<quoted text>And I like it too.
1. Why do respected patriots Alan Keyes, Pat Boone, Donald Trump and Sheriff Joe Arpaio question the birthplace and citizenship of their President?
2. Why would the President be less than forthcoming in this matter?
3. Exactly when was it made legal for the son of a foreigner to become President of the United States?
My contention is a crafty worldwide fraternity put this mystery-man in office to further their global agenda.
I hate Big Brother Obama the Kenyan-born Antichrist.
R:“1. Why do respected patriots Alan Keyes, Pat Boone, Donald Trump and Sheriff Joe Arpaio question the birthplace and citizenship of their President?“
Answer: Because they hate Obama.
Re:“2. Why would the President be less than forthcoming in this matter?”
Answer: Obama has been completely forthcoming ever since he published the short-form birth certificate of Hawaii in June 2008 (five months before the election in that year). And that is the official birth certificate of Hawaii, and the officials in Hawaii of both parties have repeatedly stated that they sent it to him and that all the facts on it are accurate.
Re:“3. Exactly when was it made legal for the son of a foreigner to become President of the United States?“
Answer: It always was legal, and in fact Bobby Jindal and Marco Rubio are both eligible to become president.
"Therefore every person born within the United States, its territories or districts, whether the parents are citizens or aliens, is a natural born citizen in the sense of the Constitution, and entitled to all the rights and privileges appertaining to that capacity."---William Rawle, A VIEW OF THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. 2d ed.(1829)
Mustata v. US Dept. of Justice, 179 F.3d 1017 (6th Cir. 1999)(children born in US to two Romanian citizens described as “natural born citizens” of the US):
“Petitioners Marian and Lenuta Mustata are citizens of Romania. At the time of their petition, they resided in Michigan with their two minor children, who are natural born citizens of the United States.”
Diaz-Salazar v. INS, 700 F.2d 1156 (7th Cir. 1983)(child born in US to Mexican citizen is “natural born citizen” of US):
“Petitioner, Sebastian Diaz-Salazar, entered the United States illegally [from Mexico] in 1974 and has been living and working in Chicago since that time.*** The relevant facts which have been placed before the INS, BIA, and this court can be summarized as follows: The petitioner has a wife and two children under the age of three in Chicago; the children are natural-born citizens of the United States.”
Nwankpa v. Kissinger, 376 F. Supp. 122 (M.D. Ala. 1974)(child born in US to two Biafra citizens described as “natural born citizen” of the US):
“The Plaintiff was a native of Biafra, now a part of the Republic of Nigeria. His wife and two older children are also natives of that country, but his third child, a daughter, is a natural-born citizen of the United States.”
AND there was Ankeny v. Gov State of Indiana, which ruled:
"Based upon the language of Article II, Section 1, Clause 4 and the guidance provided by Wong Kim Ark, we conclude that persons born within the borders of the United States are ‘natural born citizens’ for Article II, Section 1 purposes, regardless of the citizenship of their parents.”(AND, there have been nine other appeals court cases, all of which ruled exactly the same way, and not one ever ruled that two citizen parents are required, and the US Supreme Court never did either. In fact, it ruled in the Wong Kim Ark case that every child born in the USA, except for the children of foreign diplomats, is a Natural Born Citizen.)
Re:“Crucify.” It is illegal to threaten the president. The Secret Service is watching, and perhaps they will visit you. If you should take a trip to Washington, DC, or to a place where Obama is visiting, you are likely be watched.