until HIS/HER rights are trampled, then he/she does. It's like that all over the planet, not just in the USA.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 11 min RealDave 1,127,033
Health tips from healthy 70 yr. old 30 min actorvet 1
Song Titles Only (group/artist in parenthesis m... (Mar '10) 59 min RJS 7,824
Mrs. Bush: History will vindicate her husband (Jun '08) 1 hr Swedenforever 54,524
Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 5 hr Bite Me 50,643
very cute unuasual pix 8 hr ALL GOOD 1
Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 8 hr Mandela 68,666
Chicago Dating
Find my Match

Chicago Jobs

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]