BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit ...

BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

There are 194384 comments on the Chicago Tribune story from Jan 8, 2009, titled BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen.... In it, Chicago Tribune reports that:

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ...

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Chicago Tribune.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#162361 Jul 3, 2013
I wonder if Barack the Race de Baiter is happy now?

Sanford, FL Bracing for Rodney King Type of Riots Pending Zimmerman Verdict / 3 July 2013

On March 3, 1991, Rodney King, a black man, was driving on the I-210 Foothill Freeway through a Los Angeles neighborhood. Two California Highway Patrol officers attempted to pull King over, but he refused to stop and took the CHP on a high speed chase both on the freeway and through neighborhood streets. The CHP officers estimated that the speeds reached 115 mph.

When King finally stopped his car, the two passengers were subdued and placed in police cars. King was the last to exit his vehicle and when he did, five white LA police officers used tasers and their batons to subdue King. The incident was caught on video, which showed the brutal actions of the police, but it also showed that King continued to resist arrest and kept trying to get to his feet in defiance of the police.

Naturally, the whole incident was turned into a racial issue involving 5 white cops and 1 poor helpless black man. Four of five of the police officers were arrested and charged with assault and use of excessive force. On April 29, 1992, the jury acquitted all of police officers sparking off deadly riots by the black Los Angeles community.

Read more: http://MinutemenNews.com/2013/07/sanford-flor...
Truth Detector

Louisville, KY

#162362 Jul 3, 2013
Big Daddy wrote:
he was born in the usa shut the fudgsicle pops up and deal with it
Anybody can say anything!
How can you prove that with a fraudulent birth certificate?
Can you deal with that?

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#162363 Jul 3, 2013
I WROTE :

<quoted text>
Funny, only us? LMAO (LRS tm reg'd). Yes, ohly us and anyone else who is more intelligent, knowledgeable, who composes and writes better and use civilized language. THAT, my boy, is a whole lot of people.
Well, I, we act like an azz? How do you figure? Do I, we, speak like you, namely, swear, profane, sex-up like you? I don't think so. But you use profanity, sexual innuendoes, defacating vocabulary,(kerplunk comes to mind), so, does that not make YOU the azz?
You're filth. Unadulterated unfiltered inhuman and ignorant filth. If you were lounging in the sh*t hole of an outdoor outhouse, I would not even deign to sit on its toilet seat and dump my you-know-what in there. Too good for the likes of you.

YOU REPLIED :
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Creepy as all get out. Definitely a weirdo. Do not allow small children near this entity. LMAO! Apparently, you were born an azz. You're an irritant to the world. The creep thinks that one's intelligence is also a measure of one's likeability. You've proven that concept to be incorrect. LMAO! Such a small, pathetic entity. Tip for the weirdo; the world doesn't like azzholes. Too bad for you, huh? LMAO! You're a butt-ugly, butt-sore loser, sparkles. Smile! And please, QUIT THROWING YOUR RAGS IN PORT-O-LETS! They only clog them up. LMAO!
And you wrote : "Do not allow small children near this entity"

Ooookay.Check our above two texts, the composition, subject and vocabulary. Now, not one single profane word from me, except of course when I have to repeat your words. It's children proof. Always is. Andit irks you, doesn't it, as you know no other way. As for you, let's see :

azz
azzholes
butt-ugly
butt-sore loser

Fine. Children can question me about ALL the words I wrote in my post.

As for you, "hey, uncle (ewww) LRS, what's azz?" "Unca LRS, what's azzholes?". Uncle LRS, what does butt-ugly mean? "Ohhh, uncle LRS, what's butt-sore loser?"

As I've often said, loser, quit while you're merely behind. Oops, too late. Light-years behind. Can you go lower? NO? Awwww, too bad, there's always Russia.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#162364 Jul 3, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
I wonder if Barack the Race de Baiter is happy now?
Sanford, FL Bracing for Rodney King Type of Riots Pending Zimmerman Verdict / 3 July 2013
On March 3, 1991, Rodney King, a black man, was driving on the I-210 Foothill Freeway through a Los Angeles neighborhood. Two California Highway Patrol officers attempted to pull King over, but he refused to stop and took the CHP on a high speed chase both on the freeway and through neighborhood streets. The CHP officers estimated that the speeds reached 115 mph.
When King finally stopped his car, the two passengers were subdued and placed in police cars. King was the last to exit his vehicle and when he did, five white LA police officers used tasers and their batons to subdue King. The incident was caught on video, which showed the brutal actions of the police, but it also showed that King continued to resist arrest and kept trying to get to his feet in defiance of the police.
Naturally, the whole incident was turned into a racial issue involving 5 white cops and 1 poor helpless black man. Four of five of the police officers were arrested and charged with assault and use of excessive force. On April 29, 1992, the jury acquitted all of police officers sparking off deadly riots by the black Los Angeles community.
Read more: http://MinutemenNews.com/2013/07/sanford-flor...
MinutemenNews.com

Why oh why do you get your news from faux-patriot rightest-wing websites? The original Minutemen must spin in their graves every time this rag goes to press. Quote a real newspaper, not a consant right wing editorial announcing the Obama-confectioned end of the world. If your idol Romney had been president (like, what if the earth was suddenly flat?), Zimmerman still would have killed Martin and he still would've had to face a trial. Now, the so-called MinutemenNews.com will so disappointed if Zimmerman is innocented and there are no riots. So wiil you. You'll all have t find other miscellaneous coquetries that accuse Obama of everything from having a leak to attacking white children.
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#162365 Jul 3, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
I WROTE :
<quoted text>
Funny, only us? LMAO (LRS tm reg'd). Yes, ohly us and anyone else who is more intelligent, knowledgeable, who composes and writes better and use civilized language. THAT, my boy, is a whole lot of people.
Well, I, we act like an azz? How do you figure? Do I, we, speak like you, namely, swear, profane, sex-up like you? I don't think so. But you use profanity, sexual innuendoes, defacating vocabulary,(kerplunk comes to mind), so, does that not make YOU the azz?
You're filth. Unadulterated unfiltered inhuman and ignorant filth. If you were lounging in the sh*t hole of an outdoor outhouse, I would not even deign to sit on its toilet seat and dump my you-know-what in there. Too good for the likes of you.
YOU REPLIED :
<quoted text>
And you wrote : "Do not allow small children near this entity"
Ooookay.Check our above two texts, the composition, subject and vocabulary. Now, not one single profane word from me, except of course when I have to repeat your words. It's children proof. Always is. Andit irks you, doesn't it, as you know no other way. As for you, let's see :
azz
azzholes
butt-ugly
butt-sore loser
Fine. Children can question me about ALL the words I wrote in my post.
As for you, "hey, uncle (ewww) LRS, what's azz?" "Unca LRS, what's azzholes?". Uncle LRS, what does butt-ugly mean? "Ohhh, uncle LRS, what's butt-sore loser?"
As I've often said, loser, quit while you're merely behind. Oops, too late. Light-years behind. Can you go lower? NO? Awwww, too bad, there's always Russia.
Your point being? Nothing. Nothing at all. As usual. Your only purpose for being here is to antagonize. Oh, and make apologies for the doofus in chief. That about sums it up, no? You're like a five pound goiter hanging off someone's neck that needs to be removed. Prune break over already? LMAO!
Opensecrets org

Oakdale, NY

#162366 Jul 3, 2013
JBH wrote:
<quoted text>
==========
It is true as Obama protocols much to the Corporate.
But it seems he has not taken care of the average to poor people, especially in the jobs area.
NAFTA is not going too far, as US has turned to China to replace Canada, as the largest trading partner.
The juncture of NORAD which is a joint effort of both US and Canada standpoint to oversee North America's airspace is still there.
But people see too much tilting to US these days, as it is no more like before. Examples are unlike Vietnam era, as many of those Iraq deserters or some from AFGHANISTAN WERE TURNED BACK to US.
Hence, there is no way Snowden would come to Canada, as he will definitely be extradited.
This premier seems not interested in US but foreigners and immigrants, as that tells that they are more International-oriented these days.
Yet, if other Party takes over the future government, there may be possible of some change.
People don't want snooping but more freedom in beliefs and say whatever they want, to like or not like anyone or country.
Cold war is over. This is the new time for the changing world. People here are full of those from everywhere, of which many are new comers and generations. Some older ones may have gone to you there for retirement.
Obama is destroying average Americans just like Bill Clinton, the Bush's and Reagan did before him.

Both parties are joined at the hip and linked together with Wall Street.

For the most part it is the same in Canada as it is in the rest of the free world.

There is no such thing as FREE TRADE. That is a myth.

Snowden is a truth teller and governments worldwide do not appreciate truth tellers.

==========

The Republicans of the Supreme Court
July 2, 2013 / http://tinyurl.com/pmqhj3w
In order to fully understand what the five Republican appointees on the Supreme Court have been up to when they make decisions that affect our democracy, as they did last week on voting rights, you need to understand what the Republican Party has been up to.
The modern GOP is based on an unlikely coalition of wealthy business executives, small business owners, and struggling whites. Its durability depends on the latter two categories believing that the economic stresses they’ve experienced for decades have a lot to do with the government taking their money and giving it to the poor, who are disproportionately black and Latino.
The real reason small business owners and struggling whites haven’t done better is the same most of the rest of America hasn’t done better: Although the output of Americans has continued to rise, almost all the gains have gone to the very top.
http://robertreich.org/post/54226185879
Opensecrets org

Oakdale, NY

#162367 Jul 3, 2013
American Lady wrote:
<quoted text>
Which 'henhouse' in Congress ...
There ARE many!
Be 'specific' please.
There ARE many back rooms deals being made.
NO Transparency!
99% of all Republicans and 95% of all Democrats.

IN CONGRESS, HOUSE and SENATE.

They are prostitutes IMO.

“On Deck”

Since: Aug 08

French Polynesia

#162368 Jul 3, 2013
Jacques,
It is fair to say that Generalissimo Mohamed Morsi won an election.
But guess what?
From my vantage point, it appears today that the good and free thinking people of Egypt are holding an emergency special election to throw the theocracy of Islam out on its can.
THis is the tipping point for Islam. It is a do or die situation for the Muslim Brotherhood.
loose
Justice LRS

Shreveport, LA

#162369 Jul 3, 2013
The prosecution is expected to close its case today. Did they even score a point? They managed to shoot themselves in both feet but I didn't see much of a case. This is a perfect example of why you don't want the gov. in the private sector! Incompetence!
Opensecrets org

Oakdale, NY

#162370 Jul 3, 2013
Learn to Read wrote:
<quoted text>
It's not winning the suit. It is watching the hypocrites trying to defend the system.(Especially the faux cons that love big govt as long as it is doing their bidding)
I agree.

12 years of Reagan and Bush bloated the size of government with the highest deficits in history.

8 years of Bush and Cheney increased the size of government with highest deficits in history with a Republican House and Senate for 6 out of 8 years.
Opensecrets org

Oakdale, NY

#162371 Jul 3, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
I wonder if Jacques understands this. Most of the Alphabet Networks have only one MODERATE Republican and claim they are fair. But Fox News is far more fair and balanced and that is what the Libtards hate. They do not want to hear the Conservative point of view on any subject.
Rogue
Fox News Liberals
Talk to any Fox News-hating liberal and you'll here the same old regurgitated talking point- "Fox is not Fair & Balanced," "Rightwing propaganda." One network, Fox News, has twice the number of opposing commentators than does all media sources combined. If you add up the major media properties; ABC, NBC, CBS, MSNBC, CNN, PBS, New York Times, Washington Post, and Newsweek -- you get a total of five so-called conservative personalities among hundreds of liberals. At the least, Fox News employs the following liberals;
Juan Williams
Alan Colmes
Kirsten Powers
Shepard Smith
Geraldo Rivera
Mara Liasson
Bill Schulz
Susan Estrich
Bob Beckel
Santita Jackson
Simon Rosenberg
A 2009 national survey showed that 46% of those who watch FOX News “just about every day” are Democrats or Independents. Dick Morris interpreted the numbers and determines, "Could it be that the Obama Administration is concerned about FOX News not because it is 'an arm of the Republican Party'¯ but because it is so widely seen among Democrats and Independents?"
You continue to disappoint me my friend.

Those above mentioned are all corporate centrist Democrats and NOT Liberal Progressives.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#162373 Jul 3, 2013
Hummm, firearms expert at Geo. Zimmerman trial said that when the gun was fired, the muzzle was against Trayvon's short butttttt the shirt was not up against Trayvon's body. And that can only mean that Trayvon was leaning forward when he was shot which backs Zimmerman's statement that Trayvon was on top of him!

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#162374 Jul 3, 2013
Opensecrets org wrote:
<quoted text>
You continue to disappoint me my friend.
Those above mentioned are all corporate centrist Democrats and NOT Liberal Progressives.
And just what percentage of our population are Progressive Socialists?
Liberals can never be progressives as a true Liberal is open minded and believe in the free market system.

From Wiki: Classical liberalism is a political philosophy and ideology belonging to liberalism in which primary emphasis is placed on securing the freedom of the individual by limiting the power of the government. The philosophy emerged as a response to the Industrial Revolution and urbanization in the 19th century in Europe and the United States.[1] It advocates civil liberties with a limited government under the rule of law, and belief in laissez-faire economic policy. Classical liberalism is built on ideas that had already arisen by the end of the 18th century, such as selected ideas of Adam Smith, John Locke, Jean-Baptiste Say, Thomas Malthus, and David Ricardo, stressing the belief in free market and natural law, utilitarianism, and progress. Classical liberals were more suspicious than conservatives of all but the most minimal government and, adopting Thomas Hobbes's theory of government, they believed government had been created by individuals to protect themselves from one another.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#162375 Jul 3, 2013
OMG, Bill O'Reilly has been fired and Megyn Kelly will take his time slot!

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#162376 Jul 3, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Your point being? Nothing. Nothing at all. As usual. Your only purpose for being here is to antagonize. Oh, and make apologies for the doofus in chief. That about sums it up, no? You're like a five pound goiter hanging off someone's neck that needs to be removed. Prune break over already? LMAO!
You stupidly asked,(above) "Your point being? Nothing. Nothing at all"

Well, my point being is, did you not write : "Do not allow small children near this entity".

Excuse me, I merely pointed in whose presence, you or me, parents would prefer leaving their children with. Another thing, how will you also explain "kerplung" to the kindergarteners? And dumbazzbastard and dumbazzbitch? Equal opportunity foul mouth? You said you only write like that to me and the others, whoever that may be, though we can guess. LIE. You talk like that to any one who stuffs you at every turn, whether here in Topix or anywhere. You're a loudmouth who has nothing but vagaries, insults, ad hominems, profanities, all patented LMAO (LRS tm reg'd).

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#162377 Jul 3, 2013
Opensecrets org wrote:
<quoted text>
Obama is destroying average Americans just like Bill Clinton, the Bush's and Reagan did before him.
Both parties are joined at the hip and linked together with Wall Street.
For the most part it is the same in Canada as it is in the rest of the free world.
There is no such thing as FREE TRADE. That is a myth.
Snowden is a truth teller and governments worldwide do not appreciate truth tellers.
==========
The Republicans of the Supreme Court
July 2, 2013 / http://tinyurl.com/pmqhj3w
In order to fully understand what the five Republican appointees on the Supreme Court have been up to when they make decisions that affect our democracy, as they did last week on voting rights, you need to understand what the Republican Party has been up to.
The modern GOP is based on an unlikely coalition of wealthy business executives, small business owners, and struggling whites. Its durability depends on the latter two categories believing that the economic stresses they’ve experienced for decades have a lot to do with the government taking their money and giving it to the poor, who are disproportionately black and Latino.
The real reason small business owners and struggling whites haven’t done better is the same most of the rest of America hasn’t done better: Although the output of Americans has continued to rise, almost all the gains have gone to the very top.
http://robertreich.org/post/54226185879
Very unfortunately, the above is pretty much all true. But I will persist in saying that democrats or liberals, whatever, and however as corporation-bonded and dishonest, still leave a greater percentage of the crumbs to the ordinary Joe/Jane than the Republicans or conservatives , whatever. I can't think of a single piece of social legislation that your Repubs and our conservatives have ever enacted in the last 100 years. Name them ; unemployment insurance, social security, vacation leave, reduced work hours, benefits, safety on in the workplace, medical benefits or some medical benefits, maternity leave, children's allowances or tax credits, ALL democrat or here in Canada, liberal. They do leave some crumbs, the Repubs can't be bothered.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#162378 Jul 3, 2013
loose cannon wrote:
Jacques,
It is fair to say that Generalissimo Mohamed Morsi won an election.
But guess what?
From my vantage point, it appears today that the good and free thinking people of Egypt are holding an emergency special election to throw the theocracy of Islam out on its can.
THis is the tipping point for Islam. It is a do or die situation for the Muslim Brotherhood.
loose
Do you think for one second that I'm not for the people? You surely don't think I'm for Morsi. We'll see.

In the meantime, I didn't know the s.o.b. was a generalissimo.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#162379 Jul 3, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
The prosecution is expected to close its case today. Did they even score a point? They managed to shoot themselves in both feet but I didn't see much of a case. This is a perfect example of why you don't want the gov. in the private sector! Incompetence!
You may be right.

But, prediction-wise, you don't exactly shine now do you? What if he is found guilty, how will you take back your words? Same as Obama's election? Fraud? Democrat jury and judge? too many women on the jury? too many blacks on the jury? Or will you just accept the verdict like a man?

I'm checking off this post, will bring it back and throw it in your face if Zimmerman loses. And you'll deny it, or say I didn't get it, or say you already explained it. Like "can you hear us coming?"

I'm not making any predictions, except to say that legal representation seemed very good, very professional on both sides. I'll let the jury decide.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#162380 Jul 3, 2013
Opensecrets org wrote:
<quoted text>
I agree.
12 years of Reagan and Bush bloated the size of government with the highest deficits in history.
8 years of Bush and Cheney increased the size of government with highest deficits in history with a Republican House and Senate for 6 out of 8 years.
Aren't repubs the party of "small government, small budgets?" Perhaps Rogue can explain. Oh, country clubbers, progressives. I did ask Rogue , oh , a number of times, and he never replied. I asked him to name me one republican president in both the 20th and 21st century who was not a progressive country clubber. Silence.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#162381 Jul 3, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Hummm, firearms expert at Geo. Zimmerman trial said that when the gun was fired, the muzzle was against Trayvon's short butttttt the shirt was not up against Trayvon's body. And that can only mean that Trayvon was leaning forward when he was shot which backs Zimmerman's statement that Trayvon was on top of him!
So maybe he was. Does that mean Martin attacked Zimmerman? Asked you this before, but no reply. Let's say you attack me, I fight back, and find myself on top. That makes me the aggressor, the attacker? Appears to me Zimmerman was all talk, all mouth. But, hey, again, let the jury decide.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 5 min Grey Ghost 1,262,677
News Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 15 min IBdaMann 54,331
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 38 min John Oliver 100,266
Amy 7-29-15 1 hr mrs gladys kravitz 14
News Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 1 hr Mark 52,057
abby7-29-15 2 hr mrs gladys kravitz 7
Cincinnati campus police officer charged with m... 3 hr Middle of the road 1
More from around the web

Personal Finance

Chicago Mortgages