BARACK OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE: Suit contesting Obama's citizen...

The U.S. Supreme Court will consider Friday whether to take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama 's U.S. citizenship, a continuation of a New Jersey case embraced by some opponents of Obama's ... Full Story

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#161452 Jun 28, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
And spoil the suspense for you? Noooooo.
Suspense? Everyone including Pravda know why you sang it unendingly. Just have the guts to confirm it, slug.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#161453 Jun 28, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
LOW FLIGHT
Oh, I've slipped the surly bonds of earth
And hovered out of ground effect on semi-rigid blades;
Earthward I've auto'ed and met the rising brush of non-paved terrain
And done a thousand things you would never care to
Skidded and dropped and flared
Low in the heat soaked roar.
Confined there, I've chased the earthbound traffic
And lost the race to insignificant headwinds;
Forward and up a little in ground effect
I've topped the General's hedge with drooping turns
Where never Skyhawk or even Phantom flew.
Shaking and pulling collective,
I've lumbered The low untresspassed halls of victor airways,
Put out my hand and touched a tree.
—Anonymous
Nope. John Gillespie Magee, Jr. Dual American/Canadian and also British whose above poem was read by Ronald Reagan after the 1984 shuttle disaster. Most fitting, but from memory, Reagan did not attribute it.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#161454 Jun 28, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Angela Corey, who was the Special Prosecutor, did NOT interview even one witness before indicting Geo. Zimmerman for Second Degree Murder. She then "prays" with the Martin family.
Rachel Jeantel Caught in LIES and Speaking Confusing Ebonics
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =0iBBNSLbOmYXX
Tell us, if she had NOT indicted Geo. Zimmerman and then prayed with the Zimmerman's family, would you be upset?
You don't know, you weren't there. Why do you continue defending Zimmerman? On the other hand, why would anyone who was not there defend Trayvon Martin? Let the case unfold, let the "witnesses" speak, wait for the verdict.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#161455 Jun 28, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Oh, do you remember when the press found out that George Zimmerman was half Hispanic? Why all of a sudden George was a "White-Hispanic".
Do you really think Obama would have commented if George Zimmerman's name was Juan Carlos?!? Barack Obama and Eric Holder are blatant RACIST!!!
You continue commenting non-stop on racial origins in practically everything you write. That last tasteless joke of yours is but one example.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#161456 Jun 28, 2013
And, Rogue, this case is about Zimmerman killing Martin, not the other way around. And don't forget, Martin isn't around to tell his side of the story.

But nonetheless, stop judging, stop attacking, stop defending, wait 'til the trial evolves, let the prosecution and the defence do their work and the jury decide. Fair enough?

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#161457 Jun 28, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:

<quoted text>
Second time around. Is this kind of stuff on your mind 24/24? Are you jealous knowing you'd never, in a million years, even get close to Catherine Zeta Jones?

Read more at http://www.topix.com/forum/chicago/TC6SGHF806...
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>
Why, to prevent civil uprising, you silly old fart.
Your buddy Rogue's comment on oral sex and cancer by Michael Douglas will prevent civil uprising? Where are those butterfly nets when you need 'em?

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#161458 Jun 28, 2013
Scrutiny wrote:
Beth was an applicant to a University and she was excited about all the potential choices she had. So excited...she was worried she would choose the wrong field. She decided to take an aptitude test to see which field best suited her.
After taking the test she meet with a guidance counselor to review the results.
---"What are your primary interest?" inquired the counselor.
"I have always been fascinated by the big questions. I would like to do something in the field of science, there are just so many choices. I have always envisioned myself discovering the way things work."
---"Interesting, but to be honest with you...you're math scores are a little low for physics. You are free to choose any field you wish, but I wouldn't advise this particular choice."
"Well, I can't argue with that, math is not my strongest subject. What about biology? I have always loved animals!"
---"Zoology is the study of animals."
"Oh, right...my mistake. What kind of job can you get with that degree?"
---"Well, zoologist can be found at the zoo, parks, or doing projects in other countries studying animal behavior. Zoologist have a detailed knowledge of genetics and cell biology and are very specialized."
"Genetics and cell biology, hmm...ooh, what about astronomy? I am a Libra."
---"Are you?... Um, well astronomers are basically specialized physicist... They often build their own computers and equipment but, again we run into the math issue."
"Yeah... what about geology? My uncle is a geologist."
---"Geologist study the history of the Earth through rocks and they track plate tectonics..."
"No wonder he is so boring. Aren't there any sciences that I would be cut out for?"
---"Meteorology might be something you would like."
"I don't want to study rocks."
---"That is not what I...Hey? Where are you going?"
"Screw it! I am going home to be a creationist."
Creationist tea partyer/birther?
Pdamerica org

Sayville, NY

#161459 Jun 28, 2013
Rogue Scholar 05 wrote:
Hummmm, and this is their star witness against George Zimmerman! Why if she was not black, she would be called "white trash"! But she does not think calling white people "crackers" to be racist.
This just reinforces my opinion that Liberal black people are very racist.
Rachel Jeantel Most Disrespectful Moments Trayvon Martin Friend
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =bmV77E-waMAXX
!
Trent Lott, Ronald Reagan and Republican Racism
Dec. 14, 2002 / http://tinyurl.com/d9w75
Southern Strategy: The race question has haunted Reagan and the GOP for decades
The same could be said, of course, about such Republican heroes as, Barry Goldwater, Richard Nixon or George Bush the elder, all of whom used coded racial messages to lure disaffected blue collar and Southern white voters away from the Democrats. Yet it's with Reagan, who set a standard for exploiting white anger and resentment rarely seen since George Wallace stood in the schoolhouse door, that the Republican's selective memory about its race-baiting habit really stands out.
http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,859...

No tears for Reagan
June 8, 2004 / http://tinyurl.com/558r6l
Excuse me if I don’t shed any tears over the passing of former President Ronald Reagan. While the news of the 40th president’s death brought on a flood of sentimentality over the nation’s media this past weekend, I could not help but recall what the Reagan presidency really meant for Black Americans. Similar to what occurred upon the death of Richard Nixon, amnesia has set upon journalists as they recall Reagan’s era; choosing to indulge in idol worship rather than serious reflection on the former president’s policies.
http://www.blackamericatoday.com/article.cfm...

Ronald Reagan: The Great White Redeemer
http://tinyurl.com/6jljhm / June 10 2004
Only 12 years elapsed between the glorious military victory over the Confederate Slave States in 1865 and the definitive defeat of Reconstruction in 1877. In many important respects, the Reconstruction period was even briefer than that. By 1870, when the last of the southern states ratified the 15th Amendment to the Constitution, Tennessee had already rejected biracial democracy and installed an all-white “Redeemer” government.“Redemption” then swept through Georgia, North Carolina and Virginia.
http://www.blackcommentator.com/94/94_cover_r...

Reagan's heart of darkness
June 9, 2004 / http://tinyurl.com/28ytj
PRESIDENT Bush proclaimed: "Ronald Reagan believed that God takes the side of justice and that America has a special calling to oppose tyranny and defend freedom." In the first three days of news reports on the death of the former president, not a single major American newspaper, television station, or politician has dared to exhume this counterpoint to the Reagan's legacy: "Immoral, evil, and totally un-Christian."
http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_op...

Reagan, White As Snow
http://tinyurl.com/6lujee
Last week, as we’ve heard, the Republican presidential candidates praised the name and heritage of Ronald Reagan 40 times during the televised Show and Tell at the Reagan Presidential Library. That none of them mentioned Reagan’s legacy of white supremacy and support for apartheid is a little like invoking Jefferson Davis and not mentioning treason or slavery. Actually, a lot like it.
Ronald Reagan was a white supremacist to his very core, and left enough traces over his lengthy political career so that it’s evident for anyone who cares to look—which apparently few do.
Domestically, he opposed every legislative remedy for African Americans, betraying a meanness of spirit and an open racism. As Sidney Blumenthal wrote in The Guardian in 2003:/ http://www.tompaine.com/articles/2007/05/08/r...
Pdamerica org

Sayville, NY

#161460 Jun 28, 2013
Jacques from Ottawa wrote:
<quoted text>
"God's chosen?" All 25 million of them worldwide out of a population of 7 billion? God's chosen? And the other actual 6,985,000,000 and all their billions of forebears are either in or headed for hell/purgatory/limbo?
And yes they are unfairly blamed for every conceivable ill on earth, along with blacks and women. Been like that since time immemorial, not about to change.
Genesis 22:17

I will surely bless you and make your descendants as numerous as the stars in the sky and as the sand on the seashore. Your descendants will take possession of the cities of their enemies,
Learn to Read

Indianapolis, IN

#161461 Jun 28, 2013
Justice LRS wrote:
<quoted text>Why would Trump pay when the BC was forged? bean chewer
Poor Romper. Prancing from on fable to the next. How pathetic

“On Deck”

Since: Aug 08

French Polynesia

#161462 Jun 28, 2013
Jacques,
I watched some of Rachel Jeantel's testimony yesterday.
Looking past the cultural barriers, I found her witness statements to be believable and that Zimmerman was the initial aggressor.
And that the courtroom was filled with little else than a pack of hungry wolves,.... I mean attorneys.
Those lawyers can turn any legal proceeding into a 3-ring circus, IMO.
Forum

Carlsbad, NM

#161463 Jun 28, 2013
loose cannon wrote:
Jacques,
I watched some of Rachel Jeantel's testimony yesterday.
Looking past the cultural barriers, I found her witness statements to be believable and that Zimmerman was the initial aggressor.
And that the courtroom was filled with little else than a pack of hungry wolves,.... I mean attorneys.
Those lawyers can turn any legal proceeding into a 3-ring circus, IMO.
Zimmerman is a neighborhood watch pretending to be a cop.
He just wanted to hurt someone. They waste so much time
brainwashing her and twisting her words. When do the lawyers
tell the truth? Why don't they just shoot him?

“On Deck”

Since: Aug 08

French Polynesia

#161464 Jun 28, 2013
I think if zimmerman does not take the stand in his own defense, it will be a silent admission of guilt.
Time will tell.

“On Deck”

Since: Aug 08

French Polynesia

#161465 Jun 28, 2013
That courtroom's failure to understand her testimony was a failure on their part, not hers.
Pdamerica org

Sayville, NY

#161466 Jun 28, 2013
Scrutiny wrote:
<quoted text>
I can say it with a straight face because it is probability.
It is an updated model of the Hellman nuclear risk management system or equation.
Rate of initiating events...4% a year.
Probability that event will lead to major crisis 33%
Probability that crisis will lead to use of a nuclear weapon 10%-50%(This would remain at 10% if only secular nations had weapons..so it depends on who is involved.)
Probability that nuclear strike will lead to global nuclear war...10%-50%
Running this equation over 75 years (life expectancy) and you get an average of around 9%-11%
This number falls greatly without the 40% probability increase in the last two factors due to religious zealots having control of nuclear weapons.
Back in the cold war people were told we were on the edge all the time. FEAR and CONSUME. Not much has changed. The highest chances for us to destroy ourselves were in the first few decades we had the weapons. Every year that goes by since...there is less of a chance.(this is not calculated in the model)
OF COARSE 10% seems ridiculous to you. You were programmed from childhood to think impending doom is right around the corner. You belong to a cult of death. To me 10% is a monstrosity. It needs to be dealt with immediately.
Most people don't look forward with glee to an apocalypse this is exclusively a faith based mentality.(Lunacy)
The world has 25,000 nuclear weapons...Israel's 300 is a drop in the bucket. And we could triple that in about a month, if inclined.
EVERYONE who believes in a god...is pretty confident they are chosen. That is half the point. God needs YOU ... he wants YOU. Take AL for example...you can feel the entitlement and elevation she feels...and she is but a serf. And I would wager happy of her chains.
As far as asteroids go...I was pretty clear.
technology could and would save us from disaster.
It is possible to reduce the chances of both of these scenarios.
But people would have to start giving up on mythology and sitting around doing nothing. Stop supporting/funding primitive behavior.
These two scenarios are hardly the most likely to end us.
I can think of lot of way more likely scenarios...ones that we really are defenseless against at present day.
You are certainly downplaying the threats of WMDs and Asteroids/Comets.

There are many high ranking people who think the odds are still very favorable for a WMD attack.

Look at recent history:

A.Q. Khan.

The fall of the Soviet Union.

Even groups like al Qaeda could have access to a Dirty Bomb.

==========

Undercover Investigators Obtain Nuclear License
July 12, 2007 / http://tinyurl.com/ywte2c
Undercover congressional investigators posing as West Virginia businessmen obtained a license with almost no scrutiny from the Nuclear Regulatory Commission that enabled them to buy enough radioactive material from U.S. suppliers to build a "dirty bomb," a new government report says.

The investigators obtained the license within 28 days from officials at the NRC, the federal agency that in addition to regulating nuclear power plants oversees radioactive materials used in health care and industry, the report by the Government Accountability Office says. NRC officials approved the request with a minimal background check that included no face-to-face interview or visit to the purported company to ensure it existed and complied with safety rules, the report says.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/...

----
The Terrorist Threat to the US Homeland
National Intelligence Estimate : NIE July 2007
http://www.c-span.org/pdf/nie_071707.pdf

Dirty War
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0427157/

“On Deck”

Since: Aug 08

French Polynesia

#161467 Jun 28, 2013
That judge kept telling her to speak loudly and slowly.
That was not the problem by any stretch of the imagination.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#161468 Jun 28, 2013
Pdamerica org wrote:
<quoted text>
Genesis 22:17
I will surely bless you and make your descendants as numerous as the stars in the sky and as the sand on the seashore. Your descendants will take possession of the cities of their enemies,
1. No one knows who wrote Genesis. Maybe Moses. Maybe. Why do people believe unknown authors whose "presentations" have laughingly resisted the uncertainties of oral tradition and mouth-to-mouth hyperbolic "racontages";

2. And if you take the above Genesis 22.17 for cash, well, seems it didn't work out too too well, now did it? As numerous as stars? 25 million of 7 billion? Skies must be dark at night.
Pdamerica org

Sayville, NY

#161469 Jun 28, 2013
Scrutiny wrote:
<quoted text>
I can say it with a straight face because it is probability.
It is an updated model of the Hellman nuclear risk management system or equation.
Rate of initiating events...4% a year.
Probability that event will lead to major crisis 33%
Probability that crisis will lead to use of a nuclear weapon 10%-50%(This would remain at 10% if only secular nations had weapons..so it depends on who is involved.)
Probability that nuclear strike will lead to global nuclear war...10%-50%
Running this equation over 75 years (life expectancy) and you get an average of around 9%-11%
This number falls greatly without the 40% probability increase in the last two factors due to religious zealots having control of nuclear weapons.
Back in the cold war people were told we were on the edge all the time. FEAR and CONSUME. Not much has changed. The highest chances for us to destroy ourselves were in the first few decades we had the weapons. Every year that goes by since...there is less of a chance.(this is not calculated in the model)
OF COARSE 10% seems ridiculous to you. You were programmed from childhood to think impending doom is right around the corner. You belong to a cult of death. To me 10% is a monstrosity. It needs to be dealt with immediately.
Most people don't look forward with glee to an apocalypse this is exclusively a faith based mentality.(Lunacy)
The world has 25,000 nuclear weapons...Israel's 300 is a drop in the bucket. And we could triple that in about a month, if inclined.
EVERYONE who believes in a god...is pretty confident they are chosen. That is half the point. God needs YOU ... he wants YOU. Take AL for example...you can feel the entitlement and elevation she feels...and she is but a serf. And I would wager happy of her chains.
As far as asteroids go...I was pretty clear.
Yes. it is possible there is a giant asteroid out there we have not detected that could sneak up on us and cause a global extinction. Just really unlikely. Same as nuclear war it has to be a SERIES of unfortunate events to get to that outcome.
Even if we only had a few weeks warning it is likely our technology could and would save us from disaster.
It is possible to reduce the chances of both of these scenarios.
But people would have to start giving up on mythology and sitting around doing nothing. Stop supporting/funding primitive behavior.
These two scenarios are hardly the most likely to end us.
I can think of lot of way more likely scenarios...ones that we really are defenseless against at present day.
You Said: Even if we only had a few weeks warning it is likely our technology could and would save us from disaster.

Do you really believe this to be true?

You believe technology will save you from a asteroid?

You trust the Russian Generals who might have sold Nuclear devices?

You trust the Arab world with Nukes?

You trust the Asian countries with Nukes?

My senses tell me We Are Powerless to these forces if it ever materialized.

P.S. Put your gas mask on and keep your head down. LOL
Pdamerica org

Sayville, NY

#161470 Jun 28, 2013
loose cannon wrote:
Jacques,
I watched some of Rachel Jeantel's testimony yesterday.
Looking past the cultural barriers, I found her witness statements to be believable and that Zimmerman was the initial aggressor.
And that the courtroom was filled with little else than a pack of hungry wolves,.... I mean attorneys.
Those lawyers can turn any legal proceeding into a 3-ring circus, IMO.
Rachel's testimony corroborates Zimmerman's telephone conversation with 9/11 operator.

Zimmerman said he was following Martin and now Martin was running away.

CASE CLOSED.

“Bonjour Hello Buongiorno Hola”

Since: Feb 12

Ottawa

#161471 Jun 28, 2013
loose cannon wrote:
Jacques,
I watched some of Rachel Jeantel's testimony yesterday.
Looking past the cultural barriers, I found her witness statements to be believable and that Zimmerman was the initial aggressor.
And that the courtroom was filled with little else than a pack of hungry wolves,.... I mean attorneys.
Those lawyers can turn any legal proceeding into a 3-ring circus, IMO.
I still would not predict or pass judgement. But, let's not forget it's Zimmerman who is on trial here, not Martin. Let the money-hungry attorneys argue, let the "witnesses" testify, let the jury decide and the judge acquit or sentence.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Chicago Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Barack Obama, our next President (Nov '08) 14 min nanoanomaly 1,130,079
Ill. House Approves Legalizing Same-Sex Civil U... (Dec '10) 1 hr Cali Girl 2014 50,816
Once slow-moving threat, global warming speeds ... (Dec '08) 1 hr IBdaMann 47,620
Topix Chitown Regulars (Aug '09) 2 hr PEllen 98,567
Abby 10-30 2 hr PEllen 34
Homosexual honeymoon 2 hr Liberal 3
Israeli troops begin Gaza pullout as Hamas decl... (Jan '09) 3 hr Mandela 68,695
Chicago Dating
Find my Match

Chicago People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

Chicago News, Events & Info

Click for news, events and info in Chicago

Personal Finance

Mortgages [ See current mortgage rates ]